Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 14-04-2010, 08:56 PM posted to alt.philosophy,alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.global-warming
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 68
Default pro-choice on the veg matter

On 3/31/2010 12:56 PM, [email protected] wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:11:37 -0700, wrote:


[email protected] wrote in message ...
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:34:06 -0700, wrote:

[email protected] wrote

My guess is that he pretty much only hangs out with people
who are even less "tolerant" than he is, making him feel somewhat
more free. Remember at one time he pretended to be in some way a
"new welfarist" until Goo and his other boy kicked Rupert's ass
for pretending to consider the lives of some animal(s)
somewhere....possibly even som *livestock* animal(s). But he
can't do it and you can't do it and Goo can't do it and Salt
couldn't do it....you people just can't do it.

Nobody should do "it", and the reason nobody but you does is because "it"
is
self-serving bullshit.

It's a necessary part of evaluating whether or not it's cruel
TO THE ANIMALS for humans to raise them for food.


That doesn't mean anything.


Not to those of you


It doesn't mean anything at all.

  #62 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 14-04-2010, 08:57 PM posted to alt.philosophy,alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.global-warming
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 68
Default pro-choice on the veg matter

On 3/30/2010 12:25 PM, [email protected] wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:34:06 -0700, wrote:

[email protected] wrote

My guess is that he pretty much only hangs out with people
who are even less "tolerant" than he is, making him feel somewhat
more free. Remember at one time he pretended to be in some way a
"new welfarist" until Goo and his other boy kicked Rupert's ass
for pretending to consider the lives of some animal(s)
somewhere....possibly even som *livestock* animal(s). But he
can't do it and you can't do it and Goo can't do it and Salt
couldn't do it....you people just can't do it.


Nobody should do "it", and the reason nobody but you does is because "it" is
self-serving bullshit.


It's a necessary part of evaluating whether or not


It's not necessary for anything.
  #63 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 20-04-2010, 07:16 AM posted to alt.philosophy,alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.global-warming
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 68
Default pro-choice on the veg matter

On 4/7/2010 12:21 PM, [email protected] wrote:
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:26:56 -0700 (PDT), tunderbar
wrote:

On Mar 31, 3:02 pm, wrote:
[email protected] wrote in messagenews:[email protected] .com...
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:11:37 -0700, wrote:

[email protected] wrote in messagenews:[email protected] .com...
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:34:06 -0700, wrote:

[email protected] wrote

My guess is that he pretty much only hangs out with people
who are even less "tolerant" than he is, making him feel somewhat
more free. Remember at one time he pretended to be in some way a
"new welfarist" until Goo and his other boy kicked Rupert's ass
for pretending to consider the lives of some animal(s)
somewhere....possibly even som *livestock* animal(s). But he
can't do it and you can't do it and Goo can't do it and Salt
couldn't do it....you people just can't do it.

Nobody should do "it", and the reason nobody but you does is because
"it"
is
self-serving bullshit.

It's a necessary part of evaluating whether or not it's cruel
TO THE ANIMALS for humans to raise them for food.

That doesn't mean anything.

Not to those of you too purely selfish to take the animals
into consideration, but it's very significant to anyone who does
consider them.

Meaningless, self-serving tripe.. patting yourself on the back for being a
person who "considers" animals when all you do is eat them.

What a complete joke you are.


We don't just eat them. We keep them, feed them, fatten them up,


Misnomer addicts can't afford to consider the animals lives.


You don't consider the animals' lives at all.

--
Any more lip out of you and I'll haul off and let you have it...if you
know what's good for you, you won't monkey around with Fred C. Dobbs


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
It does not matter Julienne Bougie General Cooking 74 13-05-2009 04:23 PM
[OT] Do polls matter? Bob Terwilliger[_1_] General Cooking 51 30-09-2008 05:42 AM
Does it really matter... Scott[_11_] General Cooking 28 01-02-2008 02:57 PM
A matter of some delicacy J Boehm Tea 8 04-12-2004 08:27 PM
Does it matter? kingvitamin Winemaking 2 12-08-2004 08:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2020 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"

 

Copyright © 2017