Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Tea (rec.drink.tea) Discussion relating to tea, the world's second most consumed beverage (after water), made by infusing or boiling the leaves of the tea plant (C. sinensis or close relatives) in water. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana
Us "lucky" Western Pennsylvanians have finally received the wondrous
gift of having a Teavana open up in a local mall. I have had to endure at least (truly) a hundred conversations in the past few months because everyone knows I love tea. They are so happy and believe they have had the greatest tea the world has to offer in their "green tea mixed with fruit flavored rooibos" or some other god awful blend sold for some exorbitant price. There is no way to then explain that the subtlety of a real quality green tea is the true magic and that no even their "pure German sugar crystals" are not necessary and completely bogus. I applaud a company for trying to bring tea to the masses but Teavana's approach is just wrong. It is preying on unknowledgable folks and essentially a wall of lies propagated on the simple fact of the ignorance of their customers. Instead of actually trying to teach them or clue them into the amazing world of tea the salespeople tout the virtues of their ingenuitea-like devices and exotic made up tales of their blends. They are rapidly expanding and opening new stores so they are gaining quite a following, I guess I should just give in and enjoy over-flavored blends and revel in the amazing "$220 tea of the month club" as well as the $100+ cheap import Tetsubin everyone else flocks to me in excitement about. At first I tried to be happy for just the excitement about tea, then as the multitudes kept coming with their stories and brochures they so helpfully brought me I tried to explain that while it's cool they are excited about tea there is much more there and much cheaper, better, real teas, now I have resigned to Teavana and it's allure and just feign happiness and discuss the latest "Honeydew White Tea with German sugar crystals and milk" (that's really something they offer and I've heard about twice already). I get that folks like SquarePeg here and the many Joe Sixpacks could care less about the magic and rich history and tradition and the people and ceremony and on and on... but I just can't get behind it in any way knowing what I know and having experienced what I have with tea. - Dominic |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana
Ive been to Teavana once. Id go more often if they had a selection
that wasnt mostly blends. Ive gotten use to paying $10/oz for teas I can find locally without waiting for China Post. My local tea shoppe had a sale this weekend of discount blended teas the owner got from his German supplier. I didnt even bother to go. I did ride by on the bike and thought the place was a voting precinct. Nobody cares if I think it is more fun to shop a herbal store and creating their own. The only reason I dont run a tea shoppe is Id have to give people what the want. PS Try their Six Summits and tell me what you think. Jim On Nov 4, 7:48 am, "Dominic T." > wrote: > Us "lucky" Western Pennsylvanians have finally received the wondrous > gift of having a Teavana open up in a local mall. I have had to endure > at least (truly) a hundred conversations in the past few months > because everyone knows I love tea. They are so happy and believe they > have had the greatest tea the world has to offer in their "green tea > mixed with fruit flavored rooibos" or some other god awful blend sold > for some exorbitant price. There is no way to then explain that the > subtlety of a real quality green tea is the true magic and that no > even their "pure German sugar crystals" are not necessary and > completely bogus. > > I applaud a company for trying to bring tea to the masses but > Teavana's approach is just wrong. It is preying on unknowledgable > folks and essentially a wall of lies propagated on the simple fact of > the ignorance of their customers. Instead of actually trying to teach > them or clue them into the amazing world of tea the salespeople tout > the virtues of their ingenuitea-like devices and exotic made up tales > of their blends. They are rapidly expanding and opening new stores so > they are gaining quite a following, I guess I should just give in and > enjoy over-flavored blends and revel in the amazing "$220 tea of the > month club" as well as the $100+ cheap import Tetsubin everyone else > flocks to me in excitement about. > > At first I tried to be happy for just the excitement about tea, then > as the multitudes kept coming with their stories and brochures they so > helpfully brought me I tried to explain that while it's cool they are > excited about tea there is much more there and much cheaper, better, > real teas, now I have resigned to Teavana and it's allure and just > feign happiness and discuss the latest "Honeydew White Tea with German > sugar crystals and milk" (that's really something they offer and I've > heard about twice already). > > I get that folks like SquarePeg here and the many Joe Sixpacks could > care less about the magic and rich history and tradition and the > people and ceremony and on and on... but I just can't get behind it in > any way knowing what I know and having experienced what I have with > tea. > > - Dominic |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana
On Nov 4, 12:46*pm, Space Cowboy > wrote:
> Ive been to Teavana once. *Id go more often if they had a selection > that wasnt mostly blends. *Ive gotten use to paying $10/oz for teas I > can find locally without waiting for China Post. *My local tea shoppe > had a sale this weekend of discount blended teas the owner got from > his German supplier. *I didnt even bother to go. *I did ride by on the > bike and thought the place was a voting precinct. *Nobody cares if I > think it is more fun to shop a herbal store and creating their own. > The only reason I dont run a tea shoppe is Id have to give people what > the want. > > PS *Try their Six Summits and tell me what you think. > > Jim I honestly don't think I'll be spending any of my money there, even though I'd imagine the six summits is good to some degree... I'd imagine it has a proper tea analog under the proper name but I'd have no way of knowing or country of origin from their secretive nature (like Adagio) which I guess they think keeps customers from going elsewhere or ever becoming knowledgeable about the tea and the story that goes along with it. I buy tea at times from a few local coffee roasters that sell loose tea. The tea is poor to passable in quality and most often grossly overpriced but they sell it by the actual name and list the country or estate of origin and even though they are coffee folks they do a very good job of teaching and explaining the offerings even if it isn't a masterclass. People walk out with barely passable tea but at least some actual knowledge. As you and others here know I have kicked around the idea of opening a shop of my own for a few years, I've run the numbers many ways and with many different angles. The problem always was to stay afloat you have to either go evil like Teavana where it is about exploiting customers or you go good and offer great tea with great atmosphere and service but ultimately fail financially. I actually have a specific account where I have been saving to, even at a loss, go that second route eventually. My only hope is that my numbers and research proves wrong and I surprise myself. I'm sure the folks at Teavana started off right, but found that the top sellers (and top profit margins) were the flavor blends and rather than try to correct that they went with it and then began exploiting it further and further. I'll be placing an order with Seven Cups and Stephane Erler this week happily. - Dominic |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana
Im not that hung up on pedigrees. I need to know country of origin at
a minimum. I know selling a mysterious high price specialty tea is not that uncommon. I think a vendor can have connections and doesnt want his competition to know. I dont think it is fool the public perse. What I cant forgive is a markup of everyday teas even allowing for expenses. As I said before my local tea shoppe is about ready to start franchising. Their business model, suburbia with disposable income and enough on the shelf to keep types like me interested. Ill send that inlaw in Taiwan an email and see what he knows about Six Summits. Jim On Nov 4, 4:39 pm, "Dominic T." > wrote: > On Nov 4, 12:46 pm, Space Cowboy > wrote: ....Teavana sticker shock at the mall... > I honestly don't think I'll be spending any of my money there, even > though I'd imagine the six summits is good to some degree... I'd > imagine it has a proper tea analog under the proper name but I'd have > no way of knowing or country of origin from their secretive nature > (like Adagio) which I guess they think keeps customers from going > elsewhere or ever becoming knowledgeable about the tea and the story > that goes along with it. > > I buy tea at times from a few local coffee roasters that sell loose > tea. The tea is poor to passable in quality and most often grossly > overpriced but they sell it by the actual name and list the country or > estate of origin and even though they are coffee folks they do a very > good job of teaching and explaining the offerings even if it isn't a > masterclass. People walk out with barely passable tea but at least > some actual knowledge. > > As you and others here know I have kicked around the idea of opening a > shop of my own for a few years, I've run the numbers many ways and > with many different angles. The problem always was to stay afloat you > have to either go evil like Teavana where it is about exploiting > customers or you go good and offer great tea with great atmosphere and > service but ultimately fail financially. I actually have a specific > account where I have been saving to, even at a loss, go that second > route eventually. My only hope is that my numbers and research proves > wrong and I surprise myself. > > I'm sure the folks at Teavana started off right, but found that the > top sellers (and top profit margins) were the flavor blends and rather > than try to correct that they went with it and then began exploiting > it further and further. I'll be placing an order with Seven Cups and > Stephane Erler this week happily. > > - Dominic |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
"Dominic T." > writes:
> On Nov 4, 12:46*pm, Space Cowboy > wrote: > > [...Teavana...] > > PS *Try their Six Summits and tell me what you think. > > I honestly don't think I'll be spending any of my money there, even > though I'd imagine the six summits is good to some degree... I'd > imagine it has a proper tea analog under the proper name but I'd have > no way of knowing or country of origin from their secretive nature > (like Adagio) which I guess they think keeps customers from going > elsewhere or ever becoming knowledgeable about the tea and the story > that goes along with it. For me, this is an important issue. When a vendor conceals information that would enable me look elsewhere to try other teas that might be comparable to the vendor's own, I feel betrayed. In my experience, there are very few vendors in the USA who never hide the rightful names of teas. (Note that I'm not asking for detailed information like which wholesaler or farmer they bought from.) I would be interested to have a list of vendors who *always* use teas' rightful names. /Lew --- Lew Perin / http://www.panix.com/~perin/babelcarp.html Post-election tea: 30-year old Pu'er bought in Taiwan by a friend - thanks! |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
On Nov 5, 9:54*am, Lewis Perin > wrote:
> "Dominic T." > writes: > > On Nov 4, 12:46*pm, Space Cowboy > wrote: > > > [...Teavana...] > > > PS *Try their Six Summits and tell me what you think. > > > I honestly don't think I'll be spending any of my money there, even > > though I'd imagine the six summits is good to some degree... I'd > > imagine it has a proper tea analog under the proper name but I'd have > > no way of knowing or country of origin from their secretive nature > > (like Adagio) which I guess they think keeps customers from going > > elsewhere or ever becoming knowledgeable about the tea and the story > > that goes along with it. > > For me, this is an important issue. *When a vendor conceals > information that would enable me look elsewhere to try other teas that > might be comparable to the vendor's own, I feel betrayed. *In my > experience, there are very few vendors in the USA who never hide the > rightful names of teas. *(Note that I'm not asking for detailed > information like which wholesaler or farmer they bought from.) > > I would be interested to have a list of vendors who *always* use teas' > rightful names. > > /Lew > --- > Lew Perin / > Post-election tea: 30-year old Pu'er bought in Taiwan by a friend - thanks! I don't have a list of domestic vendors and as I tried to think of them I realized I was coming up with a mix of domestic and overseas so I just gave up I think most of the higher touted vendors we all deal with and discuss all do this properly. And most of them can and will happily even give you that deeper info if you ask. The only time I care about farmer/wholesaler is for a particular tea I truly love (a top 10 personal favorite) and then it is only because I'd love to know more about a tea I treasure. I don't need it to make the initial purchase. I want the real tea name and the country or location of origin, I don't need any more or less. It comes down to honesty and good business and I'll support that anyday domestic or not. I wish more American businesses would get over this secrecy==sales mentality, how many of our most beloved tea vendors have been around a long time and doing just fine without that. - Dominic Yes, I'm also a Open Source/Creative Commons fan... and extremely happy today. |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
"Dominic T." > writes:
> On Nov 5, 9:54*am, Lewis Perin > wrote: > > "Dominic T." > writes: > > > On Nov 4, 12:46*pm, Space Cowboy > wrote: > > > > [...Teavana...] > > > > PS *Try their Six Summits and tell me what you think. > > > > > I honestly don't think I'll be spending any of my money there, even > > > though I'd imagine the six summits is good to some degree... I'd > > > imagine it has a proper tea analog under the proper name but I'd have > > > no way of knowing or country of origin from their secretive nature > > > (like Adagio) which I guess they think keeps customers from going > > > elsewhere or ever becoming knowledgeable about the tea and the story > > > that goes along with it. > > > > For me, this is an important issue. *When a vendor conceals > > information that would enable me look elsewhere to try other teas that > > might be comparable to the vendor's own, I feel betrayed. *In my > > experience, there are very few vendors in the USA who never hide the > > rightful names of teas. *(Note that I'm not asking for detailed > > information like which wholesaler or farmer they bought from.) > > > > I would be interested to have a list of vendors who *always* use teas' > > rightful names. > > I don't have a list of domestic vendors and as I tried to think of > them I realized I was coming up with a mix of domestic and overseas so > I just gave up I think most of the higher touted vendors we all > deal with and discuss all do this properly. I'm having trouble thinking of one that *always* does this properly. /Lew --- Lew Perin / http://www.panix.com/~perin/babelcarp.html |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
On Nov 5, 12:17*pm, Lewis Perin > wrote:
> "Dominic T." > writes: > > On Nov 5, 9:54*am, Lewis Perin > wrote: > > > "Dominic T." > writes: > > > > On Nov 4, 12:46*pm, Space Cowboy > wrote: > > > > > [...Teavana...] > > > > > PS *Try their Six Summits and tell me what you think. > > > > > I honestly don't think I'll be spending any of my money there, even > > > > though I'd imagine the six summits is good to some degree... I'd > > > > imagine it has a proper tea analog under the proper name but I'd have > > > > no way of knowing or country of origin from their secretive nature > > > > (like Adagio) which I guess they think keeps customers from going > > > > elsewhere or ever becoming knowledgeable about the tea and the story > > > > that goes along with it. > > > > For me, this is an important issue. *When a vendor conceals > > > information that would enable me look elsewhere to try other teas that > > > might be comparable to the vendor's own, I feel betrayed. *In my > > > experience, there are very few vendors in the USA who never hide the > > > rightful names of teas. *(Note that I'm not asking for detailed > > > information like which wholesaler or farmer they bought from.) > > > > I would be interested to have a list of vendors who *always* use teas' > > > rightful names. > > > I don't have a list of domestic vendors and as I tried to think of > > them I realized I was coming up with a mix of domestic and overseas so > > I just gave up I think most of the higher touted vendors we all > > deal with and discuss all do this properly. > > I'm having trouble thinking of one that *always* does this properly. > > /Lew > --- > Lew Perin / I'd say Seven Cups and IPOT (In Pursuit of Tea) are two domestic options with proper info, Seven Cups maybe a bit moreso but both fit... Those two came to mind quickly initially, if I thought on it I could probably come up with a couple more. - Dominic |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
I walk into Seven Cups and recognize every Chinese tea on the shelf.
I walk into Red Blossom and never heard of their proprietary specialty Heirloom San Ling Xi. The fact that there is even less Google information than Six Summits doesnt mean the vendor is pulling a fast one. When I go into a tea store Im looking for something I dont have. Jim On Nov 5, 1:01 pm, "Dominic T." > wrote: > On Nov 5, 12:17 pm, Lewis Perin > wrote: > > > > > I would be interested to have a list of vendors who *always* use teas' > > > > rightful names. > > > > I don't have a list of domestic vendors and as I tried to think of > > > them I realized I was coming up with a mix of domestic and overseas so > > > I just gave up I think most of the higher touted vendors we all > > > deal with and discuss all do this properly. > > > I'm having trouble thinking of one that *always* does this properly. > > > /Lew > > --- > > Lew Perin / > > I'd say Seven Cups and IPOT (In Pursuit of Tea) are two domestic > options with proper info, Seven Cups maybe a bit moreso but both > fit... Those two came to mind quickly initially, if I thought on it I > could probably come up with a couple more. > > - Dominic |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
Space Cowboy > writes:
> I walk into Seven Cups and recognize every Chinese tea on the shelf. > I walk into Red Blossom and never heard of their proprietary specialty > Heirloom San Ling Xi. The fact that there is even less Google > information than Six Summits doesnt mean the vendor is pulling a fast > one. When I go into a tea store Im looking for something I dont > have. I tried Googling in Chinese for Six Summits using a few different Chinese renderings I could think of. I came up empty. Especially with my limited Chinese, this isn't conclusive, but I'm suspicious. Some people reading this are fluent in Chinese and could improve on my, uh, quest. Any volunteers for this mission? /Lew --- Lew Perin / http://www.panix.com/~perin/babelcarp.html |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
Me too. There are a couple of single characters and three double
characters meaning summit. I was looking at the .TW sites. One of them indicated six summits was a tourist site from the nature of the URLS. I have to go back and run the permutations. I also looked for six summits tea no hits. I should have been looking for six summits oolong from the nature of what little is said about it elsewhere besides Teavana. Jim On Nov 6, 9:00 am, Lewis Perin > wrote: > Space Cowboy > writes: > > I walk into Seven Cups and recognize every Chinese tea on the shelf. > > I walk into Red Blossom and never heard of their proprietary specialty > > Heirloom San Ling Xi. The fact that there is even less Google > > information than Six Summits doesnt mean the vendor is pulling a fast > > one. When I go into a tea store Im looking for something I dont > > have. > > I tried Googling in Chinese for Six Summits using a few different > Chinese renderings I could think of. I came up empty. Especially > with my limited Chinese, this isn't conclusive, but I'm suspicious. > Some people reading this are fluent in Chinese and could improve on > my, uh, quest. Any volunteers for this mission? > > /Lew > --- > Lew Perin / |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
> I tried Googling in Chinese for Six Summits using a few different
> Chinese renderings I could think of. *I came up empty. *Especially > with my limited Chinese, this isn't conclusive, but I'm suspicious. > Some people reading this are fluent in Chinese and could improve on > my, uh, quest. *Any volunteers for this mission? That's interesting that Teavana has registered "six summits oolong" as a trademark. But lots of famous places in China are so numbered. Like "six peaks", "three rivers", or whatever. Name a geographical feature, add a number to it, and then you come up with a number of the famous places. Chinese are into numbers. For example, in Fujian, there is a place in the northeast part of Pingnan county (in Fujian's northeast) called "six cliffs" (liu yan) - but may be also translated as "six peaks" in english . It's in a provicial park. Each one of those cliffs has a separate name, like "Big White Cliff", "Guanyin Cliff", "Hexagon Cliff", "Maitreya Cliff", "Giant Buddha Cliff'", "Snake Group Cliff". I've never been there. But it sounds like an interesting place to visit. |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
BTW, there are a few words that literally mean "summit" in Chinese.
First, there is ding "", then there is dian "", and there is also another dian "", and then there are also various alternate character variants of those. And there is also feng "", which can alternatively be written as "o", and there are other variants of that character. |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
I've had the same problem with Teavana. The only way I could think to "solve" the problem is the online tea rating service I mentioned earlier, perhaps at some point branching out into a magazine for tea 'snobs' that like something other than over-flavored over-sugared teas. I'm still not sure how best to approach the issue, but I tend to think that some sort of internet option is best, especially if persons have saved up money and considered bricks and mortar. I can't think of any reason off-hand why various existing tea blogs couldn't be combined, or various persons who contribute to this list could also contribute to a magazine of sorts. Although last time I brought this up someone (Spacecowboy? Dominic?) mentioned that they had relative success with google searches. I have not and am tired of more or less all the brick and mortar options I have encountered more or less everywhere I have lived (except Tokyo, which I suspect continues to offer better than Western PA). |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
Here is what I am using assuming my Wee Eee from Taiwan can handle
Chinese: [feng1] /peak/summit/ p [dian1] /summit/ 픷 [ding3 feng1] /peak/summit/ 픶 [ding3 duan1] /summit/peak/ c [ding3 dian3] /summit/peak/ ߷ ߷ [gao1 feng1] /peak/summit/height/ While I am here does anybody know the £Уͣƣ ʣ On Nov 6, 11:35 am, niisonge > wrote: > BTW, there are a few words that literally mean "summit" in Chinese. > First, there is ding "", then there is dian "", and there is also > another dian "", and then there are also various alternate character > variants of those. And there is also feng "", which can alternatively > be written as "o", and there are other variants of that character. |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
On Nov 6, 2:15*pm, wrote:
> Although last time I brought this up someone (Spacecowboy? Dominic?) > mentioned that they had relative success with google searches. *I have > not and am tired of more or less all the brick and mortar options I > have encountered more or less everywhere I have lived (except Tokyo, > which I suspect continues to offer better than Western PA). Hey Joel, no wasn't me... in fact I was the one who mentioned I had tried the same thing and have the scars to prove it It is almost impossible to properly catalog and offer "reviews" for tea. It is just so vastly different than wine or even food. It is like trying to hit a fast moving target. Each vendor, each batch from each vendor, each season, each year, each estate, etc. all have huge influence on everything from taste, color, roasting, handling, and on and on... and that is all *before* you get to the insanity-inducing problem of individual brewing (water quality and type, temp, teaware, different senses, etc.). There are just so many variables. I keep trying to think up a unique way to handle the problem because it intrigues me, but every time I hit a major snag which spells death. Basically it is a schema/design issue. Sorting by tea estate/source would naturally be first, but that is so hard to determine that it causes the first big hurdle. So you can categorize by year and region... then season and then the different teas but there has to be some note as to the vendor or the actual estate/source as well somewhere in there. A well taken photo of the dry leaf and color of the liquor is also very important for both documentation and to have something to compare your efforts to. The only real "standard" is in the brewing if one uses the international competition method of 3g tea/ 150cc boiling water/6 minutes steep time. This generally produces a result that isn't what you would normally drink for pleasure, but it is the standard and has been in use for a long time successfully. Even with the loss of a few highly respected members over time there is still a wealth of knowledge and experience here and enough to easily produce a high quality production (Magazine, book, what have you) but I think the coordination and logistics would be a high hurdle... I'd love to be wrong here As for combining blogs, most of us who blog link to other blogs on tea and since there are relatively few the web works pretty well... but I find new ones all the time. I too am from Western PA (I work in Pittsburgh and live about 30-45 minutes NE of the city) so I feel your pain in regards to tea availability locally... which is why I'd love to open a shop. I share your passion and ideas but I have just not been able to bring them to life by myself so far. - Dominic |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
Dominic T. wrote: > On Nov 6, 2:15�pm, wrote: > > Although last time I brought this up someone (Spacecowboy? Dominic?) > > mentioned that they had relative success with google searches. �I have > > not and am tired of more or less all the brick and mortar options I > > have encountered more or less everywhere I have lived (except Tokyo, > > which I suspect continues to offer better than Western PA). > > Hey Joel, no wasn't me... in fact I was the one who mentioned I had > tried the same thing and have the scars to prove it It is almost > impossible to properly catalog and offer "reviews" for tea. It is just > so vastly different than wine or even food. It is like trying to hit a > fast moving target. Each vendor, each batch from each vendor, each > season, each year, each estate, etc. all have huge influence on > everything from taste, color, roasting, handling, and on and on... and > that is all *before* you get to the insanity-inducing problem of > individual brewing (water quality and type, temp, teaware, different > senses, etc.). There are just so many variables. > > I keep trying to think up a unique way to handle the problem because > it intrigues me, but every time I hit a major snag which spells death. > Basically it is a schema/design issue. Sorting by tea estate/source > would naturally be first, but that is so hard to determine that it > causes the first big hurdle. So you can categorize by year and > region... then season and then the different teas but there has to be > some note as to the vendor or the actual estate/source as well > somewhere in there. A well taken photo of the dry leaf and color of > the liquor is also very important for both documentation and to have > something to compare your efforts to. The only real "standard" is in > the brewing if one uses the international competition method of 3g tea/ > 150cc boiling water/6 minutes steep time. This generally produces a > result that isn't what you would normally drink for pleasure, but it > is the standard and has been in use for a long time successfully. > > Even with the loss of a few highly respected members over time there > is still a wealth of knowledge and experience here and enough to > easily produce a high quality production (Magazine, book, what have > you) but I think the coordination and logistics would be a high > hurdle... I'd love to be wrong here As for combining blogs, most of > us who blog link to other blogs on tea and since there are relatively > few the web works pretty well... but I find new ones all the time. I > too am from Western PA (I work in Pittsburgh and live about 30-45 > minutes NE of the city) so I feel your pain in regards to tea > availability locally... which is why I'd love to open a shop. I share > your passion and ideas but I have just not been able to bring them to > life by myself so far. > > - Dominic I was thinking about this problem too, and here are some thoughts: First, only current season matters. It would be impossible to cover all or even most teas so it's best to concentrate on a few from each popular type, e.g. take silver needles and have ratings of it from several vendors for current season. Then take Yunnan Gold and also have ratings on it from a few good vendors. For my taste, I would like to see ratings for Pai Mutan, Assam, Darjeeling, BLC, dragon well. Actually there was a site a while ago called 'We Review Teas', they had the right idea. It wasn't perfect but it was pretty close. One crucial thing is that old seasons don't show up at all unless you specifically search for them. It should be possible to make a sortable, filterable results page, so that you can sort by vendor, by price, by score, by value (i.e. cheap but pretty good), by type and maybe something else. I don't know that much about pu-erhs and aged oolongs. How much do the offerings change from season to season? One other thing is that you have to somehow prevent people from tea shops giving ratings and writing reviews (unless they disclose from which shop they come from). If there are 2-3 dozen reviewers that should be fine because if one person constantly gives high ratings to lousy teas from one store, the bias will become apparent. Therefore there should be a fairly low limit to reviewers. The main issue is that there's just not enough people here. It seems like there's only about 10 people posting semi- regularly? Another idea: we should have a seasonal thread that would give advice for newbies in regard to what teas are good as an introduction, i.e. not too expensive, good, tolerant of imprecise brewing, cheap and fast shipping here in US (and separately noted UK stores for european tea drinkers). Just as a quick example: I would recommend Silver needles and yunnan gold from Hou De, 2003 chen guang he tang green puerh also from Hou De, and Darjeeling 2nd flush from IPOT for current season. And when a new season starts, we would make a new thread. |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
> Here is what I am using assuming my Wee Eee from Taiwan can handle
> Chinese: > [feng1] /peak/summit/ > p [dian1] /summit/ > 픷 [ding3 feng1] /peak/summit/ > 픶 [ding3 duan1] /summit/peak/ > c [ding3 dian3] /summit/peak/ > ߷ ߷ [gao1 feng1] /peak/summit/height/ For a tea name, you wouldn't find so many characters. They reduce to one character to make it more concise. So it won't be ߷ or , it would be more like or or or something like that. Don't forget, you can also add the mountain character "shan" in front of those too: ɽ ɽ ɽ ɽ And these would also mean summit - or more precisely, the summit of a mountain. But again, no ɽ or ɽ or ɽ. > While I am here does anybody know the £Уͣƣ That would be: Ԩڨ@ |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
"Dominic T." > writes:
> On Nov 5, 12:17*pm, Lewis Perin > wrote: > > "Dominic T." > writes: > > > On Nov 5, 9:54*am, Lewis Perin > wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > I would be interested to have a list of vendors who *always* use teas' > > > > rightful names. > > > > > I don't have a list of domestic vendors and as I tried to think of > > > them I realized I was coming up with a mix of domestic and overseas so > > > I just gave up I think most of the higher touted vendors we all > > > deal with and discuss all do this properly. > > > > I'm having trouble thinking of one that *always* does this properly. > > I'd say Seven Cups and IPOT (In Pursuit of Tea) are two domestic > options with proper info, Seven Cups maybe a bit moreso but both > fit... Those two came to mind quickly initially, if I thought on it I > could probably come up with a couple more. I just had a look, and I'm glad to say you're right. Thanks! /Lew --- Lew Perin / http://www.panix.com/~perin/babelcarp.html |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
It took most of the afternoon to make sense. I finally got the drop
down box for all the cha2 characters. BoPoMoFo is the only IME that comes with my Wee Eee. лл Jim On Nov 6, 3:13 pm, niisonge > wrote: > > > While I am here does anybody know the £Уͣƣ > > That would be: > Ԩڨ@ |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
On Nov 6, 4:31*pm, Rainy > wrote:
> Dominic T. wrote: > > On Nov 6, 2:15 pm, wrote: > > > Although last time I brought this up someone (Spacecowboy? Dominic?) > > > mentioned that they had relative success with google searches. I have > > > not and am tired of more or less all the brick and mortar options I > > > have encountered more or less everywhere I have lived (except Tokyo, > > > which I suspect continues to offer better than Western PA). > > > Hey Joel, no wasn't me... in fact I was the one who mentioned I had > > tried the same thing and have the scars to prove it It is almost > > impossible to properly catalog and offer "reviews" for tea. It is just > > so vastly different than wine or even food. It is like trying to hit a > > fast moving target. Each vendor, each batch from each vendor, each > > season, each year, each estate, etc. all have huge influence on > > everything from taste, color, roasting, handling, and on and on... and > > that is all *before* you get to the insanity-inducing problem of > > individual brewing (water quality and type, temp, teaware, different > > senses, etc.). There are just so many variables. > > > I keep trying to think up a unique way to handle the problem because > > it intrigues me, but every time I hit a major snag which spells death. > > Basically it is a schema/design issue. Sorting by tea estate/source > > would naturally be first, but that is so hard to determine that it > > causes the first big hurdle. So you can categorize by year and > > region... then season and then the different teas but there has to be > > some note as to the vendor or the actual estate/source as well > > somewhere in there. A well taken photo of the dry leaf and color of > > the liquor is also very important for both documentation and to have > > something to compare your efforts to. The only real "standard" is in > > the brewing if one uses the international competition method of 3g tea/ > > 150cc boiling water/6 minutes steep time. This generally produces a > > result that isn't what you would normally drink for pleasure, but it > > is the standard and has been in use for a long time successfully. > > > Even with the loss of a few highly respected members over time there > > is still a wealth of knowledge and experience here and enough to > > easily produce a high quality production (Magazine, book, what have > > you) but I think the coordination and logistics would be a high > > hurdle... I'd love to be wrong here As for combining blogs, most of > > us who blog link to other blogs on tea and since there are relatively > > few the web works pretty well... but I find new ones all the time. I > > too am from Western PA (I work in Pittsburgh and live about 30-45 > > minutes NE of the city) so I feel your pain in regards to tea > > availability locally... which is why I'd love to open a shop. I share > > your passion and ideas but I have just not been able to bring them to > > life by myself so far. > > > - Dominic > > I was thinking about this problem too, and here are some thoughts: > First, only current season matters. It would be impossible to > cover all or even most teas so it's best to concentrate on a few > from each popular type, e.g. take silver needles and have ratings > of it from several vendors for current season. Then take Yunnan > Gold and also have ratings on it from a few good vendors. For > my taste, I would like to see ratings for Pai Mutan, Assam, > Darjeeling, BLC, dragon well. Actually there was a site a while > ago called 'We Review Teas', they had the right idea. It wasn't > perfect but it was pretty close. One crucial thing is that old > seasons don't show up at all unless you specifically search > for them. It should be possible to make a sortable, filterable > results page, so that you can sort by vendor, by price, by score, > by value (i.e. cheap but pretty good), by type and maybe > something else. > > I don't know that much about pu-erhs and aged oolongs. How > much do the offerings change from season to season? > > One other thing is that you have to somehow prevent people > from tea shops giving ratings and writing reviews (unless > they disclose from which shop they come from). If there are > 2-3 dozen reviewers that should be fine because if one > person constantly gives high ratings to lousy teas from > one store, the bias will become apparent. Therefore > there should be a fairly low limit to reviewers. > > The main issue is that there's just not enough people here. > It seems like there's only about 10 people posting semi- > regularly? > > Another idea: we should have a seasonal thread that > would give advice for newbies in regard to what teas > are good as an introduction, i.e. not too expensive, > good, tolerant of imprecise brewing, cheap and > fast shipping here in US (and separately noted > UK stores for european tea drinkers). > > Just as a quick example: I would recommend > Silver needles and yunnan gold from Hou De, > 2003 chen guang he tang green puerh also > from Hou De, and Darjeeling 2nd flush from > IPOT for current season. > > And when a new season starts, we would make > a new thread. All good ideas. Sadly a ton of the great posters have either moved on or left for other reasons and this place is becoming a shell of what it once was. Honestly, I've wanted to just give up and move on myself lately but I've tried to hang around in hopes things might change... but it's not looking like it. It really pains me to even say it. I have learned so much here and my tastes have grown and changed in ways that they hadn't over 12+ years like they did here in just a few. I don't know what the answer is. I miss the Mike Petros, Michael Plants, Karstens, Dogmas, etc... I miss really talking and hearing about tea. Real conversations and knowledge... There are still glowing embers here and I just wish they'd fan into a flame again. - Dominic |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
On 2008-11-07, Dominic T. > wrote:
> Sadly a ton of the great posters have either moved on or left for > other reasons and this place is becoming a shell of what it once was. > Honestly, I've wanted to just give up and move on myself lately but > I've tried to hang around in hopes things might change... but it's not > looking like it. It really pains me to even say it. I have learned so > much here and my tastes have grown and changed in ways that they > hadn't over 12+ years like they did here in just a few. I have to agree 100% on this. I feel like the quality of discussion on this newsgroup has gone way downhill; a lot of the folks who used to post here pretty regularly have moved to teachat, I think. For those who are interested in Chinese teas (and, to a lesser extent, Japanese teas), I guess this is a good time to plug my current project: http://teadrunk.org/ http://teadrunk.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2 I know not everyone likes web based forums (I don't love them myself), but I felt like there was a gap in the various online communities out there, and I am hoping that this one might be able to pick up critical mass to the point where it becomes useful. It's still in the early phases; I hope to add more features and improve the look and feel of the site as time goes on... I'm always happy to listen to feedback about the site, either by private email or on the forum for "help / suggestions" on the site. w |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
> Sadly a ton of the great posters have either moved on or left for
> other reasons and this place is becoming a shell of what it once was. Yeah. It is getting pretty dead here. Now, I mostly post on Sanzui. They got a ton of interesting discussions there. You couldn't read all of the threads in one day. |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
I still remember the day I stepped out of the wilderness and found
this group in 95. I think the sum total of what has been said here will be the reference for all things said about tea. I remember the first Chinese tea characters I saw posted here by Kuri from Japan. Yesterday I generated my first tea character using BoPoMoFo without a copy and paste from some Chinese file. I sometimes wonder about the people who disappear like Wesley Neal Willams who knew everything about Yixing but couldnt find any tea in VanCouver BC. I know people have a life and move on. Maybe theyll come back when they have time to sit down and think. Jim PS I remember my most humiliating momemnt. It was one of those flames where nobody takes my side and someone said You Helped Me A Couple Of Years Ago. On Nov 6, 5:40 pm, "Dominic T." > wrote: > I don't know what the answer is. I miss the Mike Petros, Michael > Plants, Karstens, Dogmas, etc... I miss really talking and hearing > about tea. Real conversations and knowledge... There are still glowing > embers here and I just wish they'd fan into a flame again. > > - Dominic |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
Can you give me a link where I can find one of your posts there. I
need to study Chinese grammar besides the textbooks. Jim On Nov 7, 4:52 am, niisonge > wrote: > > Sadly a ton of the great posters have either moved on or left for > > other reasons and this place is becoming a shell of what it once was. > > Yeah. It is getting pretty dead here. Now, I mostly post on Sanzui. > They got a ton of interesting discussions there. You couldn't read all > of the threads in one day. |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
> Can you give me a link where I can find one of your posts there.
Sure. Mostly I just reply to other's posts. But occasionally I do post a question. Here are a couple I posted responses to: http://www.sanzui.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=65895 http://www.sanzui.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=93951 And here is a thread I started: http://www.sanzui.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=90986 |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
I cant see any thread. I also cant get any dialog boxes for Search or
Subscribe. The site must not like overseas traffic. Jim PS What about you Lew? On Nov 7, 7:03 am, niisonge > wrote: > > Can you give me a link where I can find one of your posts there. > > Sure. Mostly I just reply to other's posts. But occasionally I do post > a question. > > Here are a couple I posted responses to:http://www.sanzui.com/bbs/showthread...ad.php?t=93951 > > And here is a thread I started:http://www.sanzui.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=90986 |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
> I cant see any thread. I also cant get any dialog boxes for Search or
> Subscribe. The site must not like overseas traffic. Oh, I signed out, and now I see what you mean. You get a sign-in screen. So you have to sign-in before you can see it. If you don't have an account, then you would have to go to sanzui.com and sign up for one. Then, at the very top left side you see: ע. Click on that and you can sign up. |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
On 2008-11-07, niisonge > wrote:
>> I cant see any thread. I also cant get any dialog boxes for Search or >> Subscribe. The site must not like overseas traffic. > Oh, I signed out, and now I see what you mean. You get a sign-in > screen. So you have to sign-in before you can see it. If you don't > have an account, then you would have to go to sanzui.com and sign up > for one. Then, at the very top left side you see: ????. Click on that > and you can sign up. There's also an issue with logging on from Firefox, at least I haven't been able to login successfully *at all* on Mac or Linux / BSD Firefox, and neither have others. It works fine in Safari and in other browsers. w |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
Looks like you are right. Im using FireFox on my Wee Eee Linux. I
dont even see the characters ע. I still bet on country blocking.. Okay make me fire up Vista later on today. Jim On Nov 7, 8:35 am, Will Yardley > wrote: > On 2008-11-07, niisonge > wrote: > > >> I cant see any thread. I also cant get any dialog boxes for Search or > >> Subscribe. The site must not like overseas traffic. > > Oh, I signed out, and now I see what you mean. You get a sign-in > > screen. So you have to sign-in before you can see it. If you don't > > have an account, then you would have to go to sanzui.com and sign up > > for one. Then, at the very top left side you see: ????. Click on that > > and you can sign up. > > There's also an issue with logging on from Firefox, at least I haven't > been able to login successfully *at all* on Mac or Linux / BSD Firefox, > and neither have others. It works fine in Safari and in other browsers. > > w |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
Okay I had to Register on SanZui.Com using Vista IE. While its fresh
there is a terms and agreement window. There is a form for Userid where you enter the PW and EMAIL twice. I tried to make Google translator follow the links but got an error from the website. Youll have to follow the Chinese. It'll take me awhile to figure out the thread structure. It looks like from the showthread dropdown list there are arbitrary topics? I bet the software looks at the web browser id and hasnt added FireFox. Jim PS Niisonge if that is a real picture you look like an action hero. On Nov 7, 9:04 am, Space Cowboy > wrote: > Looks like you are right. Im using FireFox on my Wee Eee Linux. I > dont even see the characters ע. I still bet on country blocking. > Okay make me fire up Vista later on today. > > Jim > > On Nov 7, 8:35 am, Will Yardley > > wrote: > > > On 2008-11-07, niisonge > wrote: > > > >> I cant see any thread. I also cant get any dialog boxes for Search or > > >> Subscribe. The site must not like overseas traffic. > > > Oh, I signed out, and now I see what you mean. You get a sign-in > > > screen. So you have to sign-in before you can see it. If you don't > > > have an account, then you would have to go to sanzui.com and sign up > > > for one. Then, at the very top left side you see: ????. Click on that > > > and you can sign up. > > > There's also an issue with logging on from Firefox, at least I haven't > > been able to login successfully *at all* on Mac or Linux / BSD Firefox, > > and neither have others. It works fine in Safari and in other browsers. > > > w |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
My lord guys this sounds like a eulogy. Maybe I dont post often but
read it everytime Im on. I think most of the tea places I have been reading are having less postings. Give us a few links to some of the teablogs that are lively you see good discussions on please. Jenn |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
> PS Niisonge if that is a real picture you look like an action hero.
Are you talking about the avatar? Gimme a break, the real me is much better looking than that. LOL. If you want to see my pic, you can go he http://picasaweb.google.com/floating...geagle/Family# |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
When the blogs disappear they come here.
Jim On Nov 7, 12:36 pm, Jenn > wrote: > My lord guys this sounds like a eulogy. Maybe I dont post often but > read it everytime Im on. I think most of the tea places I have been > reading are having less postings. Give us a few links to some of the > teablogs that are lively you see good discussions on please. > Jenn |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
On Nov 8, 7:56*am, Space Cowboy > wrote:
> When the blogs disappear they come here. > > Jim > > On Nov 7, 12:36 pm, Jenn > wrote: > > > My lord guys this sounds like a eulogy. Maybe I dont post often but > > read it everytime Im on. I think most of the tea places I have been > > reading are having less postings. Give us a few links to some of the > > teablogs that are lively you see good discussions on please. > > Jenn Well, that and I also would rather it be about the information and resources in one place which is much more powerful than a million individual bits of unconnected insight. My other big problem is that "teachat" is run by Adagio, a company I do not support and by using their forum every page view puts money in their pocket... here it is purely about the information. No money no hidden agendas. I don't think i will get anyone to change their minds though but I would rather my tea chatting be sponsored by a tea vendor we all actually respect and use. - Dominic |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
Dominic T. wrote: > On Nov 8, 7:56�am, Space Cowboy > wrote: > > When the blogs disappear they come here. > > > > Jim > > > > On Nov 7, 12:36 pm, Jenn > wrote: > > > > > My lord guys this sounds like a eulogy. Maybe I dont post often but > > > read it everytime Im on. I think most of the tea places I have been > > > reading are having less postings. Give us a few links to some of the > > > teablogs that are lively you see good discussions on please. > > > Jenn > > Well, that and I also would rather it be about the information and > resources in one place which is much more powerful than a million > individual bits of unconnected insight. My other big problem is that > "teachat" is run by Adagio, a company I do not support and by using > their forum every page view puts money in their pocket... here it is > purely about the information. No money no hidden agendas. > > I don't think i will get anyone to change their minds though but I > would rather my tea chatting be sponsored by a tea vendor we all > actually respect and use. > > - Dominic I doubt they make anything significant over site maintenance costs. It would not be surprising if they were losing money on it. They run it so that people exchange info about their teas and buy more of 'em. Seems like they're being good- natured in allowing discussion and recommendation of other vendors. I only had a few teas from Adagio, one oolong that I liked very much and wasn't able to find a similar one anywhere else, and kind of jasmine tea which was average and a white tea that was just plain bad. I don't think they really have anything close to top notch teas but that one oolong was real nice. And they send them in nice cans! |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
For those keeping track the Wee Eee also handles Pinyin to Chinese.
BoPoMoFo requires a tone to narrow down the character selection set. Unfortunately the Pinyin IME doesnt so the character set is mixed by tones based on some frequency criteria. Im not complaining since the various characters I want are at the front of the pack if not the default first position. Jim PS I can see why Lew had an easier time with Chinese on Linux than I did on Windows. I did learn some stuff on the way which will pay off on Linux like the Mac already. On Nov 7, 6:14 am, Space Cowboy > wrote: ....WARNING Me talking about Me, I should start my own blog... > Yesterday I generated my first tea character usingBoPoMoFo without a > copy and paste from some Chinese file. |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
> For those keeping track the Wee Eee also handles Pinyin to Chinese.
> BoPoMoFo requires a tone to narrow down the character selection set. > Unfortunately the Pinyin IME doesnt so the character set is mixed by > tones based on some frequency criteria. Im not complaining since the > various characters I want are at the front of the pack if not the > default first position. If you're using Windows, there should be various pinyin IMEs that you can turn on (or off). Right now, I'm using the Microsoft Pinyin IME. Although, I can use just about any IME. But the Microsoft one works fine - unless I want to type in Cantonese - then I gotta switch to another IME. Although that Chinese Pingjam (CPIME) is kind of weird to use. And that's another point. There are all kinds of IMES that you can download for free too - and free fonts too. Another thing, the Microsoft Pinyin IME allows you to switch from Simplified characters to Traditional characters - while at the same time still allowing pinyin input. Then, there are is a user-defined phrase tool - so you can add in combinations of characters that aren't in the IME already (say like zisha hu) - or something like that. And in simplified chinese, it has natural learning, so it will learn a lot of repetitive phrases that you use constantly. Only thing though, it doesn't switch commonly typed words to the top of the list - and that's annoying. So check it out. |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
BTW, most people in Chinese don't actually use a pinyin IME, they use
WuBi, because they can type faster without inputting full pinyin. And man, are they fast. |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
Rightful names (was: OK, now I'm officially tired of Teavana)
On Nov 10, 9:32*am, niisonge > wrote:
> BTW, most people in Chinese don't actually use a pinyin IME, they use > WuBi, because they can type faster without inputting full pinyin. And > man, are they fast. Sorry, I meant most people in China. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Teavana and Puerh | Tea | |||
Teavana the cosmetic counter for tea | Tea | |||
Teavana leaf grade | Tea | |||
Teavana Tung Ting | Tea | |||
Teavana | Tea |