Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Skanky wrote:
>>>Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to >>>continue for some reason or other, >> >>Like you have. Repeatedly. >> >> >>>What ISN'T acceptable, >>>though, is your double standard in attacking SN >> >>*No* double standard -- you're comparing an apple to an orange, as >>usual. Skanky has alredy said her goodbyes but continues to post the >>same tired bullshit she always has, lingering for days on end like the >>nasty symptoms of influenza. Jon has something substantive to offer >>these groups. He also hasn't said his goodbyes, much less told anyone he >>intends to drag out farewells for days on end. > > I dragged nothing out. You've dragged out *43 years*, Skanky. You have to create your own "atmospheres" complete with a "penis patio" (whatever the hell that is), you spend your time watching soap operas, and you smoke pot -- all feeble-minded attempts to escape your do-nothing, worthless reality. http://tinyurl.com/ataee http://tinyurl.com/blrvj http://tinyurl.com/c3ed3 One last serious question before you passively get cut off from answering: why did you change the name of your site from skunkytown to scentednectar? |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
usual suspect wrote:
> Skanky wrote: > >>>Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to > >>>continue for some reason or other, > >> > >>Like you have. Repeatedly. > >> > >> > >>>What ISN'T acceptable, > >>>though, is your double standard in attacking SN > >> > >>*No* double standard -- you're comparing an apple to an orange, as > >>usual. Skanky has alredy said her goodbyes but continues to post the > >>same tired bullshit she always has, lingering for days on end like the > >>nasty symptoms of influenza. Jon has something substantive to offer > >>these groups. He also hasn't said his goodbyes, much less told anyone he > >>intends to drag out farewells for days on end. > > > > I dragged nothing out. > > You've dragged out *43 years*, Skanky. You have to create your own > "atmospheres" complete with a "penis patio" (whatever the hell that is), > you spend your time watching soap operas, and you smoke pot -- all > feeble-minded attempts to escape your do-nothing, worthless reality. > > http://tinyurl.com/ataee > http://tinyurl.com/blrvj > http://tinyurl.com/c3ed3 > > One last serious question before you passively get cut off from > answering: why did you change the name of your site from skunkytown to > scentednectar? Too late! Looks as if the ISP did the ol' snip-o-rooney on her service. I hope the door DID hit her fat ass on the way out. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Leif Erikson wrote:
> usual suspect wrote: > >>Skanky wrote: >> >>>>>Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to >>>>>continue for some reason or other, >>>> >>>>Like you have. Repeatedly. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>What ISN'T acceptable, >>>>>though, is your double standard in attacking SN >>>> >>>>*No* double standard -- you're comparing an apple to an orange, as >>>>usual. Skanky has alredy said her goodbyes but continues to post the >>>>same tired bullshit she always has, lingering for days on end like the >>>>nasty symptoms of influenza. Jon has something substantive to offer >>>>these groups. He also hasn't said his goodbyes, much less told anyone he >>>>intends to drag out farewells for days on end. >>> >>>I dragged nothing out. >> >>You've dragged out *43 years*, Skanky. You have to create your own >>"atmospheres" complete with a "penis patio" (whatever the hell that is), >>you spend your time watching soap operas, and you smoke pot -- all >>feeble-minded attempts to escape your do-nothing, worthless reality. >> >>http://tinyurl.com/ataee >>http://tinyurl.com/blrvj >>http://tinyurl.com/c3ed3 >> >>One last serious question before you passively get cut off from >>answering: why did you change the name of your site from skunkytown to >>scentednectar? > > Too late! Looks as if the ISP did the ol' snip-o-rooney on her > service. Cool. I wish I had that kind of power. > I hope the door DID hit her fat ass on the way out. Fat PIMPLY ass. Looks like a pizza. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Skanky wrote:
> And 14 days is more Fourteen days is nothing to you when all you do is sit around making up fake "atmospheres" while you get stoned and watch soap operas. Loser. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Dreck wrote:
>>JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. > > She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use > her credit card What part of her whining do you not comprehend, dummy? My ISP will be discontinuing it's usenet in 2 weeks. I won't be turning to giganews or any other paid usenet service. -- Cheapskate Skanky, 1 Dec 05 Thanks for the link. I took a look and I don't really like the format. -- Crybaby Skanky, 1 Dec 05 I won't continue through Google, but thanks for telling me about it anyways. -- Whiner Skanky, 1 Dec 05 I'm not going to continue through Google. I don't like the format. So *this is goodbye*... -- Lingering Skanky, 1 Dec 05 I don't like the format unfortunately. *This is goodbye* for now anyway. Maybe someday I'll feel like using Google and come back through there. -- Petulant Skanky, 1 Dec 05 Hopefully I'll be back, if I can find an Outlook Express compatible source out there. -- Loophole Skanky, 1 Dec 05 Thanks, but I don't like the google format for newsgroups. I'll look for another source and maybe come back at some time in the future. I may even change ISPs eventually. -- Impossible Skanky, 1 Dec 05 I simply don't like the format of Google groups. -- Grumbling Skanky, 1 Dec 05 > contrary to what you're > trying to make the reader believe, her decision to leave > these groups is entirely her own and pro-active. No, Dreck, it's passive and petulant: My ISP will be discontinuing it's usenet in 2 weeks. I won't be turning to giganews or any other paid usenet service. -- Cheapskate Skanky, 1 Dec 05 Thanks for the link. I took a look and I don't really like the format. -- Crybaby Skanky, 1 Dec 05 I won't continue through Google, but thanks for telling me about it anyways. -- Whiner Skanky, 1 Dec 05 I'm not going to continue through Google. I don't like the format. So *this is goodbye*... -- Lingering Skanky, 1 Dec 05 I don't like the format unfortunately. *This is goodbye* for now anyway. Maybe someday I'll feel like using Google and come back through there. -- Petulant Skanky, 1 Dec 05 Hopefully I'll be back, if I can find an Outlook Express compatible source out there. -- Loophole Skanky, 1 Dec 05 Thanks, but I don't like the google format for newsgroups. I'll look for another source and maybe come back at some time in the future. I may even change ISPs eventually. -- Impossible Skanky, 1 Dec 05 I simply don't like the format of Google groups. -- Grumbling Skanky, 1 Dec 05 OTOH, *you* were pro-active when you lied and said you were giving up usenet and said your cheerio. You were just disingenuous: I don't watch much tele. In fact I don't think many people on Usenet do. I'm going to take your advice though and quit it today. I've gained all I can from it over the last five years, thanks largely to you it must be said, and it's time for me to move on to something completely different. Only time will tell you how sincere I am about this decision. You can certainly count on it though, so I'll say cheerio and hope you wont think you've been a complete waste of my time. -- First of Twits, 6 Oct 2005 Why are you still posting after pro-actively saying you wouldn't, you insincere liar? |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Dreck wrote:
> Any opposition worth his salt That excludes you. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
"usual suspect" > wrote in message
... > Skanky wrote: > >>>Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to > >>>continue for some reason or other, > >> > >>Like you have. Repeatedly. > >> > >> > >>>What ISN'T acceptable, > >>>though, is your double standard in attacking SN > >> > >>*No* double standard -- you're comparing an apple to an orange, as > >>usual. Skanky has alredy said her goodbyes but continues to post the > >>same tired bullshit she always has, lingering for days on end like the > >>nasty symptoms of influenza. Jon has something substantive to offer > >>these groups. He also hasn't said his goodbyes, much less told anyone he > >>intends to drag out farewells for days on end. > > > > I dragged nothing out. > > You've dragged out *43 years*, Skanky. You have to create your own > "atmospheres" complete with a "penis patio" (whatever the hell that is), > you spend your time watching soap operas, and you smoke pot -- all > feeble-minded attempts to escape your do-nothing, worthless reality. > > http://tinyurl.com/ataee > http://tinyurl.com/blrvj > http://tinyurl.com/c3ed3 > > One last serious question before you passively get cut off from > answering: why did you change the name of your site from skunkytown to > scentednectar? Ok, one last serious answer. If you had bothered to research further, you would know that Adobe (who bought the Atmo program) discontinued it. They also made changes to it that made some older 3d chat worlds not work anymore. Now they all don't work. Skunkytown 3d was an incredible piece of art created mostly by myself and a guy I know. We built a fun adult world complete with a train ride in the air and galleries, both adult and not. It was great fun. People visited from all over the world. Your archive link only shows the page from before it was built. Once Atmosphere was changed and no longer worked for my Skunkytown, I let the domain expire. Now Atmo worlds don't work at all unless you have downloaded the browser plugin before it was discontinued. I have a lot of great memories from Skunkytown. People showed up wearing 'avatars' of all sorts. It was a riot and we all had a lot of fun there. Chat was uncensored and so were the avatars people created and wore to visit there. People were friendly and not insulting the way you are. My friend and me had a wonderful time building 3d objects and the train ride was built by someone else who knew how to program such a thing. I miss Atmo a lot. There was nothing like it. Originally it was called 3dAnarchy and I was a beta tester from day one. There was also an adult themed sculpture garden as well as the galleries and central chat area. Long live Atmo. In my heart it will never die. I made many more worlds too which I can now only visit from my hard drive with no chat. I made mazes, gardens, houses, etc. What creative things have YOU made? -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:12:54 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>Derek wrote: > >>>JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. >> >> She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use >> her credit card > >What part of her whining do you not comprehend I was about to ask the same of you, boy, because her quote below this sentence shows that my comment above is true. Thanks, but I don't like the google format for newsgroups. I'll look for another source and maybe come back at some time in the future. I may even change ISPs eventually. Scented Nectar, 1 Dec 05 As we can see by that quote, she has used Google, which proves that the first half of my above comments is true. As for the second half of my comment, she hasn't mentioned that she doesn't have a credit card, but that didn't stop you from lying to the reader by inventing a bogus quote from her claiming she doesn't, did it? "I don't have a credit card." was a quote YOU wrote and attributed to her. You lied. When are you going to apologise for lying to the reader, usual liar? I've asked you several times now, and each time you've avoided doing what's right by snipping my request for your apology away. You're hardly the Christian you claim to be if you can't bring yourself to apologise for the lies you spread around, are you? Your claim in being a Christian is clearly just as false as your earlier claim in being a vegan. In fact it would be foolish to believe a single word you write here after considering the known facts about you. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Derek wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:12:54 GMT, usual suspect > wrote: > >>Derek wrote: >> >> >>>>JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. >>> >>>She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use >>>her credit card >> >>What part of her whining do you not comprehend > > > I was about to ask the same of you, boy, because her quote > below this sentence shows that my comment above is true. > > Thanks, but I don't like the google > format for newsgroups. I'll look for > another source and maybe come > back at some time in the future. I > may even change ISPs eventually. > Scented Nectar, 1 Dec 05 > > As we can see by that quote, she has used Google, which > proves that the first half of my above comments is true. She glanced at it, and, being the pig-headed, unadaptable, inflexible skank that she is, simply rejected it out of hand. Despite being a low-brow skank, Skanky has a bizarre princess complex. She expects the world to cater to her, entirely on her terms. That's not a good attitude in anyone, but it really is bad when you're a bottom-feeder as she is. > > As for the second half of my comment, she hasn't mentioned > that she doesn't have a credit card, but that didn't stop you > from lying to the reader by inventing a bogus quote from her > claiming she doesn't, did it? We know she doesn't have one. I'm pretty certain she said it herself quite some time back, but even if she didn't, we *still* know she doesn't have one, just because of knowing how constrained she is: no car, low-end job, always whining about money. She doesn't have a credit card because she isn't credit worthy, and her parents wouldn't co-sign on the credit application. > > "I don't have a credit card." was a quote YOU wrote and > attributed to her. You lied. When are you going to apologise > for lying to the reader, usual liar? I've asked you several > times now, and each time you've avoided doing what's > right by snipping my request for your apology away. You're > hardly the Christian you claim to be if you can't bring > yourself to apologise for the lies you spread around, are you? > Your claim in being a Christian is clearly just as false as your > earlier claim in being a vegan. In fact it would be foolish to > believe a single word you write here after considering the > known facts about you. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:12:40 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote:
>Derek wrote: >> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:12:54 GMT, usual suspect > wrote: >>>Derek wrote: >>> >>>>>JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. >>>> >>>>She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use >>>>her credit card >>> >>>What part of her whining do you not comprehend >> >> I was about to ask the same of you, boy, because her quote >> below this sentence shows that my comment above is true. >> >> Thanks, but I don't like the google >> format for newsgroups. I'll look for >> another source and maybe come >> back at some time in the future. I >> may even change ISPs eventually. >> Scented Nectar, 1 Dec 05 >> >> As we can see by that quote, she has used Google, which >> proves that the first half of my above comments is true. > >She glanced at it, and, being the pig-headed, >unadaptable, inflexible skank that she is, simply >rejected it out of hand. No, she tried it and didn't like the format. The first half of my comment stands as true: "She knows how to use Google groups ..." >> As for the second half of my comment, she hasn't mentioned >> that she doesn't have a credit card, but that didn't stop you >> from lying to the reader by inventing a bogus quote from her >> claiming she doesn't, did it? > >We know she doesn't have one. No, you don't know that at all. >I'm pretty certain she >said it herself quite some time back No, she didn't. usual liar authored a quote she never wrote, claiming she didn't have a credit card, and then attributed it to her as her own. He lied. >> "I don't have a credit card." was a quote YOU wrote and >> attributed to her. You lied. When are you going to apologise >> for lying to the reader, usual liar? I've asked you several >> times now, and each time you've avoided doing what's >> right by snipping my request for your apology away. You're >> hardly the Christian you claim to be if you can't bring >> yourself to apologise for the lies you spread around, are you? >> Your claim in being a Christian is clearly just as false as your >> earlier claim in being a vegan. In fact it would be foolish to >> believe a single word you write here after considering the >> known facts about you. As we can see by my above comment, usual liar had nothing to support his claim about SN not having a credit card, so he intentionally misquoted her to make it seem that way and lied to the readers here while doing so. He owes us all an apology as well as SN, but being the type of person he is he'll avoid doing anything like that. Being that you've repeatedly declared to leave "this cesspool" and still remained under multiple identities, where do you find the nerve to criticise SN for declaring to leave? I had a nice long and productive break from this cesspool, and from you in particular, and I intend to make it permanent. New Year's resolutions and all that... Jonathan Ball as Jay Santos (69.3.208.57) Thu, 23 Dec 2004 http://tinyurl.com/bxrmh Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah And then, a whole year later; [Start Jon to Derek] >>>Find something productive to do, Dreck. Swing your >>>blue foot off the couch, knock back a pint, and go out >>>in your garden for a little while and pull some weeds. >>>Read a good book, maybe. Just stop ****ing away your >>>time in usenet. [Derek] >> You're right, I should. [Jon] >But you won't. >I will. [Derek] Actually, for both our sakes, I hope we both do. Usenet is a nasty addiction we can both do without. [end] Thu, 06 Oct 2005 http://tinyurl.com/a2cj2 When we consider your declarations to leave "this cesspool" over the years and 'usual suspect's' hypocritical silence over those declarations, neither of you have any room to criticise SN for hers. You've both made a bit of an arse of yourselves over this; usual suspect in particular, because if he did have a valid complaint against her he wouldn't have had to lie about her the way he did. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Derek wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:12:40 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: > >>Derek wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:12:54 GMT, usual suspect > wrote: >>> >>>>Derek wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>>JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. >>>>> >>>>>She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use >>>>>her credit card >>>> >>>>What part of her whining do you not comprehend >>> >>>I was about to ask the same of you, boy, because her quote >>>below this sentence shows that my comment above is true. >>> >>> Thanks, but I don't like the google >>> format for newsgroups. I'll look for >>> another source and maybe come >>> back at some time in the future. I >>> may even change ISPs eventually. >>> Scented Nectar, 1 Dec 05 >>> >>>As we can see by that quote, she has used Google, which >>>proves that the first half of my above comments is true. >> >>She glanced at it, and, being the pig-headed, >>unadaptable, inflexible skank that she is, simply >>rejected it out of hand. > > > No, she tried it and didn't like the format. The first half of my > comment stands as true: "She knows how to use Google groups ..." Its knowledge of how to use Google Groups was not in question; rather, its flexibility and adaptability to be able to continue using it in order to remain a participant are what's missing. It just doesn't have it. >>>As for the second half of my comment, she hasn't mentioned >>>that she doesn't have a credit card, but that didn't stop you >>>from lying to the reader by inventing a bogus quote from her >>>claiming she doesn't, did it? >> >>We know she doesn't have one. > > > No, you don't know that at all. We do know it. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Skanky wrote:
>>>>>Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to >>>>>continue for some reason or other, >>>> >>>>Like you have. Repeatedly. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>What ISN'T acceptable, >>>>>though, is your double standard in attacking SN >>>> >>>>*No* double standard -- you're comparing an apple to an orange, as >>>>usual. Skanky has alredy said her goodbyes but continues to post the >>>>same tired bullshit she always has, lingering for days on end like the >>>>nasty symptoms of influenza. Jon has something substantive to offer >>>>these groups. He also hasn't said his goodbyes, much less told anyone he >>>>intends to drag out farewells for days on end. >>> >>>I dragged nothing out. >> >>You've dragged out *43 years*, Skanky. You have to create your own >>"atmospheres" complete with a "penis patio" (whatever the hell that is), >>you spend your time watching soap operas, and you smoke pot -- all >>feeble-minded attempts to escape your do-nothing, worthless reality. >> >>http://tinyurl.com/ataee >>http://tinyurl.com/blrvj >>http://tinyurl.com/c3ed3 >> >>One last serious question before you passively get cut off from >>answering: why did you change the name of your site from skunkytown to >>scentednectar? > > Ok, one last serious answer. That meandering, rambling bullshit wasn't an answer. It was a waste of both your and my time. > If you had > bothered to research further, Why would I have wasted even more time? I found the posts you made under "Skunky" and found the links to your old site. > you would > know that Adobe (who bought the Atmo > program) discontinued it. With good reason. Shockwave kicked its ass. Adobe went with the better program in their arsenal when they took over Macromedia. It's not in their economic interest to support antiquated software that had limited appeal. > They also made > changes to it that made some older 3d > chat worlds not work anymore. Now they > all don't work. That's called *progress*, dummy. There are three kinds of people: those who innovate, those who adapt, and those who PASSIVELY **** AROUND SUCKING OFF THE INGENUITY OF OTHERS AND THEN WHINE WHEN THINGS CHANEG AND LIFE PASSES THEM BY YET AGAIN. You're in that last group. Loser. > Skunkytown 3d was an > incredible piece of art It was bullshit. It was your diversion from living a normal, healthy, balanced life. > created mostly > by myself and a guy I know. We built a > fun adult world Rather than attempt to live and succeed in the real one. > I have a lot of great memories from > Skunkytown. I hope you have some great ones from here, too, since you've yet again decided to passively let others dictate your fate. Unfortunately, it appears you learned very little despite all the advice offered to you: you only changed from saying "killing animals is wrong" to "killing animals is mostly wrong" -- and that was a (ha!) concession to your own convenience and your own tastes. What you really meant with that meaningless change is that it's okay to kill animals to put the food YOU like in YOUR (pot)belly. > People were friendly and not insulting > the way you are. They were losers just like you. > My friend and me You illiterate ****. "My friend and I..." > In my heart it will never die. It's dead, Skanky. Adobe won't revive obsolete software so pot-smoking slackers in Toronto can avoid reality by making their own phony worlds. > I made many more worlds too which I can now > only visit from my hard drive with no > chat. Maybe some day you might pull your head out of your smelly old ass and insert it into the real world around you. Doubtful, though, given the fact you've kept it pretty far up there for 43 years. > I made mazes, gardens, houses, You wasted *all* *that* *time* ****ing around something that's been rendered obsolete; you didn't adapt to any changes, you didn't come away with anything useful and applicable to other software or to earning an income. You have nothing to show for your fiddling around but a hard drive full of your bullshit diversions to remind you that you did something so utterly meaningless with your life and with your time. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
usual suspect wrote:
> Skanky wrote: > >>>>>> Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to >>>>>> continue for some reason or other, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Like you have. Repeatedly. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> What ISN'T acceptable, >>>>>> though, is your double standard in attacking SN >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *No* double standard -- you're comparing an apple to an orange, as >>>>> usual. Skanky has alredy said her goodbyes but continues to post the >>>>> same tired bullshit she always has, lingering for days on end like the >>>>> nasty symptoms of influenza. Jon has something substantive to offer >>>>> these groups. He also hasn't said his goodbyes, much less told >>>>> anyone he >>>>> intends to drag out farewells for days on end. >>>> >>>> >>>> I dragged nothing out. >>> >>> >>> You've dragged out *43 years*, Skanky. You have to create your own >>> "atmospheres" complete with a "penis patio" (whatever the hell that is), >>> you spend your time watching soap operas, and you smoke pot -- all >>> feeble-minded attempts to escape your do-nothing, worthless reality. >>> >>> http://tinyurl.com/ataee >>> http://tinyurl.com/blrvj >>> http://tinyurl.com/c3ed3 >>> >>> One last serious question before you passively get cut off from >>> answering: why did you change the name of your site from skunkytown to >>> scentednectar? >> >> >> Ok, one last serious answer. > > > That meandering, rambling bullshit wasn't an answer. It was a waste of > both your and my time. You didn't really expect anything else, did you? Good riddance to her skanky pimply fat pizza ass. It was fun pounding on her, but probably not really worth the effort; there are better forms of exercise. > >> If you had >> bothered to research further, > > > Why would I have wasted even more time? I found the posts you made under > "Skunky" and found the links to your old site. > >> you would >> know that Adobe (who bought the Atmo >> program) discontinued it. > > > With good reason. Shockwave kicked its ass. Adobe went with the better > program in their arsenal when they took over Macromedia. It's not in > their economic interest to support antiquated software that had limited > appeal. > >> They also made >> changes to it that made some older 3d >> chat worlds not work anymore. Now they >> all don't work. > > > That's called *progress*, dummy. There are three kinds of people: those > who innovate, those who adapt, and those who PASSIVELY **** AROUND > SUCKING OFF THE INGENUITY OF OTHERS AND THEN WHINE WHEN THINGS CHANEG > AND LIFE PASSES THEM BY YET AGAIN. You're in that last group. Loser. > >> Skunkytown 3d was an >> incredible piece of art > > > It was bullshit. It was your diversion from living a normal, healthy, > balanced life. > >> created mostly >> by myself and a guy I know. We built a >> fun adult world > > > Rather than attempt to live and succeed in the real one. > >> I have a lot of great memories from >> Skunkytown. > > > I hope you have some great ones from here, too, since you've yet again > decided to passively let others dictate your fate. Unfortunately, it > appears you learned very little despite all the advice offered to you: > you only changed from saying "killing animals is wrong" to "killing > animals is mostly wrong" -- and that was a (ha!) concession to your own > convenience and your own tastes. What you really meant with that > meaningless change is that it's okay to kill animals to put the food YOU > like in YOUR (pot)belly. > >> People were friendly and not insulting >> the way you are. > > > They were losers just like you. > >> My friend and me > > > You illiterate ****. "My friend and I..." > >> In my heart it will never die. > > > It's dead, Skanky. Adobe won't revive obsolete software so pot-smoking > slackers in Toronto can avoid reality by making their own phony worlds. > >> I made many more worlds too which I can now >> only visit from my hard drive with no >> chat. > > > Maybe some day you might pull your head out of your smelly old ass and > insert it into the real world around you. Doubtful, though, given the > fact you've kept it pretty far up there for 43 years. > >> I made mazes, gardens, houses, > > > You wasted *all* *that* *time* ****ing around something that's been > rendered obsolete; you didn't adapt to any changes, you didn't come away > with anything useful and applicable to other software or to earning an > income. You have nothing to show for your fiddling around but a hard > drive full of your bullshit diversions to remind you that you did > something so utterly meaningless with your life and with your time. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Dreck wrote:
>>>>JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. >>> >>>She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use >>>her credit card >> >>What part of her whining do you not comprehend > > I was about to ask You *should* ask questions, Dreck, before jumping to conclusions. > Thanks, but I don't like the google > format for newsgroups. I'll look for > another source and maybe come > back at some time in the future. I > may even change ISPs eventually. > Scented Nectar, 1 Dec 05 > > As we can see by that quote, she has used Google, Ipse dixit. That denotes she's at least looked at it, not used it. > As for the second half of my comment, she hasn't mentioned > that she doesn't have a credit card, I must have been too caught up in being mad about the first one needing a credit card number. -- Skanky, 4 Dec 2005 She should be mad at herself for not having one (for wasting her time making phony worlds and watching soap operas), and for lacking the funds it would take to access usenet outside of her ISP. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
S. Maizlich wrote:
> Derek wrote: > >> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:12:54 GMT, usual suspect > wrote: >> >>> Derek wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. >>>> >>>> >>>> She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use >>>> her credit card >>> >>> >>> What part of her whining do you not comprehend >> >> >> >> I was about to ask the same of you, boy, because her quote >> below this sentence shows that my comment above is true. >> >> Thanks, but I don't like the google >> format for newsgroups. I'll look for >> another source and maybe come >> back at some time in the future. I >> may even change ISPs eventually. >> Scented Nectar, 1 Dec 05 >> >> As we can see by that quote, she has used Google, which proves that >> the first half of my above comments is true. > > > She glanced at it, and, being the pig-headed, unadaptable, inflexible > skank that she is, simply rejected it out of hand. Despite being a > low-brow skank, Skanky has a bizarre princess complex. She expects the > world to cater to her, entirely on her terms. That's not a good > attitude in anyone, but it really is bad when you're a bottom-feeder as > she is. > > >> >> As for the second half of my comment, she hasn't mentioned >> that she doesn't have a credit card, but that didn't stop you >> from lying to the reader by inventing a bogus quote from her >> claiming she doesn't, did it? > > > We know she doesn't have one. I'm pretty certain she said it herself > quite some time back, but even if she didn't, we *still* know she > doesn't have one, just because of knowing how constrained she is: no > car, low-end job, always whining about money. She doesn't have a credit > card because she isn't credit worthy, and her parents wouldn't co-sign > on the credit application. She probably blames it on the fact that she's yet to win a lottery. She's often chalked up things like car and land ownership to "luck" -- as though those of us who plan our lives out well enough that we can afford things have just been fortunate rather than diligent -- and related her own retirement to winning a game of chance (so the odds of her retiring are about 1 in 21 million): What will catch up with me, if I'm lucky enough to still be alive and healthy, is retirement. -- Skanky, 19 May 2005 I feel quite happy and lucky that I will be able move rural when I retire. -- Skanky, 30 April 2005 Oh well, there's always lottery tickets. That's my early retirement plan! -- Skanky, 23 April 2005 I would love to live in the countryside actually. If I won a lottery, one of the first things I'd do is move there. -- Skanky, 3 April 2005 Luck has a lot to do with it. [land ownership] -- Skanky, 20 May 2005 The luxury of working until full retirement? It isn't a luxury. It's a necessity. If I won the lottery I would give up that 'luxury' in a flash. -- Skanky, 6 May 2005 Not unless I win the lottery or a rich person dies and leaves me everything. It's just not affordable for me. I don't have any realistic opportunity to grow all my own food until I retire and can live wherever I want, provided that I'm still able bodied by then. -- Skanky, 6 April 2005 But short of winning the lottery, that won't happen until I retire and even then, not to the extent that I could grow ALL my own. -- Skanky, 31 Dec 2004 ["that" = actually practicing what she preaches] I'm an average consumer and do buy some commercial foods. Unless I win a lottery, that's not likely to change until I retire. -- Skanky, 27 Dec 2004 If I won the lottery, I'd retire today. -- Skanky, 11 Jun 2005 Short of winning the lottery, I must wait before I can afford to live rurally. -- Skanky, 8 April 2005 >> "I don't have a credit card." was a quote YOU wrote and >> attributed to her. You lied. When are you going to apologise >> for lying to the reader, usual liar? I've asked you several >> times now, and each time you've avoided doing what's >> right by snipping my request for your apology away. You're >> hardly the Christian you claim to be if you can't bring >> yourself to apologise for the lies you spread around, are you? >> Your claim in being a Christian is clearly just as false as your >> earlier claim in being a vegan. In fact it would be foolish to >> believe a single word you write here after considering the >> known facts about you. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:13:53 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>Derek wrote: > >>>>>JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. >>>> >>>>She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use >>>>her credit card >>> >>>What part of her whining do you not comprehend >> >> I was about to ask the same of you, boy, because her quote >> below this sentence shows that my comment above is true. >> >> Thanks, but I don't like the google >> format for newsgroups. I'll look for >> another source and maybe come >> back at some time in the future. I >> may even change ISPs eventually. >> Scented Nectar, 1 Dec 05 >> >>As we can see by that quote, she has used Google, which >>proves that the first half of my above comments is true. >> >>As for the second half of my comment, she hasn't mentioned >>that she doesn't have a credit card, but that didn't stop you >>from lying to the reader by inventing a bogus quote from her >>claiming she doesn't, did it? >> >> "I don't have a credit card." was a quote YOU wrote and >>attributed to her. You lied. When are you going to apologise >>for lying to the reader, usual liar? I've asked you several >>times now, and each time you've avoided doing what's >>right by snipping my request for your apology away. You're >>hardly the Christian you claim to be if you can't bring >>yourself to apologise for the lies you spread around, are you? >>Your claim in being a Christian is clearly just as false as your >>earlier claim in being a vegan. In fact it would be foolish to >>believe a single word you write here after considering the >>known facts about you. I knew you would be able to comment on your hypocrisy here, liar. >> Thanks, but I don't like the google >> format for newsgroups. I'll look for >> another source and maybe come >> back at some time in the future. I >> may even change ISPs eventually. >> Scented Nectar, 1 Dec 05 >> >> As we can see by that quote, she has used Google, > >Ipse dixit. That denotes she's at least looked at it, not used it. She doesn't like the format, so it's true to say that she knows Google exists and can use it to continue here if she wanted to. She clearly doesn't want to because she doesn't like the format after using it. >> As for the second half of my comment, she hasn't mentioned >> that she doesn't have a credit card, > > I must have been too caught up in being mad > about the first one needing a credit > card number. > -- Skanky, 4 Dec 2005 That doesn't say she hasn't got a credit card. It only means that she didn't want to use it for an on-line subscription. "Thanks, but even for their free service they want my credit card info. I don't like the idea of giving that out over the net. Especially for something that's supposed to be free." Scented Nectar http://tinyurl.com/dybso From that it's certain that she does have a credit card but doesn't want to reveal her credit card info for a service advertised as free. You haven't a case, boy, and lying to the reader by writing fake quotes hasn't helped you either, I'm glad to say. Once again I have the pleasure in showing the reader what a liar you are. Thanks for that, liar suspect. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
you havent had a credit card for over 7 years because you are on
invalidity support, so why have a go at somone else? I thought you said you were leaving the group. You have said nothing in support of animal welfare over the last few months. the only reason you are here is to have a go at everyone else. Pro active; my arse |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
All you lot seem to be saying is " I,m the only vegan in the village"
without doing or saying anything veganistic. You all just seem bent on trying to trip everyone up on their grammer, interlect or moral basis. None of you have a chance to sort anything out as a whole. You should all be together instead of bitching with each other as to who is the dominant interlectual. You're all a bunch of garden fence gossipers with no objective other than to discredit each other instead of working with each other. If i visited this site in10 years time i would still see the same silly squabbles instead of any real uniform progress. Why dont you get on with the real job instead? You are all trying to outdo each other with false acedemia without making a possitive influence on the question in hand which is animal welfare. What a sorry lot you are and what is the purpose of this group except for trying to undermine each other.Get a grip and get on with the purpose of this site .You are all taking things too personal instead of getting on with what you think is important, which is a union set to discredit animal abuse,. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
S. Maizlich wrote: > usual suspect wrote: > > > Skanky wrote: > > > >>>>>> Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to > >>>>>> continue for some reason or other, > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Like you have. Repeatedly. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> What ISN'T acceptable, > >>>>>> though, is your double standard in attacking SN > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> *No* double standard -- you're comparing an apple to an orange, as > >>>>> usual. Skanky has alredy said her goodbyes but continues to post the > >>>>> same tired bullshit she always has, lingering for days on end like the > >>>>> nasty symptoms of influenza. Jon has something substantive to offer > >>>>> these groups. He also hasn't said his goodbyes, much less told > >>>>> anyone he > >>>>> intends to drag out farewells for days on end. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I dragged nothing out. > >>> > >>> > >>> You've dragged out *43 years*, Skanky. You have to create your own > >>> "atmospheres" complete with a "penis patio" (whatever the hell that is), > >>> you spend your time watching soap operas, and you smoke pot -- all > >>> feeble-minded attempts to escape your do-nothing, worthless reality. > >>> > >>> http://tinyurl.com/ataee > >>> http://tinyurl.com/blrvj > >>> http://tinyurl.com/c3ed3 > >>> > >>> One last serious question before you passively get cut off from > >>> answering: why did you change the name of your site from skunkytown to > >>> scentednectar? > >> > >> > >> Ok, one last serious answer. > > > > > > That meandering, rambling bullshit wasn't an answer. It was a waste of > > both your and my time. > > You didn't really expect anything else, did you? > > Good riddance to her skanky pimply fat pizza ass. It > was fun pounding on her, but probably not really worth > the effort; there are better forms of exercise. You *really* do live in your own little made-up world don't ya ~jonnie~? SN kicks your dwarf lard ass regularly............and you love it. You are doing everything you can to get her to stay. It's so cute. Almost like puppy love. Probably makes Scented Nectar puke at the thought though. > > > > > >> If you had > >> bothered to research further, > > > > > > Why would I have wasted even more time? I found the posts you made under > > "Skunky" and found the links to your old site. > > > >> you would > >> know that Adobe (who bought the Atmo > >> program) discontinued it. > > > > > > With good reason. Shockwave kicked its ass. Adobe went with the better > > program in their arsenal when they took over Macromedia. It's not in > > their economic interest to support antiquated software that had limited > > appeal. > > > >> They also made > >> changes to it that made some older 3d > >> chat worlds not work anymore. Now they > >> all don't work. > > > > > > That's called *progress*, dummy. There are three kinds of people: those > > who innovate, those who adapt, and those who PASSIVELY **** AROUND > > SUCKING OFF THE INGENUITY OF OTHERS AND THEN WHINE WHEN THINGS CHANEG > > AND LIFE PASSES THEM BY YET AGAIN. You're in that last group. Loser. > > > >> Skunkytown 3d was an > >> incredible piece of art > > > > > > It was bullshit. It was your diversion from living a normal, healthy, > > balanced life. > > > >> created mostly > >> by myself and a guy I know. We built a > >> fun adult world > > > > > > Rather than attempt to live and succeed in the real one. > > > >> I have a lot of great memories from > >> Skunkytown. > > > > > > I hope you have some great ones from here, too, since you've yet again > > decided to passively let others dictate your fate. Unfortunately, it > > appears you learned very little despite all the advice offered to you: > > you only changed from saying "killing animals is wrong" to "killing > > animals is mostly wrong" -- and that was a (ha!) concession to your own > > convenience and your own tastes. What you really meant with that > > meaningless change is that it's okay to kill animals to put the food YOU > > like in YOUR (pot)belly. > > > >> People were friendly and not insulting > >> the way you are. > > > > > > They were losers just like you. > > > >> My friend and me > > > > > > You illiterate ****. "My friend and I..." > > > >> In my heart it will never die. > > > > > > It's dead, Skanky. Adobe won't revive obsolete software so pot-smoking > > slackers in Toronto can avoid reality by making their own phony worlds. > > > >> I made many more worlds too which I can now > >> only visit from my hard drive with no > >> chat. > > > > > > Maybe some day you might pull your head out of your smelly old ass and > > insert it into the real world around you. Doubtful, though, given the > > fact you've kept it pretty far up there for 43 years. > > > >> I made mazes, gardens, houses, > > > > > > You wasted *all* *that* *time* ****ing around something that's been > > rendered obsolete; you didn't adapt to any changes, you didn't come away > > with anything useful and applicable to other software or to earning an > > income. You have nothing to show for your fiddling around but a hard > > drive full of your bullshit diversions to remind you that you did > > something so utterly meaningless with your life and with your time. |