 |
|
| Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
Derek wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 12:14:50 GMT, usual suspect > wrote: > > >>>>Why did you lie about black olives, you fat orthorexic ex-greasemonkey? >>>> >>>> I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but >>>> stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or >>>> something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to >>>> maintain my ethical standard. >>>> -- Derek "Squid Ink" Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 >>> >>>There's no lie in there. Since learning how black olives >>>are sold in a medium containing squid ink I've stopped >>>eating them to maintain my ethical standard; something >>>you've proven incapable of doing, back-slider. >> >>They're not sold in anything containing squid ink, dumb ass. > > > I'm reliably told that they are immersed in squid ink > to colour them black, and I've no reason to believe a > word you write that suggests otherwise, liar suspect. You're not reliably told any such thing. Some goof "vegan" in alt.food.vegan named "Ronny" alleged that there was squid ink in them, and never offered a shred of proof to support it. You never did any research on your own. You've taken her word for it, and she doesn't know. You're not fooling anyone. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
pearl wrote:
> "usual suspect" > wrote in message news 
>> <the usual BS> > > So when are you off When are you going to take that broken bottle out of your asshole? You ignorant ****. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Car-less Orthorexic Skanky wrote:
>>>Still fishing. >> >>Not fishing. It's already established. > > Where? AFV and atmowire.com. >>>I was car-less in 2003. >> >>You still are. > > How can you be sure? Because you're not a dynamic person, much less a go-getter. That was obvious back when you were prattling about growing your own food someday even if your current consumption doesn't rise to the level of your phony beliefs about animals (that killing them is wrong). You're a hypocrite -- and a lazy one both intellectually and physically. >>>>I'm surprised that at 42 or 43 you still haven't. Do you live with your >>>>parents and are they still a bit overprotective of their fragile 42 or >>>>43 year-old baby? >>> >>>Still fishing, huh? >> >>I'm not fishing. I have a very strong hunch, though. > > You're fishing. No. I'm quite certain that your parents still provide for you. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
pearl wrote:
> <the usual BS> If you think it's BS, why do you espouse the following? "veganism" "inner earth beings" "hollow earth" that goofy patent for a MANUFACTURED globe helium-inflated number(s) for feed:beef rain forest destruction Brazil's exports (based on *Argentina's* trade) Stolen French flying saucer Zapper Foot massage (as cure-all) Astrology Numerology Alien abduction bestiality Leprechauns Channeling Polar fountains Sun gazing Chemtrails AIDS and ebola conspiracy theory Crop circles sexually aroused by violent ex-convicts participation in skinhead subculture the validity of online IQ tests crackpot 9-11 conspiracy theories Jeff Rense for "news" ..... http://tinyurl.com/h0br http://tinyurl.com/h0bl http://tinyurl.com/v5p8 http://tinyurl.com/v5pf http://tinyurl.com/mh5w http://tinyurl.com/mh6h http://tinyurl.com/mh6r http://tinyurl.com/mh71 http://tinyurl.com/mh7a http://tinyurl.com/mh7j http://tinyurl.com/mh7p http://tinyurl.com/v5jj http://tinyurl.com/v5kd http://tinyurl.com/v5l6 http://tinyurl.com/v5ft http://tinyurl.com/v5fj http://tinyurl.com/v5fp http://tinyurl.com/v5ft http://tinyurl.com/v5ga http://tinyurl.com/v5gc http://tinyurl.com/v5i2 http://tinyurl.com/v5gk http://tinyurl.com/v5h1 http://tinyurl.com/v5h9 Those links are to your posts, proving the validity of the above claims. You're barking mad, Les. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Beach Runner wrote:
> Notice when I showed the massive support of global warming in US URLs he > ignored the reply. I proved he was liar. No, you didn't. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message nk.net...
> pearl wrote: > > > "usual suspect" > wrote in message . .. > > > >>pearl wrote: > >> > >>>>>Support your troops - http://www.americasupportsyou.mil/ . > >>> > >>>Your unethical edit is noted. > >> > >>It wasn't unethical. > > > > > > You altered my post. You've no credibility. > > > > Go 'support your troops', murderous troll. > > **** yourself with a broken bottle, you filthy slag. The sick meatarian 'mind'. As we've seen time and time again, abuse of animals goes hand in hand with the abuse of humans. > Haven't heard from your solly yet <chortle>. I won't, > either - you don't have one. No case, no solly. It's > that simple. Only your sickness enables that erroneous belief. The serial bully: ... is self-opinionated and displays arrogance, audacity, a superior sense of entitlement and sense of invulnerability and untouchability ... http://www.bullyonline.org/workbully/serial.htm |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
pearl wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message nk.net... > >>pearl wrote: >> >> >>>"usual suspect" > wrote in message . .. >>> >>> >>>>pearl wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>Support your troops - http://www.americasupportsyou.mil/ . >>>>> >>>>>Your unethical edit is noted. >>>> >>>>It wasn't unethical. >>> >>> >>>You altered my post. You've no credibility. >>> >>>Go 'support your troops', murderous troll. >> >>**** yourself with a broken bottle, you filthy slag. > > The sick meatarian 'mind'. "Meatarian" isn't a word. Why do you believe in: "veganism" "inner earth beings" "hollow earth" that goofy patent for a MANUFACTURED globe helium-inflated number(s) for feed:beef rain forest destruction Brazil's exports (based on *Argentina's* trade) Stolen French flying saucer Zapper Foot massage (as cure-all) Astrology Numerology Alien abduction bestiality Leprechauns Channeling Polar fountains Sun gazing Chemtrails AIDS and ebola conspiracy theory Crop circles sexually aroused by violent ex-convicts participation in skinhead subculture the validity of online IQ tests crackpot 9-11 conspiracy theories Jeff Rense for "news" ..... http://tinyurl.com/h0br http://tinyurl.com/h0bl http://tinyurl.com/v5p8 http://tinyurl.com/v5pf http://tinyurl.com/mh5w http://tinyurl.com/mh6h http://tinyurl.com/mh6r http://tinyurl.com/mh71 http://tinyurl.com/mh7a http://tinyurl.com/mh7j http://tinyurl.com/mh7p http://tinyurl.com/v5jj http://tinyurl.com/v5kd http://tinyurl.com/v5l6 http://tinyurl.com/v5ft http://tinyurl.com/v5fj http://tinyurl.com/v5fp http://tinyurl.com/v5ft http://tinyurl.com/v5ga http://tinyurl.com/v5gc http://tinyurl.com/v5i2 http://tinyurl.com/v5gk http://tinyurl.com/v5h1 http://tinyurl.com/v5h9 Those links are to your posts, proving the validity of the above claims. > As we've seen time and time again, You're barking mad, Lesley. >>Haven't heard from your solly yet <chortle>. I won't, >>either - you don't have one. No case, no solly. It's >>that simple. It really is. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
pearl wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message nk.net... > >>pearl wrote: >> >> >>>"usual suspect" > wrote in message . .. >>> >>> >>>>pearl wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>Support your troops - http://www.americasupportsyou.mil/ . >>>>> >>>>>Your unethical edit is noted. >>>> >>>>It wasn't unethical. >>> >>> >>>You altered my post. You've no credibility. >>> >>>Go 'support your troops', murderous troll. >> >>**** yourself with a broken bottle, you filthy slag. > > > The sick meatarian 'mind'. As we've seen time and time again, > abuse of animals goes hand in hand with the abuse of humans. > > >>Haven't heard from your solly yet <chortle>. I won't, >>either - you don't have one. No case, no solly. It's >>that simple. > > > Only your sickness enables that erroneous belief. Nope. You don't have a case, hence no need for a solly. **** off, you infectious food-rubbing shitbag. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
usual suspect wrote:
> Car-less Orthorexic Skanky wrote: > >>>> Still fishing. >>> >>> >>> Not fishing. It's already established. >> >> >> Where? > > > AFV and atmowire.com. > >>>> I was car-less in 2003. >>> >>> >>> You still are. >> >> >> How can you be sure? > > > Because you're not a dynamic person, much less a go-getter. That was > obvious back when you were prattling about growing your own food someday > even if your current consumption doesn't rise to the level of your phony > beliefs about animals (that killing them is wrong). You're a hypocrite > -- and a lazy one both intellectually and physically. > >>>>> I'm surprised that at 42 or 43 you still haven't. Do you live with >>>>> your >>>>> parents and are they still a bit overprotective of their fragile 42 or >>>>> 43 year-old baby? >>>> >>>> >>>> Still fishing, huh? >>> >>> >>> I'm not fishing. I have a very strong hunch, though. >> >> >> You're fishing. > > > No. I'm quite certain that your parents still provide for you. I think that's a very real possibility; even strongly likely. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:18:58 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>Derek wrote: > >> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 12:14:50 GMT, usual suspect > wrote: >> >> >>>>>Why did you lie about black olives, you fat orthorexic ex-greasemonkey? >>>>> >>>>> I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but >>>>> stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or >>>>> something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to >>>>> maintain my ethical standard. >>>>> -- Derek "Squid Ink" Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 >>>> >>>>There's no lie in there. Since learning how black olives >>>>are sold in a medium containing squid ink I've stopped >>>>eating them to maintain my ethical standard; something >>>>you've proven incapable of doing, back-slider. >>> >>>They're not sold in anything containing squid ink, dumb ass. >> >> >> I'm reliably told that they are immersed in squid ink >> to colour them black, and I've no reason to believe a >> word you write that suggests otherwise, liar suspect. > >You're not reliably told any such thing. Yes, I was, by usual suspect himself, right after my statement. Read on. [start - me] > I used to eat black olives up until a few months > ago, but stopped after realising they swim around > in squid ink, or something close to it. I'm always > ready to make changes to maintain my ethical > standard. [usual suspect] If it soothes your tortured conscience, not all black olives "swim around in" squid ink. Why deprive yourself of things you enjoy if reasonable alternatives exist? [end] usual suspect May 23 2003 http://tinyurl.com/cekv5 From that he clearly concedes that some do in fact swim around in squid ink while "not all". Olives are green, and though the very mature olives turn dark, olive farmers in some parts of the World that can't wait that long and have a ready supply of squid ink use it to fool their buyers. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:59:30 GMT, queer suspect > wrote:
> Derek wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>Why did you lie about black olives, you fat orthorexic ex-greasemonkey? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but >>>>>>>>>>>stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or >>>>>>>>>>>something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to >>>>>>>>>>>maintain my ethical standard. >>>>>>>>>>>-- Derek "Squid Ink" Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>There's no lie in there. Since learning how black olives >>>>>>>>>>are sold in a medium containing squid ink I've stopped >>>>>>>>>>eating them to maintain my ethical standard; something >>>>>>>>>>you've proven incapable of doing, back-slider. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>They're not sold in anything containing squid ink, dumb ass. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I'm reliably told that they are immersed in squid ink >>>>>>>>to colour them black, and I've no reason to believe a >>>>>>>>word you write that suggests otherwise, liar suspect >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You're UNreliably told that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but >>>>>>> stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or >>>>>>> something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to >>>>>>> maintain my ethical standard. >>>>>>> -- Derek Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You stopped eating them because of misinformation >>>> >>>>Like I said but which you snipped away, "I'm reliably told >>> >>>No >> >> Like I > >You keep lying [start - me] > I used to eat black olives up until a few months > ago, but stopped after realising they swim around > in squid ink, or something close to it. I'm always > ready to make changes to maintain my ethical > standard. [usual suspect] If it soothes your tortured conscience, not all black olives "swim around in" squid ink. Why deprive yourself of things you enjoy if reasonable alternatives exist? [end] usual suspect May 23 2003 http://tinyurl.com/cekv5 From that you clearly concede that some do in fact swim around in squid ink while "not all". Olives are green, and though the very mature olives turn dark, olive farmers in some parts of the World that can't wait that long and have a ready supply of squid ink use it to fool their buyers. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
--
"Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message ink.net... > usual suspect wrote: > > > Car-less Orthorexic Skanky wrote: > > > >>>> Still fishing. > >>> > >>> > >>> Not fishing. It's already established. > >> > >> > >> Where? > > > > > > AFV and atmowire.com. > > > >>>> I was car-less in 2003. > >>> > >>> > >>> You still are. > >> > >> > >> How can you be sure? > > > > > > Because you're not a dynamic person, much less a go-getter. That was > > obvious back when you were prattling about growing your own food someday > > even if your current consumption doesn't rise to the level of your phony > > beliefs about animals (that killing them is wrong). You're a hypocrite > > -- and a lazy one both intellectually and physically. > > > >>>>> I'm surprised that at 42 or 43 you still haven't. Do you live with > >>>>> your > >>>>> parents and are they still a bit overprotective of their fragile 42 or > >>>>> 43 year-old baby? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Still fishing, huh? And now you're even fishing for when my birthday is. Last you heard I was 42. Am I 43 yet? I know but you don't. > >>> I'm not fishing. I have a very strong hunch, though. > >> > >> > >> You're fishing. > > > > > > No. I'm quite certain that your parents still provide for you. > > > I think that's a very real possibility; even strongly > likely. The two of you are nuts. Just admit that you don't know. Making claims without facts won't bait me. You are trying to get me to say "Actually, blah blah" but it won't work. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
nk.net... > Scented Nectar wrote: > > > "usual suspect" > wrote in message > > ... > > > >>Car-less Orthorexic Skanky wrote: > > > > > > Still fishing. > > No. We reeled you in months ago. > > You don't have a car. Period. In 2003. What about now? > >>>>>>>>You're an idiot - an inattentive idiot. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>I'm very attentive. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>You're confusing "attentive" for "obsessive." > >>>>>> > >>>>>>For someone that has an eating disorder, OCD is a way of control > >>>>> > >>>>>I don't have an eating disorder. > >>>> > >>>>Yes, you do. > >>> > >>>You follow quackery. > >> > >>I avoid you. You, otoh, have yet to come down firmly against > >>reflexology. You want to sit on the fence because of one person's > >>anecdotes despite the studies which show it to be quackery. > > > > > > You follow quackery. > > No. Yep. Orthorexia is quackery. > > I'm not afollower of reflexology > > Yet. You are gullible, so eventually you will, or some > other form of quackery. You have lots of other > unscientific medical beliefs. I believe you are as mad as a hatter. Does that count, since no doctor is here to make it official? > >>>>>I have more of a life > >>>> > >>>>No, you don't. You're a home-bound agoraphobic pot-head. > > Ha ha ha ha ha! That's an outstanding description. I'm not home bound. Although the word agoraphobia is used, in my case I simply don't like crowds. Fear is not a factor. Dislike is, and I'm not home bound. I thankfully am only mildly agoraphobic. As for smoking pot, I do it very responsibly and not every day. So that rules out 'pot-head" Now smarten up before I have to verbally smack you out again. > >>>>Your *existence* -- it's not a life -- a feeble attempt to escape from life. > >>> > >>>I love my life. > >> > >>You love avoiding reality. Someday you'll have to face up to reality. > > > > > > It's my reality I love > > It isn't reality. Contrary to the pot-head belief > system you espouse, one does not create one's own > reality. One can not, for example, believe it's > "mostly" wrong to kill animals, because "wrong" doesn't > have degrees. Did I say I created my reality? I did bring much of it about through choices I've made. Now why are you bringing the 'mostly' stuff up again? Are you going to go on a rant again about how things are absolute or nothing? > >>I'm surprised that at 42 or 43 you still haven't. Do you live with your > >>parents and are they still a bit overprotective of their fragile 42 or > >>43 year-old baby? > > > > > > Still fishing, huh? > > No. We know, with absolute certainty, that there's > something seriously deficient in terms of your adult > independence. Nope. You're fishing. By the way why did you change the followup headers to be mispelled? I have fixed them of course. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dutch" > wrote in message
... > > "Scented Nectar" > wrote > > "usual suspect" > wrote > >> Dutch wrote: > >> > "usual suspect" > wrote > >> > > >> > > >> >>1. I want to make sure people aren't deluded by the lies people like > >> >>you > >> >>spread about diet, health, nutrition, the conditions in which animals > > are > >> >>raised, etc., so I'm here to add some balance. > >> > > >> > > >> > Quite so, "veganism" is one of the most insidious ideas in modern > > culture. > >> > Due to it's benign reputation, people find themselves ensconced in it's > >> > dogma before they know what hit them. The same people who would never > > fall > >> > victim to one of the more obvious cults are easy prey for extreme ARAs > > who > >> > use veganism to promote their agenda. > >> > >> I think it's apropos and fair to compare veganism to cults. While > >> veganism may not be as systematic as, say, Scientology, it similarly > >> defrauds its adherents, fosters an "us versus them" attitude, and gets > >> them to aggressively proselytize others. > > > > It all starts when > > ...when you become addicted to the warm, fuzzy feeling that accompanies the > illusion that you are living a killing-free lifestyle. No other cult offers > it's rewards so cheaply. Well now, Dutchie, you've joined the snip and run club. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Scented Nectar" > wrote in message
... > "Scented Nectar" > wrote in message > ... > > Usual has claimed that people > > should accept food that others > > have made and not worry what's > > in them. He give's away his > > neighbour's gift cake behind her > > back, and says that people > > should not turn down food that > > was made for them out of love > > and stuff. So, this got me to > > wondering. > > > > Usual, what do you (as a food > > definition vegan) do when the > > following occurs. You are > > invited over to someone's > > place for dinner. You are > > served a big steak and a > > small side of potatoes. What > > do you do? Eat the meat? > > Not eat the meat? If not, how > > do you explain it to them? > > I'm waaaaaiiiiittting. If you object > to the wording of the 'as a food > definition vegan', then just leave > it out. The question still remains. > And so does the steak. Well Usual, answer the question. Also, answer why you haven't enlisted in order to really support your troops. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Claire's fat shitbag of an Uncle Dreck wrote:
> Have you any direct evidence that US troops have murdered anyone for oil? >>>>>>>>>>>>Why did you lie about black olives, you fat orthorexic ex-greasemonkey? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but >>>>>>>>>>>>stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or >>>>>>>>>>>>something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to >>>>>>>>>>>>maintain my ethical standard. >>>>>>>>>>>>-- Derek "Squid Ink" Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>There's no lie in there. Since learning how black olives >>>>>>>>>>>are sold in a medium containing squid ink I've stopped >>>>>>>>>>>eating them to maintain my ethical standard; something >>>>>>>>>>>you've proven incapable of doing, back-slider. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>They're not sold in anything containing squid ink, dumb ass. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I'm reliably told that they are immersed in squid ink >>>>>>>>>to colour them black, and I've no reason to believe a >>>>>>>>>word you write that suggests otherwise, liar suspect >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You're UNreliably told that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but >>>>>>>> stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or >>>>>>>> something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to >>>>>>>> maintain my ethical standard. >>>>>>>> -- Derek Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You stopped eating them because of misinformation >>>>> >>>>>Like I said but which you snipped away, "I'm reliably told >>>> >>>>No >>> >>>Like I >> >>You keep lying > > [start - me] > > I used to eat black olives up until a few months > > ago, but stopped after realising they swim around > > in squid ink, or something close to it. I'm always > > ready to make changes to maintain my ethical > > standard. > [usual suspect] > If it soothes your tortured conscience, not all black > olives "swim around in" squid ink. Why deprive > yourself of things you enjoy if reasonable alternatives > exist? > [end] > usual suspect May 23 2003 http://tinyurl.com/cekv5 > > From that Do you really base your diet AND stake your "ethical standard" (HAWHAW!) upon things you've not inquired about yourself? Note how you initially wrote you "realised" black olives do something they don't. You now lie (and even try to spin one of my posts into your tangled web) and write it wasn't a "realization," _per se_, but rather that you've been "reliably told" olives do something they don't. "Reliably told" by whom, shitbag? These olives are processed in a lye curing solution that leaches the bitterness out. California Ripe Olives have a firm texture and smooth, mellow taste. Once curing is complete, a series of cold water rinses removes every trace of curing solution. During the curing process, which takes several days, a flow of air bubbling through the olives produces the natural, rich dark color. A trace of organic iron salt (ferrous gluconate) is added to act as a color fixer so the olives will have less tendency to fade after the cans are stored. Canning is the final step. Ripe olives are canned in a mild salt brine solution and, because they are a low-acid product, are heat sterilized under strict California State health rules. http://www.calolive.org/homecooks/facts.html Regardless, as you're wont to do, you avoid a food you previously enjoyed without guilt on the flimsiest of grounds AND YOU DO SO BECAUSE IT MAKES YOU FEEL VIRTUOUS AND MORE ETHICAL. Such belief and action is consistent with orthorexia. Your sham "virtue" is as hollow as the bullshit about "squid ink" you base it upon. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Skanky Nutball wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message > ink.net... > >>usual suspect wrote: >> >> >>>Car-less Orthorexic Skanky wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>Still fishing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Not fishing. It's already established. >>>> >>>> >>>>Where? >>> >>> >>>AFV and atmowire.com. >>> >>> >>>>>>I was car-less in 2003. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>You still are. >>>> >>>> >>>>How can you be sure? >>> >>> >>>Because you're not a dynamic person, much less a go-getter. Exactly right. The picture of passivity. >>>That was >>>obvious back when you were prattling about growing your own food someday >>>even if your current consumption doesn't rise to the level of your phony >>>beliefs about animals (that killing them is wrong). You're a hypocrite >>>-- and a lazy one both intellectually and physically. >>> >>> >>>>>>>I'm surprised that at 42 or 43 you still haven't. Do you live with >>>>>>>your >>>>>>>parents and are they still a bit overprotective of their fragile 42 > > or > >>>>>>>43 year-old baby? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Still fishing, huh? > > > And now you're even fishing No fishing. >>>>>I'm not fishing. I have a very strong hunch, though. >>>> >>>> >>>>You're fishing. >>> >>> >>>No. I'm quite certain that your parents still provide for you. >> >> >>I think that's a very real possibility; even strongly >>likely. > > > The two of you are nuts. No. Your parents do still provide for you to some extent. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scented Nectar wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message > nk.net... > >>Scented Nectar wrote: >> >> >>>"usual suspect" > wrote in message ... >>> >>> >>>>Car-less Orthorexic Skanky wrote: >>> >>> >>>Still fishing. >> >>No. We reeled you in months ago. >> >>You don't have a car. Period. > > > In 2003. What about now? No car. You have some kind of disability that prevents you from operating a motor vehicle. >>>>>>>>>>You're an idiot - an inattentive idiot. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I'm very attentive. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You're confusing "attentive" for "obsessive." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>For someone that has an eating disorder, OCD is a way of control >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I don't have an eating disorder. >>>>>> >>>>>>Yes, you do. >>>>> >>>>>You follow quackery. >>>> >>>>I avoid you. You, otoh, have yet to come down firmly against >>>>reflexology. You want to sit on the fence because of one person's >>>>anecdotes despite the studies which show it to be quackery. >>> >>> >>>You follow quackery. >> >>No. > > > Yep. Orthorexia is A description of your attitudes toward food. >>> I'm not afollower of reflexology >> >>Yet. You are gullible, so eventually you will, or some >>other form of quackery. You have lots of other >>unscientific medical beliefs. > > > I believe you Good. >>>>>>>I have more of a life >>>>>> >>>>>>No, you don't. You're a home-bound agoraphobic pot-head. >> >>Ha ha ha ha ha! That's an outstanding description. > > > I'm not home bound. Although > the word agoraphobia is used, Home-bound. >>>>>>Your *existence* -- it's not a life -- a feeble attempt to escape from > > life. > >>>>>I love my life. >>>> >>>>You love avoiding reality. Someday you'll have to face up to reality. >>> >>> >>>It's my reality I love >> >>It isn't reality. Contrary to the pot-head belief >>system you espouse, one does not create one's own >>reality. One can not, for example, believe it's >>"mostly" wrong to kill animals, because "wrong" doesn't >>have degrees. > > > Did I say I created my reality? You imply it. >>>>I'm surprised that at 42 or 43 you still haven't. Do you live with your >>>>parents and are they still a bit overprotective of their fragile 42 or >>>>43 year-old baby? >>> >>> >>>Still fishing, huh? >> >>No. We know, with absolute certainty, that there's >>something seriously deficient in terms of your adult >>independence. > > > Nope. Yep. You are not a fully independent adult. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:33:36 GMT, queer suspect > wrote:
>Derek wrote: > > >Have you any direct evidence that US troops have murdered anyone for oil? Every person murdered in Iraq during our illegal war on them was murdered for oil. >>>>>>>>>>>>>Why did you lie about black olives, you fat orthorexic ex-greasemonkey? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but >>>>>>>>>>>>>stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or >>>>>>>>>>>>>something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to >>>>>>>>>>>>>maintain my ethical standard. >>>>>>>>>>>>>-- Derek "Squid Ink" Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>There's no lie in there. Since learning how black olives >>>>>>>>>>>>are sold in a medium containing squid ink I've stopped >>>>>>>>>>>>eating them to maintain my ethical standard; something >>>>>>>>>>>>you've proven incapable of doing, back-slider. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>They're not sold in anything containing squid ink, dumb ass. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>I'm reliably told that they are immersed in squid ink >>>>>>>>>>to colour them black, and I've no reason to believe a >>>>>>>>>>word you write that suggests otherwise, liar suspect >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>You're UNreliably told that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but >>>>>>>>> stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or >>>>>>>>> something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to >>>>>>>>> maintain my ethical standard. >>>>>>>>> -- Derek Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>You stopped eating them because of misinformation >>>>>> >>>>>>Like I said but which you snipped away, "I'm reliably told >>>>> >>>>>No >>>> >>>>Like I >>> >>>You keep lying >> >> [start - me] >> > I used to eat black olives up until a few months >> > ago, but stopped after realising they swim around >> > in squid ink, or something close to it. I'm always >> > ready to make changes to maintain my ethical >> > standard. >> [usual suspect] >> If it soothes your tortured conscience, not all black >> olives "swim around in" squid ink. Why deprive >> yourself of things you enjoy if reasonable alternatives >> exist? >> [end] >> usual suspect May 23 2003 http://tinyurl.com/cekv5 >> >> From that <unsnip> From that you clearly concede that some do in fact swim around in squid ink while "not all". Olives are green, and though the very mature olives turn dark, olive farmers in some parts of the World that can't wait that long and have a ready supply of squid ink use it to fool their buyers. <end restore> I was going to wait a bit longer before hitting you with your own statement which leaves no doubt that YOU concede some olives swim around in squid ink, but I couldn't resist any longer. haw haw haw >Do you really Yes I do. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Car-less Orthorexic Skanky wrote:
>>>Still fishing. >> >>No. We reeled you in months ago. >> >>You don't have a car. Period. > > In 2003. What about now? You haven't changed in two years. You haven't changed since the moment your development arrested, which appears to have occurred some time between age 13 and age 17. <...> >>>>>>>I have more of a life >>>>>> >>>>>>No, you don't. You're a home-bound agoraphobic pot-head. >> >>Ha ha ha ha ha! That's an outstanding description. > > I'm not home bound. Liar. Look back at your posting history from Nov and Dec of last year and note that you were littering AFV 24/7 with your bullshit. > Although the word agoraphobia is used, Suitably used! > in my case I simply don't like > crowds. Fear is not a factor. Fear is a factor for you, Skanky. > Dislike is, and I'm not home > bound. Yes, you are. > I thankfully am only > mildly agoraphobic. Liar. > As for smoking pot, I do it We know. > So that rules out 'pot-head" No, it includes it. >>>>>I love my life. >>>> >>>>You love avoiding reality. Someday you'll have to face up to reality. >>> >>>It's my reality I love >> >>It isn't reality. Contrary to the pot-head belief >>system you espouse, one does not create one's own >>reality. One can not, for example, believe it's >>"mostly" wrong to kill animals, because "wrong" doesn't >>have degrees. > > Did I say I created my reality? > I did bring much of it about > through choices I've made. Poor choices which have arrested your development and made you dependent, without transportation. > Now why are you bringing the > 'mostly' stuff up again? Because it's an amusing example of your >>>>I'm surprised that at 42 or 43 you still haven't. Do you live with your >>>>parents and are they still a bit overprotective of their fragile 42 or >>>>43 year-old baby? >>> >>>Still fishing, huh? >> >>No. We know, with absolute certainty, that there's >>something seriously deficient in terms of your adult >>independence. > > Nope. Yes. You're emotionally immature and mentally defective. I'm willing to be you either live with your parents or they help you out. How long have you received welfare, and is that why you were so vociferous about how insufficient it is to meet (your) needs? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Claire's fat shitbag Uncle Dreck wrote:
> >> >>Have you any direct evidence that US troops have murdered anyone for oil? > > Every person I asked you for evidence about people being murdered FOR OIL. Do you include the Nick Bergs and victims of insurgent-based terrorism among those "murdered" or do you only count the dead insurgents among the murdered? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why did you lie about black olives, you fat orthorexic ex-greasemonkey? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>maintain my ethical standard. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>-- Derek "Squid Ink" Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>There's no lie in there. Since learning how black olives >>>>>>>>>>>>>are sold in a medium containing squid ink I've stopped >>>>>>>>>>>>>eating them to maintain my ethical standard; something >>>>>>>>>>>>>you've proven incapable of doing, back-slider. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>They're not sold in anything containing squid ink, dumb ass. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>I'm reliably told that they are immersed in squid ink >>>>>>>>>>>to colour them black, and I've no reason to believe a >>>>>>>>>>>word you write that suggests otherwise, liar suspect >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>You're UNreliably told that. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but >>>>>>>>>> stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or >>>>>>>>>> something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to >>>>>>>>>> maintain my ethical standard. >>>>>>>>>> -- Derek Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>You stopped eating them because of misinformation >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Like I said but which you snipped away, "I'm reliably told >>>>>> >>>>>>No >>>>> >>>>>Like I >>>> >>>>You keep lying >>> >>> [start - me] >>> > I used to eat black olives up until a few months >>> > ago, but stopped after realising they swim around >>> > in squid ink, or something close to it. I'm always >>> > ready to make changes to maintain my ethical >>> > standard. >>> [usual suspect] >>> If it soothes your tortured conscience, not all black >>> olives "swim around in" squid ink. Why deprive >>> yourself of things you enjoy if reasonable alternatives >>> exist? >>> [end] >>> usual suspect May 23 2003 http://tinyurl.com/cekv5 Do you really base your diet AND stake your "ethical standard" (HAWHAW!) upon things you've not inquired about yourself? Note how you initially wrote you "realised" black olives do something they don't. You now lie (and even try to spin one of my posts into your tangled web) and write it wasn't a "realization," _per se_, but rather that you've been "reliably told" olives do something they don't. "Reliably told" by whom, shitbag? These olives are processed in a lye curing solution that leaches the bitterness out. California Ripe Olives have a firm texture and smooth, mellow taste. Once curing is complete, a series of cold water rinses removes every trace of curing solution. During the curing process, which takes several days, a flow of air bubbling through the olives produces the natural, rich dark color. A trace of organic iron salt (ferrous gluconate) is added to act as a color fixer so the olives will have less tendency to fade after the cans are stored. Canning is the final step. Ripe olives are canned in a mild salt brine solution and, because they are a low-acid product, are heat sterilized under strict California State health rules. http://www.calolive.org/homecooks/facts.html Regardless, as you're wont to do, you avoid a food you previously enjoyed without guilt on the flimsiest of grounds AND YOU DO SO BECAUSE IT MAKES YOU FEEL VIRTUOUS AND MORE ETHICAL. Such belief and action is consistent with orthorexia. Your sham "virtue" is as hollow as the bullshit about "squid ink" you base it upon. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:03:01 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>Derek wrote: > >>> >>>Have you any direct evidence that US troops have murdered anyone for oil? >> >> Every person > >I asked you for evidence about people being murdered FOR OIL. Look for it yourself. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why did you lie about black olives, you fat orthorexic ex-greasemonkey? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>maintain my ethical standard. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>-- Derek "Squid Ink" Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>There's no lie in there. Since learning how black olives >>>>>>>>>>>>>>are sold in a medium containing squid ink I've stopped >>>>>>>>>>>>>>eating them to maintain my ethical standard; something >>>>>>>>>>>>>>you've proven incapable of doing, back-slider. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>They're not sold in anything containing squid ink, dumb ass. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>I'm reliably told that they are immersed in squid ink >>>>>>>>>>>>to colour them black, and I've no reason to believe a >>>>>>>>>>>>word you write that suggests otherwise, liar suspect >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>You're UNreliably told that. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but >>>>>>>>>>> stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or >>>>>>>>>>> something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to >>>>>>>>>>> maintain my ethical standard. >>>>>>>>>>> -- Derek Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>You stopped eating them because of misinformation >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Like I said but which you snipped away, "I'm reliably told >>>>>>> >>>>>>>No >>>>>> >>>>>>Like I >>>>> >>>>>You keep lying >>>> >>>> [start - me] >>>> > I used to eat black olives up until a few months >>>> > ago, but stopped after realising they swim around >>>> > in squid ink, or something close to it. I'm always >>>> > ready to make changes to maintain my ethical >>>> > standard. >>>> [usual suspect] >>>> If it soothes your tortured conscience, not all black >>>> olives "swim around in" squid ink. Why deprive >>>> yourself of things you enjoy if reasonable alternatives >>>> exist? >>>> [end] >>>> usual suspect May 23 2003 http://tinyurl.com/cekv5 <unsnip> From that you clearly concede that some do in fact swim around in squid ink while "not all". Olives are green, and though the very mature olives turn dark, olive farmers in some parts of the World that can't wait that long and have a ready supply of squid ink use it to fool their buyers. <end restore> I was going to wait a bit longer before hitting you with your own statement which leaves no doubt that YOU concede some olives swim around in squid ink, but I couldn't resist any longer. haw haw haw |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Claire's fat shitbag Uncle wrote:
> >>>> >>>>Have you any direct evidence that US troops have murdered anyone for oil? >>> >>>Every person >> >>I asked you for evidence about people being murdered FOR OIL. > > Look for it yourself. Evasion noted. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why did you lie about black olives, you fat orthorexic ex-greasemonkey? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>maintain my ethical standard. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>-- Derek "Squid Ink" Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>There's no lie in there. Since learning how black olives >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>are sold in a medium containing squid ink I've stopped >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>eating them to maintain my ethical standard; something >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you've proven incapable of doing, back-slider. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>They're not sold in anything containing squid ink, dumb ass. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>I'm reliably told that they are immersed in squid ink >>>>>>>>>>>>>to colour them black, and I've no reason to believe a >>>>>>>>>>>>>word you write that suggests otherwise, liar suspect >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>You're UNreliably told that. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but >>>>>>>>>>>> stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or >>>>>>>>>>>> something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to >>>>>>>>>>>> maintain my ethical standard. >>>>>>>>>>>> -- Derek Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>You stopped eating them because of misinformation >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Like I said but which you snipped away, "I'm reliably told >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>No >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Like I >>>>>> >>>>>>You keep lying >>>>> >>>>>[start - me] >>>>> >>>>>>I used to eat black olives up until a few months >>>>>>ago, but stopped after realising they swim around >>>>>>in squid ink, or something close to it. I'm always >>>>>>ready to make changes to maintain my ethical >>>>>>standard. >>>>> >>>>>[usual suspect] >>>>>If it soothes your tortured conscience, not all black >>>>>olives "swim around in" squid ink. Why deprive >>>>>yourself of things you enjoy if reasonable alternatives >>>>>exist? >>>>>[end] >>>>>usual suspect May 23 2003 http://tinyurl.com/cekv5 Do you really base your diet AND stake your "ethical standard" (HAWHAW!) upon things you've not inquired about yourself? Note how you initially wrote you "realised" black olives do something they don't. You now lie (and even try to spin one of my posts into your tangled web) and write it wasn't a "realization," _per se_, but rather that you've been "reliably told" olives do something they don't. "Reliably told" by whom, shitbag? These olives are processed in a lye curing solution that leaches the bitterness out. California Ripe Olives have a firm texture and smooth, mellow taste. Once curing is complete, a series of cold water rinses removes every trace of curing solution. During the curing process, which takes several days, a flow of air bubbling through the olives produces the natural, rich dark color. A trace of organic iron salt (ferrous gluconate) is added to act as a color fixer so the olives will have less tendency to fade after the cans are stored. Canning is the final step. Ripe olives are canned in a mild salt brine solution and, because they are a low-acid product, are heat sterilized under strict California State health rules. http://www.calolive.org/homecooks/facts.html Regardless, as you're wont to do, you avoid a food you previously enjoyed without guilt on the flimsiest of grounds AND YOU DO SO BECAUSE IT MAKES YOU FEEL VIRTUOUS AND MORE ETHICAL. Such belief and action is consistent with orthorexia. Your sham "virtue" is as hollow as the bullshit about "squid ink" you base it upon. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rudy Canoza wrote:
> Scented Nectar wrote: > >> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message >> nk.net... >> >>> Scented Nectar wrote: >>> >>> >>>> "usual suspect" > wrote in message >>>> ... >>>> >>>> >>>>> Car-less Orthorexic Skanky wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Still fishing. >>> >>> >>> No. We reeled you in months ago. >>> >>> You don't have a car. Period. >> >> >> >> In 2003. What about now? > > > No car. > > You have some kind of disability that prevents you from operating a > motor vehicle. Or a suspended license due to driving under the influence. >>>>>>>>>>> You're an idiot - an inattentive idiot. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm very attentive. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You're confusing "attentive" for "obsessive." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For someone that has an eating disorder, OCD is a way of control >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't have an eating disorder. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, you do. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You follow quackery. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I avoid you. You, otoh, have yet to come down firmly against >>>>> reflexology. You want to sit on the fence because of one person's >>>>> anecdotes despite the studies which show it to be quackery. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> You follow quackery. >>> >>> >>> No. >> >> >> >> Yep. Orthorexia is > > > A description of your attitudes toward food. > > > >>>> I'm not afollower of reflexology >>> >>> >>> Yet. You are gullible, so eventually you will, or some >>> other form of quackery. You have lots of other >>> unscientific medical beliefs. >> >> >> >> I believe you > > > Good. > > > >>>>>>>> I have more of a life >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, you don't. You're a home-bound agoraphobic pot-head. >>> >>> >>> Ha ha ha ha ha! That's an outstanding description. >> >> >> >> I'm not home bound. Although >> the word agoraphobia is used, > > > Home-bound. > > > >>>>>>> Your *existence* -- it's not a life -- a feeble attempt to escape >>>>>>> from >> >> >> life. >> >>>>>> I love my life. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You love avoiding reality. Someday you'll have to face up to reality. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> It's my reality I love >>> >>> >>> It isn't reality. Contrary to the pot-head belief >>> system you espouse, one does not create one's own >>> reality. One can not, for example, believe it's >>> "mostly" wrong to kill animals, because "wrong" doesn't >>> have degrees. >> >> >> >> Did I say I created my reality? > > > You imply it. > > >>>>> I'm surprised that at 42 or 43 you still haven't. Do you live with >>>>> your >>>>> parents and are they still a bit overprotective of their fragile 42 or >>>>> 43 year-old baby? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Still fishing, huh? >>> >>> >>> No. We know, with absolute certainty, that there's >>> something seriously deficient in terms of your adult >>> independence. >> >> >> >> Nope. > > > Yep. You are not a fully independent adult. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:09:26 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>Derek wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but >>>>>>>>>>>>> stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or >>>>>>>>>>>>> something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to >>>>>>>>>>>>> maintain my ethical standard. >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Derek Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>You stopped eating them because of misinformation >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Like I said but which you snipped away, "I'm reliably told >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>No >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Like I >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You keep lying >>>>>> >>>>>>>[start - me] >>>>>>>I used to eat black olives up until a few months >>>>>>>ago, but stopped after realising they swim around >>>>>>>in squid ink, or something close to it. I'm always >>>>>>>ready to make changes to maintain my ethical >>>>>>>standard. >>>>>> >>>>>>[usual suspect] >>>>>>If it soothes your tortured conscience, not all black >>>>>>olives "swim around in" squid ink. Why deprive >>>>>>yourself of things you enjoy if reasonable alternatives >>>>>>exist? >>>>>>[end] >>>>>>usual suspect May 23 2003 http://tinyurl.com/cekv5 <unsnip> From that you clearly concede that some do in fact swim around in squid ink while "not all". Olives are green, and though the very mature olives turn dark, olive farmers in some parts of the World that can't wait that long and have a ready supply of squid ink use it to fool their buyers. <end restore> I was going to wait a bit longer before hitting you with your own statement which leaves no doubt that YOU concede some olives swim around in squid ink, but I couldn't resist any longer. haw haw haw You're screwed. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Claire's shitbag Uncle Dreck wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but >>>>>>>>>>>>>> stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> maintain my ethical standard. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Derek Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>You stopped eating them because of misinformation >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Like I said but which you snipped away, "I'm reliably told >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>No >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Like I >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You keep lying >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>[start - me] >>>>>>>>I used to eat black olives up until a few months >>>>>>>>ago, but stopped after realising they swim around >>>>>>>>in squid ink, or something close to it. I'm always >>>>>>>>ready to make changes to maintain my ethical >>>>>>>>standard. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>[usual suspect] >>>>>>>If it soothes your tortured conscience, not all black >>>>>>>olives "swim around in" squid ink. Why deprive >>>>>>>yourself of things you enjoy if reasonable alternatives >>>>>>>exist? >>>>>>>[end] >>>>>>>usual suspect May 23 2003 http://tinyurl.com/cekv5 Do you really base your diet AND stake your "ethical standard" (HAWHAW!) upon things you've not inquired about yourself? Note how you initially wrote you "realised" black olives do something they don't. You now lie (and even try to spin one of my posts into your tangled web) and write it wasn't a "realization," _per se_, but rather that you've been "reliably told" olives do something they don't. "Reliably told" by whom, shitbag? These olives are processed in a lye curing solution that leaches the bitterness out. California Ripe Olives have a firm texture and smooth, mellow taste. Once curing is complete, a series of cold water rinses removes every trace of curing solution. During the curing process, which takes several days, a flow of air bubbling through the olives produces the natural, rich dark color. A trace of organic iron salt (ferrous gluconate) is added to act as a color fixer so the olives will have less tendency to fade after the cans are stored. Canning is the final step. Ripe olives are canned in a mild salt brine solution and, because they are a low-acid product, are heat sterilized under strict California State health rules. http://www.calolive.org/homecooks/facts.html Regardless, as you're wont to do, you avoid a food you previously enjoyed without guilt on the flimsiest of grounds AND YOU DO SO BECAUSE IT MAKES YOU FEEL VIRTUOUS AND MORE ETHICAL. Such belief and action is consistent with orthorexia. Your sham "virtue" is as hollow as the bullshit about "squid ink" you base it upon. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:26:24 GMT, queer suspect > wrote:
>Derek wrote: >> >>>> I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but >>>> stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or >>>> something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to >>>> maintain my ethical standard. >>>> -- Derek Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 >>>> >>>>You stopped eating them because of misinformation >>> >>>Like I said but which you snipped away, "I'm reliably told >>> >>>No >>> >>>Like I >> >>You keep lying >> >>[start - me] >>I used to eat black olives up until a few months >>ago, but stopped after realising they swim around >>in squid ink, or something close to it. I'm always >>ready to make changes to maintain my ethical >>standard. > >[usual suspect] >If it soothes your tortured conscience, not all black >olives "swim around in" squid ink. Why deprive >yourself of things you enjoy if reasonable alternatives >exist? >[end] >usual suspect May 23 2003 http://tinyurl.com/cekv5 <unsnip> From that you clearly concede that some do in fact swim around in squid ink while "not all". Olives are green, and though the very mature olives turn dark, olive farmers in some parts of the World that can't wait that long and have a ready supply of squid ink use it to fool their buyers. <end restore> I was going to wait a bit longer before hitting you with your own statement which leaves no doubt that YOU concede some olives swim around in squid ink, but I couldn't resist any longer. haw haw haw You're screwed. You fell right into it, just like I knew you would, queer. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Claire's fat shitbag Uncle Derk wrote:
>>>>> I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but >>>>> stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or >>>>> something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to >>>>> maintain my ethical standard. >>>>> -- Derek Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 >>>>> >>>>>You stopped eating them because of misinformation >>>> >>>>Like I said but which you snipped away, "I'm reliably told >>>> >>>>No >>>> >>>>Like I >>> >>>You keep lying >>> >>>[start - me] >>>I used to eat black olives up until a few months >>>ago, but stopped after realising they swim around >>>in squid ink, or something close to it. I'm always >>>ready to make changes to maintain my ethical >>>standard. Do you really base your diet AND stake your "ethical standard" (HAWHAW!) upon things you've not inquired about yourself? Note how you initially wrote you "realised" black olives do something they don't. You now lie (and even try to spin one of my posts into your tangled web) and write it wasn't a "realization," _per se_, but rather that you've been "reliably told" olives do something they don't. "Reliably told" by whom, shitbag? These olives are processed in a lye curing solution that leaches the bitterness out. California Ripe Olives have a firm texture and smooth, mellow taste. Once curing is complete, a series of cold water rinses removes every trace of curing solution. During the curing process, which takes several days, a flow of air bubbling through the olives produces the natural, rich dark color. A trace of organic iron salt (ferrous gluconate) is added to act as a color fixer so the olives will have less tendency to fade after the cans are stored. Canning is the final step. Ripe olives are canned in a mild salt brine solution and, because they are a low-acid product, are heat sterilized under strict California State health rules. http://www.calolive.org/homecooks/facts.html Regardless, as you're wont to do, you avoid a food you previously enjoyed without guilt on the flimsiest of grounds AND YOU DO SO BECAUSE IT MAKES YOU FEEL VIRTUOUS AND MORE ETHICAL. Such belief and action is consistent with orthorexia. Your sham "virtue" is as hollow as the bullshit about "squid ink" you base it upon. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:38:07 GMT, queer suspect > wrote:
>Derek wrote: >> >>>>>> I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but >>>>>> stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or >>>>>> something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to >>>>>> maintain my ethical standard. >>>>>> -- Derek Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3 >>>>>> >>>>>>You stopped eating them because of misinformation >>>>> >>>>>Like I said but which you snipped away, "I'm reliably told >>>>> >>>>>No >>>>> >>>>>Like I >>>> >>>>You keep lying >>>> >>>>[start - me] >>>>I used to eat black olives up until a few months >>>>ago, but stopped after realising they swim around >>>>in squid ink, or something close to it. I'm always >>>>ready to make changes to maintain my ethical >>>>standard. > >Do you really base your diet AND stake your "ethical standard" (HAWHAW!) >upon things you've not inquired about yourself? I have made my own enquiries and seen that you also concede the fact that some black olives swim around in squid ink as well. Your quote which you've snipped away in this post says it all, and I just couldn't wait any longer to hit you with it. <unsnip> >[start - me] >I used to eat black olives up until a few months >ago, but stopped after realising they swim around >in squid ink, or something close to it. I'm always >ready to make changes to maintain my ethical >standard. [usual suspect] If it soothes your tortured conscience, not all black olives "swim around in" squid ink. Why deprive yourself of things you enjoy if reasonable alternatives exist? [end] usual suspect May 23 2003 http://tinyurl.com/cekv5 You've been played, queer, and as always you've come away with egg on your face. Now, go and push your animal foods onto someone else if you can, because you've failed to fool me, pusher. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
nk.net... > Skanky Nutball wrote: > > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message > > ink.net... > > > >>usual suspect wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Car-less Orthorexic Skanky wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>>>Still fishing. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>Not fishing. It's already established. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>Where? > >>> > >>> > >>>AFV and atmowire.com. > >>> > >>> > >>>>>>I was car-less in 2003. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>You still are. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>How can you be sure? > >>> > >>> > >>>Because you're not a dynamic person, much less a go-getter. > > Exactly right. The picture of passivity. I guess that would be seen as an insult through the eyes of the picture of hostility. > >>>That was > >>>obvious back when you were prattling about growing your own food someday > >>>even if your current consumption doesn't rise to the level of your phony > >>>beliefs about animals (that killing them is wrong). You're a hypocrite > >>>-- and a lazy one both intellectually and physically. > >>> > >>> > >>>>>>>I'm surprised that at 42 or 43 you still haven't. Do you live with > >>>>>>>your > >>>>>>>parents and are they still a bit overprotective of their fragile 42 > > > > or > > > >>>>>>>43 year-old baby? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Still fishing, huh? > > > > > > And now you're even fishing > > No fishing. You'd think by now you'd both figure I'm not biting. You're kind of stupid that way aren't you? > >>>>>I'm not fishing. I have a very strong hunch, though. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>You're fishing. > >>> > >>> > >>>No. I'm quite certain that your parents still provide for you. > >> > >> > >>I think that's a very real possibility; even strongly > >>likely. > > > > > > The two of you are nuts. > > No. Yes and you know so. > Your parents do still provide for you to some extent. Fishing. Why did you change the spelling of the followup newsgroups. Did you not want anyone to reply? What are you scared of Rudeyboy? -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stop changing the spelling of the
followup newsgroups, moron. No more replies to you until you do. Also, no more replies to your snip and runs. You ruin the whole context of the topics at hand. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message nk.net... > Scented Nectar wrote: > > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message > > nk.net... > > > >>Scented Nectar wrote: > >> > >> > >>>"usual suspect" > wrote in message > ... > >>> > >>> > >>>>Car-less Orthorexic Skanky wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>Still fishing. > >> > >>No. We reeled you in months ago. > >> > >>You don't have a car. Period. > > > > > > In 2003. What about now? > > No car. > > You have some kind of disability that prevents you from > operating a motor vehicle. > > > >>>>>>>>>>You're an idiot - an inattentive idiot. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>I'm very attentive. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>You're confusing "attentive" for "obsessive." > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>For someone that has an eating disorder, OCD is a way of control > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>I don't have an eating disorder. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Yes, you do. > >>>>> > >>>>>You follow quackery. > >>>> > >>>>I avoid you. You, otoh, have yet to come down firmly against > >>>>reflexology. You want to sit on the fence because of one person's > >>>>anecdotes despite the studies which show it to be quackery. > >>> > >>> > >>>You follow quackery. > >> > >>No. > > > > > > Yep. Orthorexia is > > A description of your attitudes toward food. > > > > >>> I'm not afollower of reflexology > >> > >>Yet. You are gullible, so eventually you will, or some > >>other form of quackery. You have lots of other > >>unscientific medical beliefs. > > > > > > I believe you > > Good. > > > > >>>>>>>I have more of a life > >>>>>> > >>>>>>No, you don't. You're a home-bound agoraphobic pot-head. > >> > >>Ha ha ha ha ha! That's an outstanding description. > > > > > > I'm not home bound. Although > > the word agoraphobia is used, > > Home-bound. > > > > >>>>>>Your *existence* -- it's not a life -- a feeble attempt to escape from > > > > life. > > > >>>>>I love my life. > >>>> > >>>>You love avoiding reality. Someday you'll have to face up to reality. > >>> > >>> > >>>It's my reality I love > >> > >>It isn't reality. Contrary to the pot-head belief > >>system you espouse, one does not create one's own > >>reality. One can not, for example, believe it's > >>"mostly" wrong to kill animals, because "wrong" doesn't > >>have degrees. > > > > > > Did I say I created my reality? > > You imply it. > > > >>>>I'm surprised that at 42 or 43 you still haven't. Do you live with your > >>>>parents and are they still a bit overprotective of their fragile 42 or > >>>>43 year-old baby? > >>> > >>> > >>>Still fishing, huh? > >> > >>No. We know, with absolute certainty, that there's > >>something seriously deficient in terms of your adult > >>independence. > > > > > > Nope. > > Yep. You are not a fully independent adult. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I started replying, but then I came
across too much snipping and running to change the meanings and context. Try again. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scented Nectar wrote:
> I started replying, but then But then you realized you were going to say some bullshit that we had already heard. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Scented Nectar" > wrote... > Stop changing the spelling of the > followup newsgroups, moron. > No more replies to you until you > do. Control freak > Also, no more replies to your > snip and runs. You ruin the > whole context of the topics at > hand. As if anybody cares if you reply.. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"usual suspect" ?> wrote in message .. .
<..> > Those links are to your posts, proving the validity of the above claims. Some. Stupidly mixed in with lies. Your twisted crutch. > You're barking mad, Les. 'Accepting the official story of the 9/11/01 attack requires one to accept a long series of anomalies -- extremely improbable events, amazing coincidences, and contradictions. http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/a...anomalies.html You know I'm not. That is why you are so afraid of me. Why do you keep evading the 'small matter' of thousands of dead and horribly injured coalition troops in aggression you enthusiastically support? And the tens of thousands + of Iraqi people murdered on the back of your pack of lies? Rhetorical questions. We all know the answers, killer. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dutch" > wrote in message
... > > "Scented Nectar" > wrote... > > Stop changing the spelling of the > > followup newsgroups, moron. > > No more replies to you until you > > do. > > Control freak There's no control freak about it. What he did prevents the replier from posting unless they fix his intentional spelling errors. > > Also, no more replies to your > > snip and runs. You ruin the > > whole context of the topics at > > hand. > > As if anybody cares if you reply.. Obviously Rudey doesn't care if ANYONE replies. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Scented Nectar" > wrote > "Dutch" > wrote >> >> "Scented Nectar" > wrote... >> > Stop changing the spelling of the >> > followup newsgroups, moron. >> > No more replies to you until you >> > do. >> >> Control freak > > There's no control freak about it. > What he did prevents the replier > from posting unless they fix his > intentional spelling errors. Why? > >> > Also, no more replies to your >> > snip and runs. You ruin the >> > whole context of the topics at >> > hand. >> >> As if anybody cares if you reply.. > > Obviously Rudey doesn't care if > ANYONE replies. He doesn't care of YOU do, because you never add anything of interest or value to the discussion. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scented Nectar wrote:
> "Dutch" > wrote in message > ... > >>"Scented Nectar" > wrote... >> >>>Stop changing the spelling of the >>>followup newsgroups, moron. >>>No more replies to you until you >>>do. >> >>Control freak > > > There's no control freak about it. Yes, you're a control freak. >>>Also, no more replies to your >>>snip and runs. You ruin the >>>whole context of the topics at >>>hand. >> >>As if anybody cares if you reply.. > > > Obviously Rudey doesn't care if > ANYONE replies. You are free to reply. No one is stopping you. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dutch" > wrote in message
... > > "Scented Nectar" > wrote > > "Dutch" > wrote > >> > >> "Scented Nectar" > wrote... > >> > Stop changing the spelling of the > >> > followup newsgroups, moron. > >> > No more replies to you until you > >> > do. > >> > >> Control freak > > > > There's no control freak about it. > > What he did prevents the replier > > from posting unless they fix his > > intentional spelling errors. > > Why? Look at his headers of the ones I've mentioned this about. The followup newsgroups field has the groups misspelled into non- existant groups. > >> > Also, no more replies to your > >> > snip and runs. You ruin the > >> > whole context of the topics at > >> > hand. > >> > >> As if anybody cares if you reply.. > > > > Obviously Rudey doesn't care if > > ANYONE replies. > > He doesn't care of YOU do, because you never add anything of interest or > value to the discussion. By altering the headers, he's shown he doesn't want anyone to easily respond. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Tonight's Dinner Fare & Christmas Meals | General Cooking | |||
| Fair Fare | Preserving | |||
| Dinner Party Fare | General Cooking | |||
Linear Mode
