Retard wrote:
>>The brilliant analysis below was written by Jonathan Ball. I'm reposting
>>it for the benefit of vegan newbies and wannabes as well as for those
>>searching for truth and wisdom:
>>
>>---------------------------------
>>From: Jonathan Ball
>>Newsgroups:
>>talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetar ian,alt.food.vegan,free.uk.politics.animal-rights,uk.politics.animals
>>Subject: FAQ: The Irrational 'Search for Micrograms (of Animal Parts)'
>>Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 01:25:11 GMT
>>---------------------------------
>>
>>
>>All "vegans" begin their belief in "veganism" by
>>subscribing to a logically fallacious argument:
>>
>> If I eat meat, I cause harm to animals
>>
>> I do not eat meat;
>>
>> Therefore, I do not cause harm to animals.
>
>
> But when Jonathan put this to you before
....I did my homework...
> you said that it was "not well-thought out or true;

I reconsidered my initial evaluations upon a course of education. Unlike
you, I learned and applied new, better information. It turned out that
Jon Ball is correct in his assessments of veganism. I learn from my
mistakes; you just keep making the some ones over and over again. That's
the main difference between you and me, Dreck -- that and the fact that
I'm not a big fat, lazy, self-crippled, cuckolded, nymshifting,
dog-beating ex-greasemonkey.

> [start - Jonathan Ball to you]

Digging really deep in the archives in your desparation to stir the
shit, you blue-footed cuckold.

<...>