Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Sushi (alt.food.sushi) For talking sushi. (Sashimi, wasabi, miso soup, and other elements of the sushi experience are valid topics.) Sushi is a broad topic; discussions range from preparation to methods of eating to favorite kinds to good restaurants. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
ANN: alt.food.sushi.safety Newsgroup
I was thinking the "Is raw sushi safe to eat raw" and the seemingly
endless cul-de-sacs attached to it could be put in one handy newsgroup where 90% of the passers-by could play "Who's on first" till the end of time. Just a thought... -- "A Dictionary of Japanese Food, Ingredients & Culture" by Richard Hosking (Tuttle, '97). All the hints one might need for exploring Japanese food. "The Sake Handbook" by John Gaunter (Tuttle, '02). An excellent intro and reference to sake. |
|
|||
|
|||
Gerry wrote:
> I was thinking the "Is raw sushi safe to eat raw" and the seemingly > endless cul-de-sacs attached to it could be put in one handy newsgroup > where 90% of the passers-by could play "Who's on first" till the end of > time. Or how about people read the newsgroup FAQ.. which I'm we could have a section answering some of these questions. There already is a section on safety issues.. but it could use a little more bolstering. http://www.sushifaq.com/ -- Dan |
|
|||
|
|||
In ,
Dan Logcher > typed: > Gerry wrote: > >> I was thinking the "Is raw sushi safe to eat raw" and the >> seemingly >> endless cul-de-sacs attached to it could be put in one handy >> newsgroup where 90% of the passers-by could play "Who's on >> first" >> till the end of time. > > Or how about people read the newsgroup FAQ.. which I'm we could > have a > section answering some of these questions. There already is a > section > on safety issues.. but it could use a little more bolstering. > > http://www.sushifaq.com/ I always think that newsgroup faqs are essentially useless. The enormous majority of people new to the group doesn't know it exists. Even many of those who have been around for a while don't remember it's there. And hardly anyone will take the trouble to look for one. Although I don't object to the existence of a newsgroup faq, I don't think it's worth anyone's time and trouble to create and maintain one. -- Ken Blake Please reply to the newsgroup |
|
|||
|
|||
Ken Blake wrote:
> In , > Dan Logcher > typed: > > >>Gerry wrote: >> >> >>>I was thinking the "Is raw sushi safe to eat raw" and the >>>seemingly >>>endless cul-de-sacs attached to it could be put in one handy >>>newsgroup where 90% of the passers-by could play "Who's on >>>first" >>>till the end of time. >> >>Or how about people read the newsgroup FAQ.. which I'm we could >>have a >>section answering some of these questions. There already is a >>section >>on safety issues.. but it could use a little more bolstering. >> >>http://www.sushifaq.com/ > > > > I always think that newsgroup faqs are essentially useless. The > enormous majority of people new to the group doesn't know it > exists. Even many of those who have been around for a while don't > remember it's there. And hardly anyone will take the trouble to > look for one. > > Although I don't object to the existence of a newsgroup faq, I > don't think it's worth anyone's time and trouble to create and > maintain one. But one already exists and is being maintained very well. It would be a ashame to not promote such a useful piece of work. Google sushi faq and its the top one.. All the questions that are asked over and over could be (and some are) answered in the FAQ and all we need to do is point people to that. -- Dan |
|
|||
|
|||
In ,
Dan Logcher > typed: > Ken Blake wrote: >> In , >> Dan Logcher > typed: >> >> >>> Gerry wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I was thinking the "Is raw sushi safe to eat raw" and the >>>> seemingly >>>> endless cul-de-sacs attached to it could be put in one handy >>>> newsgroup where 90% of the passers-by could play "Who's on >>>> first" >>>> till the end of time. >>> >>> Or how about people read the newsgroup FAQ.. which I'm we >>> could >>> have a >>> section answering some of these questions. There already is >>> a >>> section >>> on safety issues.. but it could use a little more bolstering. >>> >>> http://www.sushifaq.com/ >> >> >> >> I always think that newsgroup faqs are essentially useless. >> The >> enormous majority of people new to the group doesn't know it >> exists. Even many of those who have been around for a while >> don't >> remember it's there. And hardly anyone will take the trouble >> to >> look for one. >> >> Although I don't object to the existence of a newsgroup faq, I >> don't think it's worth anyone's time and trouble to create and >> maintain one. > > But one already exists and is being maintained very well. It > would be > a ashame to not promote such a useful piece of work. Google > sushi faq > and its the top one.. > > All the questions that are asked over and over could be (and > some are) > answered in the FAQ and all we need to do is point people to > that. As I said, Dan, I don't mind its existence, and I don't mind your pointing someone there. My only point is that it's a mistake to think it will do much good. -- Ken Blake Please reply to the newsgroup |
|
|||
|
|||
Ken Blake wrote:
> In , > Dan Logcher > typed: > >>But one already exists and is being maintained very well. It would >>be a ashame to not promote such a useful piece of work. Google >>sushi faq and its the top one.. >> >>All the questions that are asked over and over could be (and some are) >>answered in the FAQ and all we need to do is point people to that. > > As I said, Dan, I don't mind its existence, and I don't mind your > pointing someone there. My only point is that it's a mistake to > think it will do much good. Lets try it next time someone asked an already discussed question and see how they fare. -- Dan |
|
|||
|
|||
In ,
Dan Logcher > typed: > Ken Blake wrote: >> In , >> Dan Logcher > typed: >> >>> But one already exists and is being maintained very well. It >>> would >>> be a ashame to not promote such a useful piece of work. >>> sushi faq and its the top one.. >>> >>> All the questions that are asked over and over could be (and >>> some >>> are) answered in the FAQ and all we need to do is point >>> people to >>> that. >> >> As I said, Dan, I don't mind its existence, and I don't mind >> your >> pointing someone there. My only point is that it's a mistake >> to >> think it will do much good. > > Lets try it next time someone asked an already discussed > question > and see how they fare. Sure. -- Ken Blake Please reply to the newsgroup |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Food Safety? | General Cooking | |||
Food safety? | General Cooking | |||
Rec.Food.Recipes Newsgroup | Recipes (moderated) | |||
Can I keep a food atrocity thread in this newsgroup? | Asian Cooking | |||
German Food Newsgroup? | General Cooking |