There are no true vegans
If you think your a true vegan, your just fooling yourself. Someone will
always slip some animal products in your food when your not looking. If you travel from California to New York, you better not stop at any restaurants or else they are true vegan restaurants and they are few and far between. If someone puts a little milk in your mash potatoes, are you going to have a break-down? |
There are no true vegans
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:05:33 -0700, "Richard Miller" > wrote: >If you think your a true vegan, your just fooling yourself. Someone will >always slip some animal products in your food when your not looking. Unfortynately you seem to read all the false hype that presume non-consumers of animal products aren't very mindful of their food intake. In fact it's quite the opposite. It's a daily learning and rewarding experiencefinding out where junk of all types might be getting into one's food. Unlike how you may be stuffing your face full of whatever's dumped if front of you-harmful or healthy -as long as it's tasty, vegans and vegetarians know what's a no-no generally and how to balance their diet, and hopefully they add this with daily energetic activity if possible. >travel from California to New York, you better not stop at any restaurants >or else they are true vegan restaurants and they are few and far between. Fruits, vegetables, nuts .... sandwiches - no need to rely on restaurants >someone puts a little milk in your mash potatoes, are you going to have a >break-down? > Regarding 'break-down' quip... hardly,-more like 'oops' - along with a precaution to try avoid and the situation in the future if possible,... ie, ask if milk was put in the mash-potatoes/or request it not be put in your portion.... it's not that hard-but you make it out to be an Odyssey. |
There are no true vegans
"Joe" > wrote in message ... > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:05:33 -0700, "Richard Miller" > > wrote: > >>If you think your a true vegan, your just fooling yourself. >>Someone will >>always slip some animal products in your food when your not >>looking. > Unfortynately you seem to read all the false hype that presume > non-consumers of animal products aren't very mindful of their > food > intake. ========================= The problem for you fool is that you ARE consuming animals, even if they are not on your plate. They suffer and die by the millions, and you don't even bat an eye, killer. In fact it's quite the opposite. It's a daily learning and > rewarding experiencefinding out where junk of all types might > be > getting into one's food. Unlike how you may be stuffing your > face full > of whatever's dumped if front of you-harmful or healthy -as > long as > it's tasty, vegans and vegetarians know what's a no-no > generally and > how to balance their diet, and hopefully they add this with > daily > energetic activity if possible. > >>travel from California to New York, you better not stop at any >>restaurants >>or else they are true vegan restaurants and they are few and >>far between. > > Fruits, vegetables, nuts .... sandwiches - no need to rely on > restaurants >>someone puts a little milk in your mash potatoes, are you going >>to have a >>break-down? >> > Regarding 'break-down' quip... hardly,-more like 'oops' - along > with a > precaution to try avoid and the situation in the future if > possible,... ie, ask if milk was put in the mash-potatoes/or > request > it not be put in your portion.... it's not that hard-but you > make it > out to be an Odyssey. |
There are no true vegans
Joe wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:05:33 -0700, "Richard Miller" > > wrote: > > >>If you think your a true vegan, your just fooling yourself. Someone will >>always slip some animal products in your food when your not looking. > > Unfortynately you seem to read all the false hype that presume > non-consumers of animal products aren't very mindful of their food > intake. In fact it's quite the opposite. It's a daily learning and > rewarding experiencefinding out where junk of all types might be > getting into one's food. Unlike how you may be stuffing your face full > of whatever's dumped if front of you-harmful or healthy -as long as > it's tasty, vegans and vegetarians know what's a no-no generally and > how to balance their diet, and hopefully they add this with daily > energetic activity if possible. > > >>travel from California to New York, you better not stop at any restaurants >>or else they are true vegan restaurants and they are few and far between. > > > Fruits, vegetables, nuts .... sandwiches - no need to rely on > restaurants > >>someone puts a little milk in your mash potatoes, are you going to have a >>break-down? >> > > Regarding 'break-down' quip... hardly,-more like 'oops' - along with a > precaution to try avoid and the situation in the future if > possible,... ie, ask if milk was put in the mash-potatoes/or request > it not be put in your portion.... it's not that hard-but you make it > out to be an Odyssey. We have a vegan resturant near me. And I make most of my wn food. Finally we have chincese and indian esturantnt that are wonwed by vegetarian, they server meat dishes but they are careful to mark the vegetarian dishes. Finally, resturants are getting more knowledgeable. Bob |
There are no true vegans
Richard Miller wrote:
> If you think your a true vegan, your just fooling yourself. Someone will > always slip some animal products in your food when your not looking. If you > travel from California to New York, you better not stop at any restaurants > or else they are true vegan restaurants and they are few and far between. If > someone puts a little milk in your mash potatoes, are you going to have a > break-down? What is the basis of your assumption that everyone eats at restaurants? I never eat at restaurants. I would not touch restaurant food with a ten foot pole. |
There are no true vegans
Beach Runner wrote:
<...> > We have a vegan resturant near me. And I make most of my wn food. > > Finally we have chincese and indian esturantnt that are wonwed by > vegetarian, they server meat dishes but they are careful to mark the > vegetarian dishes. > > Finally, resturants are getting more knowledgeable. ....while you're apparently not. Restaurants. Chinese. Indian should be capitalized. "They server meat dishes" sounds like Chinglish -- your first language. Your spelling and grammar are appalling. Don't blame it on the hurricane, either, Bob. I've read enough of your posts to know that it has nothing to do with hurricane season or your proximity to the tropics (where you contribute to global warming). |
There are no true vegans
usual suspect wrote: > Beach Runner wrote: > <...> > >> > ...while you're apparently not. Restaurants. Chinese. Indian should be > capitalized. "They server meat dishes" sounds like Chinglish -- your > first language. Your spelling and grammar are appalling. Don't blame it > on the hurricane, either, Bob. I've read enough of your posts to know > that it has nothing to do with hurricane season or your proximity to the > tropics (where you contribute to global warming). Pretty bad. I network when dealing with issues that sometimes require meds always in the middle of insomnia waiting for them to work. Obviously before they kick in they dramatically effect my writing. I am sorry. Prior to my car accident I was in great health. I can write well and I apologize for that appalling example of communication. Reading it later is shocking. To repeat, there is a vegan restaurant near me. Similarly there are Chinese and Indian restaurants that are owned by vegetarians by religion, serve meat for profit, but delight in serving true vegetarian meals. At buffets one can be careful. And yes, many restaurants are not honest. However, more are seeing a need to cater to vegetarians. |
There are no true vegans
Beach Runner wrote:
>> ...while you're apparently not. Restaurants. Chinese. Indian should be >> capitalized. "They server meat dishes" sounds like Chinglish -- your >> first language. Your spelling and grammar are appalling. Don't blame >> it on the hurricane, either, Bob. I've read enough of your posts to >> know that it has nothing to do with hurricane season or your proximity >> to the tropics (where you contribute to global warming). > > Pretty bad. Horrendous! > I network when dealing with issues that sometimes require > meds always in the middle of insomnia waiting for them to work. Maybe you should find something more relaxing to do. > Obviously before they kick in they dramatically effect my writing. I am > sorry. You should be. > Prior to my car accident I was in great health. I can write > well and I apologize for that appalling example of communication. > Reading it later is shocking. No kidding. > To repeat, there is a vegan restaurant near me. Similarly there are > Chinese and Indian restaurants that are owned by vegetarians by religion, > serve meat for profit, but delight in serving true vegetarian meals. They also delight in "serving meat for profit." > At buffets one can be careful. > > And yes, many restaurants are not honest. However, more are seeing a > need to cater to vegetarians. It isn't a need as much as a way to make more money by giving customers what they want. |
There are no true vegans
usual suspect wrote: > Beach Runner wrote: > >>> ...while you're apparently not. Restaurants. Chinese. Indian should >>> be capitalized. "They server meat dishes" sounds like Chinglish -- >>> your first language. Your spelling and grammar are appalling. Don't >>> blame it on the hurricane, either, Bob. I've read enough of your >>> posts to know that it has nothing to do with hurricane season or your >>> proximity to the tropics (where you contribute to global warming). >> >> >> Pretty bad. > > > Horrendous! > >> I network when dealing with issues that sometimes require meds always >> in the middle of insomnia waiting for them to work. > I actually thought I had gone off any medication that effected my writing and then I saw that. A lesson learned. > > Maybe you should find something more relaxing to do. > >> Obviously before they kick in they dramatically effect my writing. I >> am sorry. > > > You should be. > >> Prior to my car accident I was in great health. I can write well and >> I apologize for that appalling example of communication. Reading it >> later is shocking. > > > No kidding. > >> To repeat, there is a vegan restaurant near me. Similarly there are >> Chinese and Indian restaurants that are owned by vegetarians by religion, >> serve meat for profit, but delight in serving true vegetarian meals. > > > They also delight in "serving meat for profit." Or they are trying to survive in a very competitive world and are making compromises. I wouldn't do it. > >> At buffets one can be careful. >> >> And yes, many restaurants are not honest. However, more are seeing a >> need to cater to vegetarians. > > > It isn't a need as much as a way to make more money by giving customers > what they want. Of course we live in a capitalistic society but individuals also have ideals. Hopeful we can balance them in our lives. I know many people that have meaning in their life and work. |
There are no true vegans
Beach Runner wrote:
<...> >>> To repeat, there is a vegan restaurant near me. Similarly there are >>> Chinese and Indian restaurants that are owned by vegetarians by >>> religion, >>> serve meat for profit, but delight in serving true vegetarian meals. >> >> They also delight in "serving meat for profit." > > Or they are trying to survive in a very competitive world and are making > compromises. Making MONEY. Profit is not a compromise, it's a necessity for survival. > I wouldn't do it. Thus, you wouldn't survive. >>> At buffets one can be careful. >>> >>> And yes, many restaurants are not honest. However, more are seeing a >>> need to cater to vegetarians. >> >> It isn't a need as much as a way to make more money by giving >> customers what they want. > > Of course we live in a capitalistic "Capitalist" is an adjective as it is. It doesn't need an -ic suffix. > society but individuals also have > ideals. Profit motive is a noble ideal in its own right. > Hopeful we can balance them in our lives. I know many people > that have meaning in their life and work. The restauranteurs who gladly serve meat to the mainstream and serve meatless meals to the peculiar riff-raff who occasionally visit their establishments have balance in their lives. |
There are no true vegans
usual suspect wrote: > Beach Runner wrote: > <...> > >>>> To repeat, there is a vegan restaurant near me. Similarly there are >>>> Chinese and Indian restaurants that are owned by vegetarians by >>>> religion, >>>> serve meat for profit, but delight in serving true vegetarian meals. >>> >>> >>> They also delight in "serving meat for profit." >> >> >> Or they are trying to survive in a very competitive world and are >> making compromises. > > > Making MONEY. Profit is not a compromise, it's a necessity for survival. > >> I wouldn't do it. > > > Thus, you wouldn't survive. We can make choices. Earlier in my career a headhunter was trying to get me to take a high pay, cushy job with a major tobacco firm. I would not consider working for them. It was a choice. > >>>> At buffets one can be careful. >>>> >>>> And yes, many restaurants are not honest. However, more are seeing >>>> a need to cater to vegetarians. >>> >>> >>> It isn't a need as much as a way to make more money by giving >>> customers what they want. >> >> >> Of course we live in a capitalistic > > > "Capitalist" is an adjective as it is. It doesn't need an -ic suffix. Actually we live in a blended economy. It does not seem that any economic system is perfect. Capitalism has it's blemishes, and it appears that regulations/unions helped overcome some limitations. New forces, especially low wage labor in India, China, and globalization along with the speed of technological change, radical religious groups, environmental instability, overpopulation, despots, world slavery, are creating change at an incredible pace. Large forces are trying to return to middle ages using modern weapon systems and ancient religious systems. We don't live in a capitalism, we live in a capitalistic system undergoing radical changes. Then there are those people that want to try and improve the world. People do. One of my heroes recently died and she changed America by simply siting where she wasn't allowed to. Rosa Parks. There are those who live to create art, for it's own sake. Composers, musicians, artists, scientists, writers, and other creative people who live for an idea. Much of this type of living is not purely capitalism and often can do better in socialism. For example, in Poland under communism the levels of musicianship were incredible, but life was like living in a jail. You can make profit your God. > >> society but individuals also have ideals. > > > Profit motive is a noble ideal in its own right. > It can lead to the production of products that are destructive, environmentally destructive, and community destroying. Profit, in and of itself is dangerous. It can also spur great new technologies and services. Uncontrolled capitalism has proven to create a tiny upper class and a horrendous life for the majority of the population. Read Dickens for classic examples, but you don't need to. Hitler was great for most business in Germany. >> Hopeful we can balance them in our lives. I know many people that >> have meaning in their life and work. > > > The restauranteurs who gladly serve meat to the mainstream and serve > meatless meals to the peculiar riff-raff who occasionally visit their > establishments have balance in their lives. Riff-raffs? A strange way to describe people who eat healthier and care about other living creatures. |
There are no true vegans
Beach Runner wrote:
<...> >>> Hopeful we can balance them in our lives. I know many people that >>> have meaning in their life and work. >> >> The restauranteurs who gladly serve meat to the mainstream and serve >> meatless meals to the peculiar riff-raff who occasionally visit their >> establishments have balance in their lives. > > Riff-raffs? Yes. > A strange way to describe people who eat healthier That's not the issue and you know it. > and care about other living creatures. That's the issue, dummy, and **** you for arrogantly thinking you corner the market on such care for animals. |
There are no true vegans
usual suspect wrote: > That's the issue, dummy, and **** you for arrogantly thinking you corner > the market on such care for animals. I hardly corner the market. Veg*n movements are growing. |
There are no true vegans
Beach Runner wrote:
>> That's the issue, dummy, and **** you for arrogantly thinking you >> corner the market on such care for animals. > > I hardly corner the market. Veg*n movements are growing. Haha, you wish. Vegans and "serious vegetarians" are a stagnant demographic and they make up less than two-percent of the US population. With the number of serious vegetarians stagnating at less than 2% according to some estimates, the market potential may be just too small, though, for a QSR selling to a mass market. http://www.cattlenetwork.com/content.asp?contentid=4949 You might be so (counter-)culturally isolated that you think everyone is like your little circle. "Veg*n movements" are self-marginalizing and exclusivist, not exactly the best things for growth. |
There are no true vegans
usual suspect wrote: > Beach Runner wrote: > >>> That's the issue, dummy, and **** you for arrogantly thinking you >>> corner the market on such care for animals. >> >> >> I hardly corner the market. Veg*n movements are growing. > > > Haha, you wish. Vegans and "serious vegetarians" are a stagnant > demographic and they make up less than two-percent of the US population. > > With the number of serious vegetarians stagnating at less than > 2% according to some estimates, the market potential may be just > too small, though, for a QSR selling to a mass market. > http://www.cattlenetwork.com/content.asp?contentid=4949 > > You might be so (counter-)culturally isolated that you think everyone is > like your little circle. "Veg*n movements" are self-marginalizing and > exclusivist, not exactly the best things for growth. I see at my local store an "Organic" section, they have fresh squeezed carrot and orange juice. They have many items that are labeled vegetarian or vegan. This didn't use to exist. The economic discussion you ignored, I had actually hoped you would engage in the differences and the concept that there are many people with values and idealism, and capitalism and socialism in pure forms do not exist. Both need to be tempered. You appear to love capitalism as a value in itself. There are thousands of vegetarian groups on Yahoo. A new successful vegetarian restaurant near me that does a brisk business. You probably saw them on the news last year with their plywood windows blown in, but they rebuilt. |
There are no true vegans
Beach Runner wrote:
>>>> That's the issue, dummy, and **** you for arrogantly thinking you >>>> corner the market on such care for animals. >>> >>> I hardly corner the market. Veg*n movements are growing. >> >> Haha, you wish. Vegans and "serious vegetarians" are a stagnant >> demographic and they make up less than two-percent of the US population. >> >> With the number of serious vegetarians stagnating at less than >> 2% according to some estimates, the market potential may be just >> too small, though, for a QSR selling to a mass market. >> http://www.cattlenetwork.com/content.asp?contentid=4949 >> >> You might be so (counter-)culturally isolated that you think everyone >> is like your little circle. "Veg*n movements" are self-marginalizing >> and exclusivist, not exactly the best things for growth. > > I see at my local store an "Organic" section, Non sequitur. That's not a "veg-n movement." > they have fresh squeezed > carrot and orange juice. And I bet it's purchased in greater quantity by those who eat at least some meat than by those who eat none. > They have many items that are labeled > vegetarian or vegan. This didn't use to exist. That's not a sign of a growing movement any more than "fat free" or "no cholesterol" are signs of growing movements. It's just a label used to appeal to a segment of the population. Your local store has ALWAYS had foods suitable for veg-ns, it's just the marketing to them that's changed. > The economic discussion you ignored, I didn't ignore it. I was amused by your prattle, but thought it wasn't worth dignifying with a reply. > I had actually hoped you would > engage in the differences and the concept that there are many people > with values and idealism, and capitalism and socialism in pure forms do > not exist. Both need to be tempered. I disagree. > You appear to love capitalism as > a value in itself. I would say that I simply value freedom, and that I see no freedom at all in socialism or what you might call "tempered capitalism." Let me give you a couple quick examples that show how free markets are tempered by consumer demands. First, people individually or collectively can do business with those whose values they share and avoid commerce with those whose practices they abhor. That works when dealing with companies one may not like for whatever reason, such as Monsanto or McDonald's, or with an entire nation, such as when individuals chose not to travel to South Africa or invest in companies doing business there during Apartheid. Second, people can choose whether or not they even participate in a given market or choose among its substitutes. Vegetarianism itself can be such a check on a given market, such as when someone objects to the way livestock are treated. Such people can also resort to alternative markets like small family farms, eating only what they hunt or catch, etc. Free markets allow free people to act freely. Command economies -- fully or partially planned -- don't. > There are thousands of vegetarian groups on Yahoo. Not a sign of a growing movement. In fact, look at the nyms used on them and you'll find a lot of the same people posting to different groups. > A new successful > vegetarian restaurant near me that does a brisk business. Not a sign of a growing movement, just a sign of a successful niche business. > You probably saw them on the news last year No, I didn't. |
There are no true vegans
usual suspect wrote: > Beach Runner wrote: > >>>>> That's the issue, dummy, and **** you for arrogantly thinking you >>>>> corner the market on such care for animals. >>>> >>>> >>>> I hardly corner the market. Veg*n movements are growing. >>> >>> >>> Haha, you wish. Vegans and "serious vegetarians" are a stagnant >>> demographic and they make up less than two-percent of the US population. >>> >>> With the number of serious vegetarians stagnating at less than >>> 2% according to some estimates, the market potential may be just >>> too small, though, for a QSR selling to a mass market. >>> http://www.cattlenetwork.com/content.asp?contentid=4949 >>> >>> You might be so (counter-)culturally isolated that you think everyone >>> is like your little circle. "Veg*n movements" are self-marginalizing >>> and exclusivist, not exactly the best things for growth. >> >> >> I see at my local store an "Organic" section, > > > Non sequitur. That's not a "veg-n movement." > >> they have fresh squeezed carrot and orange juice. > > > And I bet it's purchased in greater quantity by those who eat at least > some meat than by those who eat none. > >> They have many items that are labeled vegetarian or vegan. This >> didn't use to exist. > > > That's not a sign of a growing movement any more than "fat free" or "no > cholesterol" are signs of growing movements. It's just a label used to > appeal to a segment of the population. Your local store has ALWAYS had > foods suitable for veg-ns, it's just the marketing to them that's changed. > >> The economic discussion you ignored, > > > I didn't ignore it. I was amused by your prattle, but thought it wasn't > worth dignifying with a reply. > >> I had actually hoped you would engage in the differences and the >> concept that there are many people with values and idealism, and >> capitalism and socialism in pure forms do not exist. Both need to be >> tempered. > > > I disagree. > >> You appear to love capitalism as a value in itself. > > > I would say that I simply value freedom, and that I see no freedom at > all in socialism or what you might call "tempered capitalism." Let me > give you a couple quick examples that show how free markets are tempered > by consumer demands. > By tempered I was referring to legislation and establishments of unions. They can certainly throttle back "growth". Some legislature helps level the playing field and protect the greater good, especially environmental regulations. Even simple ones like old plumbing codes in Chicago and Boston years ago after initial failures. Globalization unleveled the playing field. In fact, there is a huge impact regarding internationalized toxic waste. But I concede that consumer demands have a huge impact. > First, people individually or collectively can do business with those > whose values they share and avoid commerce with those whose practices > they abhor. That works when dealing with companies one may not like for > whatever reason, such as Monsanto or McDonald's, or with an entire > nation, such as when individuals chose not to travel to South Africa or > invest in companies doing business there during Apartheid. Individuals do have power. > > Second, people can choose whether or not they even participate in a > given market or choose among its substitutes. Vegetarianism itself can > be such a check on a given market, such as when someone objects to the > way livestock are treated. Such people can also resort to alternative > markets like small family farms, eating only what they hunt or catch, etc. > > Free markets allow free people to act freely. Command economies -- fully > or partially planned -- don't. I would compare it to Britain at the turn of the century. Or US at the turn of the century and minors strikes at Rockefella's coal mines. US troops massacred the coal workers families. > >> There are thousands of vegetarian groups on Yahoo. > > > Not a sign of a growing movement. In fact, look at the nyms used on them > and you'll find a lot of the same people posting to different groups. > >> A new successful vegetarian restaurant near me that does a brisk >> business. > > > Not a sign of a growing movement, just a sign of a successful niche > business. > >> You probably saw them on the news last year > > > No, I didn't. Thank you for a well written, non insulting reply. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter