Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:34:07 -0800, sf > wrote: > > >>Yahoo and the like is ok, but first you have to know where to find >>that a particular person's pictures and after you get there the viewer >>has to sift through a lot of chaff to get to the wheat, if you know >>what I mean. > > > Huh? Do you have problems trying to view my pictures on Yahoo? > > Carol Actually, yes sometimes yahoo won't load then other times it is ****y. On a good day I can view your pics. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 02:23:26 +0000, "MoM" > wrote:
> Great pictures, Carol! I wouldn't use fruitcake mix myself > because I don't like peel except fresh or citron but just > use cherries and pineapple. Thanks! I won't be using the mix with my next batch. This was a decent recipe, but I actually grew up with dark fruitcake. I'm in the process of reclaiming it. Next month ... Carol -- http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/head_trollop/my_photos |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
Why do you think a banner advertisement should not be considered an
integral part of a web site? I got theh free ring tone as part of a "log in" screen when I clicked on a legitimate link. I wouldn't call it a banner and I can't call it a popup and it's a BIG concern because it looked like a legitimate part of the web page. Banner/popups are often carriers of something bad that will attack unwary users when they click on them (I know because I spent many days deleting big time trojans from an auxiliary computer in my house that is for "kids" use). I use a HOSTS file on my personal computer at home, so I don't usually need to think about those things, but the computer I'm using now isn't protected by one. Maybe your computer is protected by a decent HOSTS file - so that's why you don't care. Most people don't even know what a HOSTS file is. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
~patches~ wrote:
> Michael "Dog3" Lonergan wrote: > >> ~patches~ > looking for trouble wrote in >> : >> >> >>> Default User wrote: >>> >>> >>>> ~patches~ wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Sorry dams, I know the pics are likely appreciated by some but not >>>>> tolerated here. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Whaaat? Not tolerated by whom? >>>> >>>> >>>> Brian >>>> >>> >>> Google. Sorry, I've taken enough flack over this issue and never >>> tagged the posts in question and right now just don't feel like going >>> back to find all of them. There were a few. I think it is rather >>> funny that pics are accepted though one source but not another but >>> right now it makes no never minds as it saves me the hassel of >>> posting anyway >> >> >> >> The may be a misconception regarding RFC. RFC is a non binary >> newsgroup so posting binaries to this group is a no-no. Posting a >> link is perfectly acceptable AFAIK. ABF is a binaries group where >> people post the actual pics of the food that they have cooked. I think >> maybe the confusion you might be having is non-binary vs. binary >> newsgroups. >> >> Michael >> > No Michael, at no time did I post an actual pic to this newsgroup. The > only thing I posted was links where one could if they so chose to click > on see the pics. So there was no confusion on my part. I've been > around usenet long enough to know the difference between binary and > non-binary. The uproar was regarding the posting of links to tinypic > links to pics of food I cooked and wanted to share. According to some > here, posting of links to pics is *not* acceptable so I have refrained > from doing so. I read that entire thread, and I do not remember anyone saying this. Link please? -- saerah "Peace is not an absence of war, it is a virtue, a state of mind, a disposition for benevolence, confidence, justice." -Baruch Spinoza "There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened." -Douglas Adams |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 04:00:02 GMT, sarah bennett
> wrote: > ~patches~ wrote: > >> > > No Michael, at no time did I post an actual pic to this newsgroup. The > > only thing I posted was links where one could if they so chose to click > > on see the pics. So there was no confusion on my part. I've been > > around usenet long enough to know the difference between binary and > > non-binary. The uproar was regarding the posting of links to tinypic > > links to pics of food I cooked and wanted to share. According to some > > here, posting of links to pics is *not* acceptable so I have refrained > > from doing so. > > I read that entire thread, and I do not remember anyone saying this. > Link please? One word. Sheldon. I liked the pictures, and so did a lot of other people. Someone has a martyr complex. Carol -- http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/head_trollop/my_photos |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
LOL! No way, woman. I'm just saying that I like that web site.
sf <backing away slowly with hands up> |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
I like the fruitcake mix... but that's me.
I'm a fruitcake. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 04:00:02 GMT, sarah bennett > > wrote: > > >>~patches~ wrote: >> >>>No Michael, at no time did I post an actual pic to this newsgroup. The >>>only thing I posted was links where one could if they so chose to click >>>on see the pics. So there was no confusion on my part. I've been >>>around usenet long enough to know the difference between binary and >>>non-binary. The uproar was regarding the posting of links to tinypic >>>links to pics of food I cooked and wanted to share. According to some >>>here, posting of links to pics is *not* acceptable so I have refrained >>>from doing so. >> >>I read that entire thread, and I do not remember anyone saying this. >>Link please? > > > One word. Sheldon. > > I liked the pictures, and so did a lot of other people. Someone has a > martyr complex. > > Carol Ok, I remember Sheldon making fun of her pictures, but I tend to skim his posts -- saerah "Peace is not an absence of war, it is a virtue, a state of mind, a disposition for benevolence, confidence, justice." -Baruch Spinoza "There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened." -Douglas Adams |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 04:23:49 GMT, sarah bennett
> wrote: > Ok, I remember Sheldon making fun of her pictures, but I tend to skim > his posts But Sheldon doesn't represent the group. Carol -- http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/head_trollop/my_photos |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 04:23:49 GMT, sarah bennett > > wrote: > > >>Ok, I remember Sheldon making fun of her pictures, but I tend to skim >>his posts > > > But Sheldon doesn't represent the group. > > Carol eggzactly! I love pics of food. tbh, a.b.f. is the reason I paid for a separate news account when I had dial up More fun than cookbooks, because its *real* food! -- saerah "Peace is not an absence of war, it is a virtue, a state of mind, a disposition for benevolence, confidence, justice." -Baruch Spinoza "There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened." -Douglas Adams |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 04:29:03 GMT, sarah bennett
> wrote: > Damsel in dis Dress wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 04:23:49 GMT, sarah bennett > > > wrote: > > > >>Ok, I remember Sheldon making fun of her pictures, but I tend to skim > >>his posts > > > > But Sheldon doesn't represent the group. > > eggzactly! > I love pics of food. tbh, a.b.f. is the reason I paid for a separate > news account when I had dial up More fun than cookbooks, because its > *real* food! I have individual.net, so I can't view the binary groups. So I appreciate the pictures that people post here. Carol -- http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/head_trollop/my_photos |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
> I love pics of food. tbh, a.b.f. is the reason I paid for a separate > news account when I had dial up More fun than cookbooks, because its > *real* food! > > -- > > saerah Confirming: Is that alt.binaries.food? Thanks, Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
"Dee Randall" > wrote in message ... > > > I love pics of food. tbh, a.b.f. is the reason I paid for a separate > > news account when I had dial up More fun than cookbooks, because its > > *real* food! > > > > -- > > > > saerah > > Confirming: > Is that alt.binaries.food? > > Thanks, > Dee Dee > > Yes it is! Come join us, we're friendly! kili |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
Dee Randall wrote:
>>I love pics of food. tbh, a.b.f. is the reason I paid for a separate >>news account when I had dial up More fun than cookbooks, because its >>*real* food! >> >>-- >> >>saerah > > > Confirming: > Is that alt.binaries.food? > > Thanks, > Dee Dee > > yes. -- saerah "Peace is not an absence of war, it is a virtue, a state of mind, a disposition for benevolence, confidence, justice." -Baruch Spinoza "There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened." -Douglas Adams |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
~patches~ wrote:
> Default User wrote: > Try googling with my nic and see if you uncover any of the > controversy. The only thing I find is that apparently Sheldumb the Idiot had nasty things to say about the images themselves. Why would listen to him? Brian -- If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
sf wrote:
> Honestly, that isn't a valid excuse. My mother died on Sunday (I was > with her) and her memorial is tomorrow, but hopefully I haven't made a > big deal out of my pain or made anyone here unhappy due to my level of > personal stress. My condolences. All the best to you. -- Reg email: RegForte (at) (that free MS email service) (dot) com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
On Wed 14 Dec 2005 06:40:07p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it sf?
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:21:36 -0500, ~patches~ > > wrote: > >> Right now we are going through a very hellish time and we have a >> funeral tomorrow and, well you know the list goes on. > > Honestly, that isn't a valid excuse. My mother died on Sunday (I was > with her) and her memorial is tomorrow, but hopefully I haven't made a > big deal out of my pain or made anyone here unhappy due to my level of > personal stress. Oh, Barbara, I didn't know this. I am sincerely sorry for your loss. I think the loss of one's mother is particularly devastating, at least it was for me. My thoughts are with you. -- Wayne Boatwright *¿* _____________________________________________ A chicken in every pot is a *LOT* of chicken! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
One time on Usenet, sfpipeline_at_gmail_dot_com said:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:21:36 -0500, ~patches~ > > wrote: > > > Right now we are going through a very hellish time and > >we have a funeral tomorrow and, well you know the list goes on. > > Honestly, that isn't a valid excuse. My mother died on Sunday (I was > with her) and her memorial is tomorrow, but hopefully I haven't made a > big deal out of my pain or made anyone here unhappy due to my level of > personal stress. Oh, Barbara -- I'm so sorry to hear about your mom. You have my best wishes... -- Jani in WA (S'mee) ~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
~patches~ wrote: > > S'mee wrote: > > > One time on Usenet, said: > > > >>On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 04:00:02 GMT, sarah bennett > > wrote: > >> > >>>~patches~ wrote: > > > > > >>>>No Michael, at no time did I post an actual pic to this newsgroup. The > >>>>only thing I posted was links where one could if they so chose to click > >>>>on see the pics. So there was no confusion on my part. I've been > >>>>around usenet long enough to know the difference between binary and > >>>>non-binary. The uproar was regarding the posting of links to tinypic > >>>>links to pics of food I cooked and wanted to share. According to some > >>>>here, posting of links to pics is *not* acceptable so I have refrained > >>>>from doing so. > >>> > >>>I read that entire thread, and I do not remember anyone saying this. > >>>Link please? > >> > >>One word. Sheldon. > >> > >>I liked the pictures, and so did a lot of other people. Someone has a > >>martyr complex. > > > > > > I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed... > > > > > > Whatever, let it go, I have and I don't have a martyr complexs. I'm > ticked but I will get over it. Nuff said. Patches, I enjoyed your pics. There is no reason to stop posting the links. No one has to click on them....<smile>....Sharon |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
biig wrote:
> > ~patches~ wrote: > >>S'mee wrote: >> >> >>>One time on Usenet, said: >>> >>> >>>>On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 04:00:02 GMT, sarah bennett > wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>~patches~ wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>No Michael, at no time did I post an actual pic to this newsgroup. The >>>>>>only thing I posted was links where one could if they so chose to click >>>>>>on see the pics. So there was no confusion on my part. I've been >>>>>>around usenet long enough to know the difference between binary and >>>>>>non-binary. The uproar was regarding the posting of links to tinypic >>>>>>links to pics of food I cooked and wanted to share. According to some >>>>>>here, posting of links to pics is *not* acceptable so I have refrained >>>>> >>>>>>from doing so. >>>>> >>>>>I read that entire thread, and I do not remember anyone saying this. >>>>>Link please? >>>> >>>>One word. Sheldon. >>>> >>>>I liked the pictures, and so did a lot of other people. Someone has a >>>>martyr complex. >>> >>> >>>I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed... >>> >>> >> >>Whatever, let it go, I have and I don't have a martyr complexs. I'm >>ticked but I will get over it. Nuff said. > > > Patches, I enjoyed your pics. There is no reason to stop posting the > links. No one has to click on them....<smile>....Sharon Thanks Sharon I enjoyed sharing them. I'm not one to enjoy disharmony or insults so for now I'll refrain from posting links to pics of food. At the moment, I'm heavily into genealogy waiting eons for images to load. The availabilty of the 1911 census online is wonderful but it is only searchable by location so it is really slow going. Most of the sub districts have 10 - 20 images, all that must be downloaded and painfully read through I hate dial-up! While the images are loading, I planning dinner and debating whether to make a few batches of cookies for Christmas. I can't believe we are so close to the holidays! I'm planning on making a batch or two of fudge later today for gift giving. We don't eat fudge ourselves but I've been told the fudge I make is quite good. We are supposed to visit friends tomorrow. They just moved so I'm wondering what I can make as a home warming present. I'm leaning towards homemade bread, jam, and a hot chocolate mix with nice mugs tucked into a wicker basket and wrapped in tea towels. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
"~patches~" > wrote in message ... > biig wrote: >> >> ~patches~ wrote: >> >>>S'mee wrote: >>> >>> >>>>One time on Usenet, said: >>>> >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 04:00:02 GMT, sarah bennett > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>~patches~ wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>No Michael, at no time did I post an actual pic to this newsgroup. >>>>>>>The >>>>>>>only thing I posted was links where one could if they so chose to >>>>>>>click >>>>>>>on see the pics. So there was no confusion on my part. I've been >>>>>>>around usenet long enough to know the difference between binary and >>>>>>>non-binary. The uproar was regarding the posting of links to tinypic >>>>>>>links to pics of food I cooked and wanted to share. According to >>>>>>>some >>>>>>>here, posting of links to pics is *not* acceptable so I have >>>>>>>refrained >>>>>> >>>>>>>from doing so. >>>>>> >>>>>>I read that entire thread, and I do not remember anyone saying this. >>>>>>Link please? >>>>> >>>>>One word. Sheldon. >>>>> >>>>>I liked the pictures, and so did a lot of other people. Someone has a >>>>>martyr complex. >>>> >>>> >>>>I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed... >>>> >>>> >>> >>>Whatever, let it go, I have and I don't have a martyr complexs. I'm >>>ticked but I will get over it. Nuff said. >> >> >> Patches, I enjoyed your pics. There is no reason to stop posting the >> links. No one has to click on them....<smile>....Sharon > > Thanks Sharon I enjoyed sharing them. I'm not one to enjoy disharmony > or insults so for now I'll refrain from posting links to pics of food. > > At the moment, I'm heavily into genealogy waiting eons for images to load. > The availabilty of the 1911 census online is wonderful but it is only > searchable by location so it is really slow going. Most of the sub > districts have 10 - 20 images, all that must be downloaded and painfully > read through I hate dial-up! While the images are loading, I planning > dinner and debating whether to make a few batches of cookies for > Christmas. I can't believe we are so close to the holidays! I'm planning > on making a batch or two of fudge later today for gift giving. We don't > eat fudge ourselves but I've been told the fudge I make is quite good. We > are supposed to visit friends tomorrow. They just moved so I'm wondering > what I can make as a home warming present. I'm leaning towards homemade > bread, jam, and a hot chocolate mix with nice mugs tucked into a wicker > basket and wrapped in tea towels. Patches, do you have library on-line privileges where you are? (I can't recall if you are in Canada or not.) Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
Dee Randall wrote:
> "~patches~" > wrote in message > ... > >>biig wrote: >> >>>~patches~ wrote: >>> >>> >>>>S'mee wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>One time on Usenet, said: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 04:00:02 GMT, sarah bennett > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>~patches~ wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>No Michael, at no time did I post an actual pic to this newsgroup. >>>>>>>>The >>>>>>>>only thing I posted was links where one could if they so chose to >>>>>>>>click >>>>>>>>on see the pics. So there was no confusion on my part. I've been >>>>>>>>around usenet long enough to know the difference between binary and >>>>>>>>non-binary. The uproar was regarding the posting of links to tinypic >>>>>>>>links to pics of food I cooked and wanted to share. According to >>>>>>>>some >>>>>>>>here, posting of links to pics is *not* acceptable so I have >>>>>>>>refrained >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>from doing so. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I read that entire thread, and I do not remember anyone saying this. >>>>>>>Link please? >>>>>> >>>>>>One word. Sheldon. >>>>>> >>>>>>I liked the pictures, and so did a lot of other people. Someone has a >>>>>>martyr complex. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed... >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>Whatever, let it go, I have and I don't have a martyr complexs. I'm >>>>ticked but I will get over it. Nuff said. >>> >>> >>> Patches, I enjoyed your pics. There is no reason to stop posting the >>>links. No one has to click on them....<smile>....Sharon >> >>Thanks Sharon I enjoyed sharing them. I'm not one to enjoy disharmony >>or insults so for now I'll refrain from posting links to pics of food. >> >>At the moment, I'm heavily into genealogy waiting eons for images to load. >>The availabilty of the 1911 census online is wonderful but it is only >>searchable by location so it is really slow going. Most of the sub >>districts have 10 - 20 images, all that must be downloaded and painfully >>read through I hate dial-up! While the images are loading, I planning >>dinner and debating whether to make a few batches of cookies for >>Christmas. I can't believe we are so close to the holidays! I'm planning >>on making a batch or two of fudge later today for gift giving. We don't >>eat fudge ourselves but I've been told the fudge I make is quite good. We >>are supposed to visit friends tomorrow. They just moved so I'm wondering >>what I can make as a home warming present. I'm leaning towards homemade >>bread, jam, and a hot chocolate mix with nice mugs tucked into a wicker >>basket and wrapped in tea towels. > > > Patches, do you have library on-line privileges where you are? (I can't > recall if you are in Canada or not.) > Dee Dee > > Dee, I'm in Canada. I can download some images from the National Archives which is really nice if I didn't have dial-up but still cheaper than travelling. I finally got a sub to ancestry.com that I really like too. It saves a lot of leg work but for what I'm doing I still need to see the actual records. Still it saves the travel costs of narrowing the sources down. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
"~patches~" > wrote in message ... > Dee Randall wrote: > >> "~patches~" > wrote in message >> ... >> >>>biig wrote: >>> >>>>~patches~ wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>S'mee wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>One time on Usenet, said: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 04:00:02 GMT, sarah bennett > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>~patches~ wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>No Michael, at no time did I post an actual pic to this newsgroup. >>>>>>>>>The >>>>>>>>>only thing I posted was links where one could if they so chose to >>>>>>>>>click >>>>>>>>>on see the pics. So there was no confusion on my part. I've been >>>>>>>>>around usenet long enough to know the difference between binary and >>>>>>>>>non-binary. The uproar was regarding the posting of links to >>>>>>>>>tinypic >>>>>>>>>links to pics of food I cooked and wanted to share. According to >>>>>>>>>some >>>>>>>>>here, posting of links to pics is *not* acceptable so I have >>>>>>>>>refrained >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>from doing so. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I read that entire thread, and I do not remember anyone saying this. >>>>>>>>Link please? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>One word. Sheldon. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I liked the pictures, and so did a lot of other people. Someone has >>>>>>>a >>>>>>>martyr complex. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Whatever, let it go, I have and I don't have a martyr complexs. I'm >>>>>ticked but I will get over it. Nuff said. >>>> >>>> >>>> Patches, I enjoyed your pics. There is no reason to stop posting the >>>>links. No one has to click on them....<smile>....Sharon >>> >>>Thanks Sharon I enjoyed sharing them. I'm not one to enjoy >>>disharmony or insults so for now I'll refrain from posting links to pics >>>of food. >>> >>>At the moment, I'm heavily into genealogy waiting eons for images to >>>load. The availabilty of the 1911 census online is wonderful but it is >>>only searchable by location so it is really slow going. Most of the sub >>>districts have 10 - 20 images, all that must be downloaded and painfully >>>read through I hate dial-up! While the images are loading, I >>>planning dinner and debating whether to make a few batches of cookies for >>>Christmas. I can't believe we are so close to the holidays! I'm >>>planning on making a batch or two of fudge later today for gift giving. >>>We don't eat fudge ourselves but I've been told the fudge I make is quite >>>good. We are supposed to visit friends tomorrow. They just moved so I'm >>>wondering what I can make as a home warming present. I'm leaning towards >>>homemade bread, jam, and a hot chocolate mix with nice mugs tucked into a >>>wicker basket and wrapped in tea towels. >> >> >> Patches, do you have library on-line privileges where you are? (I can't >> recall if you are in Canada or not.) >> Dee Dee > > Dee, I'm in Canada. I can download some images from the National Archives > which is really nice if I didn't have dial-up but still cheaper than > travelling. I finally got a sub to ancestry.com that I really like too. > It saves a lot of leg work but for what I'm doing I still need to see the > actual records. Still it saves the travel costs of narrowing the sources > down. Your mentioning the 19911 census led me to wonder if you have access to 1910. Is your interest in the 1911 census just the fact that it is a confirmation or you might be looking for someone that wasn't in the 1910 census? Lots of libraries in the U.S. have access to Heritage Quest. It is free to anyone with a library card signing up at the library and viewing at home. I find the download many times faster than ancestry. Saving to desktop has been many times faster for HQ than ancestry. I've been a subscriber for many years now to ancestry. Both are good. Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:38:10 -0500, "Dee Randall"
> wrote: > "~patches~" > wrote in message > news:11 > > > > Dee, I'm in Canada. I can download some images from the National Archives > > which is really nice if I didn't have dial-up but still cheaper than > > travelling. I finally got a sub to ancestry.com that I really like too. > > It saves a lot of leg work but for what I'm doing I still need to see the > > actual records. Still it saves the travel costs of narrowing the sources > > down. > > Your mentioning the 19911 census led me to wonder if you have access to > 1910. Is your interest in the 1911 census just the fact that it is a > confirmation or you might be looking for someone that wasn't in the 1910 > census? > Lots of libraries in the U.S. have access to Heritage Quest. It is free to > anyone with a library card signing up at the library and viewing at home. I > find the download many times faster than ancestry. Saving to desktop has > been many times faster for HQ than ancestry. I've been a subscriber for > many years now to ancestry. Both are good. Can you ladies please trim your posts? This was was 107 lines long! Not trying to be a bitch, but this thing has gotten HUGE! Thankee! Carol -- http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/head_trollop/my_photos |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
Dee Randall wrote:
> "~patches~" > wrote in message > ... > >>Dee Randall wrote: >> >> >>>"~patches~" > wrote in message ... >>> >>> >>>>biig wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>~patches~ wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>S'mee wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>One time on Usenet, said: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 04:00:02 GMT, sarah bennett > wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>~patches~ wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>No Michael, at no time did I post an actual pic to this newsgroup. >>>>>>>>>>The >>>>>>>>>>only thing I posted was links where one could if they so chose to >>>>>>>>>>click >>>>>>>>>>on see the pics. So there was no confusion on my part. I've been >>>>>>>>>>around usenet long enough to know the difference between binary and >>>>>>>>>>non-binary. The uproar was regarding the posting of links to >>>>>>>>>>tinypic >>>>>>>>>>links to pics of food I cooked and wanted to share. According to >>>>>>>>>>some >>>>>>>>>>here, posting of links to pics is *not* acceptable so I have >>>>>>>>>>refrained >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>from doing so. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I read that entire thread, and I do not remember anyone saying this. >>>>>>>>>Link please? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>One word. Sheldon. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I liked the pictures, and so did a lot of other people. Someone has >>>>>>>>a >>>>>>>>martyr complex. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Whatever, let it go, I have and I don't have a martyr complexs. I'm >>>>>>ticked but I will get over it. Nuff said. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Patches, I enjoyed your pics. There is no reason to stop posting the >>>>>links. No one has to click on them....<smile>....Sharon >>>> >>>>Thanks Sharon I enjoyed sharing them. I'm not one to enjoy >>>>disharmony or insults so for now I'll refrain from posting links to pics >>>>of food. >>>> >>>>At the moment, I'm heavily into genealogy waiting eons for images to >>>>load. The availabilty of the 1911 census online is wonderful but it is >>>>only searchable by location so it is really slow going. Most of the sub >>>>districts have 10 - 20 images, all that must be downloaded and painfully >>>>read through I hate dial-up! While the images are loading, I >>>>planning dinner and debating whether to make a few batches of cookies for >>>>Christmas. I can't believe we are so close to the holidays! I'm >>>>planning on making a batch or two of fudge later today for gift giving. >>>>We don't eat fudge ourselves but I've been told the fudge I make is quite >>>>good. We are supposed to visit friends tomorrow. They just moved so I'm >>>>wondering what I can make as a home warming present. I'm leaning towards >>>>homemade bread, jam, and a hot chocolate mix with nice mugs tucked into a >>>>wicker basket and wrapped in tea towels. >>> >>> >>>Patches, do you have library on-line privileges where you are? (I can't >>>recall if you are in Canada or not.) >>>Dee Dee >> >>Dee, I'm in Canada. I can download some images from the National Archives >>which is really nice if I didn't have dial-up but still cheaper than >>travelling. I finally got a sub to ancestry.com that I really like too. >>It saves a lot of leg work but for what I'm doing I still need to see the >>actual records. Still it saves the travel costs of narrowing the sources >>down. > > > Your mentioning the 19911 census led me to wonder if you have access to > 1910. Is your interest in the 1911 census just the fact that it is a > confirmation or you might be looking for someone that wasn't in the 1910 > census? > Lots of libraries in the U.S. have access to Heritage Quest. It is free to > anyone with a library card signing up at the library and viewing at home. I > find the download many times faster than ancestry. Saving to desktop has > been many times faster for HQ than ancestry. I've been a subscriber for > many years now to ancestry. Both are good. > Dee Dee > > Dee, the 1911 census is for Canada not the US. Census records in genealogy are important for determining where your ancestor was but really they just provide a stepping stone, something many doing genealogy don't understand. That is, while you can show someone was living in a particular location at that time, you really can't take things like the DOB as gosbel. I'm accessing the 1911 census through the National Archives not Acestry but it is really slow going because it isn't indexed by surname only location. I've been into this hard core for numerous years and quite often travel througout North America and Europe simply to get a tid bit of info or a pic. It's really nice there are more images of actual records available online. I don't mind paying for the info either. I like Ancestry. I've checked out Heritage but only briefly so I best check it out again. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
~patches~ wrote: > > biig wrote: > > > > ~patches~ wrote: > > > >>S'mee wrote: > >> > >> > >>>One time on Usenet, said: > >>> > >>> > >>>>On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 04:00:02 GMT, sarah bennett > > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>~patches~ wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>>>No Michael, at no time did I post an actual pic to this newsgroup. The > >>>>>>only thing I posted was links where one could if they so chose to click > >>>>>>on see the pics. So there was no confusion on my part. I've been > >>>>>>around usenet long enough to know the difference between binary and > >>>>>>non-binary. The uproar was regarding the posting of links to tinypic > >>>>>>links to pics of food I cooked and wanted to share. According to some > >>>>>>here, posting of links to pics is *not* acceptable so I have refrained > >>>>> > >>>>>>from doing so. > >>>>> > >>>>>I read that entire thread, and I do not remember anyone saying this. > >>>>>Link please? > >>>> > >>>>One word. Sheldon. > >>>> > >>>>I liked the pictures, and so did a lot of other people. Someone has a > >>>>martyr complex. > >>> > >>> > >>>I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed... > >>> > >>> > >> > >>Whatever, let it go, I have and I don't have a martyr complexs. I'm > >>ticked but I will get over it. Nuff said. > > > > > > Patches, I enjoyed your pics. There is no reason to stop posting the > > links. No one has to click on them....<smile>....Sharon > > Thanks Sharon I enjoyed sharing them. I'm not one to enjoy > disharmony or insults so for now I'll refrain from posting links to pics > of food. > > At the moment, I'm heavily into genealogy waiting eons for images to > load. The availabilty of the 1911 census online is wonderful but it is > only searchable by location so it is really slow going. Most of the sub > districts have 10 - 20 images, all that must be downloaded and painfully > read through I hate dial-up! While the images are loading, I > planning dinner and debating whether to make a few batches of cookies > for Christmas. I can't believe we are so close to the holidays! I'm > planning on making a batch or two of fudge later today for gift giving. > We don't eat fudge ourselves but I've been told the fudge I make is > quite good. We are supposed to visit friends tomorrow. They just moved > so I'm wondering what I can make as a home warming present. I'm leaning > towards homemade bread, jam, and a hot chocolate mix with nice mugs > tucked into a wicker basket and wrapped in tea towels. Both sound good. Good luck with your genealogy. I haven't worked on mine for a few years. Maybe since the 1911 census is available, I'll get back on it.....Sharon |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
> >>The availabilty of the 1911 census online is wonderful but it is only > >>searchable by location so it is really slow going. Most of the sub > >>districts have 10 - 20 images, all that must be downloaded and painfully > >>read through I hate dial-up! While the images are loading, I planning > >>dinner and debating whether to make a few batches of cookies for > >>Christmas. I can't believe we are so close to the holidays! I'm planning > >>on making a batch or two of fudge later today for gift giving. We don't > >>eat fudge ourselves but I've been told the fudge I make is quite good. We > >>are supposed to visit friends tomorrow. They just moved so I'm wondering > >>what I can make as a home warming present. I'm leaning towards homemade > >>bread, jam, and a hot chocolate mix with nice mugs tucked into a wicker > >>basket and wrapped in tea towels. > > > > > > Patches, do you have library on-line privileges where you are? (I can't > > recall if you are in Canada or not.) > > Dee Dee > > > > > > Dee, I'm in Canada. I can download some images from the National > Archives which is really nice if I didn't have dial-up but still cheaper > than travelling. I finally got a sub to ancestry.com that I really like > too. It saves a lot of leg work but for what I'm doing I still need to > see the actual records. Still it saves the travel costs of narrowing > the sources down. Patches, if you are near a city, the Latter Day Saints Church has a family history centre (there's one in Chatham which I used frequently in the past) that is open to all at no charge....Sharon |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:36:47 -0600, Damsel in dis Dress
> wrote: >On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:34:07 -0800, sf > wrote: > >> Yahoo and the like is ok, but first you have to know where to find >> that a particular person's pictures and after you get there the viewer >> has to sift through a lot of chaff to get to the wheat, if you know >> what I mean. > >Huh? Do you have problems trying to view my pictures on Yahoo? > Not at all, but one needs to know the address first. I like the idea of Googling for a website, which is what the visual cooking site will be. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:15:12 -0500, ~patches~
> wrote: >Default User wrote: >> >> Whaaat? Not tolerated by whom? >> >> > Google. Sorry, I've taken enough flack over this issue and never >tagged the posts in question and right now just don't feel like going >back to find all of them. There were a few. I think it is rather funny >that pics are accepted though one source but not another but right now >it makes no never minds as it saves me the hassel of posting anyway You're having trouble uploading pictures *where* via google? I know you've gotten flack for posting LINKS to pics here, but that practice is well within the boundaries of rfc and the person/persons who criticised you were completely out of line. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
sf wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:15:12 -0500, ~patches~ > > wrote: > > >>Default User wrote: >> >>>Whaaat? Not tolerated by whom? >>> >>> >> >> Google. Sorry, I've taken enough flack over this issue and never >>tagged the posts in question and right now just don't feel like going >>back to find all of them. There were a few. I think it is rather funny >>that pics are accepted though one source but not another but right now >>it makes no never minds as it saves me the hassel of posting anyway > > > You're having trouble uploading pictures *where* via google? I know > you've gotten flack for posting LINKS to pics here, but that practice > is well within the boundaries of rfc and the person/persons who > criticised you were completely out of line. I was having a lot of trouble seeing pics on the yahoo website. The flack was not very nice especially as I thought post only the links not the actual pics was acceptable <shrug> Oh well, it frees up time for cooking instead of picture taking. BTW, the house smells wonderful! I've been holiday baking and right now roast venison and potatoes are in the oven. I took pics of the roast venison along the way for my own records. I'm making a spinach salad and steamed carrots to go with the meal. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
~patches~ wrote:
> sf wrote: > >> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:15:12 -0500, ~patches~ >> > wrote: >> >> >>> Default User wrote: >>> >>>> Whaaat? Not tolerated by whom? >>>> >>> >>> Google. Sorry, I've taken enough flack over this issue and never >>> tagged the posts in question and right now just don't feel like going >>> back to find all of them. There were a few. I think it is rather >>> funny that pics are accepted though one source but not another but >>> right now it makes no never minds as it saves me the hassel of >>> posting anyway >> >> >> >> You're having trouble uploading pictures *where* via google? I know >> you've gotten flack for posting LINKS to pics here, but that practice >> is well within the boundaries of rfc and the person/persons who >> criticised you were completely out of line. > > > I was having a lot of trouble seeing pics on the yahoo website. The > flack was not very nice especially as I thought post only the links not > the actual pics was acceptable <shrug> Oh well, it frees up time for > cooking instead of picture taking. > > BTW, the house smells wonderful! I've been holiday baking and right now > roast venison and potatoes are in the oven. I took pics of the roast > venison along the way for my own records. I'm making a spinach salad > and steamed carrots to go with the meal. You sure are getting a lot of mileage outta that posting-links-to-pix thing. I had a Buick like that once... but I digress... Roast venison, potatoes, and spinach salad sounds pretty good. What time will they be ready? (BTW, Sheldoon and Projectile Vomit Chick don't speak for the group, and AFAIK nobody takes their abusive and ridiculous opinions seriously) Best regards, Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Post your Recipes - with step by step photos
zxcvbob wrote:
> ~patches~ wrote: > >> sf wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:15:12 -0500, ~patches~ >>> > wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Default User wrote: >>>> >>>>> Whaaat? Not tolerated by whom? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Google. Sorry, I've taken enough flack over this issue and never >>>> tagged the posts in question and right now just don't feel like >>>> going back to find all of them. There were a few. I think it is >>>> rather funny that pics are accepted though one source but not >>>> another but right now it makes no never minds as it saves me the >>>> hassel of posting anyway >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> You're having trouble uploading pictures *where* via google? I know >>> you've gotten flack for posting LINKS to pics here, but that practice >>> is well within the boundaries of rfc and the person/persons who >>> criticised you were completely out of line. >> >> >> >> I was having a lot of trouble seeing pics on the yahoo website. The >> flack was not very nice especially as I thought post only the links >> not the actual pics was acceptable and that is entirely correct. >><shrug> Oh well, it frees up time >> for cooking instead of picture taking. >> >> BTW, the house smells wonderful! I've been holiday baking and right >> now roast venison and potatoes are in the oven. I took pics of the >> roast venison along the way for my own records. I'm making a spinach >> salad and steamed carrots to go with the meal. > > > > You sure are getting a lot of mileage outta that posting-links-to-pix > thing. I had a Buick like that once... but I digress... > > Roast venison, potatoes, and spinach salad sounds pretty good. What > time will they be ready? > > (BTW, Sheldoon and Projectile Vomit Chick don't speak for the group, and > AFAIK nobody takes their abusive and ridiculous opinions seriously) ditto. -- saerah "Peace is not an absence of war, it is a virtue, a state of mind, a disposition for benevolence, confidence, justice." -Baruch Spinoza "There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened." -Douglas Adams |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Here's A Simple, Step-By-Step, Social Media Marketing Course That CANand WILL Increase Your Sales, Leads & Recruitment By 300% to 500%, In Less | General Cooking | |||
New Website for Sumitting Recipes with Step by Step Photo Instructions | Recipes | |||
New Website for Submitting Recipes with Step by Step Photo Instruction | General Cooking | |||
Step By Step Fruittart recipe | Recipes | |||
Step-By-Step Making Port? | Winemaking |