Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
In article >,
"Scented Nectar" > wrote: > > He has a point. I asked you to agree to compare all available foods > against > > one another, regardless of food type or category, a very reasonable > request, > > and something one would think a person in your position would be > anxious to > > do. You refused. Your excuse was that it "isn't fair", but nobody is > buying > > that. Just as with this survey, you are afraid that you won't like the > > results. > > First of all, there's no data telling us > the death toll of individual foods. Next > you consistantly only want to compare > the 'best' of meats to the 'worst' of vegan. > When you want to compare like to like, > I'll play the game too. They are relentless, aren't they? |
|
|||
|
|||
In article >,
"Scented Nectar" > wrote: > > He has a point. I asked you to agree to compare all available foods > against > > one another, regardless of food type or category, a very reasonable > request, > > and something one would think a person in your position would be > anxious to > > do. You refused. Your excuse was that it "isn't fair", but nobody is > buying > > that. Just as with this survey, you are afraid that you won't like the > > results. > > First of all, there's no data telling us > the death toll of individual foods. Next > you consistantly only want to compare > the 'best' of meats to the 'worst' of vegan. > When you want to compare like to like, > I'll play the game too. They are relentless, aren't they? |
|
|||
|
|||
"Ron" > wrote in message
... > In article >, > "Scented Nectar" > wrote: > > > > He has a point. I asked you to agree to compare all available foods > > against > > > one another, regardless of food type or category, a very reasonable > > request, > > > and something one would think a person in your position would be > > anxious to > > > do. You refused. Your excuse was that it "isn't fair", but nobody is > > buying > > > that. Just as with this survey, you are afraid that you won't like the > > > results. > > > > First of all, there's no data telling us > > the death toll of individual foods. Next > > you consistantly only want to compare > > the 'best' of meats to the 'worst' of vegan. > > When you want to compare like to like, > > I'll play the game too. > > They are relentless, aren't they? They go in circles and my head spins! All that misspent energy. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites. Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button. |
|
|||
|
|||
"Scented Nectar" > wrote in message ...
> "Ron" > wrote in message > ... > > In article >, > > "Scented Nectar" > wrote: > > > > > > He has a point. I asked you to agree to compare all available > foods > > > against > > > > one another, regardless of food type or category, a very > reasonable > > > request, > > > > and something one would think a person in your position would be > > > anxious to > > > > do. You refused. Your excuse was that it "isn't fair", but nobody > is > > > buying > > > > that. Just as with this survey, you are afraid that you won't like > the > > > > results. > > > > > > First of all, there's no data telling us > > > the death toll of individual foods. Next > > > you consistantly only want to compare > > > the 'best' of meats to the 'worst' of vegan. > > > When you want to compare like to like, > > > I'll play the game too. > > > > They are relentless, aren't they? > > They go in circles and my head spins! > All that misspent energy. Believe it or not, they've been at it for ~years~! I've seen their 'arguments' trashed _repeatedly_. But here they are, still,.. for *more* punishment.. They don't even see how self-harming they are. It's a mystery. |
|
|||
|
|||
"pearl" > wrote in message
... > "Scented Nectar" > wrote in message ... > > "Ron" > wrote in message > > ... > > > In article >, > > > "Scented Nectar" > wrote: > > > > > > > > He has a point. I asked you to agree to compare all available > > foods > > > > against > > > > > one another, regardless of food type or category, a very > > reasonable > > > > request, > > > > > and something one would think a person in your position would be > > > > anxious to > > > > > do. You refused. Your excuse was that it "isn't fair", but nobody > > is > > > > buying > > > > > that. Just as with this survey, you are afraid that you won't like > > the > > > > > results. > > > > > > > > First of all, there's no data telling us > > > > the death toll of individual foods. Next > > > > you consistantly only want to compare > > > > the 'best' of meats to the 'worst' of vegan. > > > > When you want to compare like to like, > > > > I'll play the game too. > > > > > > They are relentless, aren't they? > > > > They go in circles and my head spins! > > All that misspent energy. > > Believe it or not, they've been at it for ~years~! > > I've seen their 'arguments' trashed _repeatedly_. > > But here they are, still,.. for *more* punishment.. > > They don't even see how self-harming they are. > > It's a mystery. I don't see what they are getting out of it. Do they like being hated and disliked? Do they enjoy being annoyances? They certainly can't expect people to take them seriously! -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites. Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button. |
|
|||
|
|||
"Scented Nectar" > wrote in message ...
> "pearl" > wrote in message > ... > > "Scented Nectar" > wrote in message > ... > > > "Ron" > wrote in message > > > ... > > > > In article >, > > > > "Scented Nectar" > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > He has a point. I asked you to agree to compare all available > > > foods > > > > > against > > > > > > one another, regardless of food type or category, a very > > > reasonable > > > > > request, > > > > > > and something one would think a person in your position would > be > > > > > anxious to > > > > > > do. You refused. Your excuse was that it "isn't fair", but > nobody > > > is > > > > > buying > > > > > > that. Just as with this survey, you are afraid that you won't > like > > > the > > > > > > results. > > > > > > > > > > First of all, there's no data telling us > > > > > the death toll of individual foods. Next > > > > > you consistantly only want to compare > > > > > the 'best' of meats to the 'worst' of vegan. > > > > > When you want to compare like to like, > > > > > I'll play the game too. > > > > > > > > They are relentless, aren't they? > > > > > > They go in circles and my head spins! > > > All that misspent energy. > > > > Believe it or not, they've been at it for ~years~! > > > > I've seen their 'arguments' trashed _repeatedly_. > > > > But here they are, still,.. for *more* punishment.. > > > > They don't even see how self-harming they are. > > > > It's a mystery. > > I don't see what they are getting out of it. Do they > like being hated and disliked? Do they enjoy > being annoyances? They certainly can't expect > people to take them seriously! Like just said.. I won't repeat it. |
|
|||
|
|||
uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote: > In article et>, > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > >>Scented Nectar wrote: >> >> >>>>>You Rudy are the one who crossposted this >>>>>to the boats group. >>>> >>>>Ron continues to leave the cross post in, despite the >>>>polite request of the admiral to take it out. He is >>>>responsible. >>> >>> >>>He's stated his reason >> >>It's bullshit. >> >>He's responsible for ****ing off those boat owners >>whenever he puts up a post that contains a crosspost to >>rec.boats. It's his action. > > > The action that I am responsible for is to click "post" from within my > newsreader. You have been asked politely to trim rec.boats. Your failure to do it is a willful wish to antagonize people you don't even know who have been civil to you. You are an asshole. Deliberately. |
|
|||
|
|||
Scented Nectar wrote:
>>>And so do you with yours. Your's >> >>"YOURS", not "your's". >> >>You ignorant whore. > > > Calm down boy! Learn to read, write and spell. |
|
|||
|
|||
uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote: > In article >, > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > >>Scented Nectar wrote: >> >> >>>>He is responsible for the content of the headers of >>>>where he posts. He's unnecessarily angering the >>>>commodores and admirals, and he's responsible for it. >>> >>> >>>Who did the misdeed of crossposting >> >>in Ron's posts? Ron did. > > > I open, select reply, and click "post" in all cases. You have been asked politely to remove an unwanted crosspost. You are responsible for your posts containing rec.boats. You are an asshole. |
|
|||
|
|||
uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote: > In article et>, > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > >>uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult >>engagement and wrote: >> >> >>>>FOLLOWING the polite request to remove it, Ron, you >>>>have it within your power to do so. Why do you >>>>deliberately aggravate the rec.boat readers by not >>>>removing it, when you've been politely asked to remove it? >>>> >>>>You're responsible, Ron. >>> >>> >>>Why should I do for others what they can do for themselves? >> >>He can't remove the crossposts from the headers of your >>posts when you're composing the posts, Ron. You'd have >>to do that. >> >>You like to antagonize people. > > > He can remove them from his end. He cannot. They originate on your end, shitbag. |
|
|||
|
|||
uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote: > In article et>, > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > >>Scented Nectar wrote: >> >> >>>>>You Rudy are the one who crossposted this >>>>>to the boats group. >>>> >>>>Ron continues to leave the cross post in, despite the >>>>polite request of the admiral to take it out. He is >>>>responsible. >>> >>> >>>He's stated his reason >> >>It's bullshit. >> >>He's responsible for ****ing off those boat owners >>whenever he puts up a post that contains a crosspost to >>rec.boats. It's his action. > > > Boat owners are You are responsible for refusing to respond to a polite request. You are an asshole. |
|
|||
|
|||
uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote: > In article et>, > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > >>uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult >>engagement and wrote: >> >> >>>>Ron continues to leave the cross post in, despite the >>>>polite request of the admiral to take it out. He is >>>>responsible. >>> >>> >>>If the admiral would like the crosspost removed, I consider it his >>>responsibility to remove it. >> >>You are the one posting with rec.boats in your headers. >> You are responsible for where your posts go. >> >>Why are you trying to blame others for your actions, Ron? > > > Correction. My ISP is responsible Stop trying to shuck off responsibility for your actions, shitbag. |
|
|||
|
|||
uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote: > In article et>, > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > >>uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult >>engagement and wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>Despite your claims of feeling insulted >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>No. I never said I felt insulted. >> >>Why did you lie, Ron? Answer the question, Ron. Why did you lie? >>>>>And your interest to be close to me. >>>> >>>>No such interest, Ron. I'm not close to you, in any >>>>sense. You do provide a small amusement. >>> >>> >>>Then we can expect to see a decline in the attempts to secure personal >>>knowledge about me. >> >>I haven't sought any personal knowledge of you, Ron. >>I'd have to shower if you divulged any. > > > I know. Yes. Everything there is to know about you is filth. |
|
|||
|
|||
> >>"YOURS", not "your's".
> >> > >>You ignorant whore. > > > > > > Calm down boy! > > Learn to read, write and spell. Calm down and learn to not freak out at typos. The internets full of them especially when people are just posting back and forth. Unless it's a really wacky typo, there's no reason to point them out. Do you call your mother an ignorant whore or a skanky whore when she makes a typo? -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites. Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button. |
|
|||
|
|||
uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote: > In article et>, > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > >>Scented Nectar wrote: >> >> >>>>He's responsible for ****ing off those boat owners >>>>whenever he puts up a post that contains a crosspost to >>>>rec.boats. It's his action. >>> >>> >>>His is only a nonaction >> >>He was politely asked to take an action to trim the >>headers. He pointedly refuses. >> >>He is responsible for the content of the headers of >>where he posts. He's unnecessarily angering the >>commodores and admirals, and he's responsible for it. > > > I am Trying to shove your responsibility onto someone else. |
|
|||
|
|||
uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote: > In article >, > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > >>Scented Nectar wrote: >> >>>>>Who did the misdeed of crossposting >>>> >>>>in Ron's posts? Ron did. >>> >>> >>>You started it. >> >>Ron has it in his power to stop it as far as his posts go. > > > Who is continuing the crossposts? Ron is. He's an asshole. |
|
|||
|
|||
uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote: > In article et>, > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > >>Scented Nectar wrote: >> >> >>>>>You started it. >>>> >>>>Ron has it in his power to stop it as far as his posts go. >>> >>> >>>And so do you with yours. Your's is where it >>>first showed up. >> >>Ron's is where it continues. >> >>Ron is responsible for the headers of his posts. > > > Ron is responsible for not acceding to a polite request made of him. Ron is a shitbag. |
|
|||
|
|||
Scented Nectar wrote:
>>>Good, then stop fixating on me. >> >>You love the attention, otherwise you would stop responding. > > > My responding is because you love the attention, because you're a defective. |
|
|||
|
|||
In article t>,
Rudy Canoza > wrote: > uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult > engagement and wrote: > > > In article >, > > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > > > > >>Scented Nectar wrote: > >> > >> > >>>>He is responsible for the content of the headers of > >>>>where he posts. He's unnecessarily angering the > >>>>commodores and admirals, and he's responsible for it. > >>> > >>> > >>>Who did the misdeed of crossposting > >> > >>in Ron's posts? Ron did. > > > > > > I open, select reply, and click "post" in all cases. > > You have been asked politely to remove an unwanted > crosspost. You are responsible for your posts > containing rec.boats. > > You are an asshole. Rudy, please stop referring to Scented in the way that you do. I find this a simple request to be making of you. I find your tone and manner abusive and demeaning to her as I would with any other individual. It is a simple request to treat someone with some respect. I think her desire to have conversations on these subjects shouldn't be peppered with expletives such as you have been doing. Please consider this a polite request. |
|
|||
|
|||
> >>>Good, then stop fixating on me.
> >> > >>You love the attention, otherwise you would stop responding. > > > > > > My responding > > is because you love the attention, because you're a > defective. You're the defective one, Rudy. Aren't you due for another name change soon? The attention is amusing, but I wouldn't call the feeling love. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites. Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button. |
|
|||
|
|||
In article t>,
Rudy Canoza > wrote: > uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult > engagement and wrote: > > > In article et>, > > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > > > > >>uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult > >>engagement and wrote: > >> > >> > >>>>FOLLOWING the polite request to remove it, Ron, you > >>>>have it within your power to do so. Why do you > >>>>deliberately aggravate the rec.boat readers by not > >>>>removing it, when you've been politely asked to remove it? > >>>> > >>>>You're responsible, Ron. > >>> > >>> > >>>Why should I do for others what they can do for themselves? > >> > >>He can't remove the crossposts from the headers of your > >>posts when you're composing the posts, Ron. You'd have > >>to do that. > >> > >>You like to antagonize people. > > > > > > He can remove them from his end. > > He cannot. They originate on your end, shitbag. Of course, you attribute responsibility to me for what is theirs. People who dislike reading cross posts are responsible for their own actions of opening and reading the crossposts and they are responsible for their own feelings about their own actions of reading crossposts. |
|
|||
|
|||
pearl wrote:
> "Scented Nectar" > wrote in message ... > >>"Ron" > wrote in message ... >> >>>In article >, >>> "Scented Nectar" > wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>He has a point. I asked you to agree to compare all available >> >>foods >> >>>>against >>>> >>>>>one another, regardless of food type or category, a very >> >>reasonable >> >>>>request, >>>> >>>>>and something one would think a person in your position would be >>>> >>>>anxious to >>>> >>>>>do. You refused. Your excuse was that it "isn't fair", but nobody >> >>is >> >>>>buying >>>> >>>>>that. Just as with this survey, you are afraid that you won't like >> >>the >> >>>>>results. >>>> >>>>First of all, there's no data telling us >>>>the death toll of individual foods. Next >>>>you consistantly only want to compare >>>>the 'best' of meats to the 'worst' of vegan. >>>>When you want to compare like to like, >>>>I'll play the game too. >>> >>>They are relentless, aren't they? >> >>They go in circles and my head spins! >>All that misspent energy. > > > Believe it or not, they've been at it for ~years~! > > I've seen their 'arguments' trashed _repeatedly_. Not once, Lesley. But we have seen YOU trashed repeatedly for your weird, irrational, STUPID CRACKPOT belief in: "veganism" "inner earth beings" "hollow earth" that goofy patent for a MANUFACTURED globe helium-inflated number(s) for feed:beef rain forest destruction Brazil's exports (based on *Argentina's* trade) Stolen French flying saucer Zapper Foot massage (as cure-all) Astrology Numerology Alien abduction bestiality Leprechauns Channeling Polar fountains Sun gazing Drinking urine as a cure-all Chemtrails AIDS and ebola conspiracy theory Crop circles sexually aroused by violent ex-convicts participation in skinhead subculture the validity of online IQ tests crackpot 9-11 conspiracy theories Jeff Rense for "news" Inability to distinguish between hearsay and evidence |
|
|||
|
|||
uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote: > In article t>, > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > >>uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult >>engagement and wrote: >> >> >>>In article >, >>> Rudy Canoza > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Scented Nectar wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>He is responsible for the content of the headers of >>>>>>where he posts. He's unnecessarily angering the >>>>>>commodores and admirals, and he's responsible for it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Who did the misdeed of crossposting >>>> >>>>in Ron's posts? Ron did. >>> >>> >>>I open, select reply, and click "post" in all cases. >> >>You have been asked politely to remove an unwanted >>crosspost. You are responsible for your posts >>containing rec.boats. >> >>You are an asshole. > > > Rudy, No, RON: Stop crossposting. |
|
|||
|
|||
Scented Nectar wrote:
>>>>>Good, then stop fixating on me. >>>> >>>>You love the attention, otherwise you would stop responding. >>> >>> >>>My responding >> >>is because you love the attention, because you're a >>defective. > > > You're the defective one, Rudy. Nope. |
|
|||
|
|||
uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote: > In article t>, > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > >>uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult >>engagement and wrote: >> >> >>>>He can't remove the crossposts from the headers of your >>>>posts when you're composing the posts, Ron. You'd have >>>>to do that. >>>> >>>>You like to antagonize people. >>> >>> >>>He can remove them from his end. >> >>He cannot. They originate on your end, shitbag. > > > Of course, you attribute responsibility to me because the content of your posts IS your responsibility. You are fully responsible for every bit and byte of your posts, Ron. |
|
|||
|
|||
In article et>,
Rudy Canoza > wrote: > uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult > engagement and wrote: > > > In article et>, > > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > > > > >>Scented Nectar wrote: > >> > >> > >>>>>You Rudy are the one who crossposted this > >>>>>to the boats group. > >>>> > >>>>Ron continues to leave the cross post in, despite the > >>>>polite request of the admiral to take it out. He is > >>>>responsible. > >>> > >>> > >>>He's stated his reason > >> > >>It's bullshit. > >> > >>He's responsible for ****ing off those boat owners > >>whenever he puts up a post that contains a crosspost to > >>rec.boats. It's his action. > > > > > > Boat owners are > > You are responsible for refusing to respond to a polite > request. You are an asshole. I have the option of complying with a request, denying a request, or doing something of my own choosing. If someone is having difficulty with crossposts, I suggest _they_ do something about it. |
|
|||
|
|||
In article et>,
Rudy Canoza > wrote: > uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult > engagement and wrote: > > > In article et>, > > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > > > > >>uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult > >>engagement and wrote: > >> > >> > >>>>Ron continues to leave the cross post in, despite the > >>>>polite request of the admiral to take it out. He is > >>>>responsible. > >>> > >>> > >>>If the admiral would like the crosspost removed, I consider it his > >>>responsibility to remove it. > >> > >>You are the one posting with rec.boats in your headers. > >> You are responsible for where your posts go. > >> > >>Why are you trying to blame others for your actions, Ron? > > > > > > Correction. My ISP is responsible > > Stop trying to shuck off responsibility for your > actions, shitbag. My ISP determines what is sent and where. The admiral determines what he reads and when. Stop implying that I'm responsible for what other people do, please. |
|
|||
|
|||
In article t>,
Rudy Canoza > wrote: > uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult > engagement and wrote: > > > In article et>, > > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > > > > >>uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult > >>engagement and wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>Despite your claims of feeling insulted > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>No. I never said I felt insulted. > >> > >>Why did you lie, Ron? > > Answer the question, Ron. Why did you lie? > > >>>>>And your interest to be close to me. > >>>> > >>>>No such interest, Ron. I'm not close to you, in any > >>>>sense. You do provide a small amusement. > >>> > >>> > >>>Then we can expect to see a decline in the attempts to secure personal > >>>knowledge about me. > >> > >>I haven't sought any personal knowledge of you, Ron. > >>I'd have to shower if you divulged any. > > > > > > I know. > > Yes. Everything there is to know about you is filth. Now if you could only explain your attraction to what you deem as filth. Dutch is attracted to the disordered and you are attracted to filth. |
|
|||
|
|||
uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote: > In article et>, > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > >>uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult >>engagement and wrote: >> >> >>>>It's bullshit. >>>> >>>>He's responsible for ****ing off those boat owners >>>>whenever he puts up a post that contains a crosspost to >>>>rec.boats. It's his action. >>> >>> >>>Boat owners are >> >>You are responsible for refusing to respond to a polite >>request. You are an asshole. > > > I have the option of complying with a request and you have no good reason not to comply with this one except that you like to antagonize deliberately people who have made a polite request of you. |
|
|||
|
|||
Ron wrote:
> In article et>, > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > >>uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult >>engagement and wrote: >> >> >>>In article et>, >>> Rudy Canoza > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult >>>>engagement and wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>Ron continues to leave the cross post in, despite the >>>>>>polite request of the admiral to take it out. He is >>>>>>responsible. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>If the admiral would like the crosspost removed, I consider it his >>>>>responsibility to remove it. >>>> >>>>You are the one posting with rec.boats in your headers. >>>>You are responsible for where your posts go. >>>> >>>>Why are you trying to blame others for your actions, Ron? >>> >>> >>>Correction. My ISP is responsible >> >>Stop trying to shuck off responsibility for your >>actions, shitbag. > > > My ISP You are responsible for your actions, Ron. Stop blaming your ISP. |
|
|||
|
|||
> > You're the defective one, Rudy.
> > Nope. Considering your fantasies, from pedophilia to necrophilia and that they both have anal penetration in common, I'd say that your a little off the normal paths. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites. Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button. |
|
|||
|
|||
In article et>,
Rudy Canoza > wrote: > uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult > engagement and wrote: > > > In article et>, > > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > > > > >>Scented Nectar wrote: > >> > >> > >>>>He's responsible for ****ing off those boat owners > >>>>whenever he puts up a post that contains a crosspost to > >>>>rec.boats. It's his action. > >>> > >>> > >>>His is only a nonaction > >> > >>He was politely asked to take an action to trim the > >>headers. He pointedly refuses. > >> > >>He is responsible for the content of the headers of > >>where he posts. He's unnecessarily angering the > >>commodores and admirals, and he's responsible for it. > > > > > > I am > > Trying to shove your responsibility onto someone else. Unfortunately, I provide an accurate assessment of shared responsibility as opposed to the childlike notion that you have provided. Admiral opening an post that displeases him is based on his actions. Admiral's dislike are his feelings and his responsibility to do something about. Attributing his actions and reactions to me is fallacious. Attributing to me what is done by my ISP is more of the same. They control what is sent and where it is sent. Not me. They determine where any posts from this server are directed. Attributing their actions and reactions to me is fallacious. |
|
|||
|
|||
uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote more juvenile sarcasm: > In article t>, > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > >>uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult >>engagement and wrote: >> >> >>>In article et>, >>> Rudy Canoza > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult >>>>engagement and wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Despite your claims of feeling insulted >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>No. I never said I felt insulted. >>>> >>>>Why did you lie, Ron? >> >>Answer the question, Ron. Why did you lie? Ron doesn't know why he lied. He lies all the time, and he has no idea why. >>>>I haven't sought any personal knowledge of you, Ron. >>>>I'd have to shower if you divulged any. >>> >>> >>>I know. >> >>Yes. Everything there is to know about you is filth. > > > Now if you could only explain why I shower off filth? I think it's obvious. |
|
|||
|
|||
Scented Nectar wrote:
>>>You're the defective one, Rudy. >> >>Nope. > > > Considering your fantasies No fantasies. Homo Ron ****ed his grandfather's corpse, nonstop for three days. |
|
|||
|
|||
uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote more juvenile sarcasm: > In article et>, > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > >>uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult >>engagement and wrote: >> >> >>>>He was politely asked to take an action to trim the >>>>headers. He pointedly refuses. >>>> >>>>He is responsible for the content of the headers of >>>>where he posts. He's unnecessarily angering the >>>>commodores and admirals, and he's responsible for it. >>> >>> >>>I am >> >>Trying to shove your responsibility onto someone else. > > > Unfortunately, Unfortunately, you are developmentally retarded and have an inability to accept responsibility for your actions. |
|
|||
|
|||
> Considering your fantasies, from pedophilia
> to necrophilia and that they both have anal > penetration in common, I'd say that your > a little off the normal paths. Oh, and did I mention that both your exposed fantasies were males as the receivers of the penetration. Is there something you're trying to say? > > > -- > SN > http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ > A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites. > Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button. > > |
|
|||
|
|||
> > Considering your fantasies
> > No fantasies. Homo Ron ****ed his grandfather's > corpse, nonstop for three days. We, all the readers of this, know you made that up. The question is why? What is your relation to your relations like? Is it as insult filled and deranged as your postings here? I think necrophiliacs like yourself must like the absolute power you have over the willing dead body. Am I on the right track? -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites. Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button. |
|
|||
|
|||
In article et>,
Rudy Canoza > wrote: > uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult > engagement and wrote: > > > In article >, > > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > > > > >>Scented Nectar wrote: > >> > >>>>>Who did the misdeed of crossposting > >>>> > >>>>in Ron's posts? Ron did. > >>> > >>> > >>>You started it. > >> > >>Ron has it in his power to stop it as far as his posts go. > > > > > > Who is > > continuing the crossposts? Ron is. He's an asshole. As does the admiral, you and the ISP. I'm here for the long haul. But A for effort. |
|
|||
|
|||
In article et>,
Rudy Canoza > wrote: > uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult > engagement and wrote: > > > In article et>, > > Rudy Canoza > wrote: > > > > > >>Scented Nectar wrote: > >> > >> > >>>>>You started it. > >>>> > >>>>Ron has it in his power to stop it as far as his posts go. > >>> > >>> > >>>And so do you with yours. Your's is where it > >>>first showed up. > >> > >>Ron's is where it continues. > >> > >>Ron is responsible for the headers of his posts. > > > > > > Ron is responsible > > for not acceding to a polite request made of him. Ron > is a shitbag. Come on Rudy. I've heard worse from better. You'd have to crank it up exponentially to even start to get under my skin. As *** men, we learn to let these comments slide off us at a very early age. |
|
|||
|
|||
Scented Nectar wrote:
>>>Considering your fantasies >> >>No fantasies. Homo Ron ****ed his grandfather's >>corpse, nonstop for three days. > > > We, all the readers of this, know that Ron engaged in necrophilia. He's revolting. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Excuses, excuses....... | General Cooking | |||
skunky smell in honey apple wine | Winemaking | |||
Skunky Shitbag: STOP removing the attributions in your messages | Vegan | |||
Dreck Dog-beater Nash and Skunky Nutcase have major comprehensiondisorders | Vegan | |||
Why is Skunky so afraid? | Vegan |