Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,misc.rural,sci.agriculture
|
|||
|
|||
Life per se is not a benefit
****wit David Harrison lied, as usual:
> On 1 Dec 2005, Leif Erikson wrote: > > >>****wit David Harrison lied, as usual: > > >>> I found these quotes of YOURS which explain exactly how >>>YOU/"ARAs" want everyone to think about raising animals >>>for food: >> >>They don't show any such thing, ****wit. > > > Which of these things that They don't show how I "want" pepole to think about animals. |
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,misc.rural,sci.agriculture
|
|||
|
|||
Life per se is not a benefit
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005, Goo wept:
>Mr Harrison asked: > >> On 1 Dec 2005, Leif Erikson wrote: >> >> >>>Mr Harrison explained: >> >> >>>> I found these quotes of YOURS which explain exactly how >>>>YOU/"ARAs" want everyone to think about raising animals >>>>for food: >>> >>>They don't show any such thing, ****wit. >> >> >> Which of these things that > >They don't show how I "want" pepole to think about animals. Which of your statements do you disagree with Goo? |
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,misc.rural,sci.agriculture
|
|||
|
|||
Life per se is not a benefit
****wit David Harrison lied:
> On Sun, 04 Dec 2005, Rudy Canoza wrote: > > >>****wit David Harrison lied: >> >> >>>On 1 Dec 2005, Leif Erikson wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>****wit David Harrison lied: >>> >>> >>>>> I found these quotes of YOURS which explain exactly how >>>>>YOU/"ARAs" want everyone to think about raising animals >>>>>for food: >>>> >>>>They don't show any such thing, ****wit. >>> >>> >>> Which of these things that >> >>They don't show how I "want" people to think about animals. > > > Which of your statements NONE of my statements show how I "want" people to think about animals, ****wit. Why are you so particularly obsessed that *livestock* animals live as opposed to just "animals", ****wit? Answer the question. |
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,misc.rural,sci.agriculture
|
|||
|
|||
Life per se does not have a positive value
of course dipshit we don't give a **** about the lack of quality and verve
in your life. other than the pillow soaking and the long hours in the bathroom, squealing the plumbing with the dog. "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message ... > Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest cracker in existence - lied and > presented no challenge: >> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 20:27:48 GMT, Leif Erikson > wrote: >> >>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest cracker in existence - lied and >>> presented no challenge: >> >>>> You may truly be too stupid to understand >>> I understand it fully. You are posing a false choice. The choice is not >>> "decent lives for farm animals" vs "no life". >> >> In the case of farm animals who have decent lives, it is >> that or no life. > > NO, Goo. That is not the choice. There are *two* choices, you stupid > ****ing shit-4-braincell cracker. First is the choice of existence or > not. IF, and only if, the animals exist, then there is a choice of > "decent lives" or not. The phony choice you try to present is bullshit, > Goo. > > Of course, Goo, you don't give a **** about the quality of lives for farm > animals. All you care about is the products that can be obtained from > them. |
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,misc.rural,sci.agriculture
|
|||
|
|||
Life per se does not have a positive value
veganagev wrote:
> of course dipshit we don't give a **** about the lack of quality and verve > in your life. Of course, you shit-4-braincell "vegan" ****nozzle, we don't give a **** about any ****ing thing you have to say. Stick a broken bottle up your gaping HIV-oozing shitter, you goddamned limp-wristed "vegan" faggot. > other than the pillow soaking and the long hours in the bathroom, squealing > the plumbing with the dog. > > > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message > ... >> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest cracker in existence - lied and >> presented no challenge: >>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 20:27:48 GMT, Leif Erikson > wrote: >>> >>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest cracker in existence - lied and >>>> presented no challenge: >>>>> You may truly be too stupid to understand >>>> I understand it fully. You are posing a false choice. The choice is not >>>> "decent lives for farm animals" vs "no life". >>> In the case of farm animals who have decent lives, it is >>> that or no life. >> NO, Goo. That is not the choice. There are *two* choices, you stupid >> ****ing shit-4-braincell cracker. First is the choice of existence or >> not. IF, and only if, the animals exist, then there is a choice of >> "decent lives" or not. The phony choice you try to present is bullshit, >> Goo. >> >> Of course, Goo, you don't give a **** about the quality of lives for farm >> animals. All you care about is the products that can be obtained from >> them. > > |
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,misc.rural,sci.agriculture
|
|||
|
|||
Life per se does not have a positive value
so you have a bottle fetish?
and a faggot interest? figures since you're that dumbass laura. "Ron Hamilton" > wrote in message m... > veganagev wrote: >> of course dipshit we don't give a **** about the lack of quality and >> verve in your life. > > Of course, you shit-4-braincell "vegan" ****nozzle, we don't give a **** > about any ****ing thing you have to say. Stick a broken bottle up your > gaping HIV-oozing shitter, you goddamned limp-wristed "vegan" faggot. > > >> other than the pillow soaking and the long hours in the bathroom, >> squealing the plumbing with the dog. >> >> >> >> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message >> ... >>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest cracker in existence - lied and >>> presented no challenge: >>>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 20:27:48 GMT, Leif Erikson > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupidest cracker in existence - lied >>>>> and presented no challenge: >>>>>> You may truly be too stupid to understand >>>>> I understand it fully. You are posing a false choice. The choice is >>>>> not "decent lives for farm animals" vs "no life". >>>> In the case of farm animals who have decent lives, it is >>>> that or no life. >>> NO, Goo. That is not the choice. There are *two* choices, you stupid >>> ****ing shit-4-braincell cracker. First is the choice of existence or >>> not. IF, and only if, the animals exist, then there is a choice of >>> "decent lives" or not. The phony choice you try to present is bullshit, >>> Goo. >>> >>> Of course, Goo, you don't give a **** about the quality of lives for >>> farm animals. All you care about is the products that can be obtained >>> from them. >> |
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,misc.rural,sci.agriculture
|
|||
|
|||
Life per se does not have a positive value
veganagev wrote:
> I like to stick foreign objects up my rectum. That's nice. Keep it to yourself, shitbag. |
Posted to alt.food.vegan
|
|||
|
|||
Life per se does not have a positive value
listen sweetypie..... if protecting her i mean "her" means you may
"get some" i highly doubt that. besides you must have something to "give" first of all. next time... do what your mother was to inbred to do... use a clothes hanger. "Ron Hamilton" > wrote in message m... > veganagev wrote: >> I like to stick foreign objects up my rectum. > > That's nice. Keep it to yourself, shitbag. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Life can have positive value | Vegan | |||
Life can have positive value | Vegan | |||
Life can have positive value | Vegan | |||
Article: Soy: Positive: Men do not need to be scared of soy | Vegan | |||
Article: Soy: Positive: Men do not need to be scared of soy | Vegan |