I should probably be a little embarrassed by how much fun I obtain from
beating up on ****wit David Harrison - Goo - and Runny Hamilton, but I'm
not. The goofs just /beg/ for it.

On May 27, 1:43*pm, "Fred C. Dobbs" >
wrote:
> I should probably be a little embarrassed by how much fun I obtain from
> beating up on ****wit David Harrison - Goo - and Runny Hamilton, but I'm
> not. *The goofs just /beg/ for it.

<yawn>

Did I just hear some blubbeing from the peanut gallery?

On 5/27/2010 12:48 PM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> On May 27, 1:43 pm, "Fred C. >
> wrote:
>> I should probably be a little embarrassed by how much fun I obtain from
>> beating up on ****wit David Harrison - Goo - and Runny Hamilton, but I'm
>> not. The goofs just /beg/ for it.
>
> <yawn>

Ha ha ha ha! Oh, yeah, /that/ was convincing - NOT!

Jesus - even /more/ fun!

On May 28, 5:43*am, "Fred C. Dobbs" >
wrote:
> I should probably be a little embarrassed

Yes. This is one of those rare moments when I agree with you.

On 5/27/2010 2:40 PM, Rupert wrote:
> On May 28, 5:43 am, "Fred C. >
> wrote:
>> I should probably be a little embarrassed by how much fun I obtain from beating up on ****wit David Harrison - Goo - and Runny Hamilton, but I'm not. The goofs just /beg/ for it.
>
> Yes. This is one of those rare moments when I agree with you.

I'm surprised you agree with me that they ask for it, not because it
would be unreasonable for you to do so, but precisely the opposite: it
is eminently reasonable to agree with me on that, and because you're a
reflexively contrary ****, you usually do what's unreasonable.

I should have added you to the list of goofs.

On May 27, 3:46*pm, "Fred C. Dobbs" >
wrote:
> On 5/27/2010 2:40 PM, Rupert wrote:
>
> > On May 28, 5:43 am, "Fred C. >
> > wrote:
> >> I should probably be a little embarrassed by how much fun I obtain from beating up on ****wit David Harrison - Goo - and Runny Hamilton, but I'm not. *The goofs just /beg/ for it.
>
> > Yes. This is one of those rare moments when I agree with you.
>
> I'm surprised you agree with me that they ask for it, not because it
> would be unreasonable for you to do so, but precisely the opposite: *it
> is eminently reasonable to agree with me on that, and because you're a
> reflexively contrary ****, you usually do what's unreasonable.
>
> I should have added you to the list of goofs.


You really have yourself up on a pedestal, don't you Goober?

On 5/28/2010 12:06 AM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> On May 27, 3:46 pm, "Fred C. >
> wrote:
>> On 5/27/2010 2:40 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>> On May 28, 5:43 am, "Fred C. >
>>> wrote:
>>>> I should probably be a little embarrassed by how much fun I obtain from
>>>> beating up on ****wit David Harrison - Goo - and Runny Hamilton, but I'm not.
>>>> The goofs just /beg/ for it.
>>
>>> Yes. This is one of those rare moments when I agree with you.
>>
>> I'm surprised you agree with me that they ask for it, not because it
>> would be unreasonable for you to do so, but precisely the opposite: it
>> is eminently reasonable to agree with me on that, and because you're a
>> reflexively contrary ****, you usually do what's unreasonable.
>>
>> I should have added you to the list of goofs.
>
>
> You really have

....too much fun? I guess you'd think so.

On May 28, 8:23*am, "Fred C. Dobbs" >
wrote:
> On 5/28/2010 12:06 AM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 27, 3:46 pm, "Fred C. >
> > wrote:
> >> On 5/27/2010 2:40 PM, Rupert wrote:
>
> >>> On May 28, 5:43 am, "Fred C. >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> I should probably be a little embarrassed by how much fun I obtain from
> >>>> beating up on ****wit David Harrison - Goo - and Runny Hamilton, but I'm not.
> >>>> The goofs just /beg/ for it.
>
> >>> Yes. This is one of those rare moments when I agree with you.
>
> >> I'm surprised you agree with me that they ask for it, not because it
> >> would be unreasonable for you to do so, but precisely the opposite: *it
> >> is eminently reasonable to agree with me on that, and because you're a
> >> reflexively contrary ****, you usually do what's unreasonable.
>
> >> I should have added you to the list of goofs.
>
> > You really have
>
> ...too much fun? *I guess you'd think so.-


Keep on primping and preening, Goobs. everyone knows you don't have
the brain power of a bedbug.

On 5/28/2010 11:54 AM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> On May 28, 8:23 am, "Fred C. >
> wrote:
>> On 5/28/2010 12:06 AM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 27, 3:46 pm, "Fred C. >
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 5/27/2010 2:40 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>> On May 28, 5:43 am, "Fred C. >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> I should probably be a little embarrassed by how much fun I obtain from
>>>>>> beating up on ****wit David Harrison - Goo - and Runny Hamilton, but I'm not.
>>>>>> The goofs just /beg/ for it.
>>
>>>>> Yes. This is one of those rare moments when I agree with you.
>>
>>>> I'm surprised you agree with me that they ask for it, not because it
>>>> would be unreasonable for you to do so, but precisely the opposite: it
>>>> is eminently reasonable to agree with me on that, and because you're a
>>>> reflexively contrary ****, you usually do what's unreasonable.
>>
>>>> I should have added you to the list of goofs.
>>
>>> You really have
>>
>> ...too much fun? I guess you'd think so.-
>
>
> Keep on

I shall.

On May 27, 1:43*pm, "Fred C. Dobbs" >
wrote:
> I should probably be a little embarrassed by how much I get beaten up by >****wit David Harrison - Goo - and Runny Hamilton, but I'm not. I'm a goof >just /begging/ for it.


*That's* what Goobs meant to say.

On 5/30/2010 7:52 AM, Runny Hamilton lost *another* round:

> [snip Runny's lame lose-again try]
>

You just won't learn.

your all ****ed up idiots, what the hell does this dribble have to do with
recreational boating??? don't you ****ers have some place else to gobble
each other shit....****sticks one and all....happy boating


"Fred C. Dobbs" > wrote in message
m...
> On 5/28/2010 11:54 AM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>> On May 28, 8:23 am, "Fred C. >
>> wrote:
>>> On 5/28/2010 12:06 AM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On May 27, 3:46 pm, "Fred C. >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 5/27/2010 2:40 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> On May 28, 5:43 am, "Fred C. >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> I should probably be a little embarrassed by how much fun I obtain
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> beating up on ****wit David Harrison - Goo - and Runny Hamilton, but
>>>>>>> I'm not.
>>>>>>> The goofs just /beg/ for it.
>>>
>>>>>> Yes. This is one of those rare moments when I agree with you.
>>>
>>>>> I'm surprised you agree with me that they ask for it, not because it
>>>>> would be unreasonable for you to do so, but precisely the opposite:
>>>>> it
>>>>> is eminently reasonable to agree with me on that, and because you're a
>>>>> reflexively contrary ****, you usually do what's unreasonable.
>>>
>>>>> I should have added you to the list of goofs.
>>>
>>>> You really have
>>>
>>> ...too much fun? I guess you'd think so.-
>>
>>
>> Keep on
>
> I shall.