Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to soc.culture.indian,aus.politics,nz.politics,alt.food.vegan,rec.food.veg
|
|||
|
|||
why we should all turn vegetarian
dd wrote: > The right to life is possible only in a certain, different atmosphere that There is no such right. > is not present on the earth at the moment. Animals are killed, birds are > killed, sea animals are killed, just for game. You don't have any reverence So? Whereever there is life, there must also - inevitably - be death. There is no reason why we shouldn't kill plants or animals if it suits us. > for life. And life is the same whether it is in human beings or in other > forms. Unless man becomes aware of his violence towards animals, birds, he > cannot be really alert about his own right to life. If you are not caring There is no such right. > about others' lives, what right have you got to demand the same right for > yourself? Human rights only apply to animals in Cloud Cuckoo Land. Do *you* live in Cloud Cuckoo Land? > But the whole of humanity is non-vegetarian; they are all eating other life > forms. There is no reverence for life as such. Unless we create an > atmosphere of reverence for life, man cannot realize the goal of getting his > fundamental right of life. So what are you gong to eat, if you can't eat "other life forms"? sand? Verbal diarrhea? |
Posted to soc.culture.indian,aus.politics,nz.politics,alt.food.vegan,rec.food.veg
|
|||
|
|||
why we should all turn vegetarian
to each their own.
that's as bad as vegans forcing their pets to eat a vegan diet. Arthur Brain wrote: > dd wrote: > > The right to life is possible only in a certain, different atmosphere that > > There is no such right. > > > is not present on the earth at the moment. Animals are killed, birds are > > killed, sea animals are killed, just for game. You don't have any reverence > > So? Whereever there is life, there must also - inevitably - be death. > > There is no reason why we shouldn't kill plants or animals if it suits > us. > > > for life. And life is the same whether it is in human beings or in other > > forms. Unless man becomes aware of his violence towards animals, birds, he > > cannot be really alert about his own right to life. If you are not caring > > There is no such right. > > > about others' lives, what right have you got to demand the same right for > > yourself? > > Human rights only apply to animals in Cloud Cuckoo Land. > > Do *you* live in Cloud Cuckoo Land? > > > But the whole of humanity is non-vegetarian; they are all eating other life > > forms. There is no reverence for life as such. Unless we create an > > atmosphere of reverence for life, man cannot realize the goal of getting his > > fundamental right of life. > > So what are you gong to eat, if you can't eat "other life forms"? > > sand? > > Verbal diarrhea? |
Posted to soc.culture.indian,aus.politics,nz.politics,alt.food.vegan,rec.food.veg
|
|||
|
|||
why we should all turn vegetarian
"quidam" > wrote in message oups.com... > to each their own. > > > that's as bad as vegans forcing their pets to eat a vegan diet. Hahaha! "Pinky!! Perky!! Cucumber!!" How some Vegan friends of mine used to call their cats in. The cats thrived and were perfectly happy on a Vegan diet! So blood devastation death cruelty and horror are perfectly OK in out farming industry to feed carnivores, but a Vegan dares to feed his/her pets a Vegan diet then that's a heinous crime a thousant times worse?? B*llocks! Bullies use that kind of argument. They do the most terrible things while reacting with huge outrage and posing as teh injured party should they be criticised. > > Arthur Brain wrote: > > dd wrote: > > > The right to life is possible only in a certain, different atmosphere that > > > > There is no such right. There de facto is. > > > > > is not present on the earth at the moment. Animals are killed, birds are > > > killed, sea animals are killed, just for game. You don't have any reverence > > > > So? Whereever there is life, there must also - inevitably - be death. > > > > There is no reason why we shouldn't kill plants or animals if it suits > > us. There are dozens including important economic ones. Beef: A hundredweight or two an acre. Soya: A few tons as acre. Honey Locust bean: Tens of tons an acre. > > > > > for life. And life is the same whether it is in human beings or in other > > > forms. Unless man becomes aware of his violence towards animals, birds, he > > > cannot be really alert about his own right to life. If you are not caring > > > > There is no such right. > > > > > about others' lives, what right have you got to demand the same right for > > > yourself? > > > > Human rights only apply to animals in Cloud Cuckoo Land. > > > > Do *you* live in Cloud Cuckoo Land? > > > > > But the whole of humanity is non-vegetarian; they are all eating other life > > > forms. There is no reverence for life as such. Unless we create an > > > atmosphere of reverence for life, man cannot realize the goal of getting his > > > fundamental right of life. > > > > So what are you gong to eat, if you can't eat "other life forms"? > > > > sand? > > > > Verbal diarrhea? Diarrhoea! Through-discharge, from Greek - especially if their cooking doesn't aggree with your stomach! ) (The oe should be a diphthong BTW but OE can't manage that. It sends an e instead. Does an æ OK though.) |
Posted to soc.culture.indian,aus.politics,nz.politics,alt.food.vegan,rec.food.veg
|
|||
|
|||
why we should all turn vegetarian
most vets advise feeding meaty "science diet" to the pets.
i don't get it though. "nemo" > wrote in message o.uk... > > "quidam" > wrote in message > oups.com... >> to each their own. >> >> >> that's as bad as vegans forcing their pets to eat a vegan diet. > > Hahaha! "Pinky!! Perky!! Cucumber!!" > > How some Vegan friends of mine used to call their cats in. The cats > thrived > and were perfectly happy on a Vegan diet! > > So blood devastation death cruelty and horror are perfectly OK in out > farming industry to feed carnivores, but a Vegan dares to feed his/her > pets > a Vegan diet then that's a heinous crime a thousant times worse?? > B*llocks! > > Bullies use that kind of argument. They do the most terrible things while > reacting with huge outrage and posing as teh injured party should they be > criticised. > >> >> Arthur Brain wrote: >> > dd wrote: >> > > The right to life is possible only in a certain, different atmosphere > that >> > >> > There is no such right. > > There de facto is. > >> > >> > > is not present on the earth at the moment. Animals are killed, birds > are >> > > killed, sea animals are killed, just for game. You don't have any > reverence >> > >> > So? Whereever there is life, there must also - inevitably - be death. >> > >> > There is no reason why we shouldn't kill plants or animals if it suits >> > us. > > There are dozens including important economic ones. > > Beef: A hundredweight or two an acre. > Soya: A few tons as acre. > Honey Locust bean: Tens of tons an acre. > >> > >> > > for life. And life is the same whether it is in human beings or in > other >> > > forms. Unless man becomes aware of his violence towards animals, > birds, he >> > > cannot be really alert about his own right to life. If you are not > caring >> > >> > There is no such right. >> > >> > > about others' lives, what right have you got to demand the same right > for >> > > yourself? >> > >> > Human rights only apply to animals in Cloud Cuckoo Land. >> > >> > Do *you* live in Cloud Cuckoo Land? >> > >> > > But the whole of humanity is non-vegetarian; they are all eating >> > > other > life >> > > forms. There is no reverence for life as such. Unless we create an >> > > atmosphere of reverence for life, man cannot realize the goal of > getting his >> > > fundamental right of life. >> > >> > So what are you gong to eat, if you can't eat "other life forms"? >> > >> > sand? >> > >> > Verbal diarrhea? > > Diarrhoea! Through-discharge, from Greek - especially if their cooking > doesn't aggree with your stomach! ) > > (The oe should be a diphthong BTW but OE can't manage that. It sends an e > instead. Does an æ OK though.) > > |
Posted to soc.culture.indian,aus.politics,nz.politics,alt.food.vegan,rec.food.veg
|
|||
|
|||
why we should all turn vegetarian
nemo wrote: > "quidam" > wrote in message > oups.com... > > to each their own. > How some Vegan friends of mine used to call their cats in. The cats thrived > and were perfectly happy on a Vegan diet! Really? Did you use a mind-meld to ascertain this? No, of curse not - this is cloud-cuckoo-land fantasy, obviously. I bet those cats used to plot the thousands of different ways they could kill their cruel owner who fed them nothing but nasty meat-free gruel every day. > So blood devastation death cruelty and horror are perfectly OK in out No, cruelty and horror are not OK, but we aren't talking about cruelty and horror - we are talking about eating yummy animal flesh. > farming industry to feed carnivores, but a Vegan dares to feed his/her pets > a Vegan diet then that's a heinous crime a thousant times worse?? B*llocks! That's cruel, torturing a poor animal twice a day for its entire life by giving it an unnatural diet that the animal's is not designed for. > Bullies use that kind of argument. They do the most terrible things while > reacting with huge outrage and posing as teh injured party should they be > criticised. But you are doing terrible things with your fundamentalist approach to nutrition. > > > > The right to life is possible only in a certain, different > > > There is no such right. > There de facto is. What? There *is* no such right. Do you even understand latin? I can swat a mosquito, shoot a rabbit or catch a fish and eat it any time I like. None of these creatures has any "right" to be alive. > Beef: A hundredweight or two an acre. > Soya: A few tons as acre. > Honey Locust bean: Tens of tons an acre. Well, you can eat 10 KGs of whatever-the-**** "Honey Locust beans" are, and I will be content with 100g of nice beef. As part of a balanced, and varied diet, my beef will allow me to grow strong, while you vegans grow stunted, pale and pasty with poor eyesight and thin brittle bones. |
Posted to soc.culture.indian,aus.politics,nz.politics,alt.food.vegan,rec.food.veg
|
|||
|
|||
why we should all turn vegetarian
kookoogaaajooob.
nemo wrote: > "quidam" > wrote in message > oups.com... > > to each their own. > > > > > > that's as bad as vegans forcing their pets to eat a vegan diet. > > Hahaha! "Pinky!! Perky!! Cucumber!!" > > How some Vegan friends of mine used to call their cats in. The cats thrived > and were perfectly happy on a Vegan diet! > > So blood devastation death cruelty and horror are perfectly OK in out > farming industry to feed carnivores, but a Vegan dares to feed his/her pets > a Vegan diet then that's a heinous crime a thousant times worse?? B*llocks! > > Bullies use that kind of argument. They do the most terrible things while > reacting with huge outrage and posing as teh injured party should they be > criticised. > > > > > Arthur Brain wrote: > > > dd wrote: > > > > The right to life is possible only in a certain, different atmosphere > that > > > > > > There is no such right. > > There de facto is. > > > > > > > > is not present on the earth at the moment. Animals are killed, birds > are > > > > killed, sea animals are killed, just for game. You don't have any > reverence > > > > > > So? Whereever there is life, there must also - inevitably - be death. > > > > > > There is no reason why we shouldn't kill plants or animals if it suits > > > us. > > There are dozens including important economic ones. > > Beef: A hundredweight or two an acre. > Soya: A few tons as acre. > Honey Locust bean: Tens of tons an acre. > > > > > > > > for life. And life is the same whether it is in human beings or in > other > > > > forms. Unless man becomes aware of his violence towards animals, > birds, he > > > > cannot be really alert about his own right to life. If you are not > caring > > > > > > There is no such right. > > > > > > > about others' lives, what right have you got to demand the same right > for > > > > yourself? > > > > > > Human rights only apply to animals in Cloud Cuckoo Land. > > > > > > Do *you* live in Cloud Cuckoo Land? > > > > > > > But the whole of humanity is non-vegetarian; they are all eating other > life > > > > forms. There is no reverence for life as such. Unless we create an > > > > atmosphere of reverence for life, man cannot realize the goal of > getting his > > > > fundamental right of life. > > > > > > So what are you gong to eat, if you can't eat "other life forms"? > > > > > > sand? > > > > > > Verbal diarrhea? > > Diarrhoea! Through-discharge, from Greek - especially if their cooking > doesn't aggree with your stomach! ) > > (The oe should be a diphthong BTW but OE can't manage that. It sends an e > instead. Does an æ OK though.) |
Posted to soc.culture.indian,aus.politics,nz.politics,alt.food.vegan,rec.food.veg
|
|||
|
|||
why we should all turn vegetarian
lmfao another one..
kookoookoookoooo! bonk bonk on the head.. Arthur Brain wrote: > nemo wrote: > > "quidam" > wrote in message > > oups.com... > > > to each their own. > > > How some Vegan friends of mine used to call their cats in. The cats thrived > > and were perfectly happy on a Vegan diet! > > Really? Did you use a mind-meld to ascertain this? > No, of curse not - this is cloud-cuckoo-land fantasy, obviously. > > I bet those cats used to plot the thousands of different ways they > could kill their cruel owner who fed them nothing but nasty meat-free > gruel every day. > > > So blood devastation death cruelty and horror are perfectly OK in out > > No, cruelty and horror are not OK, but we aren't talking about cruelty > and horror - we are talking about eating yummy animal flesh. > > > farming industry to feed carnivores, but a Vegan dares to feed his/her pets > > a Vegan diet then that's a heinous crime a thousant times worse?? B*llocks! > > That's cruel, torturing a poor animal twice a day for its entire life > by giving it an unnatural diet that the animal's is not designed for. > > > Bullies use that kind of argument. They do the most terrible things while > > reacting with huge outrage and posing as teh injured party should they be > > criticised. > > But you are doing terrible things with your fundamentalist approach to > nutrition. > > > > > > The right to life is possible only in a certain, different > > > > > There is no such right. > > > There de facto is. > > What? There *is* no such right. Do you even understand latin? > I can swat a mosquito, shoot a rabbit or catch a fish and eat it any > time I like. > None of these creatures has any "right" to be alive. > > > Beef: A hundredweight or two an acre. > > Soya: A few tons as acre. > > Honey Locust bean: Tens of tons an acre. > > Well, you can eat 10 KGs of whatever-the-**** "Honey Locust beans" are, > and I will be content with 100g of nice beef. > > As part of a balanced, and varied diet, my beef will allow me to grow > strong, while you vegans grow stunted, pale and pasty with poor > eyesight and thin brittle bones. |
Posted to soc.culture.indian,aus.politics,nz.politics,alt.food.vegan,rec.food.veg
|
|||
|
|||
why we should all turn vegetarian
Arthur Brain wrote: > nemo wrote:> > As part of a balanced, and varied diet, my beef will allow me to grow > strong, while you vegans grow stunted, pale and pasty with poor > eyesight and thin brittle bones. Your beef will increase cardio vascular disease, osteoperosis, cancer of the colon, lacks any fiber, is pumped full of hormones,many with antibitotics, and wasting much energy and especially water. Growing and rendering a cow uses enough water to float a battleship. Your knowledge of osteoporsis is clearly nil. You might choose to read the "Bone Density Diet" by Dr. George Kesller, foremost expert on Osteoporosis. Meat leaches calcium from the cells, and should be eaten sparingly if at all. There is no reason at all the eat meat. This ignored that suffering of factory manufactured cattle. Have Run Bob |
Posted to soc.culture.indian,aus.politics,nz.politics,alt.food.vegan,rec.food.veg
|
|||
|
|||
why we should all turn vegetarian
"Beach Runner" > wrote in message oups.com... > > Arthur Brain wrote: >> nemo wrote:> >> As part of a balanced, and varied diet, my beef will allow me >> to grow >> strong, while you vegans grow stunted, pale and pasty with >> poor >> eyesight and thin brittle bones. > > Your beef will increase cardio vascular disease, osteoperosis, > cancer > of the colon, lacks any fiber, is pumped full of hormones,many > with > antibitotics, > and wasting much energy and especially water. Growing and > rendering a > cow > uses enough water to float a battleship. =============================== Actually, NO to all your claims above fool. Tell us about all the wasted water especially. I'm anxious to hear that particular ly from you... > > Your knowledge of osteoporsis is clearly nil. You might choose > to read > the "Bone Density Diet" by Dr. George Kesller, foremost expert > on > Osteoporosis. > Meat leaches calcium from the cells, and should be eaten > sparingly if > at all. There is no reason at all the eat meat. > > This ignored that suffering of factory manufactured cattle. =================== Why do you ignore the far more brutal, inhumane deaths that aniomals suffer in the factory-farming of your veggies, hypocrite? > > > Have Run > Bob > |
Posted to soc.culture.indian,aus.politics,nz.politics,alt.food.vegan,rec.food.veg
|
|||
|
|||
why we should all turn vegetarian
rick wrote: > "Beach Runner" > wrote in message > oups.com... > > > > Arthur Brain wrote: > >> nemo wrote:> > >> As part of a balanced, and varied diet, my beef will allow me > >> to grow > >> strong, while you vegans grow stunted, pale and pasty with > >> poor > >> eyesight and thin brittle bones. > > > > Your beef will increase cardio vascular disease, osteoperosis, > > cancer > > of the colon, lacks any fiber, is pumped full of hormones,many > > with > > antibitotics, > > and wasting much energy and especially water. Growing and > > rendering a > > cow > > uses enough water to float a battleship. > =============================== > Actually, NO to all your claims above fool. > > Tell us about all the wasted water especially. I'm anxious to > hear that particular ly from you... > Sir, perhaps you might start to do the arithmetic. First you have all the water requirements to grow for 12 times as much produce as if people simply ate the produce. Then you have to supply the water to the cattle. Not a huge amount. The a huge amount of water is required to render the animal. There are many places on the network this can be easily verified. Here's one of many URLs. http://www.cnr.berkeley.edu/classes/...es/hunger1.htm > > > > > Your knowledge of osteoporsis is clearly nil. You might choose > > to read > > the "Bone Density Diet" by Dr. George Kesller, foremost expert > > on > > Osteoporosis. > > Meat leaches calcium from the cells, and should be eaten > > sparingly if > > at all. There is no reason at all the eat meat. And of course, you made the claim that beef is somehow good for osteoporosis. I suggest you might want to read the Bone Density Diet, by Dr. George Kessler, the foremost expert on Osteoporosis. He provides all the equations. > > > > This ignored that suffering of factory manufactured cattle. > =================== > Why do you ignore the far more brutal, inhumane deaths that > aniomals suffer in the factory-farming of your veggies, > hypocrite? > That's a silly argument. Of course there are collateral damages. But you only need to eat a fraction of the produce necessary. In any case, mechanized production of harvesting is not the same as taking animals and using them as products. Once again, you have failed to address the original error you posted, that somehow eating beef avoids osteoporosis. Beef does not contain anything but trace amounts of calcium, but large amounts of calcium are required to break it down. A quick google search will show some sites which support eating beef. It's pretty funny to see who supports it. Frankly, anyone that can't understand that eating food that requires 10 to 12 times more produce, drinks water it's entire life, and is ignorant and about the use of water in rendering, (which uses more water than the rest put together) lacks the basic understanding to engage in anything but emotional diatribes. If you can offer some science, let me know. Till them, remain ignorant. Enjoy your heart disease. You might want to get a dexa scan and see where you really are. Frankly, meat isn't the main cause of the huge explosion of osteoporosis, it's drinking soda. But, I'm sure you didn't know that. Oh yes genius, enjoy eating your "aniomals" > > > > > > > Have Run > > Bob > > |
Posted to soc.culture.indian,aus.politics,nz.politics,alt.food.vegan,rec.food.veg
|
|||
|
|||
why we should all turn vegetarian
"Beach Runner" > wrote in message ups.com... > > rick wrote: >> "Beach Runner" > wrote in message >> oups.com... >> > >> > Arthur Brain wrote: >> >> nemo wrote:> >> >> As part of a balanced, and varied diet, my beef will allow >> >> me >> >> to grow >> >> strong, while you vegans grow stunted, pale and pasty with >> >> poor >> >> eyesight and thin brittle bones. >> > >> > Your beef will increase cardio vascular disease, >> > osteoperosis, >> > cancer >> > of the colon, lacks any fiber, is pumped full of >> > hormones,many >> > with >> > antibitotics, >> > and wasting much energy and especially water. Growing and >> > rendering a >> > cow >> > uses enough water to float a battleship. >> =============================== >> Actually, NO to all your claims above fool. >> >> Tell us about all the wasted water especially. I'm anxious to >> hear that particular ly from you... >> > Sir, perhaps you might start to do the arithmetic. ================ Idiot, you might first learn a thing or two... First you have > all the water requirements to grow for 12 times as much produce > as if people simply ate the produce. ============================= "produce?" Fed to cattle? What a hoot!!! Show me any requirement to feed "produce" to beef cattle... Then, again, give me the numbers for this extrme amount of 'wasted' water. Why can't you do that? Then you have to supply the > water to the cattle. Not a huge amount. The a huge amount > of water is required to render the animal. ======================= ROTFLMAO > > There are many places on the network this can be easily > verified. > Here's one of many URLs. > http://www.cnr.berkeley.edu/classes/...es/hunger1.htm ==================== Hype and propaganda, fool.... Wanna know how I know? This little ly that keeps getting passed on and on by AR/vegan loons without any cite. "...50% of the water withdrawn every year in the US to irrigate crops fed to livestock and to wash away manure..." Here's a site that will expalin water withdrawals in the US to you. It's written for school children, but you should be able to follow along... http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/totpie95.html Total irragation, livestock, and aquaculture withdrawals are only about 36%. > > >> >> > >> > Your knowledge of osteoporsis is clearly nil. You might >> > choose >> > to read >> > the "Bone Density Diet" by Dr. George Kesller, foremost >> > expert >> > on >> > Osteoporosis. >> > Meat leaches calcium from the cells, and should be eaten >> > sparingly if >> > at all. There is no reason at all the eat meat. > > And of course, you made the claim that beef is somehow good > for osteoporosis. I suggest you might want to read > the Bone Density Diet, by Dr. George Kessler, the foremost > expert on Osteoporosis. He provides all the equations. > > >> > >> > This ignored that suffering of factory manufactured cattle. >> =================== >> Why do you ignore the far more brutal, inhumane deaths that >> aniomals suffer in the factory-farming of your veggies, >> hypocrite? >> > > That's a silly argument. Of course there are collateral > damages. > But you only need to eat a fraction of the produce necessary. > In any > case, mechanized production of harvesting is not the same as > taking > animals and using them as products. ============================ Really? Why not fool? Aren't they just as dead? Why does the method of their death matter so much to you? Why does the disposition of the bodies mean so much to you? Why is it that the far more brutal, inhumane deaths that animals experience in factory-farmed veggies mean nothing to you? > > > Once again, you have failed to address the original error you > posted, > that somehow eating beef avoids osteoporosis. Beef does not > contain anything but trace amounts of > calcium, but large amounts of calcium are required to break it > down. ========================== http://www.mercola.com/2002/feb/16/v...m_myths_05.htm > > A quick google search will show some sites which support > eating beef. It's pretty funny to see who supports it. ======================= A quick search also does not say to avoid meat altogether... > > Frankly, anyone that can't understand that eating food that > requires > 10 to 12 times more produce, drinks water it's entire life, and > is > ignorant > and about the use of water in rendering, (which uses more water > than > the rest put together) lacks the basic understanding to engage > in > anything but emotional diatribes. ============================ LOL The ignorance is all yours, fool. I've provided data, now it's YOUR turn to back up some of your ignorant spews and lys. I'll wait... The only one here with nothing but emotional spew is you fool. You've yet to back up your lys and delusions. > > If you can offer some science, let me know. Till them, remain > ignorant. > Enjoy your heart disease. You might want to get a dexa scan > and > see where you really are. Frankly, meat isn't the main cause of > the > huge explosion of osteoporosis, it's drinking soda. But, I'm > sure > you didn't know that. > > Oh yes genius, enjoy eating your "aniomals" ============================= LOL I rest my case, you have nothing, killer. Should I now submit all posts to you for spell-checking? At least maybe you'll be useful at something. > > >> >> > >> > >> > Have Run >> > Bob >> > > |
Posted to soc.culture.indian,aus.politics,nz.politics,alt.food.vegan,rec.food.veg
|
|||
|
|||
why we should all turn vegetarian
rick wrote: > "Beach Runner" > wrote in message > ups.com... > > > > rick wrote: > >> "Beach Runner" > wrote in message > >> oups.com... > >> > > >> > Arthur Brain wrote: > >> >> nemo wrote:> > >> >> As part of a balanced, and varied diet, my beef will allow > >> >> me > >> >> to grow > >> >> strong, while you vegans grow stunted, pale and pasty with > >> >> poor > >> >> eyesight and thin brittle bones. > >> > That's the first silly statement. Poor eyesight, pale, pasty, eyesight. That's absurd. > >> > Your beef will increase cardio vascular disease, > >> > osteoperosis, > >> > cancer > >> > of the colon, lacks any fiber, is pumped full of > >> > hormones,many > >> > with > >> > antibitotics, > >> > and wasting much energy and especially water. Growing and > >> > rendering a > >> > cow > >> > uses enough water to float a battleship. > >> =============================== > >> Actually, NO to all your claims above fool. > >> > >> Tell us about all the wasted water especially. I'm anxious to > >> hear that particular ly from you... > >> > > Sir, perhaps you might start to do the arithmetic. > ================ > Idiot, you might first learn a thing or two... > > > First you have > > all the water requirements to grow for 12 times as much produce > > as if people simply ate the produce. > ============================= > "produce?" Fed to cattle? What a hoot!!! Show me any > requirement to feed "produce" to beef cattle... Most of the corn grown in America is feed to cattle. Cattle is a produce. > Then, again, give me the numbers for this extrme amount of > 'wasted' water. Why can't you do that? > > > > Then you have to supply the > > water to the cattle. Not a huge amount. The a huge amount > > of water is required to render the animal. > ======================= > ROTFLMAO > If you'd like the data from a non biased source, simply go to http://wrrc.p2pays.org/p2rx/subsecti...TOKEN=71483890 This is from professional documentation on the Waste Reduction Resource Center. "Meat Processing Water Consumption: Like many other food processing activities, the necessity for hygiene and quality control in meat processing results in high water usage and consequently high wastewater generation. Volumes of wastewater from meat processing are generally 80-95 percent of the total freshwater consumption (MRC, 1995). The United Nations Environmental Program, Cleaner Production Assessment in Meat Processing (2000), estimates a range of 1,100 to 4,400 gallons of water are used per live weight ton of slaughtered animal in the United States. Between 44-60 percent of water is consumed in the slaughter, evisceration and boning areas (MRC, 1995). The following table illustrates the breakdown of water consumption in beef and pork processing based on a study of Australian abattoirs." > > > > There are many places on the network this can be easily > > verified. > > Here's one of many URLs. > > http://www.cnr.berkeley.edu/classes/...es/hunger1.htm > ==================== > Hype and propaganda, fool.... > Wanna know how I know? This little ly that keeps getting passed > on and on by AR/vegan loons without any cite. > "...50% of the water withdrawn every year in the US to irrigate > crops fed to livestock and to wash away manure..." > Here's a site that will expalin water withdrawals in the US to > you. It's written for school children, but you should be able to > follow along... > http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/totpie95.html > > Total irragation, livestock, and aquaculture withdrawals are only > about 36%. > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > Your knowledge of osteoporsis is clearly nil. You might > >> > choose > >> > to read > >> > the "Bone Density Diet" by Dr. George Kesller, foremost > >> > expert > >> > on > >> > Osteoporosis. > >> > Meat leaches calcium from the cells, and should be eaten > >> > sparingly if > >> > at all. There is no reason at all the eat meat. > > > > And of course, you made the claim that beef is somehow good > > for osteoporosis. I suggest you might want to read > > the Bone Density Diet, by Dr. George Kessler, the foremost > > expert on Osteoporosis. He provides all the equations. > > > > > >> > > >> > This ignored that suffering of factory manufactured cattle. > >> =================== > >> Why do you ignore the far more brutal, inhumane deaths that > >> aniomals suffer in the factory-farming of your veggies, > >> hypocrite? > >> > > > > That's a silly argument. Of course there are collateral > > damages. > > But you only need to eat a fraction of the produce necessary. > > In any > > case, mechanized production of harvesting is not the same as > > taking > > animals and using them as products. > ============================ > Really? Why not fool? Aren't they just as dead? Why does the > method of their death matter so much to you? Why does the > disposition of the bodies mean so much to you? Why is it that > the far more brutal, inhumane deaths that animals experience in > factory-farmed veggies mean nothing to you? > First, the degree is far less. Secondly, all that collateral damage would occur with production for cattle, only far more. And then there of course is intention. > > > > > > > Once again, you have failed to address the original error you > > posted, > > that somehow eating beef avoids osteoporosis. Beef does not > > contain anything but trace amounts of > > calcium, but large amounts of calcium are required to break it > > down. > ========================== > http://www.mercola.com/2002/feb/16/v...m_myths_05.htm > Oh your kidding. Mercola? That quack? Next you'll quote Dr. Atkinson. Of course, you stuck Osteoporosis and Beef into google and you came up with Mercola. Big freaking deal. Do you know anything about how calcium is used in in the body? The effect of phosphoric acid and why it effects calcium levels? Just be honest. Do you understand the relationship of calcium to protein? > > > > > > A quick google search will show some sites which support > > eating beef. It's pretty funny to see who supports it. > ======================= > A quick search also does not say to avoid meat altogether... Who cares if people avoid meat altogether. That's not what I responded to. I responded to your statement that eating meat will avoid osteoporosis. > > > > > > Frankly, anyone that can't understand that eating food that > > requires > > 10 to 12 times more produce, drinks water it's entire life, and > > is > > ignorant > > and about the use of water in rendering, (which uses more water > > than > > the rest put together) lacks the basic understanding to engage > > in > > anything but emotional diatribes. > ============================ > LOL The ignorance is all yours, fool. I've provided data, now What data? You provided a pointer to a quack. > it's YOUR turn to back up some of your ignorant spews and lys. > I'll wait... The only one here with nothing but emotional spew > is you fool. You've yet to back up your lys and delusions. > amazing.... > > > > > If you can offer some science, let me know. Till them, remain > > ignorant. > > Enjoy your heart disease. You might want to get a dexa scan > > and > > see where you really are. Frankly, meat isn't the main cause of > > the > > huge explosion of osteoporosis, it's drinking soda. But, I'm > > sure > > you didn't know that. > > > > Oh yes genius, enjoy eating your "aniomals" > ============================= > LOL I rest my case, you have nothing, killer. Should I now > submit all posts to you for spell-checking? At least maybe > you'll be useful at something. > The original discussion was on osteoporosis. The tremendous consumption of water. The third is your inability to discuss something without emotional displays. > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > Have Run > >> > Bob > >> > > > |
Posted to soc.culture.indian,aus.politics,nz.politics,alt.food.vegan,rec.food.veg
|
|||
|
|||
why we should all turn vegetarian
According to >:
>Enjoy your heart disease. You might want to get a dexa scan and >see where you really are. Frankly, meat isn't the main cause of the >huge explosion of osteoporosis, it's drinking soda. But, I'm sure >you didn't know that. First time I've heard it. Can you cite something which says that, please? I'd be interested in having a read. -- |
Posted to soc.culture.indian,aus.politics,nz.politics,alt.food.vegan,rec.food.veg
|
|||
|
|||
why we should all turn vegetarian
rick, stop being an idiot, and quit eating beef.
eat vegetables, it's for your own good. and say thank you to beach runner. teacher taught you no manners? "rick" > wrote in message .net... > > "Beach Runner" > wrote in message > ups.com... >> >> rick wrote: >>> "Beach Runner" > wrote in message >>> oups.com... >>> > >>> > Arthur Brain wrote: >>> >> nemo wrote:> >>> >> As part of a balanced, and varied diet, my beef will allow me >>> >> to grow >>> >> strong, while you vegans grow stunted, pale and pasty with >>> >> poor >>> >> eyesight and thin brittle bones. >>> > >>> > Your beef will increase cardio vascular disease, osteoperosis, >>> > cancer >>> > of the colon, lacks any fiber, is pumped full of hormones,many >>> > with >>> > antibitotics, >>> > and wasting much energy and especially water. Growing and >>> > rendering a >>> > cow >>> > uses enough water to float a battleship. >>> =============================== >>> Actually, NO to all your claims above fool. >>> >>> Tell us about all the wasted water especially. I'm anxious to >>> hear that particular ly from you... >>> >> Sir, perhaps you might start to do the arithmetic. > ================ > Idiot, you might first learn a thing or two... > > > First you have >> all the water requirements to grow for 12 times as much produce >> as if people simply ate the produce. > ============================= > "produce?" Fed to cattle? What a hoot!!! Show me any requirement to > feed "produce" to beef cattle... > Then, again, give me the numbers for this extrme amount of 'wasted' water. > Why can't you do that? > > > > Then you have to supply the >> water to the cattle. Not a huge amount. The a huge amount >> of water is required to render the animal. > ======================= > ROTFLMAO > >> >> There are many places on the network this can be easily verified. >> Here's one of many URLs. >> http://www.cnr.berkeley.edu/classes/...es/hunger1.htm > ==================== > Hype and propaganda, fool.... > Wanna know how I know? This little ly that keeps getting passed on and on > by AR/vegan loons without any cite. > "...50% of the water withdrawn every year in the US to irrigate crops fed > to livestock and to wash away manure..." > Here's a site that will expalin water withdrawals in the US to you. It's > written for school children, but you should be able to follow along... > http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/totpie95.html > > Total irragation, livestock, and aquaculture withdrawals are only about > 36%. > > > > >> >> >>> >>> > >>> > Your knowledge of osteoporsis is clearly nil. You might choose >>> > to read >>> > the "Bone Density Diet" by Dr. George Kesller, foremost expert >>> > on >>> > Osteoporosis. >>> > Meat leaches calcium from the cells, and should be eaten >>> > sparingly if >>> > at all. There is no reason at all the eat meat. >> >> And of course, you made the claim that beef is somehow good >> for osteoporosis. I suggest you might want to read >> the Bone Density Diet, by Dr. George Kessler, the foremost >> expert on Osteoporosis. He provides all the equations. >> >> >>> > >>> > This ignored that suffering of factory manufactured cattle. >>> =================== >>> Why do you ignore the far more brutal, inhumane deaths that >>> aniomals suffer in the factory-farming of your veggies, >>> hypocrite? >>> >> >> That's a silly argument. Of course there are collateral damages. >> But you only need to eat a fraction of the produce necessary. In any >> case, mechanized production of harvesting is not the same as taking >> animals and using them as products. > ============================ > Really? Why not fool? Aren't they just as dead? Why does the method of > their death matter so much to you? Why does the disposition of the bodies > mean so much to you? Why is it that the far more brutal, inhumane deaths > that animals experience in factory-farmed veggies mean nothing to you? > > >> >> >> Once again, you have failed to address the original error you posted, >> that somehow eating beef avoids osteoporosis. Beef does not >> contain anything but trace amounts of >> calcium, but large amounts of calcium are required to break it down. > ========================== > http://www.mercola.com/2002/feb/16/v...m_myths_05.htm > > > >> >> A quick google search will show some sites which support >> eating beef. It's pretty funny to see who supports it. > ======================= > A quick search also does not say to avoid meat altogether... > > >> >> Frankly, anyone that can't understand that eating food that requires >> 10 to 12 times more produce, drinks water it's entire life, and is >> ignorant >> and about the use of water in rendering, (which uses more water than >> the rest put together) lacks the basic understanding to engage in >> anything but emotional diatribes. > ============================ > LOL The ignorance is all yours, fool. I've provided data, now it's YOUR > turn to back up some of your ignorant spews and lys. I'll wait... The > only one here with nothing but emotional spew is you fool. You've yet to > back up your lys and delusions. > > >> >> If you can offer some science, let me know. Till them, remain >> ignorant. >> Enjoy your heart disease. You might want to get a dexa scan and >> see where you really are. Frankly, meat isn't the main cause of the >> huge explosion of osteoporosis, it's drinking soda. But, I'm sure >> you didn't know that. >> >> Oh yes genius, enjoy eating your "aniomals" > ============================= > LOL I rest my case, you have nothing, killer. Should I now submit all > posts to you for spell-checking? At least maybe you'll be useful at > something. > > >> >> >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > Have Run >>> > Bob >>> > >> > > |
Posted to soc.culture.indian,aus.politics,nz.politics,alt.food.vegan,rec.food.veg
|
|||
|
|||
why we should all turn vegetarian
"harmony" > wrote in message news:ll3Cg.5328$yO4.2537@dukeread02... > rick, stop being an idiot, and quit eating beef. ======================= The only idiots are the ones that deny themselves natural foods that they need, and instead rely on the petro-chemical industry to destroy the environment, killer. All because of a simple rule for your simple mind... tsk, tsk... > eat vegetables, it's for your own good. ======================== I eat lots of veggies, right now fresh from the garden. This mythical meat centered diet you seem to think everyone eats, how much meat is that per person in the US? You might suprise yourself if you actually learned some facts, hypocrite... and say thank you to beach runner. > teacher taught you no manners? ===================== Not for fools, idiots, and hypocrites, no... You loons invite abuse, to not oblige you would be rude of me, eh fool? Like you, he makes claims he can't back up. Too bad for you that I do, huh killer? > > "rick" > wrote in message > .net... >> >> "Beach Runner" > wrote in message >> ups.com... >>> >>> rick wrote: >>>> "Beach Runner" > wrote in message >>>> oups.com... >>>> > >>>> > Arthur Brain wrote: >>>> >> nemo wrote:> >>>> >> As part of a balanced, and varied diet, my beef will >>>> >> allow me >>>> >> to grow >>>> >> strong, while you vegans grow stunted, pale and pasty >>>> >> with >>>> >> poor >>>> >> eyesight and thin brittle bones. >>>> > >>>> > Your beef will increase cardio vascular disease, >>>> > osteoperosis, >>>> > cancer >>>> > of the colon, lacks any fiber, is pumped full of >>>> > hormones,many >>>> > with >>>> > antibitotics, >>>> > and wasting much energy and especially water. Growing and >>>> > rendering a >>>> > cow >>>> > uses enough water to float a battleship. >>>> =============================== >>>> Actually, NO to all your claims above fool. >>>> >>>> Tell us about all the wasted water especially. I'm anxious >>>> to >>>> hear that particular ly from you... >>>> >>> Sir, perhaps you might start to do the arithmetic. >> ================ >> Idiot, you might first learn a thing or two... >> >> >> First you have >>> all the water requirements to grow for 12 times as much >>> produce >>> as if people simply ate the produce. >> ============================= >> "produce?" Fed to cattle? What a hoot!!! Show me any >> requirement to feed "produce" to beef cattle... >> Then, again, give me the numbers for this extrme amount of >> 'wasted' water. Why can't you do that? >> >> >> >> Then you have to supply the >>> water to the cattle. Not a huge amount. The a huge amount >>> of water is required to render the animal. >> ======================= >> ROTFLMAO >> >>> >>> There are many places on the network this can be easily >>> verified. >>> Here's one of many URLs. >>> http://www.cnr.berkeley.edu/classes/...es/hunger1.htm >> ==================== >> Hype and propaganda, fool.... >> Wanna know how I know? This little ly that keeps getting >> passed on and on by AR/vegan loons without any cite. >> "...50% of the water withdrawn every year in the US to >> irrigate crops fed to livestock and to wash away manure..." >> Here's a site that will expalin water withdrawals in the US to >> you. It's written for school children, but you should be able >> to follow along... >> http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/totpie95.html >> >> Total irragation, livestock, and aquaculture withdrawals are >> only about 36%. >> >> >> >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> > >>>> > Your knowledge of osteoporsis is clearly nil. You might >>>> > choose >>>> > to read >>>> > the "Bone Density Diet" by Dr. George Kesller, foremost >>>> > expert >>>> > on >>>> > Osteoporosis. >>>> > Meat leaches calcium from the cells, and should be eaten >>>> > sparingly if >>>> > at all. There is no reason at all the eat meat. >>> >>> And of course, you made the claim that beef is somehow good >>> for osteoporosis. I suggest you might want to read >>> the Bone Density Diet, by Dr. George Kessler, the foremost >>> expert on Osteoporosis. He provides all the equations. >>> >>> >>>> > >>>> > This ignored that suffering of factory manufactured >>>> > cattle. >>>> =================== >>>> Why do you ignore the far more brutal, inhumane deaths that >>>> aniomals suffer in the factory-farming of your veggies, >>>> hypocrite? >>>> >>> >>> That's a silly argument. Of course there are collateral >>> damages. >>> But you only need to eat a fraction of the produce necessary. >>> In any >>> case, mechanized production of harvesting is not the same as >>> taking >>> animals and using them as products. >> ============================ >> Really? Why not fool? Aren't they just as dead? Why does >> the method of their death matter so much to you? Why does the >> disposition of the bodies mean so much to you? Why is it that >> the far more brutal, inhumane deaths that animals experience >> in factory-farmed veggies mean nothing to you? >> >> >>> >>> >>> Once again, you have failed to address the original error you >>> posted, >>> that somehow eating beef avoids osteoporosis. Beef does not >>> contain anything but trace amounts of >>> calcium, but large amounts of calcium are required to break >>> it down. >> ========================== >> http://www.mercola.com/2002/feb/16/v...m_myths_05.htm >> >> >> >>> >>> A quick google search will show some sites which support >>> eating beef. It's pretty funny to see who supports it. >> ======================= >> A quick search also does not say to avoid meat altogether... >> >> >>> >>> Frankly, anyone that can't understand that eating food that >>> requires >>> 10 to 12 times more produce, drinks water it's entire life, >>> and is >>> ignorant >>> and about the use of water in rendering, (which uses more >>> water than >>> the rest put together) lacks the basic understanding to >>> engage in >>> anything but emotional diatribes. >> ============================ >> LOL The ignorance is all yours, fool. I've provided data, >> now it's YOUR turn to back up some of your ignorant spews and >> lys. I'll wait... The only one here with nothing but >> emotional spew is you fool. You've yet to back up your lys >> and delusions. >> >> >>> >>> If you can offer some science, let me know. Till them, >>> remain >>> ignorant. >>> Enjoy your heart disease. You might want to get a dexa scan >>> and >>> see where you really are. Frankly, meat isn't the main cause >>> of the >>> huge explosion of osteoporosis, it's drinking soda. But, I'm >>> sure >>> you didn't know that. >>> >>> Oh yes genius, enjoy eating your "aniomals" >> ============================= >> LOL I rest my case, you have nothing, killer. Should I now >> submit all posts to you for spell-checking? At least maybe >> you'll be useful at something. >> >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Have Run >>>> > Bob >>>> > >>> >> >> > > |
Posted to soc.culture.indian,aus.politics,nz.politics,alt.food.vegan,rec.food.veg
|
|||
|
|||
why we should all turn vegetarian
On 12 Jul 2006 03:56:16 -0700, "Arthur Brain" > wrote:
> >dd wrote: >> The right to life is possible only in a certain, different atmosphere that > >There is no such right. > >> is not present on the earth at the moment. Animals are killed, birds are >> killed, sea animals are killed, just for game. You don't have any reverence > >So? Whereever there is life, there must also - inevitably - be death. > >There is no reason why we shouldn't kill plants or animals if it suits >us. > >> for life. And life is the same whether it is in human beings or in other >> forms. Unless man becomes aware of his violence towards animals, birds, he >> cannot be really alert about his own right to life. If you are not caring > >There is no such right. > >> about others' lives, what right have you got to demand the same right for >> yourself? > >Human rights only apply to animals in Cloud Cuckoo Land. > >Do *you* live in Cloud Cuckoo Land? > >> But the whole of humanity is non-vegetarian; they are all eating other life >> forms. There is no reverence for life as such. Unless we create an >> atmosphere of reverence for life, man cannot realize the goal of getting his >> fundamental right of life. > >So what are you gong to eat, if you can't eat "other life forms"? · Vegans contribute to the deaths of animals by their use of wood and paper products, electricity, roads and all types of buildings, their own diet, etc... just as everyone else does. What they try to avoid are products which provide life (and death) for farm animals, but even then they would have to avoid the following items containing animal by-products in order to be successful: Tires, Paper, Upholstery, Floor waxes, Glass, Water Filters, Rubber, Fertilizer, Antifreeze, Ceramics, Insecticides, Insulation, Linoleum, Plastic, Textiles, Blood factors, Collagen, Heparin, Insulin, Solvents, Biodegradable Detergents, Herbicides, Gelatin Capsules, Adhesive Tape, Laminated Wood Products, Plywood, Paneling, Wallpaper and Wallpaper Paste, Cellophane Wrap and Tape, Abrasives, Steel Ball Bearings The meat industry provides life for the animals that it slaughters, and the animals live and die as a result of it as animals do in other habitats. They also depend on it for their lives as animals do in other habitats. If people consume animal products from animals they think are raised in decent ways, they will be promoting life for more such animals in the future. People who want to contribute to decent lives for livestock with their lifestyle must do it by being conscientious consumers of animal products, because they can not do it by being vegan. From the life and death of a thousand pound grass raised steer and whatever he happens to kill during his life, people get over 500 pounds of human consumable meat...that's well over 500 servings of meat. From a grass raised dairy cow people get thousands of dairy servings. Due to the influence of farm machinery, and *icides, and in the case of rice the flooding and draining of fields, one serving of soy or rice based product is likely to involve more animal deaths than hundreds of servings derived from grass raised animals. Grass raised animal products contribute to fewer wildlife deaths, better wildlife habitat, and better lives for livestock than soy or rice products. · |
Posted to soc.culture.indian,aus.politics,nz.politics,alt.food.vegan,rec.food.veg
|
|||
|
|||
why we should all turn vegetarian
the health insurance companies should lower the premium of veggie guys by
40pct and tag a 50pct meat surcahrge. just like they treat smoking. "Beach Runner" > wrote in message ups.com... > > rick wrote: >> "Beach Runner" > wrote in message >> ups.com... >> > >> > rick wrote: >> >> "Beach Runner" > wrote in message >> >> oups.com... >> >> > >> >> > Arthur Brain wrote: >> >> >> nemo wrote:> >> >> >> As part of a balanced, and varied diet, my beef will allow >> >> >> me >> >> >> to grow >> >> >> strong, while you vegans grow stunted, pale and pasty with >> >> >> poor >> >> >> eyesight and thin brittle bones. >> >> > > That's the first silly statement. Poor eyesight, pale, pasty, > eyesight. > That's absurd. > > >> >> > Your beef will increase cardio vascular disease, >> >> > osteoperosis, >> >> > cancer >> >> > of the colon, lacks any fiber, is pumped full of >> >> > hormones,many >> >> > with >> >> > antibitotics, >> >> > and wasting much energy and especially water. Growing and >> >> > rendering a >> >> > cow >> >> > uses enough water to float a battleship. >> >> =============================== >> >> Actually, NO to all your claims above fool. >> >> >> >> Tell us about all the wasted water especially. I'm anxious to >> >> hear that particular ly from you... >> >> >> > Sir, perhaps you might start to do the arithmetic. >> ================ >> Idiot, you might first learn a thing or two... >> >> >> First you have >> > all the water requirements to grow for 12 times as much produce >> > as if people simply ate the produce. >> ============================= >> "produce?" Fed to cattle? What a hoot!!! Show me any >> requirement to feed "produce" to beef cattle... > > Most of the corn grown in America is feed to cattle. Cattle is a > produce. > >> Then, again, give me the numbers for this extrme amount of >> 'wasted' water. Why can't you do that? >> >> >> >> Then you have to supply the >> > water to the cattle. Not a huge amount. The a huge amount >> > of water is required to render the animal. >> ======================= >> ROTFLMAO >> > If you'd like the data from a non biased source, simply go to > http://wrrc.p2pays.org/p2rx/subsecti...TOKEN=71483890 > > This is from professional documentation on the Waste Reduction Resource > Center. > > "Meat Processing Water Consumption: Like many other food processing > activities, the necessity for hygiene and quality control in meat > processing results in high water usage and consequently high wastewater > generation. Volumes of wastewater from meat processing are generally > 80-95 percent of the total freshwater consumption (MRC, 1995). The > United Nations Environmental Program, Cleaner Production Assessment in > Meat Processing (2000), estimates a range of 1,100 to 4,400 gallons of > water are used per live weight ton of slaughtered animal in the United > States. Between 44-60 percent of water is consumed in the slaughter, > evisceration and boning areas (MRC, 1995). The following table > illustrates the breakdown of water consumption in beef and pork > processing based on a study of Australian abattoirs." > > >> > >> > There are many places on the network this can be easily >> > verified. >> > Here's one of many URLs. >> > http://www.cnr.berkeley.edu/classes/...es/hunger1.htm >> ==================== >> Hype and propaganda, fool.... >> Wanna know how I know? This little ly that keeps getting passed >> on and on by AR/vegan loons without any cite. >> "...50% of the water withdrawn every year in the US to irrigate >> crops fed to livestock and to wash away manure..." >> Here's a site that will expalin water withdrawals in the US to >> you. It's written for school children, but you should be able to >> follow along... >> http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/totpie95.html >> >> Total irragation, livestock, and aquaculture withdrawals are only >> about 36%. >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Your knowledge of osteoporsis is clearly nil. You might >> >> > choose >> >> > to read >> >> > the "Bone Density Diet" by Dr. George Kesller, foremost >> >> > expert >> >> > on >> >> > Osteoporosis. >> >> > Meat leaches calcium from the cells, and should be eaten >> >> > sparingly if >> >> > at all. There is no reason at all the eat meat. >> > >> > And of course, you made the claim that beef is somehow good >> > for osteoporosis. I suggest you might want to read >> > the Bone Density Diet, by Dr. George Kessler, the foremost >> > expert on Osteoporosis. He provides all the equations. >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > This ignored that suffering of factory manufactured cattle. >> >> =================== >> >> Why do you ignore the far more brutal, inhumane deaths that >> >> aniomals suffer in the factory-farming of your veggies, >> >> hypocrite? >> >> >> > >> > That's a silly argument. Of course there are collateral >> > damages. >> > But you only need to eat a fraction of the produce necessary. >> > In any >> > case, mechanized production of harvesting is not the same as >> > taking >> > animals and using them as products. >> ============================ >> Really? Why not fool? Aren't they just as dead? Why does the >> method of their death matter so much to you? Why does the >> disposition of the bodies mean so much to you? Why is it that >> the far more brutal, inhumane deaths that animals experience in >> factory-farmed veggies mean nothing to you? >> > First, the degree is far less. Secondly, all that collateral damage > would > occur with production for cattle, only far more. And then there of > course > is intention. >> >> > >> > >> > Once again, you have failed to address the original error you >> > posted, >> > that somehow eating beef avoids osteoporosis. Beef does not >> > contain anything but trace amounts of >> > calcium, but large amounts of calcium are required to break it >> > down. >> ========================== >> http://www.mercola.com/2002/feb/16/v...m_myths_05.htm >> > Oh your kidding. Mercola? That quack? Next you'll quote Dr. > Atkinson. > Of course, you stuck Osteoporosis and Beef into google and you came up > with Mercola. Big freaking deal. > > Do you know anything about how calcium is used in in the body? The > effect of phosphoric acid and why it effects calcium levels? Just be > honest. > Do you understand the relationship of calcium to protein? > > >> >> >> > >> > A quick google search will show some sites which support >> > eating beef. It's pretty funny to see who supports it. >> ======================= >> A quick search also does not say to avoid meat altogether... > > Who cares if people avoid meat altogether. That's not what I responded > to. I responded to your statement that eating meat will avoid > osteoporosis. > >> >> >> > >> > Frankly, anyone that can't understand that eating food that >> > requires >> > 10 to 12 times more produce, drinks water it's entire life, and >> > is >> > ignorant >> > and about the use of water in rendering, (which uses more water >> > than >> > the rest put together) lacks the basic understanding to engage >> > in >> > anything but emotional diatribes. >> ============================ >> LOL The ignorance is all yours, fool. I've provided data, now > > What data? You provided a pointer to a quack. > >> it's YOUR turn to back up some of your ignorant spews and lys. >> I'll wait... The only one here with nothing but emotional spew >> is you fool. You've yet to back up your lys and delusions. >> > amazing.... >> >> > >> > If you can offer some science, let me know. Till them, remain >> > ignorant. >> > Enjoy your heart disease. You might want to get a dexa scan >> > and >> > see where you really are. Frankly, meat isn't the main cause of >> > the >> > huge explosion of osteoporosis, it's drinking soda. But, I'm >> > sure >> > you didn't know that. >> > >> > Oh yes genius, enjoy eating your "aniomals" >> ============================= >> LOL I rest my case, you have nothing, killer. Should I now >> submit all posts to you for spell-checking? At least maybe >> you'll be useful at something. >> > The original discussion was on osteoporosis. The tremendous > consumption of water. The third is your inability to discuss > something without emotional displays. > >> >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Have Run >> >> > Bob >> >> > >> > > |
Posted to soc.culture.indian,aus.politics,nz.politics,alt.food.vegan,rec.food.veg
|
|||
|
|||
why we should all turn vegetarian
"Beach Runner" > wrote in message ups.com... > > rick wrote: >> "Beach Runner" > wrote in message >> ups.com... >> > >> > rick wrote: >> >> "Beach Runner" > wrote in message >> >> oups.com... >> >> > >> >> > Arthur Brain wrote: >> >> >> nemo wrote:> >> >> >> As part of a balanced, and varied diet, my beef will >> >> >> allow >> >> >> me >> >> >> to grow >> >> >> strong, while you vegans grow stunted, pale and pasty >> >> >> with >> >> >> poor >> >> >> eyesight and thin brittle bones. >> >> > > That's the first silly statement. Poor eyesight, pale, pasty, > eyesight. > That's absurd. ======================= I didn't write that fool. Your eyesight and comprehesion must be bad... > > >> >> > Your beef will increase cardio vascular disease, >> >> > osteoperosis, >> >> > cancer >> >> > of the colon, lacks any fiber, is pumped full of >> >> > hormones,many >> >> > with >> >> > antibitotics, >> >> > and wasting much energy and especially water. Growing >> >> > and >> >> > rendering a >> >> > cow >> >> > uses enough water to float a battleship. >> >> =============================== >> >> Actually, NO to all your claims above fool. >> >> >> >> Tell us about all the wasted water especially. I'm anxious >> >> to >> >> hear that particular ly from you... >> >> >> > Sir, perhaps you might start to do the arithmetic. >> ================ >> Idiot, you might first learn a thing or two... >> >> >> First you have >> > all the water requirements to grow for 12 times as much >> > produce >> > as if people simply ate the produce. >> ============================= >> "produce?" Fed to cattle? What a hoot!!! Show me any >> requirement to feed "produce" to beef cattle... > > Most of the corn grown in America is feed to cattle. Cattle is > a > produce. ====================== Again, killer, show me any requirement to feed produce to cattle... > >> Then, again, give me the numbers for this extrme amount of >> 'wasted' water. Why can't you do that? >> >> >> >> Then you have to supply the >> > water to the cattle. Not a huge amount. The a huge amount >> > of water is required to render the animal. >> ======================= >> ROTFLMAO >> > If you'd like the data from a non biased source, simply go to > http://wrrc.p2pays.org/p2rx/subsecti...TOKEN=71483890 ======================== Which still does not represnet what yopu tried to impaly. That most water used is used t=o produce meats. You can't fool... BTW, your pair of jeans takes a 1000 gallons... > > This is from professional documentation on the Waste Reduction > Resource > Center. > > "Meat Processing Water Consumption: Like many other food > processing > activities, the necessity for hygiene and quality control in > meat > processing results in high water usage and consequently high > wastewater > generation. Volumes of wastewater from meat processing are > generally > 80-95 percent of the total freshwater consumption (MRC, 1995). > The > United Nations Environmental Program, Cleaner Production > Assessment in > Meat Processing (2000), estimates a range of 1,100 to 4,400 > gallons of > water are used per live weight ton of slaughtered animal in the > United > States. Between 44-60 percent of water is consumed in the > slaughter, > evisceration and boning areas (MRC, 1995). The following table > illustrates the breakdown of water consumption in beef and pork > processing based on a study of Australian abattoirs." > > >> > >> > There are many places on the network this can be easily >> > verified. >> > Here's one of many URLs. >> > http://www.cnr.berkeley.edu/classes/...es/hunger1.htm >> ==================== >> Hype and propaganda, fool.... >> Wanna know how I know? This little ly that keeps getting >> passed >> on and on by AR/vegan loons without any cite. >> "...50% of the water withdrawn every year in the US to >> irrigate >> crops fed to livestock and to wash away manure..." >> Here's a site that will expalin water withdrawals in the US >> to >> you. It's written for school children, but you should be able >> to >> follow along... >> http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/totpie95.html >> >> Total irragation, livestock, and aquaculture withdrawals are >> only >> about 36%. >>============================== I see you couldn't bring yourself to read the facts, huh fool? >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Your knowledge of osteoporsis is clearly nil. You might >> >> > choose >> >> > to read >> >> > the "Bone Density Diet" by Dr. George Kesller, foremost >> >> > expert >> >> > on >> >> > Osteoporosis. >> >> > Meat leaches calcium from the cells, and should be eaten >> >> > sparingly if >> >> > at all. There is no reason at all the eat meat. >> > >> > And of course, you made the claim that beef is somehow good >> > for osteoporosis. I suggest you might want to read >> > the Bone Density Diet, by Dr. George Kessler, the foremost >> > expert on Osteoporosis. He provides all the equations. >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > This ignored that suffering of factory manufactured >> >> > cattle. >> >> =================== >> >> Why do you ignore the far more brutal, inhumane deaths that >> >> aniomals suffer in the factory-farming of your veggies, >> >> hypocrite? >> >> >> > >> > That's a silly argument. Of course there are collateral >> > damages. >> > But you only need to eat a fraction of the produce >> > necessary. >> > In any >> > case, mechanized production of harvesting is not the same as >> > taking >> > animals and using them as products. >> ============================ >> Really? Why not fool? Aren't they just as dead? Why does >> the >> method of their death matter so much to you? Why does the >> disposition of the bodies mean so much to you? Why is it that >> the far more brutal, inhumane deaths that animals experience >> in >> factory-farmed veggies mean nothing to you? >> > First, the degree is far less. Secondly, all that collateral > damage > would > occur with production for cattle, only far more. And then there > of > course > is intention. ============================ No fool, all that does not occur for all beef cattle. Too bad for you that your blinders are on too tight, eh hypocrite? They ALL do occur for the veggies your hop down to the supermarket for though... So now a 'degree' of death matters to you, huh? What degree is less in your CDs? The brutality? The inhumane deaths? The numbers? You're wrong on all counts killer. Again, why is it ok to kill more animals and leave them to rot than to kill fewer and eat them? Hypocrisy? Willful ignorance? Plain stupidity? >> >> > >> > >> > Once again, you have failed to address the original error >> > you >> > posted, >> > that somehow eating beef avoids osteoporosis. Beef does not >> > contain anything but trace amounts of >> > calcium, but large amounts of calcium are required to break >> > it >> > down. >> ========================== >> http://www.mercola.com/2002/feb/16/v...m_myths_05.htm >> > Oh your kidding. Mercola? That quack? Next you'll quote Dr. > Atkinson. > Of course, you stuck Osteoporosis and Beef into google and you > came up > with Mercola. Big freaking deal. > > Do you know anything about how calcium is used in in the body? > The > effect of phosphoric acid and why it effects calcium levels? > Just be > honest. > Do you understand the relationship of calcium to protein? ======================== Again, you have failed to prove that the elimination of meat does any good. Too bad you can't read your own spew, fool... > > >> >> >> > >> > A quick google search will show some sites which support >> > eating beef. It's pretty funny to see who supports it. >> ======================= >> A quick search also does not say to avoid meat altogether... > > Who cares if people avoid meat altogether. That's not what I > responded > to. I responded to your statement that eating meat will avoid > osteoporosis. ========================= I don't think I made such a claim fool... care to post it? You're the only one that was talking about it, killer... > >> >> >> > >> > Frankly, anyone that can't understand that eating food that >> > requires >> > 10 to 12 times more produce, drinks water it's entire life, >> > and >> > is >> > ignorant >> > and about the use of water in rendering, (which uses more >> > water >> > than >> > the rest put together) lacks the basic understanding to >> > engage >> > in >> > anything but emotional diatribes. >> ============================ >> LOL The ignorance is all yours, fool. I've provided data, >> now > > What data? You provided a pointer to a quack. ======================== many many times fool. Just right here in this thread I provided data that disproves your ignorant contentions. Learn to use your computer, since you have already proven that you don't care how mnay animals you kill. The fact remains, you know NOTHING about water useages in the US. Apparently you can't read at a grade-school level yet. Maybe it's your diet, eh killer? > >> it's YOUR turn to back up some of your ignorant spews and lys. >> I'll wait... The only one here with nothing but emotional >> spew >> is you fool. You've yet to back up your lys and delusions. >> > amazing.... ========================= Yes, it is amazing that you have yet to prove any of the ignorant claims you've made and that you are still here spewing your nonsense... >> >> > >> > If you can offer some science, let me know. Till them, >> > remain >> > ignorant. >> > Enjoy your heart disease. You might want to get a dexa scan >> > and >> > see where you really are. Frankly, meat isn't the main cause >> > of >> > the >> > huge explosion of osteoporosis, it's drinking soda. But, >> > I'm >> > sure >> > you didn't know that. >> > >> > Oh yes genius, enjoy eating your "aniomals" >> ============================= >> LOL I rest my case, you have nothing, killer. Should I now >> submit all posts to you for spell-checking? At least maybe >> you'll be useful at something. >> > The original discussion was on osteoporosis. The tremendous > consumption of water. The third is your inability to discuss > something without emotional displays. > =============================== The first you have failed to prove your claims, and which I care nothing about... The water claims you make have been disproven and yet you still insist on making a fool of yourself. Again, it must be your diet... >> >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Have Run >> >> > Bob >> >> > >> > > |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
'Meatless Mondays': LA urges residents to turn vegetarian one day a week | General Cooking | |||
Turn 60, turn this cellar out! | Wine | |||
why we should all turn vegetarian | Vegan | |||
Near Vegetarian to Vegetarian to Vegan | Vegan | |||
FA: Four Vegetarian Books for children, mothers, etc. VEGAN VEGETARIAN | General Cooking |