Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,alt.food.vegan.science,rec.food.veg,alt.food.fast-food,sac.politics,alt.survival
|
|||
|
|||
Those Plant-Based "Burgers" Aren't Better For You, So Why Are YouEating Them?
On 2019-09-16 6:32 p.m., Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:
> https://hotair.com/archives/jazz-sha...based-burgers- > arent-better-eating/ > > The title question is being asked by Kate Bernot at The Takeout, and its > a good one. Before anyone starts imagining a totally meatless future > (speaking of horror shows), we should figure out why so many people are > flocking to plant-based €śmeat€ť like the Impossible Whopper and its > cousins. Since experts are quickly concluding that these products are no > healthier for you (or for the environment) than their traditional animal- > based counterparts, whats the attraction making these offerings > sustainable? > > (Insert record scratch sound effect here.) Whoa! Hold on one second. Did > someone just say that these €śimpossible€ť foods arent any better for you? > Wasnt that supposed to be the whole idea? As it turns out, theyre not. > So the people peddling them had better figure out another market hook if > they want their businesses to continue booming. > > The latest €śwoke€ť take on vegan fast food, like the Impossible Whopper and > Del Taco Beyond Meats tacos, is this: Theyre not any healthier than the > standard meat versions of those items. Outlets from NBC News to Fox > Business to CNBC are all sounding the alarm that these menu items often > contain roughly the same amount of calories than their beefy > counterparts€”and often pack in more sodium. But is health even the real > reason customers are ordering these Impossible and Beyond options in the > first place? > > A July 2019 report from NPD Group found that 95% of the customers who > order faux-meat fast food options arent strictly vegan or vegetarian. > Theyre people who do regularly eat meat€”€śflexatarian€ť, if you will€”but > perhaps are trying to reduce the percentage of red meat in their diets by > incorporating more plant-based ingredients. > > Read it for yourself. Heres NBC News. €śThe Impossible Burger and Beyond > Meat arent healthier. Fast foods meatless marvels are just P.R.€ť > > How about Fox Business? €śPlant-based burgers may not be as healthy as you > think.€ť > > Lets hear from Julieanna Hever, a plant-based dietician at CNBC: €śTheyre > not much healthier than a meat-based burger. Im concerned about the > saturated fat levels as well as the excessive amounts of amino acids.€ť > > The author offers up four possible reasons people are eating these > laboratory experiments if we include the mistaken belief that they are > healthier for you. But since youre usually taking in the same amount of > calories or more, plus more salt, thats kind of out the window. Some may > be doing it because its a novelty€¦ something new and cool to talk about. > They might also be doing it in the belief that its more friendly to the > environment, or because of worries over animal welfare in the beef > industry. > > If those really are the main drivers of sales, this may turn out to be a > fad that doesnt last very long. If that many people were all that > concerned about the impact of the cattle industry on the environment or > the conditions the animals are raised under, beef sales would have > plummeted long ago. Not without a palatable alternative. > > The only one that might stick is the stated reason the founders of these > companies have been telling us all along. They want to drive the livestock > industry out of business and get rid of the cows to save the planet. And > if they can make the sale to enough of this emerging fast-food market, we > might be in trouble. But somehow I dont think so. Call me a starry-eyed > optimist, but I think people will tire of the novelty quickly enough and > realize that they miss eating good old reliable beef, just as nature > intended. Is that supposed to be a serious remark? "Nature" doesn't "intend" humans to eat beef. > > Also, I suspect that more information will eventually get out to the > general public about the €śheme€ť thats used in the manufacturing process > and the other substances they produce. Id be willing to bet that a lot of > people eating these burgers are under the impression that €śplant-based€ť > just means its a new type of veggie burger. But thats not what this is > at all. These burgers are a mad scientists chemistry experiment running > off the rails. And if all of you out there who are scarfing them down > suddenly start growing tails in a couple of months, dont say I didnt try > to warn you. So this is a tongue in cheek article, OK. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|