Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
Beach Runner wrote:
>>>>> Read levitius. I obviously use it as a guide. >>>> >>>> Do you stone homosexuals, adulterers, psychics, wizards, or >>>> disobedient children? Do you cut your hair and shave? Have you ever >>>> had sex with a menstruating woman, or a woman who's just off her >>>> period (within a week)? >>> >>> i've made clear my view of the bible. "Don't do to other what is >>> hateful to you, all the rest is commentary" - Hillel > > No, you are anti semetic for saying Jews who follow tradition are sick. I didn't write that Jews who follow tradition are sick, you disgusting little prick. I wrote that Jews who micromanage their diets far beyond what the Torah commands are orthorexic. There's NO command for anyone to have TWO ****ING SETS of cookware. There's NO command for anyone to abstain from cheeseburgers or enchiladas or tacos. There's NO command for anyone to wait several hours between a dairy meal and a meat meal. That's all made-up hogwash. >> IOW, you pick and choose the parts you like and then impugn others as >> "anti-Semitic" for disagreeing with your choices. > > I respect other religions and moralities. There's nothing "moral" about having TWO SETS OF COOKWARE. > I don't have to follow them. You don't have to follow the bullshit rules about when you can and can't eat certain foods, about how many sets of cookware, or have a rabbi come in and certify that your kitchen is kashrut. > I'm not Buddhist but I would never call them sick. Buddhists have no orthorexic dietary rules. Vegetarianism was not a part of the early Buddhist tradition and the Buddha himself was not a vegetarian. The Buddha got his food either by going on alms rounds or by being invited to the houses of his supporters and in both cases he ate what he was given. Before his enlightenment he had experimented with various diets including a meatless diet, but he eventually abandoned them believing that they did not contribute to spiritual development. http://www.buddhanet.net/e-learning/...data/fdd21.htm |
|
|||
|
|||
usual suspect wrote: > Beach Runner wrote: > >>>>>> Read levitius. I obviously use it as a guide. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Do you stone homosexuals, adulterers, psychics, wizards, or >>>>> disobedient children? Do you cut your hair and shave? Have you ever >>>>> had sex with a menstruating woman, or a woman who's just off her >>>>> period (within a week)? >>>> >>>> >>>> i've made clear my view of the bible. "Don't do to other what is >>>> hateful to you, all the rest is commentary" - Hillel >> >> >> No, you are anti semetic for saying Jews who follow tradition are sick. > > > I didn't write that Jews who follow tradition are sick, you disgusting > little prick. I wrote that Jews who micromanage their diets far beyond > what the Torah commands are orthorexic. There's NO command for anyone to > have TWO ****ING SETS of cookware. There's NO command for anyone to > abstain from cheeseburgers or enchiladas or tacos. There's NO command > for anyone to wait several hours between a dairy meal and a meat meal. > That's all made-up hogwash. > Leviticus is not all of Judaism. It is based on other books. Orthodox Jews follow these laws. They are not sick. I respect them. >>> IOW, you pick and choose the parts you like and then impugn others as >>> "anti-Semitic" for disagreeing with your choices. >> >> >> I respect other religions and moralities. > > > There's nothing "moral" about having TWO SETS OF COOKWARE. > >> I don't have to follow them. > > > You don't have to follow the bullshit rules about when you can and can't > eat certain foods, about how many sets of cookware, or have a rabbi come > in and certify that your kitchen is kashrut. > >> I'm not Buddhist but I would never call them sick. > > > Buddhists have no orthorexic dietary rules. > > Vegetarianism was not a part of the early Buddhist tradition and > the Buddha himself was not a vegetarian. The Buddha got his food > either by going on alms rounds or by being invited to the houses > of his supporters and in both cases he ate what he was given. > Before his enlightenment he had experimented with various diets > including a meatless diet, but he eventually abandoned them > believing that they did not contribute to spiritual development. > http://www.buddhanet.net/e-learning/...data/fdd21.htm |
|
|||
|
|||
Beach Runner wrote:
>>>>>>> Read levitius. I obviously use it as a guide. >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you stone homosexuals, adulterers, psychics, wizards, or >>>>>> disobedient children? Do you cut your hair and shave? Have you >>>>>> ever had sex with a menstruating woman, or a woman who's just off >>>>>> her period (within a week)? >>>>> >>>>> i've made clear my view of the bible. "Don't do to other what is >>>>> hateful to you, all the rest is commentary" - Hillel >>> >>> No, you are anti semetic for saying Jews who follow tradition are sick. >> >> I didn't write that Jews who follow tradition are sick, you disgusting >> little prick. I wrote that Jews who micromanage their diets far beyond >> what the Torah commands are orthorexic. There's NO command for anyone >> to have TWO ****ING SETS of cookware. There's NO command for anyone to >> abstain from cheeseburgers or enchiladas or tacos. There's NO command >> for anyone to wait several hours between a dairy meal and a meat meal. >> That's all made-up hogwash. > > Leviticus is not all of Judaism. I didn't say it was. > It is based on other books. The Talmud has very little to do with Judaism, but everything to do with Pharisaism. > Orthodox Jews follow these laws. Man's laws, not God's. > They are not sick. Yes, they are. They're not holy or special just because they mandate their followers have two sets of cookware or observe their own silly rules. > I respect them. I don't with respect to their rules. >>>> IOW, you pick and choose the parts you like and then impugn others >>>> as "anti-Semitic" for disagreeing with your choices. >>> >>> I respect other religions and moralities. >> >> There's nothing "moral" about having TWO SETS OF COOKWARE. Explain the "morality" of requiring adherents to have TWO SETS OF COOKWARE, Boob. >>> I don't have to follow them. >> >> You don't have to follow the bullshit rules about when you can and >> can't eat certain foods, about how many sets of cookware, or have a >> rabbi come in and certify that your kitchen is kashrut. >> >>> I'm not Buddhist but I would never call them sick. >> >> Buddhists have no orthorexic dietary rules. >> >> Vegetarianism was not a part of the early Buddhist tradition and >> the Buddha himself was not a vegetarian. The Buddha got his food >> either by going on alms rounds or by being invited to the houses >> of his supporters and in both cases he ate what he was given. >> Before his enlightenment he had experimented with various diets >> including a meatless diet, but he eventually abandoned them >> believing that they did not contribute to spiritual development. >> http://www.buddhanet.net/e-learning/...data/fdd21.htm Established. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why is JethroUK so horribly afraid to answer simple and good questions? | Vegan | |||
Atomic Wings | Recipes (moderated) | |||
Goo is Horribly Agitated.................. | Vegan | |||
Tuna Salad - horribly salty | General Cooking | |||
grape stomping gone horribly wrong | Wine |