Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Tea (rec.drink.tea) Discussion relating to tea, the world's second most consumed beverage (after water), made by infusing or boiling the leaves of the tea plant (C. sinensis or close relatives) in water. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks everybody in this groups
Thanks everyone in this groups, i am sorry about all my characters in
this groups again. I have a question, who tasted the white tea, who know how to make the white tea, i bet white tea only produced in my hometown. White tea is made from green tea, use the green tea to half-zymolysis, only half, if they zymolysis it will be the black tea. |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks everybody in this groups
|
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks everybody in this groups
John wrote:
> ... i bet white tea only produced in my > hometown. White tea is made from green tea, use the green tea to > half-zymolysis, only half, if they zymolysis it will be the black tea. The above indicates to me that this guy doesn't have a ****ing clue what he's talking about. stePH -- Today's waste is tomorrow's overtime. |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks everybody in this groups
"John" > writes:
> Thanks everyone in this groups, i am sorry about all my characters in > this groups again. I have a question, who tasted the white tea, who > know how to make the white tea, i bet white tea only produced in my > hometown. How many hometowns have you collected? /Lew --- Lew Perin / http://www.panix.com/~perin/babelcarp.html |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks everybody in this groups
>The above indicates to me that this guy doesn't have a ****ing clue
>what he's talking about. The obscure word Zymolysis and his grammar tells me that he/she is a Chinese trying to find information on this forum. I teach em here, and when you get strange word amid a bunch of regular words, it's easy to see that they pulled it out of computer translation software such as Kingsoft. |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
zymolysis, yes
|
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
zymolysis, yes
Michael Plant wrote: > Zymolysis is a perfectly good word, albeit a bit obscure. A dictionary might > help you, first poster above. I don't need a dictionary to know that white tea is not "made from green tea" as he/she/it states. Furthermore, I don't know where its hometown is, but I'm sure it isn't the world's sole source of white tea either. I stand by my original statement: OP is totally clueless and talking from its ass. stePH In cup: English Breakfast, from Limbo in E. Portland, OR -- Today's waste is tomorrow's overtime |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
zymolysis, yes
stePH > wrote:
> >I don't need a dictionary to know that white tea is not "made from >green tea" as he/she/it states. Furthermore, I don't know where its >hometown is, but I'm sure it isn't the world's sole source of white tea >either. Your white tea isn't made from green tea, but maybe HIS is. You take a little pouchong, a little white latex housepaint and voila, white tea! --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
zymolysis, yes
On 8 Dec 2005 10:28:44 -0500, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> stePH > wrote: >> >>I don't need a dictionary to know that white tea is not "made from >>green tea" as he/she/it states. Furthermore, I don't know where its >>hometown is, but I'm sure it isn't the world's sole source of white tea >>either. > > Your white tea isn't made from green tea, but maybe HIS is. You take > a little pouchong, a little white latex housepaint and voila, white tea! > --scott No, no, no! You don't use paint. You use bleach. Geeze. -- Derek "People ask for criticism, but they only want praise." -- W. Somerset Maugham |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
zymolysis, yes
/8/05
> On 8 Dec 2005 10:28:44 -0500, Scott Dorsey wrote: > >> stePH > wrote: >>> >>> I don't need a dictionary to know that white tea is not "made from >>> green tea" as he/she/it states. Furthermore, I don't know where its >>> hometown is, but I'm sure it isn't the world's sole source of white tea >>> either. >> >> Your white tea isn't made from green tea, but maybe HIS is. You take >> a little pouchong, a little white latex housepaint and voila, white tea! >> --scott > > No, no, no! You don't use paint. You use bleach. Geeze. I suspect you could produce a more natural product by leaving your LJ leaves in the sun for a week or so. That oughta drain the green out've 'em. BTW, my defense of the word Z was solely etymological, not teaological Michael |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
zymolysis, yes
Michael Plant wrote: > BTW, my defense of the word Z was solely etymological, not teaological And my saying the guy doesn't have a ****ing clue what he's talking about, had nothing to do with the use of the Z word. stePH in cup: Ahmad Earl Grey -- Today's waste is tomorrow's overtime |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
zymolysis, yes
|
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
zymolysis, yes
Michael Plant wrote: > and this from a man I respect, drinking "Ahmad Earl Grey"? What an > adventurer you are. I wouldn't have tried it until you paved the way. I see > you discovered the F word. I advise you to use it with discretion lest the > word lose its magic power. Your message does not parse into my computer. Please repost it in BASIC. stePH NP: Motor Totemist Guild, "A Mixture of Guise" -- Today's waste is tomorrow's overtime |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
zymolysis, yes
|
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
zymolysis, yes (corrected response, sorry for previous)
|
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
zymolysis, yes
Michael Plant wrote: > 12/9/05 > > > > Your message does not parse into my computer. Please repost it in > > BASIC. > > > It is in a plain text format. Are referring to its content? Nothing gets by you, eh? stePH -- Today's waste is tomorrow's overtime |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
zymolysis, yes
|
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
zymolysis, yes [and a bit of explanation per request]
> Make sense of the post in question, if you would. OK, here goes: [Michael's original post] "and this from a man I respect, drinking "Ahmad Earl Grey"? What an adventurer you are. I wouldn't have tried it until you paved the way. I see you discovered the F word. I advise you to use it with discretion lest the word lose its magic power." [Michael's parsing of his own post] I was teasing you about drinking Ahmad Earl Grey because it is not a high profile, high end tea, so I didn't expect you to be drinking it. The next sentences were further teasing. I meant to say that you went far away from your usual teas -- or so I thought. Now I'll try that tea too, since you did, and I respect your taste in tea. The final two sentences suggest that you use the word "****ing" a lot lately. I meant that when you use that word a lot, it no longer has the emphatic feeling you want it to have because it becomes too familiar. Do you see what I mean? Sorry to be abstruse. My post basically meant that these elements appear to be new to your personality as we have come to know you. Michael |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
zymolysis, yes [and a bit of explanation per request]
Michael Plant wrote:
> > Make sense of the post in question, if you would. > > OK, here goes: > > [Michael's original post] > "and this from a man I respect, drinking "Ahmad Earl Grey"? What an > adventurer you are. I wouldn't have tried it until you paved the way. I see > you discovered the F word. I advise you to use it with discretion lest the > word lose its magic power." > > > [Michael's parsing of his own post] > I was teasing you about drinking Ahmad Earl Grey because it is not a high > profile, high end tea, so I didn't expect you to be drinking it. The next > sentences were further teasing. I meant to say that you went far away from > your usual teas -- or so I thought. Now I'll try that tea too, since you > did, and I respect your taste in tea. If that's not sarcasm or facetiousness, then: thank you, but I've never represented myself as having a refined taste in tea. I recently mentioned being unable to tell the difference between the midori and gyokuro varieties of sencha from the Tao of Tea. I've been tending towards cheap-to-middling teas in my purchases lately, though I'm not as far gone as Mr. Space "anything over a penny a gram is an indulgence" Cowboy. Basically, if it tastes good to me, I'll drink it. Also, I tend toward cheaper teas in the morning since it's as much about getting a caffeine dose as it is about having a nice cuppa. Later in the day I'll usually have some oolong, sencha or puerh, or the delicious ginger peach black that I get from Seattle's Perennial Tea room. My preferred oolong is the Se Chung from Wild Oats (formerly Natures) that goes for under $2 an ounce, but I haven't been out that way lately so I've been drinking a "TIKUANYIN" from an Asian grocery that I got a 3 oz. tin of for five bucks. It's not particularly good, though it's not bad either. stePH in cup: Stash peach black tea (from teabag) -- NP: Motor Totemist Guild, "The Barbie Variations" |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Zymoysis - fixing up errors
[StePH]
>>>Make sense of the post in question, if you would. >> [Michael's original post] >> "and this from a man I respect, drinking "Ahmad Earl Grey"? What an >> adventurer you are. I wouldn't have tried it until you paved the way. I see >> you discovered the F word. I advise you to use it with discretion lest the >> word lose its magic power." >> >> [Michael's parsing of his own post] >> I was teasing you about drinking Ahmad Earl Grey because it is not a high >> profile, high end tea, so I didn't expect you to be drinking it. The next >> sentences were further teasing. I meant to say that you went far away from >> your usual teas -- or so I thought. Now I'll try that tea too, since you >> did, and I respect your taste in tea. [StePH] > If that's not sarcasm or facetiousness, then: thank you, but I've never > represented myself as having a refined taste in tea. I recently > mentioned being unable to tell the difference between the midori and > gyokuro varieties of sencha from the Tao of Tea. I've been tending > towards cheap-to-middling teas in my purchases lately, though I'm not > as far gone as Mr. Space "anything over a penny a gram is an > indulgence" Cowboy. [Michael] Can you forgive me? While I didn't exactly confuse with somebody else, I did conflate you, so to speak, with somebody else who claims a more intellectual highbrow tea life. I'm really sorry. I couldn't get to my archived posts until this morning where and when I straightened the whole thing out, at least in my own muddled head. Having said that it was not sarcasm, although sarcastic and facetious are my middle names. I will continue without sarcasm below. [StePH] > Basically, if it tastes good to me, I'll drink it. Also, I tend toward > cheaper teas in the morning since it's as much about getting a caffeine > dose as it is about having a nice cuppa. Later in the day I'll usually > have some oolong, sencha or puerh, or the delicious ginger peach black > that I get from Seattle's Perennial Tea room. [Michael] Good for you. As good a reason as any, the primary reason to drink tea being your first sentence. That's tea philosophy in a nut shell. This ginger peach is a tea with added ginger and peach flavor bits? [StePH] > My preferred oolong is the Se Chung from Wild Oats (formerly Natures) > that goes for under $2 an ounce, but I haven't been out that way lately > so I've been drinking a "TIKUANYIN" from an Asian grocery that I got a > 3 oz. tin of for five bucks. It's not particularly good, though it's > not bad either. [Michael] There ought to be Ti Kuan Yin teas in your price range that knock your socks off. They come in so many styles, too. It has been my experience that the cheapest are in the middle oxidation range which ought to given them some "fruit" but doesn't always, and more often gives them a "metalic" quality that some incidentally find quite pleasing. Traditional TKY is highly roasted, dark in color, and sometimes even "smokey" in aroma and taste. Heavy roast tends to sweeten them, but also changes their character radically in other ways, bringing a new taste and aroma spectrum to the tea soup. Really green varieties, espcially those from Taiwan -- IMHO -- can be extraordinarily flower soft and delicious, but often reek of flower perfume essence -- I mean this figuratively -- which turns me off big time. Enough lecture. Contact me off group, and I will happily send you samples of my favorites in the lightly oxidized non-roasted side and on the really heavily roasted side. I don't care what anybody says; the TKY you get from a reliable vendor of tea and the TKY you buy in a grocery store that has been on the shelf a year are two different animals. Only the most heavily roasted can stand that kind of delay. Sorry for length. Again, sorry for the mix-up. Michael |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Zymoysis - fixing up errors
>I don't care what anybody says; the TKY you get from a reliable vendor of
>tea and the TKY you buy in a grocery store that has been on the shelf a year >are two different animals. Only the most heavily roasted can stand that kind >of delay. And, of course you are right. The highest prices at market go for the freshest teas; especially the spring and autumn pick. The stuff that has been sitting on a shelf for a year was usually low quality stuff to begin with. With that said, you still have to consider the age of the fully roasted stuff (we call it Nong Xiang). Give it a year or so and it will improve the taste and make it quite smooth. With the lightly roasted stuff (qing xiang), if you let it sit on the shelf for longer than a month or two, it will begin to have a stale flavor. I recently put some top grade in the fridge for a while to see if it would keep it fresh...bad idea. heh. It requires a special fridge. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Google Groups...if you are having problems use something other thanIE, or use new google groups. | General Cooking | |||
"Google Groups does not currently support posting to the following usenet groups: 'rec.food.cooking!'" | General Cooking | |||
Hello groups | General Cooking | |||
Bread groups | General Cooking | |||
join my groups | General Cooking |