 |
|
| Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
William Sessions's first e-mail
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:21:40 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>Derek wrote: >> On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:09:11 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote: >> >>>The only alteration is the complete removal of my >>>e-mail address. >> >> The part you altered was the informational part of it > >I didn't post all of it, because it wasn't necessary. The part you admittedly altered in the second alleged email had nothing to do with your hiding your identity at all. It was the informational part of the email that you altered, yet your now claiming that that altered email is but one of two. It cannot be, since you've already admitted that the second alleged email was something YOU altered. According to you, the informational part of his brief email went; "The marketing claim standards are still under review by USDA. Accordingly, the standards have not been published in a final form for use." but now reads; "A revised grass-fed marketing claim is under development by USDA. Any grass-fed marketing claim proposed by USDA will be published with a public comment period." Here's the claimed original email; From: "Sessions, William" > To: <jonball@[...]> Mr. Ball: Thanks for your message. The marketing claim standards are still under review by USDA. Accordingly, the standards have not been published in a final form for use. I hope this information is helpful. Please let me know if further information is needed. Thanks, William T. Sessions Associate Deputy Administrator Livestock and Seed Program http://tinyurl.com/dkdxo and here's your edited copy; Mr. Ball: Thanks for your message. A revised grass-fed marketing claim is under development by USDA. Any grass-fed marketing claim proposed by USDA will be published with a public comment period. I hope this information is helpful. Please let me know if further information is needed. Thanks, William T. Sessions Associate Deputy Administrator Livestock and Seed Program http://tinyurl.com/9m9cz Both emails start with, "Mr. Ball: Thanks for your message." and end with "I hope this information is helpful. Please let me know if further information is needed. Thanks, William T. Sessions Associate Deputy Administrator Livestock and Seed Program" How could you be so stupid as to try a stunt like that and think you could get away with it? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Derek lied:
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:21:40 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote: > >>Derek lied: >> >>>On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:09:11 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote: >>> >>> >>>>The only alteration is the complete removal of my >>>>e-mail address. >>> >>>The part you altered was the informational part of it >> >>I didn't post all of it, because it wasn't necessary. > > > The part you admittedly altered Was only my e-mail address, which I removed. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 19:13:24 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>Derek wrote: >> On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:21:40 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote: >>>Derek wrote: >>>>On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:09:11 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote: >>>> >>>>>The only alteration is the complete removal of my >>>>>e-mail address. >>>> >>>>The part you altered was the informational part of it >>> >>>I didn't post all of it, because it wasn't necessary. >> >> The part you admittedly altered > >Was only my e-mail address, which I removed. The part you admittedly altered in the second alleged email had nothing to do with hiding your identity at all. It was the informational part of the email that you altered, yet you're now claiming that that altered email is but one of two sent to you. It cannot be, since you've already admitted that the second alleged email was something YOU altered. According to you, the informational part of his brief email went; "The marketing claim standards are still under review by USDA. Accordingly, the standards have not been published in a final form for use." but now reads; "A revised grass-fed marketing claim is under development by USDA. Any grass-fed marketing claim proposed by USDA will be published with a public comment period." Here's the claimed original email; From: "Sessions, William" > To: <jonball@[...]> Mr. Ball: Thanks for your message. The marketing claim standards are still under review by USDA. Accordingly, the standards have not been published in a final form for use. I hope this information is helpful. Please let me know if further information is needed. Thanks, William T. Sessions Associate Deputy Administrator Livestock and Seed Program http://tinyurl.com/dkdxo and here's your edited copy; Mr. Ball: Thanks for your message. A revised grass-fed marketing claim is under development by USDA. Any grass-fed marketing claim proposed by USDA will be published with a public comment period. I hope this information is helpful. Please let me know if further information is needed. Thanks, William T. Sessions Associate Deputy Administrator Livestock and Seed Program http://tinyurl.com/9m9cz Both emails start with, "Mr. Ball: Thanks for your message." and end with "I hope this information is helpful. Please let me know if further information is needed. Thanks, William T. Sessions Associate Deputy Administrator Livestock and Seed Program" How could you be so stupid as to try a stunt like that and think you could get away with it, and how many times are you going to ignore this solid evidence against you by snipping it all away and insisting that the only part you altered was your email address? This is the most pathetic charade I've seen you go through after being caught lying. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rudy Canoza wrote:
> Derek lied: > > > On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:21:40 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > > >>Derek lied: > >> > >>>On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:09:11 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>The only alteration is the complete removal of my > >>>>e-mail address. > >>> > >>>The part you altered was the informational part of it > >> > >>I didn't post all of it, because it wasn't necessary. > > > > > > The part you admittedly altered > > Was only my e-mail address, which I removed. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!! Stupid, stupid Goober. *If* you truly were innocent you'd be freakin' out and swearing and cursing and name-calling. As it is you are whimpering feebly. It looks good on ya Gooby! |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 11 Sep 2005 14:01:25 -0700, "Ron" > wrote:
>Derek wrote: >> On 11 Sep 2005 13:06:58 -0700, wrote: >> >Rudy Canoza wrote: >> >> Derek wrote: >> >> > On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:21:40 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote: >> >> >>Derek wrote: >> >> >>>On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:09:11 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>>>The only alteration is the complete removal of my >> >> >>>>e-mail address. >> >> >>> >> >> >>>The part you altered was the informational part of it >> >> >> >> >> >>I didn't post all of it, because it wasn't necessary. >> >> > >> >> > The part you admittedly altered >> >> >> >> Was only my e-mail address, which I removed. >> > >> >BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!! >> >> I know; pathetic, isn't he? >> >> >Stupid, stupid Goober. >> > >> >*If* you truly were innocent you'd be freakin' out and swearing and >> >cursing and name-calling. >> >> Just a quibble - He's always freaking out and swearing >> his head off. Are we now to conclude that he's always >> telling the truth? ;-) > >Hardly  )....but when he's been nailed good and proper as you have done>he knows there's no escape and *forgets* to throw a tantrum and simply >cowers and whimpers. >A good bitch-slapping seems to do him a world of good. I've given Jon his very own 9/11 disaster to think about, and all because he got in the way while I was going after Harrison, which is hilarious in itself when you think about it. He should know by now that if there's one thing that gets me really worked up into a lather, it's someone getting in my way while I'm busy. G' night Ron. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Derek lied:
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 19:13:24 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote: > >>Derek lied: >> >>>On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:21:40 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote: >>> >>>>Derek lied: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:09:11 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>The only alteration is the complete removal of my >>>>>>e-mail address. >>>>> >>>>>The part you altered was the informational part of it >>>> >>>>I didn't post all of it, because it wasn't necessary. >>> >>>The part you admittedly altered >> >>Was only my e-mail address, which I removed. > > > The part you admittedly altered in the second alleged Also was only my e-mail address. You're finished, Dreck. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rudy Canoza wrote:
> Derek lied: > > On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 19:13:24 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > > >>Derek lied: > >> > >>>On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:21:40 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote: > >>> > >>>>Derek lied: > >>>> > >>>>>On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:09:11 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>The only alteration is the complete removal of my > >>>>>>e-mail address. > >>>>> > >>>>>The part you altered was the informational part of it > >>>> > >>>>I didn't post all of it, because it wasn't necessary. > >>> > >>>The part you admittedly altered > >> > >>Was only my e-mail address, which I removed. > > > > > > The part you admittedly altered in the second alleged > > Also was only my e-mail address. > > You're finished, Dreck. You wish,... retard! |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| For those who are frustrated by Google preferences not saving between sessions | General Cooking | |||
| The William | General Cooking | |||
| 2005 William Fevre Chablis Fourchaume 1er | Wine | |||
| Jonathan's fake email from William T. Sessions (USDA) | Vegan | |||
| OT If you're outside of US and try to send e-mail to Verizon e-mail address, good luck | General Cooking | |||
Linear Mode
