|
Beach Runner wrote:
> This could be a valuable resource. Certainly, reasonable debates are > always welcomed, but nasty "killer statements" are clearly inflammatory. > We all need to discuss B12 and issues related to life. Just ignore the > trolls. they are not interested in discussions. I used thunderbird to read usent. It has an "ignore thread" option that will ignore anything written by a particular person and all replies. I only needed to put one person's email address to eliminate about 85% of the garbage content. Another 2-3 email addesses to elimnate 99% of the garbage. Steve http://www.geocities.com/beforewisdom/ Be a healthy Vegan or Vegetarian http://geocities.com/beforewisdom/Veg/healthyVeg.html "The great American thought trap: It is not real unless it can be seen on television or bought in a shopping mall" |
rick etter wrote: > > "Beach Runner" > wrote in message > m... > > This could be a valuable resource. Certainly, reasonable debates are > > always welcomed, but nasty "killer statements" are clearly inflammatory. > > We all need to discuss B12 and issues related to life. Just ignore the > > trolls. they are not interested in discussions. > ============================== > TRANSLATION: Don't interfere with my ignorance, the facts mean nothing to > me, and I love killing animals for entertainment and convenience. Red goes > well with my eyes.... Typical vegan mind-set.... Not really, we are interested in polite, reasonable discussions. This includes disagreements. Not nasty SOBs. |
Why spend so much energy on trolls, just kill file them?
Bob C wrote:
>>>This could be a valuable resource. Certainly, reasonable debates are >>>always welcomed, but nasty "killer statements" are clearly inflammatory. >>>We all need to discuss B12 and issues related to life. Just ignore the >>>trolls. they are not interested in discussions. >> >>============================== >>TRANSLATION: Don't interfere with my ignorance, the facts mean nothing to >>me, and I love killing animals for entertainment and convenience. Red goes >>well with my eyes.... Typical vegan mind-set.... > > Not really, we are interested in polite, reasonable discussions. Bullshit. Does that include discussions from "compassionate" vegans who've wished non-vegans and anti-ARAs heart attacks, cancer, and other misfortune in health and well-being? > This includes disagreements. Not nasty SOBs. You hit a very big nerve. Don't overlook the "nasty SOB" vegans and ARAs: We should plaster Etter's, Dutch's and Ball's homes with PETA and PCRM flyers so that THEY will have NO square inch to post THEIR views and discuss topics of interest to THEM. http://tinyurl.com/5m5ew I hope you die slowly, and in excruciating pain from cancer or in a house fire you worthless tramp for what you have just said. Just one animals life is worth 10 of yours. Your wife is better off where she is, at least she doesn't have to live with YOU. I bet she would have committed suicide anyway rather than put up with you. Please do like her and choke to death. http://tinyurl.com/5lndg I can hardly wait until you get your first heart attack. I will jump for joy when you suffer and drop dead! It will be hilarious for the medical staff to laugh at you and tell you that they don't have to be told by YOU what to do. http://tinyurl.com/3jalp Keep on eating that red meat, Dick Etter! http://tinyurl.com/3vkss So you are saying I and fellow vegetarians have the legal right to run an office the way WE want. Well, then, that is good -- because I encourage medical doctors not to help hunters and non-vegetarians. http://tinyurl.com/4j4tm Want more examples? There are plenty more where those were found. That's just from one quick search. Vegans are the least compassionate people on the planet. They are misanthropes. They don't care about animals, they just hate their fellow man and use their prattle about animals to sugarcoat their base contempt for mankind. As you can see from the above, their hate-filled expressions to those who oppose them is often malevolent, if not psychotic. That's to be expected, though, given the fact that vegans and ARAs are often very mentally disturbed. |
"Bob C" > wrote in message ... > > > rick etter wrote: >> >> "Beach Runner" > wrote in message >> m... >> > This could be a valuable resource. Certainly, reasonable debates are >> > always welcomed, but nasty "killer statements" are clearly >> > inflammatory. >> > We all need to discuss B12 and issues related to life. Just ignore the >> > trolls. they are not interested in discussions. >> ============================== >> TRANSLATION: Don't interfere with my ignorance, the facts mean nothing >> to >> me, and I love killing animals for entertainment and convenience. Red >> goes >> well with my eyes.... Typical vegan mind-set.... > > Not really, we are interested in polite, reasonable discussions. This > includes > disagreements. Not nasty SOBs. ================== Strange, I've never used any obscenities in my posts. Wonder why you have to? Nothing to add to the discussion. Come on, be a hero, beachbum can't defend a vegan diet in terms of no/fewer/least animal deaths, maybe you'll be the one to finally do it. Give it a try. And, if you don't feel you can defend vegaism, then just refute what I post about some meat-included diets being better than some vegan diets. |
wowfabgroovy wrote: > Beach Runner > went: > > >>This could be a valuable resource. Certainly, reasonable debates are >>always welcomed, but nasty "killer statements" are clearly inflammatory. >>We all need to discuss B12 and issues related to life. Just ignore the >>trolls. they are not interested in discussions. > > > the time for that would've been when they first moved in. from what i > can see you've already let them take over. the only non-troll threads > in here are ones started by people who've just wandered in. and it's > not long before those get turned into troll threads as well. casual > readers won't bother staying here for long. > > Well, they are clearly strange folks that gets there jollies destroying a vegan forum |
wowfabgroovy wrote: > Beach Runner > went: > > >>This could be a valuable resource. Certainly, reasonable debates are >>always welcomed, but nasty "killer statements" are clearly inflammatory. >>We all need to discuss B12 and issues related to life. Just ignore the >>trolls. they are not interested in discussions. > > > the time for that would've been when they first moved in. from what i > can see you've already let them take over. the only non-troll threads > in here are ones started by people who've just wandered in. and it's > not long before those get turned into troll threads as well. casual > readers won't bother staying here for long. > > Well, they are clearly strange folks that gets there jollies destroying a vegan forum |
usual suspect wrote: > > Bob C wrote: > >>>This could be a valuable resource. Certainly, reasonable debates are > >>>always welcomed, but nasty "killer statements" are clearly inflammatory. > >>>We all need to discuss B12 and issues related to life. Just ignore the > >>>trolls. they are not interested in discussions. > >> > >>============================== > >>TRANSLATION: Don't interfere with my ignorance, the facts mean nothing to > >>me, and I love killing animals for entertainment and convenience. Red goes > >>well with my eyes.... Typical vegan mind-set.... > > > > Not really, we are interested in polite, reasonable discussions. > > Bullshit. Does that include discussions from "compassionate" vegans who've > wished non-vegans and anti-ARAs heart attacks, cancer, and other misfortune in > health and well-being? > > > This includes disagreements. Not nasty SOBs. > > You hit a very big nerve. Don't overlook the "nasty SOB" vegans and ARAs: > > We should plaster Etter's, Dutch's and Ball's homes with PETA > and PCRM flyers so that THEY will have NO square inch to post > THEIR views and discuss topics of interest to THEM. > http://tinyurl.com/5m5ew > > I hope you die slowly, and in excruciating pain from cancer or in a > house fire you worthless tramp for what you have just said. Just one > animals life is worth 10 of yours. Your wife is better off where she is, > at least she doesn't have to live with YOU. I bet she would have > committed suicide anyway rather than put up with you. Please do like her > and choke to death. > http://tinyurl.com/5lndg > > I can hardly wait until you get your first heart attack. > I will jump for joy when you suffer and drop dead! > It will be hilarious for the medical staff to laugh at you > and tell you that they don't have to be told by YOU what to do. > http://tinyurl.com/3jalp > > Keep on eating that red meat, Dick Etter! > http://tinyurl.com/3vkss > > So you are saying I and fellow vegetarians have the legal > right to run an office the way WE want. Well, then, that is good -- > because I encourage medical doctors not to help hunters and > non-vegetarians. > http://tinyurl.com/4j4tm > > Want more examples? There are plenty more where those were found. That's just > from one quick search. Vegans are the least compassionate people on the planet. > They are misanthropes. They don't care about animals, they just hate their > fellow man and use their prattle about animals to sugarcoat their base contempt > for mankind. As you can see from the above, their hate-filled expressions to > those who oppose them is often malevolent, if not psychotic. That's to be > expected, though, given the fact that vegans and ARAs are often very mentally > disturbed. That's so stupid. It's just filled with hate. We are people in general who love nature and responsible scientific organization say we can feed more people in a more environmentally friendly manner with a vegan diet. |
"Bob C" > wrote in message ... > > > usual suspect wrote: >> >> Bob C wrote: >> >>>This could be a valuable resource. Certainly, reasonable debates are >> >>>always welcomed, but nasty "killer statements" are clearly >> >>>inflammatory. >> >>>We all need to discuss B12 and issues related to life. Just ignore >> >>>the >> >>>trolls. they are not interested in discussions. >> >> >> >>============================== >> >>TRANSLATION: Don't interfere with my ignorance, the facts mean >> >>nothing to >> >>me, and I love killing animals for entertainment and convenience. Red >> >>goes >> >>well with my eyes.... Typical vegan mind-set.... >> > >> > Not really, we are interested in polite, reasonable discussions. >> >> Bullshit. Does that include discussions from "compassionate" vegans >> who've >> wished non-vegans and anti-ARAs heart attacks, cancer, and other >> misfortune in >> health and well-being? >> >> > This includes disagreements. Not nasty SOBs. >> >> You hit a very big nerve. Don't overlook the "nasty SOB" vegans and ARAs: >> >> We should plaster Etter's, Dutch's and Ball's homes with PETA >> and PCRM flyers so that THEY will have NO square inch to post >> THEIR views and discuss topics of interest to THEM. >> http://tinyurl.com/5m5ew >> >> I hope you die slowly, and in excruciating pain from cancer or in >> a >> house fire you worthless tramp for what you have just said. Just >> one >> animals life is worth 10 of yours. Your wife is better off where >> she is, >> at least she doesn't have to live with YOU. I bet she would have >> committed suicide anyway rather than put up with you. Please do >> like her >> and choke to death. >> http://tinyurl.com/5lndg >> >> I can hardly wait until you get your first heart attack. >> I will jump for joy when you suffer and drop dead! >> It will be hilarious for the medical staff to laugh at you >> and tell you that they don't have to be told by YOU what to do. >> http://tinyurl.com/3jalp >> >> Keep on eating that red meat, Dick Etter! >> http://tinyurl.com/3vkss >> >> So you are saying I and fellow vegetarians have the legal >> right to run an office the way WE want. Well, then, that is >> good -- >> because I encourage medical doctors not to help hunters and >> non-vegetarians. >> http://tinyurl.com/4j4tm >> >> Want more examples? There are plenty more where those were found. That's >> just >> from one quick search. Vegans are the least compassionate people on the >> planet. >> They are misanthropes. They don't care about animals, they just hate >> their >> fellow man and use their prattle about animals to sugarcoat their base >> contempt >> for mankind. As you can see from the above, their hate-filled expressions >> to >> those who oppose them is often malevolent, if not psychotic. That's to be >> expected, though, given the fact that vegans and ARAs are often very >> mentally >> disturbed. > > That's so stupid. It's just filled with hate. We are people in general > who love > nature and > responsible scientific organization say we can feed more people in a more > environmentally > friendly manner with a vegan diet. ======================== No, your hand picked sites full of spew and hate say that. There are areas that cannot support crops without massive inputs from the petro-chemical industry, but work just fine for raising animals. Why is it that you cannot defnd your religion without resorting to lys, hate, and delusions? You prove with each and every post that you are not vegan, and that killing animals unnecessarily means nothing to you, hypocrite. |
"Beach Runner" > wrote in message ... > > > wowfabgroovy wrote: > >> Beach Runner > went: >> >> >>>This could be a valuable resource. Certainly, reasonable debates are >>>always welcomed, but nasty "killer statements" are clearly inflammatory. >>>We all need to discuss B12 and issues related to life. Just ignore the >>>trolls. they are not interested in discussions. >> >> >> the time for that would've been when they first moved in. from what i >> can see you've already let them take over. the only non-troll threads >> in here are ones started by people who've just wandered in. and it's >> not long before those get turned into troll threads as well. casual >> readers won't bother staying here for long. >> >> Well, they are clearly strange folks that gets there jollies destroying a >> vegan forum ===================== ROTFLMAO It was detroyed by the lys and hate spewed by vegans, killer. We're here to help you get a liitle truth out. You can't seem to do it yourself, killer. |
Bob C wrote:
>>>>>This could be a valuable resource. Certainly, reasonable debates are >>>>>always welcomed, but nasty "killer statements" are clearly inflammatory. >>>>>We all need to discuss B12 and issues related to life. Just ignore the >>>>>trolls. they are not interested in discussions. >>>> >>>>============================== >>>>TRANSLATION: Don't interfere with my ignorance, the facts mean nothing to >>>>me, and I love killing animals for entertainment and convenience. Red goes >>>>well with my eyes.... Typical vegan mind-set.... >>> >>>Not really, we are interested in polite, reasonable discussions. >> >>Bullshit. Does that include discussions from "compassionate" vegans who've >>wished non-vegans and anti-ARAs heart attacks, cancer, and other misfortune in >>health and well-being? >> >> >>>This includes disagreements. Not nasty SOBs. >> >>You hit a very big nerve. Don't overlook the "nasty SOB" vegans and ARAs: >> >> We should plaster Etter's, Dutch's and Ball's homes with PETA >> and PCRM flyers so that THEY will have NO square inch to post >> THEIR views and discuss topics of interest to THEM. >> http://tinyurl.com/5m5ew >> >> I hope you die slowly, and in excruciating pain from cancer or in a >> house fire you worthless tramp for what you have just said. Just one >> animals life is worth 10 of yours. Your wife is better off where she is, >> at least she doesn't have to live with YOU. I bet she would have >> committed suicide anyway rather than put up with you. Please do like her >> and choke to death. >> http://tinyurl.com/5lndg >> >> I can hardly wait until you get your first heart attack. >> I will jump for joy when you suffer and drop dead! >> It will be hilarious for the medical staff to laugh at you >> and tell you that they don't have to be told by YOU what to do. >> http://tinyurl.com/3jalp >> >> Keep on eating that red meat, Dick Etter! >> http://tinyurl.com/3vkss >> >> So you are saying I and fellow vegetarians have the legal >> right to run an office the way WE want. Well, then, that is good -- >> because I encourage medical doctors not to help hunters and >> non-vegetarians. >> http://tinyurl.com/4j4tm >> >>Want more examples? There are plenty more where those were found. That's just >>from one quick search. Vegans are the least compassionate people on the planet. >>They are misanthropes. They don't care about animals, they just hate their >>fellow man and use their prattle about animals to sugarcoat their base contempt >>for mankind. As you can see from the above, their hate-filled expressions to >>those who oppose them is often malevolent, if not psychotic. That's to be >>expected, though, given the fact that vegans and ARAs are often very mentally >>disturbed. > > > That's so stupid. It's just filled with hate. Those are quotes from the vegans and animal rights activists, not the people you call "trolls." Find me some instances of the opposition to your viewpoints wishing you unwell, much less that you'd drop dead of a heart attack. > We are people in general who love nature And nobody else does? What an arrogant son of a bitch you are. > and responsible scientific organization Name one. > say we can feed more people in a more environmentally > friendly manner with a vegan diet. They're not very responsible if they say you can do that. You're also apparently offering the wrong solution to the wrong problem. The problem of world hunger has nothing to do with lack of resources, but of distribution due to politics and war. As distribution improves, hunger decreases: Not only is it true that a hunger free world is totally attainable, we are, right now in fact, gaining on it and well on the winning side of achieving it. Today, about 24,000 people die every day from hunger or hunger-related causes. This is down from 35,000 ten years ago, and 41,000 twenty years ago. Three-fourths of the deaths are children under the age of five. Today 10% of children in developing countries die before the age of five. This is down from 28% fifty years ago. All of this despite the increase in world population during this time. http://www.worldlegacy.org/HungerInfo.htm Perhaps you should do a little more study to see if the vegan propaganda you've been using is shared by those working directly on the issues vegans like to raise to promote veganism. Or do you accept the dogmatic tenets of veganism with a blind faith and are unopen to challenging your belief system to see if it's true? |
wowfabgroovy wrote:
>>>Well, they are clearly strange folks that gets there jollies destroying a vegan forum > > i heard they're planning to take over a flower arranging group next. And just how long have you been experiencing auditory hallucinations? > they just need to toughen themselves up on them there vegans and old > lady knitters first. Your malnourishment is probably to blame for your utter lack of creativity. *yawn* |
rick etter wrote: > > "Bob C" > wrote in message > ... > > > > > > usual suspect wrote: > >> > >> Bob C wrote: > >> >>>This could be a valuable resource. Certainly, reasonable debates are > >> >>>always welcomed, but nasty "killer statements" are clearly > >> >>>inflammatory. > >> >>>We all need to discuss B12 and issues related to life. Just ignore > >> >>>the > >> >>>trolls. they are not interested in discussions. > >> >> > >> >>============================== > >> >>TRANSLATION: Don't interfere with my ignorance, the facts mean > >> >>nothing to > >> >>me, and I love killing animals for entertainment and convenience. Red > >> >>goes > >> >>well with my eyes.... Typical vegan mind-set.... > >> > > >> > Not really, we are interested in polite, reasonable discussions. > >> > >> Bullshit. Does that include discussions from "compassionate" vegans > >> who've > >> wished non-vegans and anti-ARAs heart attacks, cancer, and other > >> misfortune in > >> health and well-being? > >> > >> > This includes disagreements. Not nasty SOBs. > >> > >> You hit a very big nerve. Don't overlook the "nasty SOB" vegans and ARAs: > >> > >> We should plaster Etter's, Dutch's and Ball's homes with PETA > >> and PCRM flyers so that THEY will have NO square inch to post > >> THEIR views and discuss topics of interest to THEM. > >> http://tinyurl.com/5m5ew > >> > >> I hope you die slowly, and in excruciating pain from cancer or in > >> a > >> house fire you worthless tramp for what you have just said. Just > >> one > >> animals life is worth 10 of yours. Your wife is better off where > >> she is, > >> at least she doesn't have to live with YOU. I bet she would have > >> committed suicide anyway rather than put up with you. Please do > >> like her > >> and choke to death. > >> http://tinyurl.com/5lndg > >> > >> I can hardly wait until you get your first heart attack. > >> I will jump for joy when you suffer and drop dead! > >> It will be hilarious for the medical staff to laugh at you > >> and tell you that they don't have to be told by YOU what to do. > >> http://tinyurl.com/3jalp > >> > >> Keep on eating that red meat, Dick Etter! > >> http://tinyurl.com/3vkss > >> > >> So you are saying I and fellow vegetarians have the legal > >> right to run an office the way WE want. Well, then, that is > >> good -- > >> because I encourage medical doctors not to help hunters and > >> non-vegetarians. > >> http://tinyurl.com/4j4tm > >> > >> Want more examples? There are plenty more where those were found. That's > >> just > >> from one quick search. Vegans are the least compassionate people on the > >> planet. > >> They are misanthropes. They don't care about animals, they just hate > >> their > >> fellow man and use their prattle about animals to sugarcoat their base > >> contempt > >> for mankind. As you can see from the above, their hate-filled expressions > >> to > >> those who oppose them is often malevolent, if not psychotic. That's to be > >> expected, though, given the fact that vegans and ARAs are often very > >> mentally > >> disturbed. > > > > That's so stupid. It's just filled with hate. We are people in general > > who love > > nature and > > responsible scientific organization say we can feed more people in a more > > environmentally > > friendly manner with a vegan diet. > ======================== > No, your hand picked sites full of spew and hate say that. There are areas > that cannot support crops without massive inputs from the petro-chemical > industry, but work just fine for raising animals. Why is it that you cannot > defnd your religion without resorting to lys, hate, and delusions? You > prove with each and every post that you are not vegan, and that killing > animals unnecessarily means nothing to you, hypocrite. You have obviously never heard of orgnaic farming, which I promote. You're also a nasty SOB. YOu can make points to consider, and they would be considered if you weren't so nasty. |
Bob C wrote:
>>>>>>>This could be a valuable resource. Certainly, reasonable debates are >>>>>>>always welcomed, but nasty "killer statements" are clearly >>>>>>>inflammatory. >>>>>>>We all need to discuss B12 and issues related to life. Just ignore >>>>>>>the >>>>>>>trolls. they are not interested in discussions. >>>>>> >>>>>>============================== >>>>>>TRANSLATION: Don't interfere with my ignorance, the facts mean >>>>>>nothing to >>>>>>me, and I love killing animals for entertainment and convenience. Red >>>>>>goes >>>>>>well with my eyes.... Typical vegan mind-set.... >>>>> >>>>>Not really, we are interested in polite, reasonable discussions. >>>> >>>>Bullshit. Does that include discussions from "compassionate" vegans >>>>who've >>>>wished non-vegans and anti-ARAs heart attacks, cancer, and other >>>>misfortune in >>>>health and well-being? >>>> >>>> >>>>>This includes disagreements. Not nasty SOBs. >>>> >>>>You hit a very big nerve. Don't overlook the "nasty SOB" vegans and ARAs: >>>> >>>> We should plaster Etter's, Dutch's and Ball's homes with PETA >>>> and PCRM flyers so that THEY will have NO square inch to post >>>> THEIR views and discuss topics of interest to THEM. >>>> http://tinyurl.com/5m5ew >>>> >>>> I hope you die slowly, and in excruciating pain from cancer or in >>>>a >>>> house fire you worthless tramp for what you have just said. Just >>>>one >>>> animals life is worth 10 of yours. Your wife is better off where >>>>she is, >>>> at least she doesn't have to live with YOU. I bet she would have >>>> committed suicide anyway rather than put up with you. Please do >>>>like her >>>> and choke to death. >>>> http://tinyurl.com/5lndg >>>> >>>> I can hardly wait until you get your first heart attack. >>>> I will jump for joy when you suffer and drop dead! >>>> It will be hilarious for the medical staff to laugh at you >>>> and tell you that they don't have to be told by YOU what to do. >>>> http://tinyurl.com/3jalp >>>> >>>> Keep on eating that red meat, Dick Etter! >>>> http://tinyurl.com/3vkss >>>> >>>> So you are saying I and fellow vegetarians have the legal >>>> right to run an office the way WE want. Well, then, that is >>>>good -- >>>> because I encourage medical doctors not to help hunters and >>>> non-vegetarians. >>>> http://tinyurl.com/4j4tm >>>> >>>>Want more examples? There are plenty more where those were found. That's >>>>just >>>>from one quick search. Vegans are the least compassionate people on the >>>>planet. >>>>They are misanthropes. They don't care about animals, they just hate >>>>their >>>>fellow man and use their prattle about animals to sugarcoat their base >>>>contempt >>>>for mankind. As you can see from the above, their hate-filled expressions >>>>to >>>>those who oppose them is often malevolent, if not psychotic. That's to be >>>>expected, though, given the fact that vegans and ARAs are often very >>>>mentally >>>>disturbed. >>> >>>That's so stupid. It's just filled with hate. We are people in general >>>who love >>>nature and >>>responsible scientific organization say we can feed more people in a more >>>environmentally >>>friendly manner with a vegan diet. >> >>======================== >>No, your hand picked sites full of spew and hate say that. There are areas >>that cannot support crops without massive inputs from the petro-chemical >>industry, but work just fine for raising animals. Why is it that you cannot >>defnd your religion without resorting to lys, hate, and delusions? You >>prove with each and every post that you are not vegan, and that killing >>animals unnecessarily means nothing to you, hypocrite. > > You have obviously never heard of orgnaic farming, which I promote. You're gullible, Bob. Organic farming kills animals, including humans: IF you buy organic food because you think it's free of the cancer-causing pesticides used on other farms, think again. "Organic" farmers routinely spray their crops with naturally occurring pesticides - and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has classified pyrethrum, a top organic pesticide, as a "likely human carcinogen." Feeling paranoid yet? Well, in fact, the EPA made that call in secret, almost two years ago! The revelation about pyrethrum, with other recent findings, calls into question the superiority of organic farming. For decades, activists have claimed that organic food is healthier and kinder to the environment than "chemically farmed" food. Organic farmers, for example, didn't use synthetic pesticides. What most people don't realize - and activists try to hide - is that organic farmers are allowed to use a wide array of natural chemicals as pest killers. Moreover, these natural poisons pose the same theoretical (but remote) dangers as the synthetic pesticides so hated by organic devotees. http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuse...etails&id=1107 You buy the whole BS about "organics = good" without ever looking to see what "organic" really means. It does NOT mean free of pesticides, it can mean MORE pesticides because the synthetic versions are regulated and produce is tested for its residues. Your organic produce is not tested for residues even though it's treated even more applications of the "natural" versions of the same pesticides you worry about: ...[M]any of the widely used synthetic pesticides are based on natural plant-defense chemicals. Synthetic versions of pyrethrum (known as pyrethroids) make it possible to protect a crop with one or two sprays instead of spraying natural pyrethrum five to seven times at higher volumes. (same link as above) Do yourself a favor and research these issues and see if the organic and vegan activists are telling you the truth or dishing out a bunch of bullshit. > You're also a nasty SOB. YOu can make points to consider, and they would be > considered if you weren't so nasty. You're the one calling people SOBs and failing to admit that vegans have demonstrated far more nastiness than their opponents in this group. My two responses to you have been very substantive and I've dealt fairly and politely with the issues (hunger, organics) you've raised. Now respond in kind and we can have a civil discussion, or keep pulling the same stunts and you'll get it back in kind. |
Bob C wrote:
>>>>>>>This could be a valuable resource. Certainly, reasonable debates are >>>>>>>always welcomed, but nasty "killer statements" are clearly >>>>>>>inflammatory. >>>>>>>We all need to discuss B12 and issues related to life. Just ignore >>>>>>>the >>>>>>>trolls. they are not interested in discussions. >>>>>> >>>>>>============================== >>>>>>TRANSLATION: Don't interfere with my ignorance, the facts mean >>>>>>nothing to >>>>>>me, and I love killing animals for entertainment and convenience. Red >>>>>>goes >>>>>>well with my eyes.... Typical vegan mind-set.... >>>>> >>>>>Not really, we are interested in polite, reasonable discussions. >>>> >>>>Bullshit. Does that include discussions from "compassionate" vegans >>>>who've >>>>wished non-vegans and anti-ARAs heart attacks, cancer, and other >>>>misfortune in >>>>health and well-being? >>>> >>>> >>>>>This includes disagreements. Not nasty SOBs. >>>> >>>>You hit a very big nerve. Don't overlook the "nasty SOB" vegans and ARAs: >>>> >>>> We should plaster Etter's, Dutch's and Ball's homes with PETA >>>> and PCRM flyers so that THEY will have NO square inch to post >>>> THEIR views and discuss topics of interest to THEM. >>>> http://tinyurl.com/5m5ew >>>> >>>> I hope you die slowly, and in excruciating pain from cancer or in >>>>a >>>> house fire you worthless tramp for what you have just said. Just >>>>one >>>> animals life is worth 10 of yours. Your wife is better off where >>>>she is, >>>> at least she doesn't have to live with YOU. I bet she would have >>>> committed suicide anyway rather than put up with you. Please do >>>>like her >>>> and choke to death. >>>> http://tinyurl.com/5lndg >>>> >>>> I can hardly wait until you get your first heart attack. >>>> I will jump for joy when you suffer and drop dead! >>>> It will be hilarious for the medical staff to laugh at you >>>> and tell you that they don't have to be told by YOU what to do. >>>> http://tinyurl.com/3jalp >>>> >>>> Keep on eating that red meat, Dick Etter! >>>> http://tinyurl.com/3vkss >>>> >>>> So you are saying I and fellow vegetarians have the legal >>>> right to run an office the way WE want. Well, then, that is >>>>good -- >>>> because I encourage medical doctors not to help hunters and >>>> non-vegetarians. >>>> http://tinyurl.com/4j4tm >>>> >>>>Want more examples? There are plenty more where those were found. That's >>>>just >>>>from one quick search. Vegans are the least compassionate people on the >>>>planet. >>>>They are misanthropes. They don't care about animals, they just hate >>>>their >>>>fellow man and use their prattle about animals to sugarcoat their base >>>>contempt >>>>for mankind. As you can see from the above, their hate-filled expressions >>>>to >>>>those who oppose them is often malevolent, if not psychotic. That's to be >>>>expected, though, given the fact that vegans and ARAs are often very >>>>mentally >>>>disturbed. >>> >>>That's so stupid. It's just filled with hate. We are people in general >>>who love >>>nature and >>>responsible scientific organization say we can feed more people in a more >>>environmentally >>>friendly manner with a vegan diet. >> >>======================== >>No, your hand picked sites full of spew and hate say that. There are areas >>that cannot support crops without massive inputs from the petro-chemical >>industry, but work just fine for raising animals. Why is it that you cannot >>defnd your religion without resorting to lys, hate, and delusions? You >>prove with each and every post that you are not vegan, and that killing >>animals unnecessarily means nothing to you, hypocrite. > > You have obviously never heard of orgnaic farming, which I promote. You're gullible, Bob. Organic farming kills animals, including humans: IF you buy organic food because you think it's free of the cancer-causing pesticides used on other farms, think again. "Organic" farmers routinely spray their crops with naturally occurring pesticides - and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has classified pyrethrum, a top organic pesticide, as a "likely human carcinogen." Feeling paranoid yet? Well, in fact, the EPA made that call in secret, almost two years ago! The revelation about pyrethrum, with other recent findings, calls into question the superiority of organic farming. For decades, activists have claimed that organic food is healthier and kinder to the environment than "chemically farmed" food. Organic farmers, for example, didn't use synthetic pesticides. What most people don't realize - and activists try to hide - is that organic farmers are allowed to use a wide array of natural chemicals as pest killers. Moreover, these natural poisons pose the same theoretical (but remote) dangers as the synthetic pesticides so hated by organic devotees. http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuse...etails&id=1107 You buy the whole BS about "organics = good" without ever looking to see what "organic" really means. It does NOT mean free of pesticides, it can mean MORE pesticides because the synthetic versions are regulated and produce is tested for its residues. Your organic produce is not tested for residues even though it's treated even more applications of the "natural" versions of the same pesticides you worry about: ...[M]any of the widely used synthetic pesticides are based on natural plant-defense chemicals. Synthetic versions of pyrethrum (known as pyrethroids) make it possible to protect a crop with one or two sprays instead of spraying natural pyrethrum five to seven times at higher volumes. (same link as above) Do yourself a favor and research these issues and see if the organic and vegan activists are telling you the truth or dishing out a bunch of bullshit. > You're also a nasty SOB. YOu can make points to consider, and they would be > considered if you weren't so nasty. You're the one calling people SOBs and failing to admit that vegans have demonstrated far more nastiness than their opponents in this group. My two responses to you have been very substantive and I've dealt fairly and politely with the issues (hunger, organics) you've raised. Now respond in kind and we can have a civil discussion, or keep pulling the same stunts and you'll get it back in kind. |
"Bob C" > wrote in message ... > > > rick etter wrote: snippage... >> > responsible scientific organization say we can feed more people in a >> > more >> > environmentally >> > friendly manner with a vegan diet. >> ======================== >> No, your hand picked sites full of spew and hate say that. There are >> areas >> that cannot support crops without massive inputs from the petro-chemical >> industry, but work just fine for raising animals. Why is it that you >> cannot >> defnd your religion without resorting to lys, hate, and delusions? You >> prove with each and every post that you are not vegan, and that killing >> animals unnecessarily means nothing to you, hypocrite. > > You have obviously never heard of orgnaic farming, which I promote. ================= LOL Which means you still promote the unnecessary death and suffering of animals, killer. Organic does not mean cruelty-free. Organic does not mean pesticide free. Organic does not mean animal free. Try getting beyond the rhetoric and myths, hypocrite. > > You're also a nasty SOB. YOu can make points to consider, and they would > be > considered if you weren't so nasty. ======================== They don't have to be, fool. Go back and review many of my posts. When first time posters get here, and if *they* are reasonable, sane, and really looking for information, my replies are just that, calm and informative. Otherwise, fools get what fools deserve. You've already blown your chance killer. Now, if you would *really* like to try, then start all over without the ignorance and stupidity. I predict that you can't, because as just proven by this post, your delusions are already running rampant. |
usual suspect wrote: > Bob C wrote: > >>>>>> This could be a valuable resource. Certainly, reasonable debates are >>>>>> always welcomed, but nasty "killer statements" are clearly >>>>>> inflammatory. >>>>>> We all need to discuss B12 and issues related to life. Just >>>>>> ignore the >>>>>> trolls. they are not interested in discussions. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ============================== >>>>> TRANSLATION: Don't interfere with my ignorance, the facts mean >>>>> nothing to >>>>> me, and I love killing animals for entertainment and convenience. >>>>> Red goes >>>>> well with my eyes.... Typical vegan mind-set.... >>>> >>>> >>>> Not really, we are interested in polite, reasonable discussions. >>> >>> >>> Bullshit. Does that include discussions from "compassionate" vegans >>> who've >>> wished non-vegans and anti-ARAs heart attacks, cancer, and other >>> misfortune in >>> health and well-being? >>> >>> >>>> This includes disagreements. Not nasty SOBs. >>> >>> >>> You hit a very big nerve. Don't overlook the "nasty SOB" vegans and >>> ARAs: >>> >>> We should plaster Etter's, Dutch's and Ball's homes with PETA >>> and PCRM flyers so that THEY will have NO square inch to post >>> THEIR views and discuss topics of interest to THEM. >>> http://tinyurl.com/5m5ew >>> >>> I hope you die slowly, and in excruciating pain from cancer or >>> in a >>> house fire you worthless tramp for what you have just said. >>> Just one >>> animals life is worth 10 of yours. Your wife is better off >>> where she is, >>> at least she doesn't have to live with YOU. I bet she would have >>> committed suicide anyway rather than put up with you. Please >>> do like her >>> and choke to death. >>> http://tinyurl.com/5lndg >>> >>> I can hardly wait until you get your first heart attack. >>> I will jump for joy when you suffer and drop dead! >>> It will be hilarious for the medical staff to laugh at you >>> and tell you that they don't have to be told by YOU what to do. >>> http://tinyurl.com/3jalp >>> >>> Keep on eating that red meat, Dick Etter! >>> http://tinyurl.com/3vkss >>> >>> So you are saying I and fellow vegetarians have the legal >>> right to run an office the way WE want. Well, then, that is >>> good -- >>> because I encourage medical doctors not to help hunters and >>> non-vegetarians. >>> http://tinyurl.com/4j4tm >>> >>> Want more examples? There are plenty more where those were found. >>> That's just >>> from one quick search. Vegans are the least compassionate people on >>> the planet. >>> They are misanthropes. They don't care about animals, they just hate >>> their >>> fellow man and use their prattle about animals to sugarcoat their >>> base contempt >>> for mankind. As you can see from the above, their hate-filled >>> expressions to >>> those who oppose them is often malevolent, if not psychotic. That's >>> to be >>> expected, though, given the fact that vegans and ARAs are often very >>> mentally >>> disturbed. >> >> >> >> That's so stupid. It's just filled with hate. > > > Those are quotes from the vegans and animal rights activists, not the > people you call "trolls." Find me some instances of the opposition to > your viewpoints wishing you unwell, much less that you'd drop dead of a > heart attack. > >> We are people in general who love nature > > > And nobody else does? What an arrogant son of a bitch you are. > >> and responsible scientific organization > > > Name one. > Society for Concerned Scientists >> say we can feed more people in a more environmentally >> friendly manner with a vegan diet. > > > They're not very responsible if they say you can do that. You're also > apparently offering the wrong solution to the wrong problem. The problem > of world hunger has nothing to do with lack of resources, but of > distribution due to politics and war. As distribution improves, hunger > decreases: > > Not only is it true that a hunger free world is totally > attainable, we are, right now in fact, gaining on it and well > on the winning side of achieving it. Today, about 24,000 people > die every day from hunger or hunger-related causes. This is down > from 35,000 ten years ago, and 41,000 twenty years ago. > Three-fourths of the deaths are children under the age of five. > Today 10% of children in developing countries die before the age > of five. This is down from 28% fifty years ago. All of this > despite the increase in world population during this time. > http://www.worldlegacy.org/HungerInfo.htm > > Perhaps you should do a little more study to see if the vegan propaganda > you've been using is shared by those working directly on the issues > vegans like to raise to promote veganism. Or do you accept the dogmatic > tenets of veganism with a blind faith and are unopen to challenging your > belief system to see if it's true? > |
usual suspect wrote: > Bob C wrote: > >>>>>> This could be a valuable resource. Certainly, reasonable debates are >>>>>> always welcomed, but nasty "killer statements" are clearly >>>>>> inflammatory. >>>>>> We all need to discuss B12 and issues related to life. Just >>>>>> ignore the >>>>>> trolls. they are not interested in discussions. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ============================== >>>>> TRANSLATION: Don't interfere with my ignorance, the facts mean >>>>> nothing to >>>>> me, and I love killing animals for entertainment and convenience. >>>>> Red goes >>>>> well with my eyes.... Typical vegan mind-set.... >>>> >>>> >>>> Not really, we are interested in polite, reasonable discussions. >>> >>> >>> Bullshit. Does that include discussions from "compassionate" vegans >>> who've >>> wished non-vegans and anti-ARAs heart attacks, cancer, and other >>> misfortune in >>> health and well-being? >>> >>> >>>> This includes disagreements. Not nasty SOBs. >>> >>> >>> You hit a very big nerve. Don't overlook the "nasty SOB" vegans and >>> ARAs: >>> >>> We should plaster Etter's, Dutch's and Ball's homes with PETA >>> and PCRM flyers so that THEY will have NO square inch to post >>> THEIR views and discuss topics of interest to THEM. >>> http://tinyurl.com/5m5ew >>> >>> I hope you die slowly, and in excruciating pain from cancer or >>> in a >>> house fire you worthless tramp for what you have just said. >>> Just one >>> animals life is worth 10 of yours. Your wife is better off >>> where she is, >>> at least she doesn't have to live with YOU. I bet she would have >>> committed suicide anyway rather than put up with you. Please >>> do like her >>> and choke to death. >>> http://tinyurl.com/5lndg >>> >>> I can hardly wait until you get your first heart attack. >>> I will jump for joy when you suffer and drop dead! >>> It will be hilarious for the medical staff to laugh at you >>> and tell you that they don't have to be told by YOU what to do. >>> http://tinyurl.com/3jalp >>> >>> Keep on eating that red meat, Dick Etter! >>> http://tinyurl.com/3vkss >>> >>> So you are saying I and fellow vegetarians have the legal >>> right to run an office the way WE want. Well, then, that is >>> good -- >>> because I encourage medical doctors not to help hunters and >>> non-vegetarians. >>> http://tinyurl.com/4j4tm >>> >>> Want more examples? There are plenty more where those were found. >>> That's just >>> from one quick search. Vegans are the least compassionate people on >>> the planet. >>> They are misanthropes. They don't care about animals, they just hate >>> their >>> fellow man and use their prattle about animals to sugarcoat their >>> base contempt >>> for mankind. As you can see from the above, their hate-filled >>> expressions to >>> those who oppose them is often malevolent, if not psychotic. That's >>> to be >>> expected, though, given the fact that vegans and ARAs are often very >>> mentally >>> disturbed. >> >> >> >> That's so stupid. It's just filled with hate. > > > Those are quotes from the vegans and animal rights activists, not the > people you call "trolls." Find me some instances of the opposition to > your viewpoints wishing you unwell, much less that you'd drop dead of a > heart attack. > >> We are people in general who love nature > > > And nobody else does? What an arrogant son of a bitch you are. > >> and responsible scientific organization > > > Name one. > Society for Concerned Scientists >> say we can feed more people in a more environmentally >> friendly manner with a vegan diet. > > > They're not very responsible if they say you can do that. You're also > apparently offering the wrong solution to the wrong problem. The problem > of world hunger has nothing to do with lack of resources, but of > distribution due to politics and war. As distribution improves, hunger > decreases: > > Not only is it true that a hunger free world is totally > attainable, we are, right now in fact, gaining on it and well > on the winning side of achieving it. Today, about 24,000 people > die every day from hunger or hunger-related causes. This is down > from 35,000 ten years ago, and 41,000 twenty years ago. > Three-fourths of the deaths are children under the age of five. > Today 10% of children in developing countries die before the age > of five. This is down from 28% fifty years ago. All of this > despite the increase in world population during this time. > http://www.worldlegacy.org/HungerInfo.htm > > Perhaps you should do a little more study to see if the vegan propaganda > you've been using is shared by those working directly on the issues > vegans like to raise to promote veganism. Or do you accept the dogmatic > tenets of veganism with a blind faith and are unopen to challenging your > belief system to see if it's true? > |
Well, if they posted their information in a reasonable, non insulting
way, their comments would be welcome. They're just nasty. They don't seek to share knowledge. They just have a strange agenda. usual suspect wrote: > wowfabgroovy wrote: > >>>> Well, they are clearly strange folks that gets there jollies >>>> destroying a vegan forum >> >> >> i heard they're planning to take over a flower arranging group next. > > > And just how long have you been experiencing auditory hallucinations? > >> they just need to toughen themselves up on them there vegans and old >> lady knitters first. > > > Your malnourishment is probably to blame for your utter lack of creativity. > > *yawn* > |
Well, if they posted their information in a reasonable, non insulting
way, their comments would be welcome. They're just nasty. They don't seek to share knowledge. They just have a strange agenda. usual suspect wrote: > wowfabgroovy wrote: > >>>> Well, they are clearly strange folks that gets there jollies >>>> destroying a vegan forum >> >> >> i heard they're planning to take over a flower arranging group next. > > > And just how long have you been experiencing auditory hallucinations? > >> they just need to toughen themselves up on them there vegans and old >> lady knitters first. > > > Your malnourishment is probably to blame for your utter lack of creativity. > > *yawn* > |
Beach Runner wrote:
<snipping to make sure you don't miss what I learned by a quick search> >> Those are quotes from the vegans and animal rights activists, not the >> people you call "trolls." Find me some instances of the opposition to >> your viewpoints wishing you unwell, much less that you'd drop dead of >> a heart attack. >> >>> We are people in general who love nature >> >> And nobody else does? What an arrogant son of a bitch you are. >> >>> and responsible scientific organization >> >> Name one. >> > Society for Concerned Scientists Do you mean Union of Concerned Scientists? That organization has a membership that consists primarily of laymen, not scientists. Their agenda is based on activism, not science. They "seek to ensure that all people have clean air, energy and transportation" (does everyone else want dirty air, energy and transportation?!). They pick and choose research that supports their political leaning (which is decidedly far left); that is the antithesis of science and of sound policymaking. That said, I searched their site anyway. They do NOT endorse veganism, as you suggested. I broadened my search to vegetarianism and found news releases giving props to fastfood chains that sought to purchase "sustainably-raised" meats. Indeed, the section in which that release is found is about sustainable agriculture. In it, they promote SUSTAINABLE MEAT PRODUCTION, not veganism. http://www.ucsusa.org/food_and_envir...ture/index.cfm This pretty much contradicts your claim, doesn't it? I think so. <...> >> Perhaps you should do a little more study to see if the vegan >> propaganda you've been using is shared by those working directly on >> the issues vegans like to raise to promote veganism. Or do you accept >> the dogmatic tenets of veganism with a blind faith and are unopen to >> challenging your belief system to see if it's true? That also applies to the claims you've heard vegan activists make about other organizations like UCS. Check out your sources and stop spreading bullshit. |
Beach Runner wrote:
> Well, if they posted their information in a reasonable, non insulting > way, their comments would be welcome. They're just nasty. They don't > seek to share knowledge. They just have a strange agenda. I just shared some knowledge with you about YOUR strange agenda and YOUR claim about the Union of Concerned Scientists. What will you do with that knowledge? <...> |
The UCS site has something very interesting if they actually do support veganism:
"You can help stop this problem by making smart meat purchases." http://www.ucsusa.org/publications/g...licationID=689 You lied and you got caught, Beachboob. |
"Beach Runner" > wrote in message . .. snippage... >> >> Name one. >> > Society for Concerned Scientists > ===================== Are you trying to say Union of Concerned Scientists? A quick search comes up with no "Society for..." Or, is this just something else you're making up? Like the rest of vegan delusional idiocy? Either way, you're an ignorant loon, killer. snippage... |
"usual suspect" > wrote in message ... > Beach Runner wrote: > >> Well, if they posted their information in a reasonable, non insulting >> way, their comments would be welcome. They're just nasty. They don't >> seek to share knowledge. They just have a strange agenda. > > I just shared some knowledge with you about YOUR strange agenda and YOUR > claim about the Union of Concerned Scientists. What will you do with that > knowledge? ================== I predict snip it out and ignore it. What do you think? :-) > > <...> > |
usual suspect wrote: > Beach Runner wrote: > >> Well, if they posted their information in a reasonable, non insulting >> way, their comments would be welcome. They're just nasty. They don't >> seek to share knowledge. They just have a strange agenda. > Typo's are indeed a source of a strange agenda. I don't go insulting people. > > I just shared some knowledge with you about YOUR strange agenda and YOUR > claim about the Union of Concerned Scientists. What will you do with > that knowledge? > > <...> > |
i had a typo.
usual suspect wrote: > The UCS site has something very interesting if they actually do support > veganism: > > "You can help stop this problem by making smart meat purchases." > http://www.ucsusa.org/publications/g...licationID=689 > > You lied and you got caught, Beachboob. > |
Beach Runner wrote:
>>> Well, if they posted their information in a reasonable, non insulting >>> way, their comments would be welcome. They're just nasty. They don't >>> seek to share knowledge. They just have a strange agenda. > > Typo's are indeed a source of a strange agenda. I don't go insulting > people. Your problem is far worse than mere typographical error, it's your incessant disregard for facts. IOW, you are a reflexive and congential liar. Your wreckless deceit is far, FAR more insulting than namecalling. >> I just shared some knowledge with you about YOUR strange agenda and >> YOUR claim about the Union of Concerned Scientists. What will you do >> with that knowledge? >> >> <...> >> |
Beach Runner wrote:
> i had a typo. No, asswipe, that was not a typo. It was much more than a typo. A typo doesn't alter the gist of what you actually wrote or conveyed. A typo is a misspelling. Your problem is the entire substance of what you said was patently untrue. When asked to support a claim, you said UCS promoted veganism. You lied, and you ****ing got caught. You also said the ADA promoted a vegan diet; they do not. They only approve of vegetarian diets so long as they're carefully planned. You have been shown to be a liar and a fraud. > usual suspect wrote: > >> The UCS site has something very interesting if they actually do >> support veganism: >> >> "You can help stop this problem by making smart meat purchases." >> http://www.ucsusa.org/publications/g...licationID=689 >> >> You lied and you got caught, Beachboob. >> |
"wowfabgroovy" > wrote in message ... > Beach Runner > went: > >>Well, if they posted their information in a reasonable, non insulting >>way, their comments would be welcome. They're just nasty. They don't >>seek to share knowledge. They just have a strange agenda. > > the only agenda they have is to stop this group being used for its > intended purpose. ====================== LOL Which, btw, you have again failed to adhere to by your own standards. What a hoot! > |
wowfabgroovy wrote:
>>Well, if they posted their information in a reasonable, non insulting >>way, their comments would be welcome. They're just nasty. They don't >>seek to share knowledge. They just have a strange agenda. > > the only agenda they have is to stop this group being used for its > intended purpose. This group is being used for its intended purpose. We're discussing veganism; we're also finding out through the exchange of ideas and information that vegans willfully lie (see the exchange I've had with Beachboob). Feel free to either join the discussion or stop your boring bitching. |
wowfabgroovy wrote:
>>Well, if they posted their information in a reasonable, non insulting >>way, their comments would be welcome. They're just nasty. They don't >>seek to share knowledge. They just have a strange agenda. > > the only agenda they have is to stop this group being used for its > intended purpose. This group is being used for its intended purpose. We're discussing veganism; we're also finding out through the exchange of ideas and information that vegans willfully lie (see the exchange I've had with Beachboob). Feel free to either join the discussion or stop your boring bitching. |
Tyey were recruteing a vegan nuritonist.
Bob C wrote: > > usual suspect wrote: > >>Bob C wrote: >> >>>>>This could be a valuable resource. Certainly, reasonable debates are >>>>>always welcomed, but nasty "killer statements" are clearly inflammatory. >>>>>We all need to discuss B12 and issues related to life. Just ignore the >>>>>trolls. they are not interested in discussions. >>>> >>>>============================== >>>>TRANSLATION: Don't interfere with my ignorance, the facts mean nothing to >>>>me, and I love killing animals for entertainment and convenience. Red goes >>>>well with my eyes.... Typical vegan mind-set.... >>> >>>Not really, we are interested in polite, reasonable discussions. >> >>Bullshit. Does that include discussions from "compassionate" vegans who've >>wished non-vegans and anti-ARAs heart attacks, cancer, and other misfortune in >>health and well-being? >> >> >>>This includes disagreements. Not nasty SOBs. >> >>You hit a very big nerve. Don't overlook the "nasty SOB" vegans and ARAs: >> >> We should plaster Etter's, Dutch's and Ball's homes with PETA >> and PCRM flyers so that THEY will have NO square inch to post >> THEIR views and discuss topics of interest to THEM. >> http://tinyurl.com/5m5ew >> >> I hope you die slowly, and in excruciating pain from cancer or in a >> house fire you worthless tramp for what you have just said. Just one >> animals life is worth 10 of yours. Your wife is better off where she is, >> at least she doesn't have to live with YOU. I bet she would have >> committed suicide anyway rather than put up with you. Please do like her >> and choke to death. >> http://tinyurl.com/5lndg >> >> I can hardly wait until you get your first heart attack. >> I will jump for joy when you suffer and drop dead! >> It will be hilarious for the medical staff to laugh at you >> and tell you that they don't have to be told by YOU what to do. >> http://tinyurl.com/3jalp >> >> Keep on eating that red meat, Dick Etter! >> http://tinyurl.com/3vkss >> >> So you are saying I and fellow vegetarians have the legal >> right to run an office the way WE want. Well, then, that is good -- >> because I encourage medical doctors not to help hunters and >> non-vegetarians. >> http://tinyurl.com/4j4tm >> >>Want more examples? There are plenty more where those were found. That's just >>from one quick search. Vegans are the least compassionate people on the planet. >>They are misanthropes. They don't care about animals, they just hate their >>fellow man and use their prattle about animals to sugarcoat their base contempt >>for mankind. As you can see from the above, their hate-filled expressions to >>those who oppose them is often malevolent, if not psychotic. That's to be >>expected, though, given the fact that vegans and ARAs are often very mentally >>disturbed. > > > That's so stupid. It's just filled with hate. We are people in general who love > nature and > responsible scientific organization say we can feed more people in a more > environmentally > friendly manner with a vegan diet. |
Tyey were recruteing a vegan nuritonist.
Bob C wrote: > > usual suspect wrote: > >>Bob C wrote: >> >>>>>This could be a valuable resource. Certainly, reasonable debates are >>>>>always welcomed, but nasty "killer statements" are clearly inflammatory. >>>>>We all need to discuss B12 and issues related to life. Just ignore the >>>>>trolls. they are not interested in discussions. >>>> >>>>============================== >>>>TRANSLATION: Don't interfere with my ignorance, the facts mean nothing to >>>>me, and I love killing animals for entertainment and convenience. Red goes >>>>well with my eyes.... Typical vegan mind-set.... >>> >>>Not really, we are interested in polite, reasonable discussions. >> >>Bullshit. Does that include discussions from "compassionate" vegans who've >>wished non-vegans and anti-ARAs heart attacks, cancer, and other misfortune in >>health and well-being? >> >> >>>This includes disagreements. Not nasty SOBs. >> >>You hit a very big nerve. Don't overlook the "nasty SOB" vegans and ARAs: >> >> We should plaster Etter's, Dutch's and Ball's homes with PETA >> and PCRM flyers so that THEY will have NO square inch to post >> THEIR views and discuss topics of interest to THEM. >> http://tinyurl.com/5m5ew >> >> I hope you die slowly, and in excruciating pain from cancer or in a >> house fire you worthless tramp for what you have just said. Just one >> animals life is worth 10 of yours. Your wife is better off where she is, >> at least she doesn't have to live with YOU. I bet she would have >> committed suicide anyway rather than put up with you. Please do like her >> and choke to death. >> http://tinyurl.com/5lndg >> >> I can hardly wait until you get your first heart attack. >> I will jump for joy when you suffer and drop dead! >> It will be hilarious for the medical staff to laugh at you >> and tell you that they don't have to be told by YOU what to do. >> http://tinyurl.com/3jalp >> >> Keep on eating that red meat, Dick Etter! >> http://tinyurl.com/3vkss >> >> So you are saying I and fellow vegetarians have the legal >> right to run an office the way WE want. Well, then, that is good -- >> because I encourage medical doctors not to help hunters and >> non-vegetarians. >> http://tinyurl.com/4j4tm >> >>Want more examples? There are plenty more where those were found. That's just >>from one quick search. Vegans are the least compassionate people on the planet. >>They are misanthropes. They don't care about animals, they just hate their >>fellow man and use their prattle about animals to sugarcoat their base contempt >>for mankind. As you can see from the above, their hate-filled expressions to >>those who oppose them is often malevolent, if not psychotic. That's to be >>expected, though, given the fact that vegans and ARAs are often very mentally >>disturbed. > > > That's so stupid. It's just filled with hate. We are people in general who love > nature and > responsible scientific organization say we can feed more people in a more > environmentally > friendly manner with a vegan diet. |
Beach Runner wrote:
> Tyey were recruteing a vegan nuritonist. Only one of those was doing that, you idiot, and even that's not reason to want someone to have a heart attack or die slowly. The fact remains that it's the vegans who've wished harm upon others -- I'm still waiting for you or the OP(s) to find instances of "anti-vegans" wishing harm and misery upon you. Leaving in the remarks made by vegans and other "compassionate" types. Feel the love. <...> >>> You hit a very big nerve. Don't overlook the "nasty SOB" vegans and >>> ARAs: >>> >>> We should plaster Etter's, Dutch's and Ball's homes with PETA >>> and PCRM flyers so that THEY will have NO square inch to post >>> THEIR views and discuss topics of interest to THEM. >>> http://tinyurl.com/5m5ew >>> >>> I hope you die slowly, and in excruciating pain from cancer or >>> in a >>> house fire you worthless tramp for what you have just said. >>> Just one >>> animals life is worth 10 of yours. Your wife is better off >>> where she is, >>> at least she doesn't have to live with YOU. I bet she would have >>> committed suicide anyway rather than put up with you. Please >>> do like her >>> and choke to death. >>> http://tinyurl.com/5lndg >>> >>> I can hardly wait until you get your first heart attack. >>> I will jump for joy when you suffer and drop dead! >>> It will be hilarious for the medical staff to laugh at you >>> and tell you that they don't have to be told by YOU what to do. >>> http://tinyurl.com/3jalp >>> >>> Keep on eating that red meat, Dick Etter! >>> http://tinyurl.com/3vkss >>> >>> So you are saying I and fellow vegetarians have the legal >>> right to run an office the way WE want. Well, then, that is >>> good -- >>> because I encourage medical doctors not to help hunters and >>> non-vegetarians. >>> http://tinyurl.com/4j4tm >>> >>> Want more examples? There are plenty more where those were found. >>> That's just >>> from one quick search. Vegans are the least compassionate people on >>> the planet. >>> They are misanthropes. They don't care about animals, they just hate >>> their >>> fellow man and use their prattle about animals to sugarcoat their >>> base contempt >>> for mankind. As you can see from the above, their hate-filled >>> expressions to >>> those who oppose them is often malevolent, if not psychotic. That's >>> to be >>> expected, though, given the fact that vegans and ARAs are often very >>> mentally >>> disturbed. |
usual suspect wrote: > Beach Runner wrote: > >> Tyey were recruteing a vegan nuritonist. > > > Only one of those was doing that, you idiot, and even that's not reason > to want someone to have a heart attack or die slowly. The fact remains > that it's the vegans who've wished harm upon others -- I'm still waiting > for you or the OP(s) to find instances of "anti-vegans" wishing harm and > misery upon you. > > Leaving in the remarks made by vegans and other "compassionate" types. > Feel the love. > > <...> > >>>> You hit a very big nerve. Don't overlook the "nasty SOB" vegans and >>>> ARAs: >>>> >>>> We should plaster Etter's, Dutch's and Ball's homes with PETA >>>> and PCRM flyers so that THEY will have NO square inch to post >>>> THEIR views and discuss topics of interest to THEM. >>>> http://tinyurl.com/5m5ew >>>> >>>> I hope you die slowly, and in excruciating pain from cancer >>>> or in a >>>> house fire you worthless tramp for what you have just said. >>>> Just one >>>> animals life is worth 10 of yours. Your wife is better off >>>> where she is, >>>> at least she doesn't have to live with YOU. I bet she would have >>>> committed suicide anyway rather than put up with you. Please >>>> do like her >>>> and choke to death. >>>> http://tinyurl.com/5lndg >>>> >>>> I can hardly wait until you get your first heart attack. >>>> I will jump for joy when you suffer and drop dead! >>>> It will be hilarious for the medical staff to laugh at you >>>> and tell you that they don't have to be told by YOU what to do. >>>> http://tinyurl.com/3jalp >>>> >>>> Keep on eating that red meat, Dick Etter! >>>> http://tinyurl.com/3vkss >>>> >>>> So you are saying I and fellow vegetarians have the legal >>>> right to run an office the way WE want. Well, then, that is >>>> good -- >>>> because I encourage medical doctors not to help hunters and >>>> non-vegetarians. >>>> http://tinyurl.com/4j4tm >>>> >>>> Want more examples? There are plenty more where those were found. >>>> That's just >>>> from one quick search. Vegans are the least compassionate people on >>>> the planet. >>>> They are misanthropes. They don't care about animals, they just hate >>>> their >>>> fellow man and use their prattle about animals to sugarcoat their >>>> base contempt >>>> for mankind. As you can see from the above, their hate-filled >>>> expressions to >>>> those who oppose them is often malevolent, if not psychotic. That's >>>> to be >>>> expected, though, given the fact that vegans and ARAs are often very >>>> mentally >>>> disturbed. I don't think we should cause you harm. Just let this forum be. |
usual suspect wrote: > Beach Runner wrote: > >> Tyey were recruteing a vegan nuritonist. > > > Only one of those was doing that, you idiot, and even that's not reason > to want someone to have a heart attack or die slowly. The fact remains > that it's the vegans who've wished harm upon others -- I'm still waiting > for you or the OP(s) to find instances of "anti-vegans" wishing harm and > misery upon you. > > Leaving in the remarks made by vegans and other "compassionate" types. > Feel the love. > > <...> > >>>> You hit a very big nerve. Don't overlook the "nasty SOB" vegans and >>>> ARAs: >>>> >>>> We should plaster Etter's, Dutch's and Ball's homes with PETA >>>> and PCRM flyers so that THEY will have NO square inch to post >>>> THEIR views and discuss topics of interest to THEM. >>>> http://tinyurl.com/5m5ew >>>> >>>> I hope you die slowly, and in excruciating pain from cancer >>>> or in a >>>> house fire you worthless tramp for what you have just said. >>>> Just one >>>> animals life is worth 10 of yours. Your wife is better off >>>> where she is, >>>> at least she doesn't have to live with YOU. I bet she would have >>>> committed suicide anyway rather than put up with you. Please >>>> do like her >>>> and choke to death. >>>> http://tinyurl.com/5lndg >>>> >>>> I can hardly wait until you get your first heart attack. >>>> I will jump for joy when you suffer and drop dead! >>>> It will be hilarious for the medical staff to laugh at you >>>> and tell you that they don't have to be told by YOU what to do. >>>> http://tinyurl.com/3jalp >>>> >>>> Keep on eating that red meat, Dick Etter! >>>> http://tinyurl.com/3vkss >>>> >>>> So you are saying I and fellow vegetarians have the legal >>>> right to run an office the way WE want. Well, then, that is >>>> good -- >>>> because I encourage medical doctors not to help hunters and >>>> non-vegetarians. >>>> http://tinyurl.com/4j4tm >>>> >>>> Want more examples? There are plenty more where those were found. >>>> That's just >>>> from one quick search. Vegans are the least compassionate people on >>>> the planet. >>>> They are misanthropes. They don't care about animals, they just hate >>>> their >>>> fellow man and use their prattle about animals to sugarcoat their >>>> base contempt >>>> for mankind. As you can see from the above, their hate-filled >>>> expressions to >>>> those who oppose them is often malevolent, if not psychotic. That's >>>> to be >>>> expected, though, given the fact that vegans and ARAs are often very >>>> mentally >>>> disturbed. I don't think we should cause you harm. Just let this forum be. |
usual suspect wrote: > Beach Runner wrote: > >> Well, if they posted their information in a reasonable, non insulting >> way, their comments would be welcome. They're just nasty. They don't >> seek to share knowledge. They just have a strange agenda. > > > I just shared some knowledge with you about YOUR strange agenda and YOUR > claim about the Union of Concerned Scientists. What will you do with > that knowledge? I made a memory mistake, it was Union, not Organization. kill me for it. > > <...> > |
Beached Runt wrote:
>>> Well, if they posted their information in a reasonable, non insulting >>> way, their comments would be welcome. They're just nasty. They don't >>> seek to share knowledge. They just have a strange agenda. >> >> I just shared some knowledge with you about YOUR strange agenda and >> YOUR claim about the Union of Concerned Scientists. What will you do >> with that knowledge? > > I made a memory mistake, it was Union, not Organization. kill me for it. No, you asinine twit, I didn't berate you for getting the *name* wrong. I generously overlooked that part of it. I want you to tell everyone why you lied and said that particular organization -- WHATEVER ITS NAME IS -- recommends a vegan diet when they do *NOT* recommend it. They recommend sustainable agricultural practices INCLUDING SUSTAINABLE MEAT PRODUCTION. Deal with the substance and stop trying to get away with claiming it was a typo. It was a ****ing LIE. Admit it. And while you're at it, admit you ****ing lied again when you said the ADA recommends a vegan diet. They don't. Their approval of vegetarian diets is only *qualified*. |
They recently advertised for a vegan nutritionist.
usual suspect wrote: > Beached Runt wrote: > >>>> Well, if they posted their information in a reasonable, non >>>> insulting way, their comments would be welcome. They're just nasty. >>>> They don't seek to share knowledge. They just have a strange agenda. >>> >>> >>> I just shared some knowledge with you about YOUR strange agenda and >>> YOUR claim about the Union of Concerned Scientists. What will you do >>> with that knowledge? >> >> >> I made a memory mistake, it was Union, not Organization. kill me for it. > > > No, you asinine twit, I didn't berate you for getting the *name* wrong. > I generously overlooked that part of it. I want you to tell everyone why > you lied and said that particular organization -- WHATEVER ITS NAME IS > -- recommends a vegan diet when they do *NOT* recommend it. They > recommend sustainable agricultural practices INCLUDING SUSTAINABLE MEAT > PRODUCTION. > > Deal with the substance and stop trying to get away with claiming it was > a typo. It was a ****ing LIE. Admit it. And while you're at it, admit > you ****ing lied again when you said the ADA recommends a vegan diet. > They don't. Their approval of vegetarian diets is only *qualified*. |
They recently advertised for a vegan nutritionist.
usual suspect wrote: > Beached Runt wrote: > >>>> Well, if they posted their information in a reasonable, non >>>> insulting way, their comments would be welcome. They're just nasty. >>>> They don't seek to share knowledge. They just have a strange agenda. >>> >>> >>> I just shared some knowledge with you about YOUR strange agenda and >>> YOUR claim about the Union of Concerned Scientists. What will you do >>> with that knowledge? >> >> >> I made a memory mistake, it was Union, not Organization. kill me for it. > > > No, you asinine twit, I didn't berate you for getting the *name* wrong. > I generously overlooked that part of it. I want you to tell everyone why > you lied and said that particular organization -- WHATEVER ITS NAME IS > -- recommends a vegan diet when they do *NOT* recommend it. They > recommend sustainable agricultural practices INCLUDING SUSTAINABLE MEAT > PRODUCTION. > > Deal with the substance and stop trying to get away with claiming it was > a typo. It was a ****ing LIE. Admit it. And while you're at it, admit > you ****ing lied again when you said the ADA recommends a vegan diet. > They don't. Their approval of vegetarian diets is only *qualified*. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter