Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
Liar Skunky's pathetic excuses
Skunky won't take the political quiz because she claims it to be
"off-topic" from vegetarianism, and because it would eat up too much of her time. Google reveals Skunky has posted something like 20 times today in alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.food.vegan and talk.politics.animals, and NOT ONE of the posts was on the topic of vegetarianism. She also has been posting intermittenly over some five hours. Why are you afraid to take the political quiz, Skunky? Your excuses don't hold up. |
|
|||
|
|||
> Skunky won't take the political quiz because she claims it to be
> "off-topic" from vegetarianism, and because it would eat up too much of > her time. It would. > Google reveals Skunky has posted something like 20 times today in > alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.food.vegan and > talk.politics.animals, and NOT ONE of the posts was on the topic of > vegetarianism. She also has been posting intermittenly over some five > hours. > > Why are you afraid to take the political quiz, Skunky? Your excuses > don't hold up. I had 5 reasons why not. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites. Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button. |
|
|||
|
|||
Scented Nectar wrote: > > Skunky won't take the political quiz because she claims it to be > > "off-topic" from vegetarianism, and because it would eat up too much > > of her time. > > It would. It wouldn't. You clearly have LOTS of time to spend her, and at all hours of the day. Your time isn't worth much. > > > Google reveals Skunky has posted something like 20 times today in > > alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.food.vegan and > > talk.politics.animals, and NOT ONE of the posts was on the topic of > > vegetarianism. She also has been posting intermittenly over some five > > hours. > > > > Why are you afraid to take the political quiz, Skunky? Your excuses > > don't hold up. > > I had 5 reasons why not. I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be bullshit. All the rest are bullshit, too. The reason is FEAR. You're afraid of something, and it's something terribly irrational, because we both know that no awful consequence will come of your taking the quiz. |
|
|||
|
|||
> > I had 5 reasons why not.
> > I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be bullshit. > All the rest are bullshit, too. Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test. > The reason is FEAR. You're afraid of something, and it's something > terribly irrational, because we both know that no awful consequence > will come of your taking the quiz. It's not fear. We both know that no awful concequence will come of it . -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites. Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button. |
|
|||
|
|||
Scented Nectar wrote:
> > > I had 5 reasons why not. > > > > I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be > > bullshit. All the rest are bullshit, too. > > Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test. I already demolished them when you first stated them. You're lying. You have no intention of taking the quiz, because you're afraid - deeply and irrationally afraid. > > > The reason is FEAR. You're afraid of something, and it's something > > terribly irrational, because we both know that no awful consequence > > will come of your taking the quiz. > > It's not fear. It's fear: deep, irrational, paralyzing fear. |
|
|||
|
|||
In article .com>,
"Rudy Canoza" > wrote: > Scented Nectar wrote: > > > > I had 5 reasons why not. > > > > > > I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be > > > bullshit. All the rest are bullshit, too. > > > > Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test. > > I already demolished them when you first stated them. > > You're lying. You have no intention of taking the quiz, because you're > afraid - deeply and irrationally afraid. I notice how you are attempting to manipulate Scented into acting the way that you want. Unfortunately, she's smart enough to avoid such manipulation. > > > The reason is FEAR. You're afraid of something, and it's something > > > terribly irrational, because we both know that no awful consequence > > > will come of your taking the quiz. > > > > It's not fear. > > It's fear: deep, irrational, paralyzing fear. |
|
|||
|
|||
In article >,
"Scented Nectar" > wrote: > > > I had 5 reasons why not. > > > > I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be > bullshit. > > All the rest are bullshit, too. > > Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test. I'm curious Rudy. What information appears to the person who holds an online quiz through a website? |
|
|||
|
|||
"Ron" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > "Scented Nectar" > wrote: > >> > > I had 5 reasons why not. >> > >> > I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be >> bullshit. >> > All the rest are bullshit, too. >> >> Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test. > > I'm curious Rudy. What information appears to the person who holds an > online quiz through a website? ================== We already know what your mental illness has shown, queer-boy... |
|
|||
|
|||
witless Ron wrote:
> In article .com>, > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote: > > > Scented Nectar wrote: > > > > > I had 5 reasons why not. > > > > > > > > I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be > > > > bullshit. All the rest are bullshit, too. > > > > > > Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test. > > > > I already demolished them when you first stated them. > > > > You're lying. You have no intention of taking the quiz, because you're > > afraid - deeply and irrationally afraid. > > I notice how you are attempting to manipulate I'm not manipulating anyone. You are wrong. > > > > > The reason is FEAR. You're afraid of something, and it's something > > > > terribly irrational, because we both know that no awful consequence > > > > will come of your taking the quiz. > > > > > > It's not fear. > > > > It's fear: deep, irrational, paralyzing fear. |
|
|||
|
|||
uncurious Ron wrote:
> In article >, > "Scented Nectar" > wrote: > > > > > I had 5 reasons why not. > > > > > > I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be > > bullshit. > > > All the rest are bullshit, too. > > > > Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test. > > I'm curious Rudy. No, you're not, Ron. > What information appears to the person who holds an > online quiz through a website? I've already indicated the information that will be revealed. |
|
|||
|
|||
In article t>,
"rick etter" > wrote: > "Ron" > wrote in message > ... > > In article >, > > "Scented Nectar" > wrote: > > > >> > > I had 5 reasons why not. > >> > > >> > I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be > >> bullshit. > >> > All the rest are bullshit, too. > >> > >> Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test. > > > > I'm curious Rudy. What information appears to the person who holds an > > online quiz through a website? > ================== > We already know what your mental illness has shown, queer-boy... We'll ring a bell when we want you to respond, rick. |
|
|||
|
|||
In article .com>,
"Rudy Canoza" > wrote: > witless Ron wrote: > > In article .com>, > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote: > > > > > Scented Nectar wrote: > > > > > > I had 5 reasons why not. > > > > > > > > > > I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be > > > > > bullshit. All the rest are bullshit, too. > > > > > > > > Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test. > > > > > > I already demolished them when you first stated them. > > > > > > You're lying. You have no intention of taking the quiz, because > you're > > > afraid - deeply and irrationally afraid. > > > > I notice how you are attempting to manipulate > > I'm not manipulating anyone. You are wrong. If you were intelligent, confident and not disguising your true motivation then you wouldn't need to attempt to sway Scented to take an online test to secure personal information through a webiste. (See how manipulation works.) > > > > > The reason is FEAR. You're afraid of something, and it's > something > > > > > terribly irrational, because we both know that no awful > consequence > > > > > will come of your taking the quiz. > > > > > > > > It's not fear. > > > > > > It's fear: deep, irrational, paralyzing fear. |
|
|||
|
|||
In article .com>,
"Rudy Canoza" > wrote: > uncurious Ron wrote: > > In article >, > > "Scented Nectar" > wrote: > > > > > > > I had 5 reasons why not. > > > > > > > > I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be > > > bullshit. > > > > All the rest are bullshit, too. > > > > > > Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test. > > > > I'm curious Rudy. > > No, you're not, Ron. > > > What information appears to the person who holds an > > online quiz through a website? > I've already indicated the information that will be revealed. You avoided the question -- a tactic for manipulators. When a person logs into a website that purports to have a quiz, what information is revealed to the host of the website? |
|
|||
|
|||
"Ron" > wrote in message ... > In article t>, > "rick etter" > wrote: > >> "Ron" > wrote in message >> ... >> > In article >, >> > "Scented Nectar" > wrote: >> > >> >> > > I had 5 reasons why not. >> >> > >> >> > I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be >> >> bullshit. >> >> > All the rest are bullshit, too. >> >> >> >> Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test. >> > >> > I'm curious Rudy. What information appears to the person who holds an >> > online quiz through a website? >> ================== >> We already know what your mental illness has shown, queer-boy... > > We'll ring a bell when we want you to respond, rick. ================== Ah, yes, your tinker-bell syndrome. I don't think so, pansy-boy. Maybe it works for your HIV infected fudge packers, but it doesn't cut it here. |
|
|||
|
|||
In article >,
"rick etter" > wrote: > "Ron" > wrote in message > ... > > In article t>, > > "rick etter" > wrote: > > > >> "Ron" > wrote in message > >> ... > >> > In article >, > >> > "Scented Nectar" > wrote: > >> > > >> >> > > I had 5 reasons why not. > >> >> > > >> >> > I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be > >> >> bullshit. > >> >> > All the rest are bullshit, too. > >> >> > >> >> Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test. > >> > > >> > I'm curious Rudy. What information appears to the person who holds an > >> > online quiz through a website? > >> ================== > >> We already know what your mental illness has shown, queer-boy... > > > > We'll ring a bell when we want you to respond, rick. > ================== > Ah, yes, your tinker-bell syndrome. I don't think so, pansy-boy. Maybe it > works for your HIV infected fudge packers, but it doesn't cut it here. Drop the charade rick. You'll be a much nicer person once you come out of the closet. |
|
|||
|
|||
Ron wrote:
> In article .com>, > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote: > > >>witless Ron wrote: >> >>>In article .com>, >>> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Scented Nectar wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>I had 5 reasons why not. >>>>>> >>>>>>I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be >>>>>>bullshit. All the rest are bullshit, too. >>>>> >>>>>Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test. >>>> >>>>I already demolished them when you first stated them. >>>> >>>>You're lying. You have no intention of taking the quiz, because >> >>you're >> >>>>afraid - deeply and irrationally afraid. >>> >>>I notice how you are attempting to manipulate >> >>I'm not manipulating anyone. You are wrong. > > > If you were intelligent, confident and not disguising your true > motivation All conditions met. > then you wouldn't need to attempt to sway So many infinitives, so little sense. Non sequitur, Ronnie. Your IF-THEN is bogus. > Scented to take an > online test to secure personal information through a webiste. You moron. I'm not asking her to provide any personal information through a website. I posted 10 statements in usenet and asked her to give her reactions. There is no subterfuge. |
|
|||
|
|||
Ron wrote:
> In article .com>, > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote: > > >>uncurious Ron wrote: >> >>>In article >, >>> "Scented Nectar" > wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>I had 5 reasons why not. >>>>> >>>>>I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be >>>> >>>>bullshit. >>>> >>>>>All the rest are bullshit, too. >>>> >>>>Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test. >>> >>>I'm curious Rudy. >> >>No, you're not, Ron. >> >> >>>What information appears to the person who holds an >>>online quiz through a website? >> >>I've already indicated the information that will be revealed. > > > You avoided the question I didn't. I did already indicated how her responses will be used. And it isn't through a WEBSITE, you colossal idiot. |
|
|||
|
|||
Ron wrote:
> In article >, > "rick etter" > wrote: > > >>>>We already know what your mental illness has shown, queer-boy... >>> >>>We'll ring a bell when we want you to respond, rick. >> >>================== >>Ah, yes, your tinker-bell syndrome. I don't think so, pansy-boy. Maybe it >>works for your HIV infected fudge packers, but it doesn't cut it here. > > > Drop the charade rick. You'll be a much nicer person once you come out > of the closet. And AGAIN, we see Ronnie attempting to insult someone by suggesting the person is homo. You really are a self-loathing homo, Ron. Get help. |
|
|||
|
|||
Scented Nectar wrote:
>>Skunky won't take the political quiz because she claims it to be >>"off-topic" from vegetarianism, and because it would eat up too much >>of her time. > > > It would. It wouldn't. You spend a ton of time here. You'd just have to let some other topics go. You don't need to write all the off-topic posts you already do. > > >>Google reveals Skunky has posted something like 20 times today in >>alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.food.vegan and >>talk.politics.animals, and NOT ONE of the posts was on the topic of >>vegetarianism. She also has been posting intermittenly over some five >>hours. >> >>Why are you afraid to take the political quiz, Skunky? Your excuses >>don't hold up. > > > I had 5 reasons why not. Weak, weak dodge. Five pieces of bullshit I already addressed. It all comes down to fear. |
|
|||
|
|||
In article >,
Rudy Canoza > wrote: > Ron wrote: > > > In article >, > > "rick etter" > wrote: > > > > > >>>>We already know what your mental illness has shown, queer-boy... > >>> > >>>We'll ring a bell when we want you to respond, rick. > >> > >>================== > >>Ah, yes, your tinker-bell syndrome. I don't think so, pansy-boy. Maybe > >>it > >>works for your HIV infected fudge packers, but it doesn't cut it here. > > > > > > Drop the charade rick. You'll be a much nicer person once you come out > > of the closet. > > And AGAIN, we see Ronnie attempting to insult someone > by suggesting the person is homo. Being *** or assuming one is *** isn't an insult. That you would feel insulted is your issue. It's my disappointment that Rick would choose such a difficult life of his hidden identity rather than being himself. I like it when you refer to me as homo and such. The resulting email and free advertising is greatly appreciated. > You really are a self-loathing homo, Ron. Get help. |
|
|||
|
|||
> You're lying. You have no intention of taking the quiz, because
you're > afraid - deeply and irrationally afraid. If around a hundred other veg*ns took the test, I might want to see how I compare, depending on my curiosity. > > It's not fear. > > It's fear: deep, irrational, paralyzing fear. No. It's just a refusal to do something I don't feel like doing. No fear although I see that's what you're hoping. Maybe you don't like the cold fact that I'm not following your orders. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites. Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button. |
|
|||
|
|||
> >>Skunky won't take the political quiz because she claims it to be
> >>"off-topic" from vegetarianism, and because it would eat up too much > >>of her time. > > > > > > It would. > > It wouldn't. You spend a ton of time here. You'd just > have to let some other topics go. You don't need to > write all the off-topic posts you already do. Soon my schedule will be changing and I'll actually have a bit less time at the computer. But even on a day like today where I have the whole day to do whatever I want, I still have no desire to take your test. Weird, eh? > It all comes down to fear. Lack of desire. I simply don't want to take your test. You are upset that I'm not doing as you demand. That's what I figure, because you're not just letting this go. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites. Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button. |
|
|||
|
|||
Ron wrote:
> In article >, > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > >>Ron wrote: >> >> >>>In article >, >>> "rick etter" > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>>>We already know what your mental illness has shown, queer-boy... >>>>> >>>>>We'll ring a bell when we want you to respond, rick. >>>> >>>>================== >>>>Ah, yes, your tinker-bell syndrome. I don't think so, pansy-boy. Maybe >>>>it >>>>works for your HIV infected fudge packers, but it doesn't cut it here. >>> >>> >>>Drop the charade rick. You'll be a much nicer person once you come out >>>of the closet. >> >>And AGAIN, we see Ronnie attempting to insult someone >>by suggesting the person is homo. > > > Being *** or assuming one is *** isn't an insult. You are using it as an insult. You cling to a bigoted caricature of men who insult homos, and you automatically assume that you can insult them by suggesting they are themselves ***. It is powerful evidence of your hatred of your own sexuality. > > I like it when you refer to me as homo and such. Sure you do. |
|
|||
|
|||
Ron wrote:
> In article >, > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > >>Ron wrote: >> >> >>>In article >, >>> "rick etter" > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>>>We already know what your mental illness has shown, queer-boy... >>>>> >>>>>We'll ring a bell when we want you to respond, rick. >>>> >>>>================== >>>>Ah, yes, your tinker-bell syndrome. I don't think so, pansy-boy. Maybe >>>>it >>>>works for your HIV infected fudge packers, but it doesn't cut it here. >>> >>> >>>Drop the charade rick. You'll be a much nicer person once you come out >>>of the closet. >> >>And AGAIN, we see Ronnie attempting to insult someone >>by suggesting the person is homo. > > > Being *** or assuming one is *** isn't an insult. You are using it as an insult. You cling to a bigoted caricature of men who insult homos, and you automatically assume that you can insult them by suggesting they are themselves ***. It is powerful evidence of your hatred of your own sexuality. > > I like it when you refer to me as homo and such. Sure you do. |
|
|||
|
|||
Scented Nectar wrote:
>>You're lying. You have no intention of taking the quiz, because >>you're afraid - deeply and irrationally afraid. > > > If around a hundred other veg*ns took the > test, I might want to see how I compare, > depending on my curiosity. You're afraid. All your "reasons" are weak excuses. You're just deeply afraid. > > >>>It's not fear. >> >>It's fear: deep, irrational, paralyzing fear. > > > No. Yes. > It's just a refusal to do something > I don't feel like doing. Because you're afraid. |
|
|||
|
|||
Scented Nectar wrote:
>>>>Skunky won't take the political quiz because she claims it to be >>>>"off-topic" from vegetarianism, and because it would eat up too much >>>>of her time. >>> >>> >>>It would. >> >>It wouldn't. You spend a ton of time here. You'd just >>have to let some other topics go. You don't need to >>write all the off-topic posts you already do. > > > Soon my schedule will be changing and > I'll actually have a bit less time at the > computer. But even on a day like today > where I have the whole day to do > whatever I want, I still have no desire > to take your test. No, you're afraid to take it. You're afraid of what it will reveal. > >>It all comes down to fear. > > > Lack of desire. Fear. Deep, paralyzing fear. |
|
|||
|
|||
> > If around a hundred other veg*ns took the
> > test, I might want to see how I compare, > > depending on my curiosity. > > You're afraid. All your "reasons" are weak excuses. > You're just deeply afraid. No. But where did you get this test? Who wrote it? Maybe your answers will make me interested in taking the test. Another thing that might make me interested in it, is if approx. 100 other veg*ns took the test too. That would be a high enough number that some potential generalizations can be seen, if they exist. > > It's just a refusal to do something > > I don't feel like doing. > > Because you're afraid. What's to be afraid of? If I was interested in discussing right vs.left politics, I'd hang out in those kind of newgroups. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites. Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button. |
|
|||
|
|||
> > Soon my schedule will be changing and
> > I'll actually have a bit less time at the > > computer. But even on a day like today > > where I have the whole day to do > > whatever I want, I still have no desire > > to take your test. > > No, you're afraid to take it. You're afraid of what it > will reveal. It wouldn't reveal anything I don't already know about myself. Just in reading the test, I know what my answers are. You sure do want to know my thoughts on those subjects. How come? Why me and not all veg*ns? If you really were doing an actual poll, you wouldn't hound one person about it. > > Lack of desire. > > Fear. Deep, paralyzing fear. Booo! -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites. Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button. |
|
|||
|
|||
Scented Nectar wrote:
>>>If around a hundred other veg*ns took the >>>test, I might want to see how I compare, >>>depending on my curiosity. >> >>You're afraid. All your "reasons" are weak excuses. >>You're just deeply afraid. > > > No. Yes. Deeply and irrationally afraid. You're wasting time that could have been spent on the quiz. > But where did you get this test? > Who wrote it? These questions are purely evasive. You could easily find out for yourself if you were really interested, but we all know you're not; the questions are pure evasion, nothing more. > Maybe your answers > will make me interested in taking the > test. No. We all know it, too. Your refusal to take the quiz has nothing to do with my refusal to say anything about the origin of the quiz. Your refusal to take the quiz is based solely on your irrational fear. > Another thing that might make > me interested in it, is if approx. 100 > other veg*ns took the test too. Thanks for admitting that you're a mindless sheep. >>>It's just a refusal to do something >>>I don't feel like doing. >> >>Because you're afraid. > > > What's to be afraid of? Exactly! But nonetheless, you are. That's why your fear is irrational. |
|
|||
|
|||
Scented Nectar wrote:
>>>Soon my schedule will be changing and >>>I'll actually have a bit less time at the >>>computer. But even on a day like today >>>where I have the whole day to do >>>whatever I want, I still have no desire >>>to take your test. >> >>No, you're afraid to take it. You're afraid of what it >>will reveal. > > > It wouldn't reveal anything I don't already know > about myself. It would publicly demonstrate that I was correct about your political leanings, and would serve to confirm my claim about the political leanings of all "vegans". > Just in reading the test, I know > what my answers are. You sure do want to > know my thoughts on those subjects. How > come? Why me and not all veg*ns? The quiz is open to one and all. > If you > really were doing an actual poll, you wouldn't > hound one person about it. Only one person is so frantically and irrationally afraid to take it. > > >>>Lack of desire. >> >>Fear. Deep, paralyzing fear. |
|
|||
|
|||
> You're wasting time that could have been spent on the quiz.
We have all the time in the world. > > But where did you get this test? > > Who wrote it? > > These questions are purely evasive. You could easily > find out for yourself if you were really interested, > but we all know you're not; the questions are pure > evasion, nothing more. I did a quick google and found nothing. I'm not going to spend more time on that. You could just simply answer. Are you afraid that revealing the source might discredit the test? > > Maybe your answers > > will make me interested in taking the > > test. > > No. We all know it, too. Your refusal to take the > quiz has nothing to do with my refusal to say anything > about the origin of the quiz. Your refusal to take the > quiz is based solely on your irrational fear. I'm starting to suspect that you made up this test yourself, and probably have all kinds of wacky ideas about what the answers IMPLY, eh? Am I close on this one? > > Another thing that might make > > me interested in it, is if approx. 100 > > other veg*ns took the test too. > > Thanks for admitting that you're a mindless sheep. Sometimes I'm willing to be part of a statistic taking test. > > What's to be afraid of? > > Exactly! But nonetheless, you are. That's why your > fear is irrational. But I'm not afraid. I question the test's source and validity. I also question why you're so hung up on ME is partiicular taking the test. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites. Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button. |
|
|||
|
|||
> > It wouldn't reveal anything I don't already know
> > about myself. > > It would publicly demonstrate that I was correct about > your political leanings, and would serve to confirm my > claim about the political leanings of all "vegans". I wasn't aware that you had made a guess of my political leanings. Did you post it, or is it still just in your head? I'm not a good test subject for you to use, now that I see it's for vegans. I'm not 100% vegan yet. I know it's a miniscule of difference but it's there all the same. Have you considered doing the test on vegetarians also? > > Just in reading the test, I know > > what my answers are. You sure do want to > > know my thoughts on those subjects. How > > come? Why me and not all veg*ns? > > The quiz is open to one and all. But you're not pestering one and all, just me. > > If you > > really were doing an actual poll, you wouldn't > > hound one person about it. > > Only one person is so frantically and irrationally > afraid to take it. The others are beating down your door to take the test? You seem to think that by accusing me of fear, that I will take the test just to prove you wrong. I won't be playing that game. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites. Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button. |
|
|||
|
|||
Scented Nectar wrote:
>>You're wasting time that could have been spent on the quiz. > > > We have all the time in the world. You do. Your time is worth very little. > > >>>But where did you get this test? >>>Who wrote it? >> >>These questions are purely evasive. You could easily >>find out for yourself if you were really interested, >>but we all know you're not; the questions are pure >>evasion, nothing more. > > > I did a quick google and found nothing. Bullshit. *I* did a quick Google and found literally HUNDREDS of references. > I'm not going to spend more time on that. You didn't spend any. > You could just simply answer. I could, but it would be pointless, because your refusal to take the quiz has nothing to do with my failure to tell you. It ONLY has to do with fear, and now stubbornness. > Are you > afraid that revealing the source might > discredit the test? Not in the least. > > >>>Maybe your answers >>>will make me interested in taking the >>>test. >> >>No. We all know it, too. Your refusal to take the >>quiz has nothing to do with my refusal to say anything >>about the origin of the quiz. Your refusal to take the >>quiz is based solely on your irrational fear. > > > I'm starting to suspect that you made up > this test yourself, Nope. I wish I could take credit for it, but I can't. > and probably have all > kinds of wacky ideas about what the > answers IMPLY, eh? Am I close on this > one? > > >>>Another thing that might make >>>me interested in it, is if approx. 100 >>>other veg*ns took the test too. >> >>Thanks for admitting that you're a mindless sheep. > > > Sometimes I'm willing to be part of a > statistic taking test. This test does not gather statistics in any way. It's usenet, you idiot. I know that that snarky cocksucker Ron explicitly talked about the test being "at a website", but he GOT THAT WRONG. > > >>>What's to be afraid of? >> >>Exactly! But nonetheless, you are. That's why your >>fear is irrational. > > > But I'm not afraid. Yes, you are. > I question the test's source > and validity. No, you don't. You don't care about its source and validity. That's just your time-wasting smokescreen. Thanks again for demonstrating you're a liar: the test being a waste of time is of no concern to you. |
|
|||
|
|||
Scented Nectar wrote:
>>You're wasting time that could have been spent on the quiz. > > > We have all the time in the world. You do. Your time is worth very little. > > >>>But where did you get this test? >>>Who wrote it? >> >>These questions are purely evasive. You could easily >>find out for yourself if you were really interested, >>but we all know you're not; the questions are pure >>evasion, nothing more. > > > I did a quick google and found nothing. Bullshit. *I* did a quick Google and found literally HUNDREDS of references. > I'm not going to spend more time on that. You didn't spend any. > You could just simply answer. I could, but it would be pointless, because your refusal to take the quiz has nothing to do with my failure to tell you. It ONLY has to do with fear, and now stubbornness. > Are you > afraid that revealing the source might > discredit the test? Not in the least. > > >>>Maybe your answers >>>will make me interested in taking the >>>test. >> >>No. We all know it, too. Your refusal to take the >>quiz has nothing to do with my refusal to say anything >>about the origin of the quiz. Your refusal to take the >>quiz is based solely on your irrational fear. > > > I'm starting to suspect that you made up > this test yourself, Nope. I wish I could take credit for it, but I can't. > and probably have all > kinds of wacky ideas about what the > answers IMPLY, eh? Am I close on this > one? > > >>>Another thing that might make >>>me interested in it, is if approx. 100 >>>other veg*ns took the test too. >> >>Thanks for admitting that you're a mindless sheep. > > > Sometimes I'm willing to be part of a > statistic taking test. This test does not gather statistics in any way. It's usenet, you idiot. I know that that snarky cocksucker Ron explicitly talked about the test being "at a website", but he GOT THAT WRONG. > > >>>What's to be afraid of? >> >>Exactly! But nonetheless, you are. That's why your >>fear is irrational. > > > But I'm not afraid. Yes, you are. > I question the test's source > and validity. No, you don't. You don't care about its source and validity. That's just your time-wasting smokescreen. Thanks again for demonstrating you're a liar: the test being a waste of time is of no concern to you. |
|
|||
|
|||
Scented Nectar wrote:
>>>It wouldn't reveal anything I don't already know >>>about myself. >> >>It would publicly demonstrate that I was correct about >>your political leanings, and would serve to confirm my >>claim about the political leanings of all "vegans". > > > I wasn't aware that you had made a guess of > my political leanings. You certainly should have been, you moron - I first posted the quiz following a typically stupid response you made to an insightful comment I made about the politics of all "vegans". > Did you post it, or is it > still just in your head? Posted. > I'm not a good test > subject for you to use, now that I see it's for > vegans. It's not "for" "vegans". It's for everyone. I just know how "vegans" will respond to about 80% of the statements. > I'm not 100% vegan yet. You'll never be "vegan", because ethics has no meaning to you. Anyway, the quiz isn't only for "vegans"; never was. > > >>>Just in reading the test, I know >>>what my answers are. You sure do want to >>>know my thoughts on those subjects. How >>>come? Why me and not all veg*ns? >> >>The quiz is open to one and all. > > > But you're not pestering one and all, > just me. Because you're the only one being a chickenshit about it. > > >>>If you >>>really were doing an actual poll, you wouldn't >>>hound one person about it. >> >>Only one person is so frantically and irrationally >>afraid to take it. > > > The others are beating down your door > to take the test? Others did take the test when it was posted in alt.food.vegan before. You are the ONLY one who has demonstrated deep, irrational fear over it. |
|
|||
|
|||
> > We have all the time in the world.
> > You do. Your time is worth very little. Little to you, a lot to me. That's why I only do things that I want on this news group. Your test isn't one of them. > Bullshit. *I* did a quick Google and found literally > HUNDREDS of references. > > > I'm not going to spend more time on that. > > You didn't spend any. I did. What were your search criteria? I likely had wrong ones. > > You could just simply answer. > > I could, but it would be pointless, because your > refusal to take the quiz has nothing to do with my > failure to tell you. It ONLY has to do with fear, and > now stubbornness. > > > Are you > > afraid that revealing the source might > > discredit the test? > > Not in the least. Well, cough it up then. > > I'm starting to suspect that you made up > > this test yourself, > > Nope. I wish I could take credit for it, but I can't. > > Sometimes I'm willing to be part of a > > statistic taking test. > > This test does not gather statistics in any way. It's > usenet, you idiot. I know that that snarky cocksucker > Ron explicitly talked about the test being "at a > website", but he GOT THAT WRONG. If it does not gather statistics, then what's it for? You said it would tell whether every vegan was leftwing like you say. So, would that not involve getting the statistics through the test? What else is it for? > > I question the test's source > > and validity. > > No, you don't. You don't care about its source and > validity. That's just your time-wasting smokescreen. > Thanks again for demonstrating you're a liar: the test > being a waste of time is of no concern to you. What are you hiding about it's source, or maybe a better question, why are you hiding it's source? -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites. Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button. |
|
|||
|
|||
> It's not "for" "vegans". It's for everyone. I just
> know how "vegans" will respond to about 80% of the > statements. > > > I'm not 100% vegan yet. > > You'll never be "vegan", because ethics has no meaning > to you. I don't feel like taking that test. > >>The quiz is open to one and all. > > > > > > But you're not pestering one and all, > > just me. > > Because you're the only one being a chickenshit about it. And the others are...where? Not taking the test either as far as I can see. No one seems to want to take the test. > Others did take the test when it was posted in > alt.food.vegan before. So then you already have your test answers. Do you have any reason to believe it would turn out different results to do the test over? > You are the ONLY one who has demonstrated deep, > irrational fear over it. You are hoping that by accusing me of fear, that I will take the test just to prove you wrong. I don't play that game. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites. Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button. |
|
|||
|
|||
> It's not "for" "vegans". It's for everyone. I just
> know how "vegans" will respond to about 80% of the > statements. > > > I'm not 100% vegan yet. > > You'll never be "vegan", because ethics has no meaning > to you. I don't feel like taking that test. > >>The quiz is open to one and all. > > > > > > But you're not pestering one and all, > > just me. > > Because you're the only one being a chickenshit about it. And the others are...where? Not taking the test either as far as I can see. No one seems to want to take the test. > Others did take the test when it was posted in > alt.food.vegan before. So then you already have your test answers. Do you have any reason to believe it would turn out different results to do the test over? > You are the ONLY one who has demonstrated deep, > irrational fear over it. You are hoping that by accusing me of fear, that I will take the test just to prove you wrong. I don't play that game. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites. Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button. |
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:49:34 -0500, "Scented Nectar"
> wrote: Could you guys please delete rec.boats from your cross posting list? That would be nice. Thank you. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:49:34 -0500, "Scented Nectar"
> wrote: Could you guys please delete rec.boats from your cross posting list? That would be nice. Thank you. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Excuses, excuses....... | General Cooking | |||
skunky smell in honey apple wine | Winemaking | |||
Skunky Shitbag: STOP removing the attributions in your messages | Vegan | |||
Dreck Dog-beater Nash and Skunky Nutcase have major comprehensiondisorders | Vegan | |||
Why is Skunky so afraid? | Vegan |