 |
|
| Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:57:31 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>Derek wrote: >>>>>>>>"He who joyfully marches to music rank and file, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You still don't. >>>>>> >>>>>>Hey Usual, >>>>> >>>>>Hiya Skanky. >>>> >>>>Watching >>> >>>Porn again. >> >> No. > >Yes No. No more homoerotic videos for you, closet queer. "Wrestling is homo-erotic. Those who enjoy watching oiled young men rolling on the floor with each other are closet homosexuals." usual suspect Jul 21 2005 http://tinyurl.com/cvs6l "I think that has much more to do with latent homosexual tendencies -- well-adjusted people don't get excited about watching oily, semi-nude men rolling around with each other on the floor." usual suspect Nov 21 2003 http://tinyurl.com/b4m8l Only a closet queer like yourself would feel that "Wrestling is homo-erotic", and, like you clearly admit, "well-adjusted people don't get excited about watching oily, semi-nude men rolling around with each other on the floor", so if you were working as a PE instructor with young children you would most certainly be fired from that position. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Claire's ethically-challenged Uncle Dork wrote:
>>>>>>>>>"He who joyfully marches to music rank and file, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You still don't. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Hey Usual, >>>>>> >>>>>>Hiya Skanky. >>>>> >>>>>Watching >>>> >>>>Porn again. >>> >>>No. >> >>Yes > > No. Yes. Consider what you, Dreck Nash, wrote about why you don't eat black olives: I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to maintain my ethical standard. -- Dreck Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 Do those changes to maintain your "ethical standard" include other areas of your life? Consider you admission that you've illegally downloaded at least one pirated pornographic movie off a peer-to-peer network: I downloaded Debby Does Dallas 2000 from kazaa and watch it every time the wife goes shopping. -- Derk "******" Nash, http://snipurl.com/6zej Why do you consider the groundless alteration of his your based upon false claims about squid ink to be ethical while you download bootlegged (copyrighted) movies off p2p networks? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Closet queer usual suspect > wrote:
>Derek wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>"He who joyfully marches to music rank and file, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>You still don't. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Hey Usual, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Hiya Skanky. >>>>>> >>>>>>Watching >>>>> >>>>>Porn again. >>>> >>>>No. >>> >>>Yes >> >> No. No more homoerotic videos for you, closet queer. > >Yes. I said no, queer, so take a telling and stop debasing the sport of wrestling and yourself by jerking off over it. "Wrestling is homo-erotic. Those who enjoy watching oiled young men rolling on the floor with each other are closet homosexuals." usual suspect Jul 21 2005 http://tinyurl.com/cvs6l "I think that has much more to do with latent homosexual tendencies -- well-adjusted people don't get excited about watching oily, semi-nude men rolling around with each other on the floor." usual suspect Nov 21 2003 http://tinyurl.com/b4m8l Only a closet queer like yourself would feel that "Wrestling is homo-erotic", and, like you clearly admit, "well-adjusted people don't get excited about watching oily, semi-nude men rolling around with each other on the floor", so if you were working as a PE instructor with young children you would most certainly be fired from that position. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Scented Nectar" > wrote in message ... > "Dutch" > wrote in message > ... >> >> "Scented Nectar" > wrote in message >> ... >> > "Dutch" > wrote in message >> > ... >> >> >> >> "Scented Nectar" > wrote >> >> > "Dutch" > wrote >> >> >> >> >> >> "Scented Nectar" > wrote... >> >> >> > Stop changing the spelling of the >> >> >> > followup newsgroups, moron. >> >> >> > No more replies to you until you >> >> >> > do. >> >> >> >> >> >> Control freak >> >> > >> >> > There's no control freak about it. >> >> > What he did prevents the replier >> >> > from posting unless they fix his >> >> > intentional spelling errors. >> >> >> >> Why? >> > >> > Look at his headers of the ones >> > I've mentioned this about. The >> > followup newsgroups field has the >> > groups misspelled into non- >> > existant groups. >> >> I don't know what the hell you're talking about. I think you're finally >> losing it. > > From the headers in Rudey's post > above: > > Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan > Followup-To: alt.animals.ethics.vegatarian,alt.food.vegen Which post? he's made dozens of them. Identify it. > > This made Outlook Express try to > send it to the misspelled ones until > I corrected it. Right click his post > a few posts up and select Properties. > See for yourself. Or try to reply to it. > >> >> >> > Also, no more replies to your >> >> >> > snip and runs. You ruin the >> >> >> > whole context of the topics at >> >> >> > hand. >> >> >> >> >> >> As if anybody cares if you reply.. >> >> > >> >> > Obviously Rudey doesn't care if >> >> > ANYONE replies. >> >> >> >> He doesn't care of YOU do, because you never add anything of interest > or >> >> value to the discussion. >> > >> > By altering the headers, he's shown >> > he doesn't want anyone to easily >> > respond. >> >> Alter what headers? You're daft. > > Helllloooooo. His post's headers. > Right click. Select Properties. > > > -- > SN > http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ > > > |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
pearl wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message nk.net... > > pearl wrote: > > > > > "usual suspect" > wrote in message . .. > > > > > >>pearl wrote: > > >> > > >>>>>Support your troops - http://www.americasupportsyou.mil/ . > > >>> > > >>>Your unethical edit is noted. > > >> > > >>It wasn't unethical. > > > > > > > > > You altered my post. You've no credibility. > > > > > > Go 'support your troops', murderous troll. > > > > **** yourself with a broken bottle, you filthy slag. > > The sick meatarian 'mind'. No such word as "meatarian"; useless, silly invective is all it is. > > Haven't heard from your solly yet <chortle>. I won't, > > either - you don't have one. No case, no solly. It's > > that simple. > > Only your sickness enables that erroneous belief. No case, no solly, no sickness. I will not hear from any solicitor you stupidly wish to engage. That's a guarantee. You stupid slag. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
pearl wrote:
>>>And who's the crackpot? > > Never mind leprechauns, No, Lesley, let's discuss them. Why do you remain open to their existence? Also, why do you believe in the rest of your list (with links to your posts)? "veganism" "inner earth beings" "hollow earth" that goofy patent for a MANUFACTURED globe helium-inflated number(s) for feed:beef rain forest destruction Brazil's exports (based on *Argentina's* trade) Stolen French flying saucer Zapper Foot massage (as cure-all) Astrology Numerology Alien abduction bestiality Leprechauns Channeling Polar fountains Sun gazing Chemtrails AIDS and ebola conspiracy theory Crop circles sexually aroused by violent ex-convicts participation in skinhead subculture the validity of online IQ tests crackpot 9-11 conspiracy theories Jeff Rense for "news" ..... http://tinyurl.com/h0br http://tinyurl.com/h0bl http://tinyurl.com/v5p8 http://tinyurl.com/v5pf http://tinyurl.com/mh5w http://tinyurl.com/mh6h http://tinyurl.com/mh6r http://tinyurl.com/mh71 http://tinyurl.com/mh7a http://tinyurl.com/mh7j http://tinyurl.com/mh7p http://tinyurl.com/v5jj http://tinyurl.com/v5kd http://tinyurl.com/v5l6 http://tinyurl.com/v5ft http://tinyurl.com/v5fj http://tinyurl.com/v5fp http://tinyurl.com/v5ft http://tinyurl.com/v5ga http://tinyurl.com/v5gc http://tinyurl.com/v5i2 http://tinyurl.com/v5gk http://tinyurl.com/v5h1 http://tinyurl.com/v5h9 |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
usual suspect wrote:
> pearl wrote: > >>>And who's the crackpot? > > > > Never mind leprechauns, > > No, Lesley, let's discuss them. Why do you remain open to their > existence? Because she's another self-marginalizer, and stating an openness to belief in clearly impossible things is a way of increasing the marginalization. So is foot-rubbing. > Also, why do you believe in the rest of your list (with links > to your posts)? > > "veganism" > "inner earth beings" > "hollow earth" > that goofy patent for a MANUFACTURED globe > helium-inflated number(s) for feed:beef > rain forest destruction > Brazil's exports (based on *Argentina's* trade) > Stolen French flying saucer > Zapper > Foot massage (as cure-all) > Astrology > Numerology > Alien abduction > bestiality > Leprechauns > Channeling > Polar fountains > Sun gazing > Chemtrails > AIDS and ebola conspiracy theory > Crop circles > sexually aroused by violent ex-convicts > participation in skinhead subculture > the validity of online IQ tests > crackpot 9-11 conspiracy theories > Jeff Rense for "news" > > .... > http://tinyurl.com/h0br > http://tinyurl.com/h0bl > http://tinyurl.com/v5p8 > http://tinyurl.com/v5pf > http://tinyurl.com/mh5w > http://tinyurl.com/mh6h > http://tinyurl.com/mh6r > http://tinyurl.com/mh71 > http://tinyurl.com/mh7a > http://tinyurl.com/mh7j > http://tinyurl.com/mh7p > http://tinyurl.com/v5jj > http://tinyurl.com/v5kd > http://tinyurl.com/v5l6 > http://tinyurl.com/v5ft > http://tinyurl.com/v5fj > http://tinyurl.com/v5fp > http://tinyurl.com/v5ft > http://tinyurl.com/v5ga > http://tinyurl.com/v5gc > http://tinyurl.com/v5i2 > http://tinyurl.com/v5gk > http://tinyurl.com/v5h1 > http://tinyurl.com/v5h9 |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"usual suspect" > wrote in message ...
> pearl wrote: > >>>And who's the crackpot? > > > > Never mind leprechauns, > > No, Lesley, let's discuss them. Why do you remain open to their > existence? Also, why do you believe in the rest of your list (with links > to your posts)? Well now! right here 'usual suspect' inadvertently, stupidly, admits that his claim that I "believe in leprechauns" is a lie. What a dumbass. Snip and run from his hero's participation in a Satanic society, of course. Scary stuff - http://www.cuttingedge.org/ce1011.html . |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dutch" > wrote in message
... > > "Scented Nectar" > wrote in message > ... > > "Dutch" > wrote in message > > ... > >> > >> "Scented Nectar" > wrote in message > >> ... > >> > "Dutch" > wrote in message > >> > ... > >> >> > >> >> "Scented Nectar" > wrote > >> >> > "Dutch" > wrote > >> >> >> > >> >> >> "Scented Nectar" > wrote... > >> >> >> > Stop changing the spelling of the > >> >> >> > followup newsgroups, moron. > >> >> >> > No more replies to you until you > >> >> >> > do. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Control freak > >> >> > > >> >> > There's no control freak about it. > >> >> > What he did prevents the replier > >> >> > from posting unless they fix his > >> >> > intentional spelling errors. > >> >> > >> >> Why? > >> > > >> > Look at his headers of the ones > >> > I've mentioned this about. The > >> > followup newsgroups field has the > >> > groups misspelled into non- > >> > existant groups. > >> > >> I don't know what the hell you're talking about. I think you're finally > >> losing it. > > > > From the headers in Rudey's post > > above: > > > > Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan > > Followup-To: alt.animals.ethics.vegatarian,alt.food.vegen > > Which post? he's made dozens of them. Identify it. There's been a few now, but look at the one further up in THIS thread. The one I commented about the headers on. Here's the full headers. Go to his post and try replying to it, you'll see. Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!newsfeed2.easynews.c om!easynews.com!easynews!n ewsfeed.news2me.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!sta mper.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earth link.net!newsread2.news.at l.earthlink.net.POSTED!f94371c3!not-for-mail From: Rudy Canoza > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan Followup-To: alt.animals.ethics.vegatarian,alt.food.vegen Subject: Usual Dinner Fare References: > et> > > > > > > > et> > In-Reply-To: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 125 Message-ID: et> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:48:39 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.3.119.36 X-Complaints-To: X-Trace: newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net 1124048919 69.3.119.36 (Sun, 14 Aug 2005 12:48:39 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 12:48:39 PDT Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian:208765 alt.food.vegan:123503 Also, for anyone interested, the headers show his ISP's abuse reporting email, for anyone not as thick skinned as me. > > This made Outlook Express try to > > send it to the misspelled ones until > > I corrected it. Right click his post > > a few posts up and select Properties. > > See for yourself. Or try to reply to it. > > > >> >> >> > Also, no more replies to your > >> >> >> > snip and runs. You ruin the > >> >> >> > whole context of the topics at > >> >> >> > hand. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> As if anybody cares if you reply.. > >> >> > > >> >> > Obviously Rudey doesn't care if > >> >> > ANYONE replies. > >> >> > >> >> He doesn't care of YOU do, because you never add anything of interest > > or > >> >> value to the discussion. > >> > > >> > By altering the headers, he's shown > >> > he doesn't want anyone to easily > >> > respond. > >> > >> Alter what headers? You're daft. > > > > Helllloooooo. His post's headers. > > Right click. Select Properties. Are you using Outlook? Or Express? Just right click and select properties. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Scented Nectar" > wrote in message
... > "Scented Nectar" > wrote in message > ... > > Usual has claimed that people > > should accept food that others > > have made and not worry what's > > in them. He give's away his > > neighbour's gift cake behind her > > back, and says that people > > should not turn down food that > > was made for them out of love > > and stuff. So, this got me to > > wondering. > > > > Usual, what do you (as a food > > definition vegan) do when the > > following occurs. You are > > invited over to someone's > > place for dinner. You are > > served a big steak and a > > small side of potatoes. What > > do you do? Eat the meat? > > Not eat the meat? If not, how > > do you explain it to them? > > I'm waaaaaiiiiittting. If you object > to the wording of the 'as a food > definition vegan', then just leave > it out. The question still remains. > And so does the steak. Well Usual, answer the question. Also, answer why you haven't enlisted in order to really support your troops. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Scented Nectar" > wrote > Are you using Outlook? Or Express? > Just right click and select properties. Oh yeah, here's another Followup to: alt.skanky.is.a.****ing.pinhead HAR HAR HAR! |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dutch wrote:
> "Scented Nectar" > wrote > >>Are you using Outlook? Or Express? >>Just right click and select properties. > > > Oh yeah, here's another > > Followup to: alt.skanky.is.a.****ing.pinhead Right. > > HAR HAR HAR! > > |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
usual suspect wrote: > Beach Runner wrote: > >> Notice when I showed the massive support of global warming in US URLs >> he ignored the reply. I proved he was liar. > > > No, you didn't. I'll let other's decide. I posted the URL's which said they were evenly divided. They were not. Let other's decide. Many called for strong action. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Beach Runner wrote:
>>> Notice when I showed the massive support of global warming in US URLs >>> he ignored the reply. I proved he was liar. >> >> No, you didn't. > > I'll let other's decide. Read this link first: http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/paleo/ctl/abrupt.html Then go through the rest of the timeline: http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/paleo/ctl/100k.html Note that ~11,600 years ago: Ice core records from Greenland show in less than a decade there was a sudden warming of around 15 degrees Celsius (27-degrees F) of the annual mean temperature. What is the amount of recent temperature rise over a century that you have your knickers all twisted up over? From the stuff you pasted in yesterday: The global average surface temperature has increased over the 20th century by about 0.6°C... The rise in temperature ~11,600 years ago was 2500% more in the span of <10 years than the tiny rise today which you and other leftist kooks suggest is from human activities over the last hundred years or more. Global warming is a NATURAL phenomenon. We don't need your radical changes to deal with it. We just need ice machines and air-conditioners. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dutch" > wrote in message
... > > "Scented Nectar" > wrote > > Are you using Outlook? Or Express? > > Just right click and select properties. > > Oh yeah, here's another > > Followup to: alt.skanky.is.a.****ing.pinhead > > HAR HAR HAR! You know, Douche, you're not too bright. It took 2 posts just to explain to you that the followups have been changed. Cowardly, Rudey does not want people to answer back. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Scented Nectar" > wrote in message
... > "Scented Nectar" > wrote in message > ... > > Usual has claimed that people > > should accept food that others > > have made and not worry what's > > in them. He give's away his > > neighbour's gift cake behind her > > back, and says that people > > should not turn down food that > > was made for them out of love > > and stuff. So, this got me to > > wondering. > > > > Usual, what do you (as a food > > definition vegan) do when the > > following occurs. You are > > invited over to someone's > > place for dinner. You are > > served a big steak and a > > small side of potatoes. What > > do you do? Eat the meat? > > Not eat the meat? If not, how > > do you explain it to them? > > I'm waaaaaiiiiittting. If you object > to the wording of the 'as a food > definition vegan', then just leave > it out. The question still remains. > And so does the steak. Golly, Usual Idiot, your absence here is very noteable. It says a lot. You have chosen to cowardly not answer the above. How come? Still twisted with internal conflicts over how you can remain mainstream and conforming while eating a strict vegetarian diet???? How do you explain it to the nice people who just gave you steak on a plate? -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Scented Nectar" > wrote in message ...
> "Dutch" > wrote in message > ... > > > > "Scented Nectar" > wrote > > > Are you using Outlook? Or Express? > > > Just right click and select properties. > > > > Oh yeah, here's another > > > > Followup to: alt.skanky.is.a.****ing.pinhead > > > > HAR HAR HAR! > > You know, Douche, you're not too > bright. It took 2 posts just to explain > to you that the followups have been > changed. Cowardly, Rudey does > not want people to answer back. 'The serial bully .... is emotionally retarded with an arrested level of emotional development; whilst language and intellect may appear to be that of an adult, the bully displays the emotional age of a five-year-old ...... http://www.bullyonline.org/workbully/serial.htm And regressing by the hour.... > > > -- > SN > http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ > > > > |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"pearl" > wrote in message
... > "Scented Nectar" > wrote in message ... > > "Dutch" > wrote in message > > ... > > > > > > "Scented Nectar" > wrote > > > > Are you using Outlook? Or Express? > > > > Just right click and select properties. > > > > > > Oh yeah, here's another > > > > > > Followup to: alt.skanky.is.a.****ing.pinhead > > > > > > HAR HAR HAR! > > > > You know, Douche, you're not too > > bright. It took 2 posts just to explain > > to you that the followups have been > > changed. Cowardly, Rudey does > > not want people to answer back. > > 'The serial bully > ... > is emotionally retarded with an arrested level > of emotional development; whilst language and > intellect may appear to be that of an adult, the > bully displays the emotional age of a five-year-old > ..... > http://www.bullyonline.org/workbully/serial.htm > > And regressing by the hour.... Most people end their name- calling phase by their late teens latest. There is certainly some arrested development here, and I think the bullies are the ones with it. The meat lobby in these groups use name-calling a lot. The little they get back in retaliation is nothing compared to what they do themselves. I would hate to be them. So full of hate, that they could never fully enjoy themselves. Hate and anger always override their emotions. Pathetic. If they don't like vegans, leave. Why hang out with people one doesn't like? -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
pearl wrote:
> 'The serial hippie foot-rubbist > ... > is emotionally retarded with an arrested level > of emotional development; whilst language and > intellect may appear to be that of an adult, the > reflexologist displays the emotional age of a five-year-old > ..... > http://www.reflexologyonline.org/innerearth/being.htm > > And regressing by the hour.... You sure are. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"usual suspect" > wrote in message
.. . > pearl wrote: > > 'The serial hippie foot-rubbist > > ... > > is emotionally retarded with an arrested level > > of emotional development; whilst language and > > intellect may appear to be that of an adult, the > > reflexologist displays the emotional age of a five-year-old > > ..... > > http://www.reflexologyonline.org/innerearth/being.htm > > > > And regressing by the hour.... > > You sure are. How come you haven't enlisted, Mr. Support Our Troops?????? Get your ugly ass over to the recruiting center. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Skanky wrote:
>>>'The serial hippie foot-rubbist >>>... >>> is emotionally retarded with an arrested level >>>of emotional development; whilst language and >>>intellect may appear to be that of an adult, the >>>reflexologist displays the emotional age of a five-year-old >>>..... >>>http://www.reflexologyonline.org/innerearth/being.htm >>> >>>And regressing by the hour.... >> >>You sure are. > > How come Because she is, like you are, nuttier than squirrel shit. Neither of you has sought treatment for your respective and manifold mental disorders. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Scented Nectar" > wrote in message ... > "Dutch" > wrote in message > ... >> >> "Scented Nectar" > wrote >> > Are you using Outlook? Or Express? >> > Just right click and select properties. >> >> Oh yeah, here's another >> >> Followup to: alt.skanky.is.a.****ing.pinhead >> >> HAR HAR HAR! > > You know, Douche, you're not too > bright. It took 2 posts just to explain > to you that the followups have been > changed. You didn't specify which messages, and I wasn't about to hunt for them, I don't care that much. > Cowardly, Rudey does > not want people to answer back. He wants to poke you in the eye with a pointy stick, for good reason. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
usual suspect wrote: > Beach Runner wrote: > >>>> Notice when I showed the massive support of global warming in US >>>> URLs he ignored the reply. I proved he was liar. >>> >>> >>> No, you didn't. >> >> >> I'll let other's decide. > > > Read this link first: Read the original posts. I printed them for the group. That didn't work so you dance. Pouring greenhouse gasses at increasing rates and changing land to concrete has an effect. The full effect is unknown. It is good for the richest of the richest. Except, we were a country with a good future, and a surplus, now we have a deficit with much of our debt owned to China. Our unemployment is horrendous, terrorist grows, and the oil companies, making the biggest profits ever just got huge tax breaks. An intelligent direction would be energy credit for conservation, solar energy, wind energy, wave energy and other geothermal energy. But McCain is right, the government is run by lobbies. > http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/paleo/ctl/abrupt.html > > Then go through the rest of the timeline: > http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/paleo/ctl/100k.html > > Note that ~11,600 years ago: > Ice core records from Greenland show in less than a decade there > was a sudden warming of around 15 degrees Celsius (27-degrees F) > of the annual mean temperature. > > What is the amount of recent temperature rise over a century that you > have your knickers all twisted up over? From the stuff you pasted in > yesterday: > The global average surface temperature has increased over the > 20th century by about 0.6°C... > > The rise in temperature ~11,600 years ago was 2500% more in the span of > <10 years than the tiny rise today which you and other leftist kooks > suggest is from human activities over the last hundred years or more. > > Global warming is a NATURAL phenomenon. We don't need your radical > changes to deal with it. We just need ice machines and air-conditioners. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scented Nectar wrote: > "Scented Nectar" > wrote in message > ... > >>"Scented Nectar" > wrote in message ... >> >>>Usual has claimed that people >>>should accept food that others >>>have made and not worry what's >>>in them. He give's away his >>>neighbour's gift cake behind her >>>back, and says that people >>>should not turn down food that >>>was made for them out of love >>>and stuff. So, this got me to >>>wondering. >>> >>>Usual, what do you (as a food >>>definition vegan) do when the >>>following occurs. You are >>>invited over to someone's >>>place for dinner. You are >>>served a big steak and a >>>small side of potatoes. What >>>do you do? Eat the meat? >>>Not eat the meat? If not, how >>>do you explain it to them? >> >>I'm waaaaaiiiiittting. If you object >>to the wording of the 'as a food >>definition vegan', then just leave >>it out. The question still remains. >>And so does the steak. > > > Golly, Usual Idiot, your absence here > is very noteable. It says a lot. You > have chosen to cowardly not answer > the above. How come? Still twisted > with internal conflicts over how you > can remain mainstream and > conforming while eating a strict > vegetarian diet???? How do you > explain it to the nice people who > just gave you steak on a plate? > > He never answered your question. I doubt he's a vegetarian. I doubt he has friends. He's a bully that tries to hurt people. If he had a real friend, they would not give him a steak, if he really was a vegetarian. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rudy Canoza wrote: >>> >>> >>> GIVES, not "give's", you illiterate ****. >> >> >> >> It doesn't take much to give you >> a case of the freak-outs, does it. > > > No "freak-outs". I like pointing out how goddamned stupid you are. > It's fun. Perhaps someone else that is more documented in psychology could come up for a word to describe this behavior. I see it as mean, nasty, and when it give someone pleasure to hurt someone, a sign of sickness and even potentially dangerous. Not to mention insecure. It makes you think less of the person giving the insults. You wonder why they have such needs. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dutch wrote: > "Beach Runner" > wrote > >> >>Rudy Canoza wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>>It doesn't take much to give you >>>>a case of the freak-outs, does it. >>> >>> >>>No "freak-outs". I like pointing out how goddamned stupid you are. It's >>>fun. >>> >> >>if his joy is hurting other people, than he is sick. > > > If you can take constructive criticism then it can help you, immensely, > otherwise, sticks and stones... > Constructive criticism is not designed to hurt other people. Giving constructive criticism is an art, how to help someone while not hurting their feelings. If it just the joy of hurting someone for some stupid typo in one of the world's most inconsistent language, with inconsistent, contradictory rules, written by Microsoft which spell checker can innocently change a word into something absurd, than that's not constructive criticism. It is sickness. > |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
usual suspect wrote: > Skanky wrote: > <...> > >>> You're an idiot - an inattentive idiot. >> >> >> I'm very attentive. > > > You're confusing "attentive" for "obsessive." > > For someone that has an eating disorder, OCD is a way of control > over the person's body and therefore, life. The OCD controls > what kind of food goes in, what shape the food is, the color, > the weight, the amount, what the person does in other areas of > life, and so on. By completing the compulsions, the person once > again feels "safe" or protected... until they have to perform > another task again. Often the two problems - OCD and eating > disorders - are linked through the problem of perfectionism. > It's been said that the compulsive actions are a response to > always feeling that nothing the person does is good enough > (whether it has been or not) which has led them to over > compensate for things. > http://tinyurl.com/8vkpu > > Your desire to be a vegan is a pathetic, meaningless gesture to control > your own life. Or in your case, to have a life. Hardly, the vegan movement is a statement about life. That you wish to contribute as a positive part of the human race, not cause unnecessary harm to other living creatures, and generally support the world as a better place to live. What Unusual is describing are obsessive behaviors. Not a well thought out life style. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scented Nectar wrote: > "usual suspect" > wrote in message > ... > >>Car-less Orthorexic Skanky wrote: > > > Still fishing. I was car-less in > 2003. What does that say about > this year? Or last year? Or next > year? > Is the value of your form of transportation make one a better person. Ken Olsen drove a Ford Pinto, turned Digital into a great company until bankers got control of it. Now he serves the board of AMD which is beating the pants off of Intel. I remember my dear, but insecure Grandfather wanting to buy a new Caddy. My father, said "Harry, it's just a status symbol". He replied, "That's what I'm trying to tell Ester". Judging someone by their transportation is superficial. I loved when I lived in NYC and didn't need a car. And England, and between public transportation and a bike, had no need for a car. I love bikes much more than cars. I used to often ride them from Long Island to Manhattan, 40 miles each way. It's healthy, fun, and non polluting. I admit to taking pride that it was easy for me to do so while most Americans are too lazy to take the stairs. I hate living where I'm dependent about having a car. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Beach Runner" > wrote in message
. .. > > > Scented Nectar wrote: > > > "Scented Nectar" > wrote in message > > ... > > > >>"Scented Nectar" > wrote in message > ... > >> > >>>Usual has claimed that people > >>>should accept food that others > >>>have made and not worry what's > >>>in them. He give's away his > >>>neighbour's gift cake behind her > >>>back, and says that people > >>>should not turn down food that > >>>was made for them out of love > >>>and stuff. So, this got me to > >>>wondering. > >>> > >>>Usual, what do you (as a food > >>>definition vegan) do when the > >>>following occurs. You are > >>>invited over to someone's > >>>place for dinner. You are > >>>served a big steak and a > >>>small side of potatoes. What > >>>do you do? Eat the meat? > >>>Not eat the meat? If not, how > >>>do you explain it to them? > >> > >>I'm waaaaaiiiiittting. If you object > >>to the wording of the 'as a food > >>definition vegan', then just leave > >>it out. The question still remains. > >>And so does the steak. > > > > > > Golly, Usual Idiot, your absence here > > is very noteable. It says a lot. You > > have chosen to cowardly not answer > > the above. How come? Still twisted > > with internal conflicts over how you > > can remain mainstream and > > conforming while eating a strict > > vegetarian diet???? How do you > > explain it to the nice people who > > just gave you steak on a plate? > > > > > > He never answered your question. I doubt he's a vegetarian. > I doubt he has friends. He's a bully that tries to hurt people. > If he had a real friend, they would not give him a steak, if he really > was a vegetarian. I doubt he has friends too. The type of people he would like to hang out with would pick on him for being veg. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Beach Runner wrote:
>>>> GIVES, not "give's", you illiterate ****. >>> >>> It doesn't take much to give you >>> a case of the freak-outs, does it. >> >> No "freak-outs". I like pointing out how goddamned stupid you are. >> It's fun. > > Perhaps someone else that is more documented in psychology could come up > for a word to describe this behavior. WTF does "more documented in psychology" mean? > I see it as mean, nasty, and when it give someone pleasure to hurt > someone, a sign of sickness and even potentially dangerous. What about the danger you pose to others, Bob? You're simply an asshole who deserves to get his ass kicked. -- Violent Bob, 23 July 2005: http://tinyurl.com/9k2ml Why do you threaten violence but take offense when others point out your and Skanky's lunacy and idiocy? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Beach Runner wrote:
> He never answered your question. I don't have to because I've addressed the issue enough already. I have no moral objection to eating beef, just an aesthetic one. > I doubt he's a vegetarian. I doubt you have a degree from Columbia. Does that make us even? > I doubt he has friends. I've more friends than you do. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"usual suspect" > wrote in message
.. . > Beach Runner wrote: > > He never answered your question. > > I don't have to because I've addressed the issue enough already. I have > no moral objection to eating beef, just an aesthetic one. So how do you explain to the nice people who just made you a steak? > > I doubt he's a vegetarian. > > I doubt you have a degree from Columbia. Does that make us even? > > > I doubt he has friends. > > I've more friends than you do. Maybe you'd get some friends if you enlisted and really support your troops like you pretend to want to. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Beach Runner wrote:
> > usual suspect wrote: > >> Skanky wrote: >> <...> >> >>>> You're an idiot - an inattentive idiot. >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm very attentive. >> >> >> >> You're confusing "attentive" for "obsessive." >> >> For someone that has an eating disorder, OCD is a way of control >> over the person's body and therefore, life. The OCD controls >> what kind of food goes in, what shape the food is, the color, >> the weight, the amount, what the person does in other areas of >> life, and so on. By completing the compulsions, the person once >> again feels "safe" or protected... until they have to perform >> another task again. Often the two problems - OCD and eating >> disorders - are linked through the problem of perfectionism. >> It's been said that the compulsive actions are a response to >> always feeling that nothing the person does is good enough >> (whether it has been or not) which has led them to over >> compensate for things. >> http://tinyurl.com/8vkpu >> >> Your desire to be a vegan is a pathetic, meaningless gesture to >> control your own life. Or in your case, to have a life. > > Hardly, the vegan movement is a statement about life. No, it is not. It's an empty gesture. > That you wish to > contribute as a positive part of the human race, Bullshit. Veganism is misanthropic. Go read some of the vegan screeds on the internet and in their literature. Vegans reek of their contempt for the entire human race. They use their ersatz "compassion" for animals to show contempt for others: consumerism, corporations, "meatarians," "meat lobby," and the list goes on. Their agenda is authoritarian and malevolent. > not cause unnecessary > harm to other living creatures, That's not so. They seek only to keep formerly "living creatures" off the plates of other people. They don't object to billions of dead animals killed to produce their "vegan" dishes, only to the presence of parts-per-billion of possible animal-derived ingredients. > and generally support the world as a > better place to live. No, their authoritarian agenda would deny freedom to others in terms of what they wear, what they eat, and what kind of medication they can take. It would make the world a much, much worse place. > What Unusual is describing are obsessive behaviors. Veganism is an obsessive behavior, a mental illness. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Beach Runner wrote:
>>> Car-less Orthorexic Skanky wrote: >> >> Still fishing. I was car-less in >> 2003. What does that say about >> this year? Or last year? Or next >> year? > > Is the value of your form of transportation make one a better person. Did you get your Columbia Master's degree in Chinglish? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Skanky wrote:
>>>He never answered your question. >> >>I don't have to because I've addressed the issue enough already. I have >>no moral objection to eating beef, just an aesthetic one. > > So how do you explain to the nice > people who just made Do you mean *cook*? > you a steak? Explain what? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"usual suspect" > wrote in message
.. . > Skanky wrote: > >>>He never answered your question. > >> > >>I don't have to because I've addressed the issue enough already. I have > >>no moral objection to eating beef, just an aesthetic one. > > > > So how do you explain to the nice > > people who just made > > Do you mean *cook*? Yes, that's what I meant to say. > > you a steak? > > Explain what? That you can't eat it due to the fact that you don't eat steak. You find it aesthetically gross. How do you tell them? It sounds like the type of people you would like to hang around with would find you strange if you didn't enjoy their steak, their roast, their bacon and eggs. Do you tell people you are a strict vegetarian? Then again you can't do that anymore. You broke your vegan diet with a little sashimi. How do you tell them no? -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think your are dangerous. usual suspect wrote: > Beach Runner wrote: > >>>>> GIVES, not "give's", you illiterate ****. >>>> >>>> >>>> It doesn't take much to give you >>>> a case of the freak-outs, does it. >>> >>> >>> No "freak-outs". I like pointing out how goddamned stupid you are. >>> It's fun. >> >> >> Perhaps someone else that is more documented in psychology could come >> up for a word to describe this behavior. > > > WTF does "more documented in psychology" mean? > A certified psychologist. >> I see it as mean, nasty, and when it give someone pleasure to hurt >> someone, a sign of sickness and even potentially dangerous. > > > What about the danger you pose to others, Bob? > > You're simply an asshole who deserves to > get his ass kicked. > -- Violent Bob, 23 July 2005: http://tinyurl.com/9k2ml > Did I say I would do it. I said deserves. You also challenged me saying I don't have the balls. > Why do you threaten violence but take offense when others point out your > and Skanky's lunacy and idiocy? No because your say things to be mean and insult them. You even diagnose psychological conditions based on newsgroups. I still contend you are nasty and potentially dangerous. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Skanky wrote:
>>>>>He never answered your question. >>>> >>>>I don't have to because I've addressed the issue enough already. I have >>>>no moral objection to eating beef, just an aesthetic one. >>> >>>So how do you explain to the nice >>>people who just made >> >>Do you mean *cook*? > > Yes, that's what I meant to say. You didn't because you're a jello-headed, orthorexic, home-bound, car-less, hypocritical pot-head. >>>you a steak? >> >>Explain what? > > That you can't eat it When did I write that I *can't*? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"usual suspect" > wrote in message .. . > It's been said that the compulsive actions are a response to > always feeling that nothing the person does is good enough > (whether it has been or not) which has led them to over > compensate for things. So, this is the reason for your obsessive-compulsive lying, evasiveness, name-calling, and vulgarity? > Your desire to be a vegan is a pathetic, meaningless gesture to control > your own life. Or in your case, to have a life. As is your desire to be an obnoxious, vulgar, psychopathic anti-vegan. Laurie |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Tonight's Dinner Fare & Christmas Meals | General Cooking | |||
| Fair Fare | Preserving | |||
| Dinner Party Fare | General Cooking | |||
Linear Mode
