Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Steve
 
Posts: n/a
Default DIET: USDA study indicates price no reason to avoid produce

From:
http://www.boston.com/news/local/new...oid _produce/

DIET: USDA study indicates price no reason to avoid produce

By J.M. Hirsch, AP Food Writer | August 1, 2004

CONCORD, N.H. -- There goes another excuse for not eating more vegetables.
ADVERTISEMENT


A government study found that though many people say cost prevents them
from eating more produce, consumers can get the recommended three
servings of fruits and four servings of vegetables daily for just 64 cents.

That would account for 12 percent of daily food spending per person,
which averaged $5.50 in 1999.

"That's a lot of good nutrition for only 64 cents, only 225 calories and
less than 1 gram of fat," said the study by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture. "That leaves 88 percent of their food dollar left for the
other three food groups."

The study, which is based on information collected by A.C. Nielsen from
7,195 homes in 1999, looked at how consumers spent nearly $223 billion
at supermarkets, other retail stores and farmers' markets. It did not
include restaurants.

A department spokeswoman does not believe produce prices had changed
substantially since the data were gathered.

More than three-quarters of the fruits and vegetables included in the
study cost less than 50 cents a serving. "That's 127 different ways to
eat a serving of fruits and vegetables for less than the price of a
3-ounce candy bar," the study said.

Parke Wilde, a food economist at the Friedman School of Nutrition at
Tufts University, said the research helps dispel the myth that healthy
eating has to be expensive.

"It tells you that while economics may be part of the reason for
unhealthy diets, it can't be the only reason," he said. "If you're
looking for fairly inexpensive choices for fruits and vegetables, it's
possible to buy these on a budget."

Only 7 percent of people eat the daily number of fruit and vegetables
servings suggested by the federal Food Guide Pyramid, according to a
2002 NPD Group study for the Produce for Better Health Foundation.

But Ruth Kava of the American Council of Science and Health cautions
against assuming price perception is the primary impediment to produce
consumption. She said access plays a significant role in determining
what people eat.

Many experts note that poor and rural neighborhoods often lack good
access to supermarkets, forcing residents to rely on convenience stores
and other small shops, where selection is poor and prices are high.

At Maple Ridge Farm recently, shoppers at the roadside farmstand in
Concord doubted the USDA's estimates are realistic. One man held up his
produce and laughed. "Three bags. $13."

"Per person? Sixty-four cents? It could be done," said Lisa Malvey, a
Barrington woman shopping for her husband and daughter. "But
realistically for a growing family you need to spend more than that."

Part of the price perception problem is that too few consumers
accurately judge proper serving sizes, the study said. Health officials
have blamed the nation's skyrocketing obesity rate in part on Americans'
lack of portion control.

The study said that consumers who balk at spending 97 cents for a pound
of peaches likely don't realize that they are getting four half-cup
servings at roughly 21 cents per serving.

It also found that fresh often is best, at least economically.
Researchers found that nearly two-thirds of the fruits and vegetables
studied were cheapest in their fresh form.

The study rated produce by cost-per-serving. Among fresh vegetables,
peas cost the most, at 91 cents per serving. Cabbage and potatoes were
the least, at 4 cents and 6 cents respectively.

For fresh fruit, blackberries topped the list at 66 cents per serving,
followed by raspberries at 64 cents. Watermelon and apples tied for
least expensive, at 11 cents.

Among 27 fruits the USDA examined, Americans spent the most on whole
oranges, bought the most pounds of bananas and ate the most servings of
apples.

Of 30 vegetables considered, potatoes dominated. People consumed more
than four times as many servings of potatoes as they did tomatoes, the
second most popular vegetable.

Price seems to play a large role in vegetable purchases. The five least
expensive fresh vegetables -- potatoes, cabbage, whole carrots, onions
and sweet potatoes -- account for 62 percent of all purchases by weight.

Another USDA study released in May found that income plays a significant
role in produce consumption. Low-income families spent an average of
$3.59 per person per week, while higher-income families spent $5.02.

That study also found that while wealthier families bought more produce
as their incomes increased, low-income families did not. It also found
that college-educated families spend the most -- $5.99 per person per
week on fruits and vegetables.
--
Steve
http://www.geocities.com/beforewisdom/

"The great American thought trap: It is not real unless it can be seen
on television or bought in a shopping mall"

Be a healthy Vegan or Vegetarian
http://geocities.com/beforewisdom/Veg/healthyVeg.html
  #2 (permalink)   Report Post  
Tesoro
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steve" > wrote in message
...
> From:
>

http://www.boston.com/news/local/new...oid _produce/
>
> DIET: USDA study indicates price no reason to avoid produce
>
> By J.M. Hirsch, AP Food Writer | August 1, 2004
>
> CONCORD, N.H. -- There goes another excuse for not eating more vegetables.
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
> A government study found that though many people say cost prevents them
> from eating more produce, consumers can get the recommended three
> servings of fruits and four servings of vegetables daily for just 64

cents.
>
> That would account for 12 percent of daily food spending per person,
> which averaged $5.50 in 1999.
>
> "That's a lot of good nutrition for only 64 cents, only 225 calories and
> less than 1 gram of fat," said the study by the U.S. Department of
> Agriculture. "That leaves 88 percent of their food dollar left for the
> other three food groups."
>
> The study, which is based on information collected by A.C. Nielsen from
> 7,195 homes in 1999, looked at how consumers spent nearly $223 billion
> at supermarkets, other retail stores and farmers' markets. It did not
> include restaurants.
>
> A department spokeswoman does not believe produce prices had changed
> substantially since the data were gathered.
>
> More than three-quarters of the fruits and vegetables included in the
> study cost less than 50 cents a serving. "That's 127 different ways to
> eat a serving of fruits and vegetables for less than the price of a
> 3-ounce candy bar," the study said.
>
> Parke Wilde, a food economist at the Friedman School of Nutrition at
> Tufts University, said the research helps dispel the myth that healthy
> eating has to be expensive.
>
> "It tells you that while economics may be part of the reason for
> unhealthy diets, it can't be the only reason," he said. "If you're
> looking for fairly inexpensive choices for fruits and vegetables, it's
> possible to buy these on a budget."
>
> Only 7 percent of people eat the daily number of fruit and vegetables
> servings suggested by the federal Food Guide Pyramid, according to a
> 2002 NPD Group study for the Produce for Better Health Foundation.
>
> But Ruth Kava of the American Council of Science and Health cautions
> against assuming price perception is the primary impediment to produce
> consumption. She said access plays a significant role in determining
> what people eat.
>
> Many experts note that poor and rural neighborhoods often lack good
> access to supermarkets, forcing residents to rely on convenience stores
> and other small shops, where selection is poor and prices are high.
>
> At Maple Ridge Farm recently, shoppers at the roadside farmstand in
> Concord doubted the USDA's estimates are realistic. One man held up his
> produce and laughed. "Three bags. $13."
>
> "Per person? Sixty-four cents? It could be done," said Lisa Malvey, a
> Barrington woman shopping for her husband and daughter. "But
> realistically for a growing family you need to spend more than that."
>
> Part of the price perception problem is that too few consumers
> accurately judge proper serving sizes, the study said. Health officials
> have blamed the nation's skyrocketing obesity rate in part on Americans'
> lack of portion control.
>
> The study said that consumers who balk at spending 97 cents for a pound
> of peaches likely don't realize that they are getting four half-cup
> servings at roughly 21 cents per serving.
>
> It also found that fresh often is best, at least economically.
> Researchers found that nearly two-thirds of the fruits and vegetables
> studied were cheapest in their fresh form.
>
> The study rated produce by cost-per-serving. Among fresh vegetables,
> peas cost the most, at 91 cents per serving. Cabbage and potatoes were
> the least, at 4 cents and 6 cents respectively.
>
> For fresh fruit, blackberries topped the list at 66 cents per serving,
> followed by raspberries at 64 cents. Watermelon and apples tied for
> least expensive, at 11 cents.
>
> Among 27 fruits the USDA examined, Americans spent the most on whole
> oranges, bought the most pounds of bananas and ate the most servings of
> apples.
>
> Of 30 vegetables considered, potatoes dominated. People consumed more
> than four times as many servings of potatoes as they did tomatoes, the
> second most popular vegetable.
>
> Price seems to play a large role in vegetable purchases. The five least
> expensive fresh vegetables -- potatoes, cabbage, whole carrots, onions
> and sweet potatoes -- account for 62 percent of all purchases by weight.
>
> Another USDA study released in May found that income plays a significant
> role in produce consumption. Low-income families spent an average of
> $3.59 per person per week, while higher-income families spent $5.02.
>
> That study also found that while wealthier families bought more produce
> as their incomes increased, low-income families did not. It also found
> that college-educated families spend the most -- $5.99 per person per
> week on fruits and vegetables.
> --
> Steve
> http://www.geocities.com/beforewisdom/
>
> "The great American thought trap: It is not real unless it can be seen
> on television or bought in a shopping mall"
>
> Be a healthy Vegan or Vegetarian
> http://geocities.com/beforewisdom/Veg/healthyVeg.html



  #3 (permalink)   Report Post  
magnulus
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Canned vegetables and fruits can be nutritious too. Also, they don't
spoil quickly.


  #4 (permalink)   Report Post  
magnulus
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Canned vegetables and fruits can be nutritious too. Also, they don't
spoil quickly.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How Can Diet Sodas Make You Fat? Study May Explain It Janet Bostwick General Cooking 92 22-09-2014 11:43 PM
Another Reason To Avoid U.S. Beef Mark Thorson General Cooking 13 20-02-2011 11:13 PM
Vegetarian diet is nuts: study Jeßus[_3_] Vegan 4 21-05-2008 04:07 AM
Diet study report C. James Strutz Vegan 1 11-11-2003 12:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"