Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Skanky wrote:
>> >>>Why do you keep responding to me? >> >>Why are you still here *nine* days after saying your goodbyes? >> My ISP will be discontinuing it's usenet >> in 2 weeks. I won't be turning to giganews >> or any other paid usenet service. >> -- Cheapskate Skanky, 1 Dec 05 > > Duh. You don't need 14 days to keep saying goodbye. I'm not going to continue through Google. I don't like the format. So *this is goodbye*... -- Lingering Skanky, 1 Dec 05 I don't like the format unfortunately. *This is goodbye* for now anyway. Maybe someday I'll feel like using Google and come back through there. -- Petulant Skanky, 1 Dec 05 |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Skanky wrote:
>>>Stop responding to me, you pathetic >>>moron. >>> >> >>Stop posting at all, you pathetic PASSIVE stupid >>arrested development skank. >> >>Holy ****, you have posted several dozen times since >>Dec. 01, and all but ONE of them have been useless >>blabbering about not being here any more! Just GO. > > What part of 'Stop responding to > me Nobody is under any obligation to take orders from a drug-abusing, excuse-making, carless, agoraphobic, credit card-less, hypocritical, arrested development, fantasy-prone, disgustingly passive 43 year-old "vegan wannabe" wastrel like you. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Claire's Uncle Dreck wrote:
> Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to > continue for some reason or other, Like you have. Repeatedly. > What ISN'T acceptable, > though, is your double standard in attacking SN *No* double standard -- you're comparing an apple to an orange, as usual. Skanky has alredy said her goodbyes but continues to post the same tired bullshit she always has, lingering for days on end like the nasty symptoms of influenza. Jon has something substantive to offer these groups. He also hasn't said his goodbyes, much less told anyone he intends to drag out farewells for days on end. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 14:53:50 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>Derek wrote: > >> Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to >> continue for some reason or other, > >Like you have. Repeatedly. Yes, like me. >> What ISN'T acceptable, >> though, is your double standard in attacking SN > >*No* double standard Yes, as usual, being the toady you are, instead of criticising everyone who declares they're going to leave equally, you fail to comment on Jon's declarations, and even snip them away. <restore> I had a nice long and productive break from this cesspool, and from you in particular, and I intend to make it permanent. New Year's resolutions and all that... Jonathan Ball as Jay Santos (69.3.208.57) Thu, 23 Dec 2004 http://tinyurl.com/bxrmh And then, a whole year later; [Start Jon to Derek] >>>Find something productive to do, Dreck. Swing your >>>blue foot off the couch, knock back a pint, and go out >>>in your garden for a little while and pull some weeds. >>>Read a good book, maybe. Just stop ****ing away your >>>time in usenet. [Derek] >> You're right, I should. [Jon] >But you won't. >I will. [Derek] Actually, for both our sakes, I hope we both do. Usenet is a nasty addiction we can both do without. [end] Thu, 06 Oct 2005 http://tinyurl.com/a2cj2 As you can plainly see, Jon's told us he's going to quit several times now, but instead of doing it he continues here with two or three identities at the same time, and you say nothing about it. Your double standards are appalling, 'us', but we knew that anyway. <end restore> What a double-standard playing, toadying twerp you are, usual, but who's surprised. Since your toadying began you can't even think up your own names to call your betters, so you copy *everything* from Jon, and even then you still don't do a very good job with that material. You're weak, usual, and apart from being easily led you're a moral failure as well. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Dreck Scrooge, who doesn't wish his mum a happy Christmas, wrote:
>>>Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to >>>continue for some reason or other, >> >>Like you have. Repeatedly. > > Yes, like me. Then hit the road. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:44:53 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>Derek wrote: > >>>>Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to >>>>continue for some reason or other, >>> >>>Like you have. Repeatedly. >> >> Yes, like me. > >Then hit the road. You get to tell me what to do, boy. When are you going to address your double standard, and when are you going to apologise for intentionally misquoting SN? You're a liar and a laughing stock, but you knew that anyway. >*No* double standard Yes, as usual, being the toady you are, instead of criticising everyone who declares they're going to leave equally, you fail to comment on Jon's declarations, and even snip them away. <restore> I had a nice long and productive break from this cesspool, and from you in particular, and I intend to make it permanent. New Year's resolutions and all that... Jonathan Ball as Jay Santos (69.3.208.57) Thu, 23 Dec 2004 http://tinyurl.com/bxrmh And then, a whole year later; [Start Jon to Derek] >>>Find something productive to do, Dreck. Swing your >>>blue foot off the couch, knock back a pint, and go out >>>in your garden for a little while and pull some weeds. >>>Read a good book, maybe. Just stop ****ing away your >>>time in usenet. [Derek] >> You're right, I should. [Jon] >But you won't. >I will. [Derek] Actually, for both our sakes, I hope we both do. Usenet is a nasty addiction we can both do without. [end] Thu, 06 Oct 2005 http://tinyurl.com/a2cj2 As you can plainly see, Jon's told us he's going to quit several times now, but instead of doing it he continues here with two or three identities at the same time, and you say nothing about it. Your double standards are appalling, 'us', but we knew that anyway. <end restore> What a double-standard playing, toadying twerp you are, usual, but who's surprised. Since your toadying began you can't even think up your own names to call your betters, so you copy *everything* from Jon, and even then you still don't do a very good job with that material. You're weak, usual, and apart from being easily led you're a moral failure as well. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Dreck wrote:
>>>>>Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to >>>>>continue for some reason or other, >>>> >>>>Like you have. Repeatedly. >>> >>>Yes, like me. >> >>Then hit the road. > > You get to tell me what to do I know. Now get gone, tubby. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:10:29 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>Derek wrote: > >>>>>>Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to >>>>>>continue for some reason or other, >>>>> >>>>>Like you have. Repeatedly. >>>> >>>>Yes, like me. >>> >>>Then hit the road. >> >> You get to tell me what to do > >I know. Exactly, so when are you going to apologise for intentionally misquoting SN, liar, and when are you going to apologise for your obvious double standard and tampering with others' quotes? Admit it; you're just a talentless troll since becoming Jon's toady. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
"usual suspect" > wrote in message
... > Skanky wrote: > >>>Stop responding to me, you pathetic > >>>moron. > >>> > >> > >>Stop posting at all, you pathetic PASSIVE stupid > >>arrested development skank. > >> > >>Holy ****, you have posted several dozen times since > >>Dec. 01, and all but ONE of them have been useless > >>blabbering about not being here any more! Just GO. > > > > What part of 'Stop responding to > > me > > Nobody is under any obligation to take orders from a drug-abusing, > excuse-making, carless, agoraphobic, credit card-less, hypocritical, > arrested development, fantasy-prone, disgustingly passive 43 year-old > "vegan wannabe" wastrel like you. Whoa, take a pill Useless. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
"usual suspect" > wrote in message
... > Skanky wrote: > > Stop responding to me > > Nobody is under any obligation to take orders from a drug-abusing, > excuse-making, carless, agoraphobic, credit card-less, hypocritical, > arrested development, fantasy-prone, disgustingly passive 43 year-old > "vegan wannabe" wastrel like you. Grow up, little boy (with the make believe girlfriend). I heard that you pour wine on your hand at the bar. Why? You're trying to get your date drunk! -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
"usual suspect" > wrote in message
... > Skanky wrote: > > Stop responding to me > > Nobody is under any obligation to take orders from a drug-abusing, > excuse-making, carless, agoraphobic, credit card-less, hypocritical, > arrested development, fantasy-prone, disgustingly passive 43 year-old > "vegan wannabe" wastrel like you. Have you repeated yourself enough yet, Liar Useless? -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
"usual suspect" > wrote in message
news > Skanky wrote: > >> > >>>Why do you keep responding to me? > >> > >>Why are you still here *nine* days after saying your goodbyes? > >> My ISP will be discontinuing it's usenet > >> in 2 weeks. I won't be turning to giganews > >> or any other paid usenet service. > >> -- Cheapskate Skanky, 1 Dec 05 > > > > Duh. > > You don't need 14 days to keep saying goodbye. > > I'm not going to continue through > Google. I don't like the format. So > *this is goodbye*... > -- Lingering Skanky, 1 Dec 05 > > I don't like the format > unfortunately. *This is goodbye* > for now anyway. Maybe someday > I'll feel like using Google and come > back through there. > -- Petulant Skanky, 1 Dec 05 Then why are you perpetuating this terrible evil by responding to me? -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
"usual suspect" > wrote in message
... > Claire's Uncle Dreck wrote: > > Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to > > continue for some reason or other, > > Like you have. Repeatedly. > > > What ISN'T acceptable, > > though, is your double standard in attacking SN > > *No* double standard -- you're comparing an apple to an orange, as > usual. Skanky has alredy said her goodbyes but continues to post the > same tired bullshit she always has, lingering for days on end like the > nasty symptoms of influenza. Jon has something substantive to offer > these groups. He also hasn't said his goodbyes, much less told anyone he > intends to drag out farewells for days on end. I dragged nothing out. I openly said that it would be in 2 weeks. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Scented Nectar wrote: > "usual suspect" > wrote in message > ... > > Claire's Uncle Dreck wrote: > > > Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to > > > continue for some reason or other, > > > > Like you have. Repeatedly. > > > > > What ISN'T acceptable, > > > though, is your double standard in attacking SN > > > > *No* double standard -- you're comparing an apple to an orange, as > > usual. Skanky has alredy said her goodbyes but continues to post the > > same tired bullshit she always has, lingering for days on end like the > > nasty symptoms of influenza. Jon has something substantive to offer > > these groups. He also hasn't said his goodbyes, much less told anyone he > > intends to drag out farewells for days on end. > > I dragged nothing out. I openly said > that it would be in 2 weeks. Neither Goober nor Useless can tell time. It's all a hazy blur to them. > > > -- > SN > http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
usual suspect wrote: > Claire's Uncle Dreck wrote: > > Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to > > continue for some reason or other, > > Like you have. Repeatedly. > > > What ISN'T acceptable, > > though, is your double standard in attacking SN > > *No* double standard -- you're comparing an apple to an orange, as > usual. Skanky has alredy said her goodbyes but continues to post the > same tired bullshit she always has, lingering for days on end like the > nasty symptoms of influenza. Jon has something substantive to offer BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! the only thing Jon offers *you* (and vice versa) is a wet, warm mouth to poke. > these groups. He also hasn't said his goodbyes, much less told anyone he > intends to drag out farewells for days on end. Just as well as he tells enough lies as it is. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
> wrote in message
ups.com.gnresend... > > Scented Nectar wrote: > > "usual suspect" > wrote in message > > ... > > > Claire's Uncle Dreck wrote: > > > > Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to > > > > continue for some reason or other, > > > > > > Like you have. Repeatedly. > > > > > > > What ISN'T acceptable, > > > > though, is your double standard in attacking SN > > > > > > *No* double standard -- you're comparing an apple to an orange, as > > > usual. Skanky has alredy said her goodbyes but continues to post the > > > same tired bullshit she always has, lingering for days on end like the > > > nasty symptoms of influenza. Jon has something substantive to offer > > > these groups. He also hasn't said his goodbyes, much less told anyone he > > > intends to drag out farewells for days on end. > > > > I dragged nothing out. I openly said > > that it would be in 2 weeks. > > > > > Neither Goober nor Useless can tell time. It's all a hazy blur to them. And 14 days is more than the fingers on both hands. I should have realized it would be a challenge for them. > > > > > > -- > > SN > > http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ > |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Scented Nectar wrote:
> > wrote in message > ups.com.gnresend... > >>Scented Nectar wrote: >> >>>"usual suspect" > wrote in message . .. >>> >>>>Claire's Uncle Dreck wrote: >>>> >>>>>Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to >>>>>continue for some reason or other, >>>> >>>>Like you have. Repeatedly. >>>> >>>> >>>>>What ISN'T acceptable, >>>>>though, is your double standard in attacking SN >>>> >>>>*No* double standard -- you're comparing an apple to an orange, as >>>>usual. Skanky has alredy said her goodbyes but continues to post the >>>>same tired bullshit she always has, lingering for days on end like the >>>>nasty symptoms of influenza. Jon has something substantive to offer >>>>these groups. He also hasn't said his goodbyes, much less told anyone > > he > >>>>intends to drag out farewells for days on end. >>> >>>I dragged nothing out. I openly said >>>that it would be in 2 weeks. >> >> >> >> >>Neither Goober nor Useless can tell time. It's all a hazy blur to them. > > > And 14 Shut the **** up and get out now. You haven't said a single substantive thing in months anyway, and you're not taking advantage of your remaining time to do so. Shut up and get out. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
"S. Maizlich" > wrote in message
ink.net... > Scented Nectar wrote: > > > > wrote in message > > ups.com.gnresend... > > > >>Scented Nectar wrote: > >> > >>>"usual suspect" > wrote in message > . .. > >>> > >>>>Claire's Uncle Dreck wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to > >>>>>continue for some reason or other, > >>>> > >>>>Like you have. Repeatedly. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>What ISN'T acceptable, > >>>>>though, is your double standard in attacking SN > >>>> > >>>>*No* double standard -- you're comparing an apple to an orange, as > >>>>usual. Skanky has alredy said her goodbyes but continues to post the > >>>>same tired bullshit she always has, lingering for days on end like the > >>>>nasty symptoms of influenza. Jon has something substantive to offer > >>>>these groups. He also hasn't said his goodbyes, much less told anyone > > > > he > > > >>>>intends to drag out farewells for days on end. > >>> > >>>I dragged nothing out. I openly said > >>>that it would be in 2 weeks. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>Neither Goober nor Useless can tell time. It's all a hazy blur to them. > > > > > > And 14 > > Shut the **** up and get out now. You haven't said a > single substantive thing in months anyway, and you're > not taking advantage of your remaining time to do so. > Shut up and get out. Aw shucks, you're already missing me! You're stuck with me for another day bozo. Ptthht. Now go do something productive like standing in the middle of a busy highway. Squashed Gooby alert. _______________________ Recipe 1 squashed Gooby (it's ok, he's a vegetable!) 1 onion 1 dash Cajun seasoning. Stir fry until done. Now throw it out because Gooby has bad taste. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Scented Nectar wrote:
> "S. Maizlich" > wrote in message > ink.net... > >>Scented Nectar wrote: >> >> > wrote in message groups.com.gnresend... >>> >>> >>>>Scented Nectar wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>"usual suspect" > wrote in message m... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Claire's Uncle Dreck wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to >>>>>>>continue for some reason or other, >>>>>> >>>>>>Like you have. Repeatedly. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>What ISN'T acceptable, >>>>>>>though, is your double standard in attacking SN >>>>>> >>>>>>*No* double standard -- you're comparing an apple to an orange, as >>>>>>usual. Skanky has alredy said her goodbyes but continues to post the >>>>>>same tired bullshit she always has, lingering for days on end like the >>>>>>nasty symptoms of influenza. Jon has something substantive to offer >>>>>>these groups. He also hasn't said his goodbyes, much less told anyone >>> >>>he >>> >>> >>>>>>intends to drag out farewells for days on end. >>>>> >>>>>I dragged nothing out. I openly said >>>>>that it would be in 2 weeks. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Neither Goober nor Useless can tell time. It's all a hazy blur to them. >>> >>> >>>And 14 >> >>Shut the **** up and get out now. You haven't said a >>single substantive thing in months anyway, and you're >>not taking advantage of your remaining time to do so. >>Shut up and get out. > > > Aw Shut the **** up and get out. JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
"S. Maizlich" > wrote in message
ink.net... > Scented Nectar wrote: > > > "S. Maizlich" > wrote in message > > ink.net... > > > >>Scented Nectar wrote: > >> > >> > > wrote in message > groups.com.gnresend... > >>> > >>> > >>>>Scented Nectar wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>"usual suspect" > wrote in message > m... > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>Claire's Uncle Dreck wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to > >>>>>>>continue for some reason or other, > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Like you have. Repeatedly. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>What ISN'T acceptable, > >>>>>>>though, is your double standard in attacking SN > >>>>>> > >>>>>>*No* double standard -- you're comparing an apple to an orange, as > >>>>>>usual. Skanky has alredy said her goodbyes but continues to post the > >>>>>>same tired bullshit she always has, lingering for days on end like the > >>>>>>nasty symptoms of influenza. Jon has something substantive to offer > >>>>>>these groups. He also hasn't said his goodbyes, much less told anyone > >>> > >>>he > >>> > >>> > >>>>>>intends to drag out farewells for days on end. > >>>>> > >>>>>I dragged nothing out. I openly said > >>>>>that it would be in 2 weeks. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>Neither Goober nor Useless can tell time. It's all a hazy blur to them. > >>> > >>> > >>>And 14 > >> > >>Shut the **** up and get out now. You haven't said a > >>single substantive thing in months anyway, and you're > >>not taking advantage of your remaining time to do so. > >>Shut up and get out. > > > > > > Aw > > Shut the **** up and get out. JUST ONCE in your life, > be pro-active. Now, now, behave yourself Gooby. Wipe the froth from your mouth, or whatever that is. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:11:33 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote:
> >JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use her credit card to pay for a yearly subscription if she really wanted to. That established, contrary to what you're trying to make the reader believe, her decision to leave these groups is entirely her own and pro-active. If those like yourself against the proposition of veganism were more able to argue their case in rem rather than against the person, she might find a good reason to continue. As things are with the antis' total focus on the person rather than the principle they hold, vegetarians aren't being challenged enough to hang around here for very long. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Scented Nectar wrote:
> "S. Maizlich" > wrote in message > ink.net... > >>Scented Nectar wrote: >> >> >>>"S. Maizlich" > wrote in message thlink.net... >>> >>> >>>>Scented Nectar wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> > wrote in message legroups.com.gnresend... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Scented Nectar wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>"usual suspect" > wrote in message . com... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Claire's Uncle Dreck wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to >>>>>>>>>continue for some reason or other, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Like you have. Repeatedly. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>What ISN'T acceptable, >>>>>>>>>though, is your double standard in attacking SN >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>*No* double standard -- you're comparing an apple to an orange, as >>>>>>>>usual. Skanky has alredy said her goodbyes but continues to post the >>>>>>>>same tired bullshit she always has, lingering for days on end like > > the > >>>>>>>>nasty symptoms of influenza. Jon has something substantive to offer >>>>>>>>these groups. He also hasn't said his goodbyes, much less told > > anyone > >>>>>he >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>intends to drag out farewells for days on end. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I dragged nothing out. I openly said >>>>>>>that it would be in 2 weeks. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Neither Goober nor Useless can tell time. It's all a hazy blur to > > them. > >>>>> >>>>>And 14 >>>> >>>>Shut the **** up and get out now. You haven't said a >>>>single substantive thing in months anyway, and you're >>>>not taking advantage of your remaining time to do so. >>>>Shut up and get out. >>> >>> >>>Aw >> >>Shut the **** up and get out. JUST ONCE in your life, >>be pro-active. > > > Now, now Yes, NOW: get the **** out NOW, you stupid parasite. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Derek wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:11:33 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: > >>JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. > > > She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use > her credit card to pay for a yearly subscription if she > really wanted to. That established, contrary to what you're > trying to make the reader believe, her decision to leave > these groups is entirely her own and pro-active. Absolutely not. If her ISP weren't dropping usenet as one of their product offerings, she's keep her fat squishy ass right here posting her bullshit non-contributing blather just as she has for the last year. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Derek wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:11:33 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: > >>JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. > > > She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use > her credit card Oh, and I forgot to add: she doesn't have a credit card. She doesn't have a car, either, and apparently doesn't have a job that pays well enough to get some $10 per month el cheapo internet ISP that *does* offer usenet. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:00:39 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote:
>Derek wrote: >> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:11:33 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: >> >>>JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. >> >> She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use >> her credit card to pay for a yearly subscription if she >> really wanted to. That established, contrary to what you're >> trying to make the reader believe, her decision to leave >> these groups is entirely her own and pro-active. > >Absolutely not. If her ISP weren't dropping usenet as >one of their product offerings, she's keep her fat >squishy ass right here posting her bullshit >non-contributing blather just as she has for the last year. Denial of the antecedent; 1) If SN's ISP keeps their usenet service, then SN will continue posting. 2) SN's ISP is dropping its usenet service therefore 3) SN will not continue posting Any opposition worth his salt would be able to keep the vegetarians engaged here with reasoned debate they couldn't resist following up on, but it's obviously clear to all that you're too lazy for that and prefer to attack them personally rather than deal with the propositions they put forward. It's your loss. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Derek wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:00:39 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: > >>Derek wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:11:33 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: >>> >>> >>>>JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. >>> >>>She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use >>>her credit card to pay for a yearly subscription if she >>>really wanted to. That established, contrary to what you're >>>trying to make the reader believe, her decision to leave >>>these groups is entirely her own and pro-active. >> >>Absolutely not. If her ISP weren't dropping usenet as >>one of their product offerings, she's keep her fat >>squishy ass right here posting her bullshit >>non-contributing blather just as she has for the last year. > > > Denial of the antecedent; Oh, give this shit up. It's just crap. She is ONLY leaving because her bargain-basement ISP is dropping usenet, *and* because she is TOO ****ING LAZY to switch to a new ISP. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:01:48 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote:
>Derek wrote: >> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:11:33 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: >> >>>JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. >> >> >> She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use >> her credit card > >Oh, and I forgot to add: she doesn't have a credit >card. Says you and your toady, but I believe what she has to say about that. Your toady's intentional misquoting her didn't help your case much, either, and only leaves me to believe you're both lying about her. >She doesn't have a car, either, Irrelevant, even if true, but I doubt that it is. >and apparently >doesn't have a job that pays well enough to get some >$10 per month el cheapo internet ISP that *does* offer >usenet. No, that's not apparent at all, either. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
"S. Maizlich" > wrote in message
nk.net... > Derek wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:11:33 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: > > > >>JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. > > > > > > She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use > > her credit card > > Oh, and I forgot to add: she doesn't have a credit > card. She doesn't have a car, either, and apparently > doesn't have a job that pays well enough to get some > $10 per month el cheapo internet ISP that *does* offer > usenet. Hmm, major fishing trip re cards, cars, and income. Ask yourself this. Why would I switch from the fastest broadband service in my area to el cheapo slow ISP? As fun as these groups have been, it's not worth buying a phone modem and an additional ISP just for usenet. How come you're not standing in the middle of the highway as I told you to? Get back there now! -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:28:20 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote:
>Derek wrote: >> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:00:39 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: >>>Derek wrote: >>>>On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:11:33 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: >>>> >>>>>JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. >>>> >>>>She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use >>>>her credit card to pay for a yearly subscription if she >>>>really wanted to. That established, contrary to what you're >>>>trying to make the reader believe, her decision to leave >>>>these groups is entirely her own and pro-active. >>> >>>Absolutely not. If her ISP weren't dropping usenet as >>>one of their product offerings, she's keep her fat >>>squishy ass right here posting her bullshit >>>non-contributing blather just as she has for the last year. >> >> Denial of the antecedent; > >Oh, give this shit up. It's just crap. It shows that your reasoning is specious. There may be other reasons behind her decision to not continue here rather than her ISP's decision to end its Usenet service. >She is ONLY leaving because her bargain-basement ISP is >dropping usenet, *and* because she is TOO ****ING LAZY >to switch to a new ISP. Ipse dixit and false, even after moving the goal posts by including another possible reason. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Scented Nectar wrote:
> "S. Maizlich" > wrote in message > nk.net... > >>Derek wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:11:33 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > > > wrote: > >>>>JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. >>> >>> >>>She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use >>>her credit card >> >>Oh, and I forgot to add: she doesn't have a credit >>card. She doesn't have a car, either, and apparently >>doesn't have a job that pays well enough to get some >>$10 per month el cheapo internet ISP that *does* offer >>usenet. > > > Hmm, major fishing trip No fishing; established fact. You're a low-end deadbeat. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Derek wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:28:20 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: > >>Derek wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:00:39 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: >>> >>>>Derek wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:11:33 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. >>>>> >>>>>She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use >>>>>her credit card to pay for a yearly subscription if she >>>>>really wanted to. That established, contrary to what you're >>>>>trying to make the reader believe, her decision to leave >>>>>these groups is entirely her own and pro-active. >>>> >>>>Absolutely not. If her ISP weren't dropping usenet as >>>>one of their product offerings, she's keep her fat >>>>squishy ass right here posting her bullshit >>>>non-contributing blather just as she has for the last year. >>> >>>Denial of the antecedent; >> >>Oh, give this shit up. It's just crap. > > > It shows It shows that you're a pompous ass with a grotesquely inflated sense of your intellect. > >>She is ONLY leaving because her bargain-basement ISP is >>dropping usenet, *and* because she is TOO ****ING LAZY >>to switch to a new ISP. > > > Ipse dixit and false, Established truth. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:44:39 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote:
>Derek wrote: >> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:28:20 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: >> >>>Derek wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:00:39 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: >>>> >>>>>Derek wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:11:33 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. >>>>>> >>>>>>She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use >>>>>>her credit card to pay for a yearly subscription if she >>>>>>really wanted to. That established, contrary to what you're >>>>>>trying to make the reader believe, her decision to leave >>>>>>these groups is entirely her own and pro-active. >>>>> >>>>>Absolutely not. If her ISP weren't dropping usenet as >>>>>one of their product offerings, she's keep her fat >>>>>squishy ass right here posting her bullshit >>>>>non-contributing blather just as she has for the last year. >>>> >>>>Denial of the antecedent; >>> >>>Oh, give this shit up. It's just crap. >> >> >> It shows > >It shows that you're a pompous ass with a grotesquely >inflated sense of your intellect. Your argument is a conditional 'if, then' proposition; 1) If SN's ISP keeps their usenet service, then SN will continue posting. "*If* her ISP weren't dropping usenet as one of their product offerings, [*then*]she'd keep [] posting []." The minor premise (2) is a true premise that denies the antecedent of the major premise (1); 2) SN's ISP is dropping its usenet service The conclusion (3) is the conclusion you've drawn from (1) and (2) speciously by denying the antecedent; therefore 3) SN will not continue posting If showing you your errors in thinking appears pompous to you, it might be from a sense of embarrassment. Spotting bad arguments should be second nature to you by now, especially when you see a conclusion drawn from an 'if, then' conditional proposition. There's nothing pompous about identifying and tackling them in the proper way. You're in the wrong place if you think there is. >>>She is ONLY leaving because her bargain-basement ISP is >>>dropping usenet, *and* because she is TOO ****ING LAZY >>>to switch to a new ISP. >> >> Ipse dixit and false, > >Established truth. Then show where if you can. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Derek wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:44:39 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: > > >Derek wrote: > >> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:28:20 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: > >> > >>>Derek wrote: > >>> > >>>>On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:00:39 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>Derek wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:11:33 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use > >>>>>>her credit card to pay for a yearly subscription if she > >>>>>>really wanted to. That established, contrary to what you're > >>>>>>trying to make the reader believe, her decision to leave > >>>>>>these groups is entirely her own and pro-active. > >>>>> > >>>>>Absolutely not. If her ISP weren't dropping usenet as > >>>>>one of their product offerings, she's keep her fat > >>>>>squishy ass right here posting her bullshit > >>>>>non-contributing blather just as she has for the last year. > >>>> > >>>>Denial of the antecedent; > >>> > >>>Oh, give this shit up. It's just crap. > >> > >> > >> It shows > > > >It shows that you're a pompous ass with a grotesquely > >inflated sense of your intellect. > > Your argument Skanky is only leaving because her bottom-feeding ISP is dropping usenet access. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
"Derek" > wrote > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:01:48 GMT, "S. Maizlich" > > wrote: >>Derek wrote: >>> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:11:33 GMT, "S. Maizlich" >>> > wrote: >>> >>>>JUST ONCE in your life, be pro-active. >>> >>> >>> She knows how to use Google groups, and she could use >>> her credit card >> >>Oh, and I forgot to add: she doesn't have a credit >>card. > > Says you and your toady, but I believe what she has to > say about that. Your toady's intentional misquoting her > didn't help your case much, either, and only leaves me > to believe you're both lying about her. > >>She doesn't have a car, either, > > Irrelevant, even if true, but I doubt that it is. > >>and apparently >>doesn't have a job that pays well enough to get some >>$10 per month el cheapo internet ISP that *does* offer >>usenet. > > No, that's not apparent at all, either. Supernews is $4.95 a month, the cost of one large latté at Starbucks. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:22:10 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
[..] >Supernews is $4.95 a month, the cost of one large latté at Starbucks. 'news.individual.net' is a lot less than that if you're only interested in the non-binary groups. "Effective from April 1st, 2005, use of News.Individual.NET is not free of charge anymore. The news service continues as a fee-based service. The fee for an account for News.Individual.NET is 10 EUR per year (annual payment), that converts to only 0.84 EUR per month.] http://news.individual.net/ That's unbeatable, and the service is faster than Ali in his prime. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Dreck wrote:
>>>>>>>Many of us declare we're leaving and then decide to >>>>>>>continue for some reason or other, >>>>>> >>>>>>Like you have. Repeatedly. >>>>> >>>>>Yes, like me. >>>> >>>>Then hit the road. >>> >>>You get to tell me what to do >> >>I know. > > Exactly I told you what to do: hit the road. Now do it, lard ass. Wear comfy shoes so your blue foot doesn't cause you extreme discomfort when you waddle. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Skanky wrote:
>>>>>Stop responding to me, you pathetic >>>>>moron. >>>>> >>>> >>>>Stop posting at all, you pathetic PASSIVE stupid >>>>arrested development skank. >>>> >>>>Holy ****, you have posted several dozen times since >>>>Dec. 01, and all but ONE of them have been useless >>>>blabbering about not being here any more! Just GO. >>> >>>What part of 'Stop responding to >>>me >> >>Nobody is under any obligation to take orders from a drug-abusing, >>excuse-making, carless, agoraphobic, credit card-less, hypocritical, >>arrested development, fantasy-prone, disgustingly passive 43 year-old >>"vegan wannabe" wastrel like you. > > Whoa No, just go. Now. Your time is up. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Skanky wrote:
>>>Stop responding to me >> >>Nobody is under any obligation to take orders from a drug-abusing, >>excuse-making, carless, agoraphobic, credit card-less, hypocritical, >>arrested development, fantasy-prone, disgustingly passive 43 year-old >>"vegan wannabe" wastrel like you. > > Grow up Pretty rich coming from someone who has to create her own "atmospheres," complete with a "penis patio" (whatever the hell that is), who spends her time watching soap operas, and who smokes pot -- all feeble-minded attempts to escape your do-nothing, worthless reality. http://tinyurl.com/ataee http://tinyurl.com/blrvj http://tinyurl.com/c3ed3 |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Skanky wrote:
>>>Stop responding to me >> >>Nobody is under any obligation to take orders from a drug-abusing, >>excuse-making, carless, agoraphobic, credit card-less, hypocritical, >>arrested development, fantasy-prone, disgustingly passive 43 year-old >>"vegan wannabe" wastrel like you. > > > Have you repeated Not nearly as many times as you have, whether it's "killing animals is wrong" or your petulant "I'm the boss of me" bullshit or even this protracted two weeks of saying goodbye. Just **** off. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|||
|
|||
test
Skanky wrote:
>>>>>Why do you keep responding to me? >>>> >>>>Why are you still here *nine* days after saying your goodbyes? >>>> My ISP will be discontinuing it's usenet >>>> in 2 weeks. I won't be turning to giganews >>>> or any other paid usenet service. >>>> -- Cheapskate Skanky, 1 Dec 05 >>> >>>Duh. >> >>You don't need 14 days to keep saying goodbye. >> >>I'm not going to continue through >>Google. I don't like the format. So >>*this is goodbye*... >>-- Lingering Skanky, 1 Dec 05 >> >>I don't like the format >>unfortunately. *This is goodbye* >>for now anyway. Maybe someday >>I'll feel like using Google and come >>back through there. >>-- Petulant Skanky, 1 Dec 05 > > > Then why You have to create your own "atmospheres," complete with a "penis patio" (whatever the hell that is), you spend your time watching soap operas, and you smokes pot -- all feeble-minded attempts to escape your do-nothing, worthless reality. http://tinyurl.com/ataee http://tinyurl.com/blrvj http://tinyurl.com/c3ed3 You said your goodbyes on 1 December. Get gone already. |