What would someone have to do, in order for them
to be lower than Goo?

On Jul 29, 10:38*pm, dh@. wrote:
> * * What would someone have to do, in order for them
> to be lower than Goo?


Here's another one for ya, Dave.

Q: What's the difference between Boobs and a sturgeon?

A: One's a mud-sucking, low level, bottom feeder and the other one is
a fish.

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:29:08 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants" > wrote:

>On Jul 29, 10:38*pm, dh@. wrote:
>> * * What would someone have to do, in order for them
>> to be lower than Goo?
>
>
>Here's another one for ya, Dave.
>
>Q: What's the difference between Boobs and a sturgeon?
>
>A: One's a mud-sucking, low level, bottom feeder and the other one is
>a fish.

Good point. Even though in some ways they are similar, the
fish isn't deliberately being a dishonest, inconsiderate low life
sort of scum, but Goo is.

On Jul 30, 11:25*pm, dh@. wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:29:08 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants" > wrote:
> >On Jul 29, 10:38*pm, dh@. wrote:
> >> * * What would someone have to do, in order for them
> >> to be lower than Goo?
>
> >Here's another one for ya, Dave.
>
> >Q: What's the difference between Boobs and a sturgeon?
>
> >A: One's a mud-sucking, low level, bottom feeder and the other one is
> >a fish.
>
> * * Good point. Even though in some ways they are similar, the
> fish isn't deliberately being a dishonest, inconsiderate low life
> sort of scum, but Goo is.


Also I bet if the sturgeion thought he disagreed with himself, he
could probably attempt to explain why and how........unlike Boobs who
has no clue.

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:55:36 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants" > wrote:

>On Jul 30, 11:25*pm, dh@. wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:29:08 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants" > wrote:
>> >On Jul 29, 10:38*pm, dh@. wrote:
>> >> * * What would someone have to do, in order for them
>> >> to be lower than Goo?
>>
>> >Here's another one for ya, Dave.
>>
>> >Q: What's the difference between Boobs and a sturgeon?
>>
>> >A: One's a mud-sucking, low level, bottom feeder and the other one is
>> >a fish.
>>
>> * * Good point. Even though in some ways they are similar, the
>> fish isn't deliberately being a dishonest, inconsiderate low life
>> sort of scum, but Goo is.
>
>
>Also I bet if the sturgeion thought he disagreed with himself, he
>could probably attempt to explain why and how........unlike Boobs who
>has no clue.

His total ineptitude reveals his cluelessness. His own cluelessness
has pounded the Goober to a pasty mush, no doubt. Goo can't make
a peep for himself this time, and his Dutch character doesn't appear
able to help a Goober out much either.