General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
nancree
 
Posts: n/a
Default A sensible explanation of response to Hurricane Katrina/ New Orleans

Jack Kelly: No shame
The federal response to Katrina was not as portrayed
Sunday, September 11, 2005

It is settled wisdom among journalists that the federal response to the
devastation wrought by Hurricane Katrina was unconscionably slow.


Jack Kelly is national security writer for the Post-Gazette and
The Blade of Toledo, Ohio , 412-263-1476).

"Mr. Bush's performance last week will rank as one of the worst ever
during a dire national emergency," wrote New York Times columnist Bob
Herbert in a somewhat more strident expression of the conventional
wisdom.

But the conventional wisdom is the opposite of the truth.

Jason van Steenwyk is a Florida Army National Guardsman who has been
mobilized six times for hurricane relief. He notes that:

"The federal government pretty much met its standard time lines, but
the volume of support provided during the 72-96 hour was unprecedented.
The federal response here was faster than Hugo, faster than Andrew,
faster than Iniki, faster than Francine and Jeanne."

For instance, it took five days for National Guard troops to arrive in
strength on the scene in Homestead, Fla. after Hurricane Andrew hit in
1992. But after Katrina, there was a significant National Guard
presence in the afflicted region in three.

Journalists who are long on opinions and short on knowledge have no
idea what is involved in moving hundreds of tons of relief supplies
into an area the size of England in which power lines are down,
telecommunications are out, no gasoline is available, bridges are
damaged, roads and airports are covered with debris, and apparently
have little interest in finding out.

So they libel as a "national disgrace" the most monumental and
successful disaster relief operation in world history.

I write this column a week and a day after the main levee protecting
New Orleans breached. In the course of that week:

More than 32,000 people have been rescued, many plucked from rooftops
by Coast Guard helicopters.

The Army Corps of Engineers has all but repaired the breaches and begun
pumping water out of New Orleans.

Shelter, food and medical care have been provided to more than 180,000
refugees.

Journalists complain that it took a whole week to do this. A former Air
Force logistics officer had some words of advice for us in the Fourth
Estate on his blog, Moltenthought:

"We do not yet have teleporter or replicator technology like you saw on
'Star Trek' in college between hookah hits and waiting to pick up your
worthless communications degree while the grown-ups actually engaged in
the recovery effort were studying engineering.

"The United States military can wipe out the Taliban and the Iraqi
Republican Guard far more swiftly than they can bring 3 million Swanson
dinners to an underwater city through an area the size of Great Britain
which has no power, no working ports or airports, and a devastated and
impassable road network.

"You cannot speed recovery and relief efforts up by prepositioning
assets (in the affected areas) since the assets are endangered by the
very storm which destroyed the region.

"No amount of yelling, crying and mustering of moral indignation will
change any of the facts above."

"You cannot just snap your fingers and make the military appear
somewhere," van Steenwyk said.

Guardsmen need to receive mobilization orders; report to their
armories; draw equipment; receive orders and convoy to the disaster
area. Guardsmen driving down from Pennsylvania or Navy ships sailing
from Norfolk can't be on the scene immediately.

Relief efforts must be planned. Other than prepositioning supplies near
the area likely to be afflicted (which was done quite efficiently),
this cannot be done until the hurricane has struck and a damage
assessment can be made. There must be a route reconnaissance to
determine if roads are open, and bridges along the way can bear the
weight of heavily laden trucks.

And federal troops and Guardsmen from other states cannot be sent to a
disaster area until their presence has been requested by the governors
of the afflicted states.

Exhibit A on the bill of indictment of federal sluggishness is that it
took four days before most people were evacuated from the Louisiana
Superdome.

The levee broke Tuesday morning. Buses had to be rounded up and driven
from Houston to New Orleans across debris-strewn roads. The first ones
arrived Wednesday evening. That seems pretty fast to me.

A better question -- which few journalists ask -- is why weren't the
roughly 2,000 municipal and school buses in New Orleans utilized to
take people out of the city before Katrina struck?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hurricane Katrina [email protected] General Cooking 0 06-01-2008 11:36 AM
Hurricane Katrina jmcquown General Cooking 238 29-09-2005 05:31 PM
Due to Hurricane Katrina... OnlySunshine.com General Cooking 0 21-09-2005 07:31 PM
Hurricane Katrina hubert liverman General Cooking 3 30-08-2005 05:42 PM
Hurricane Katrina. Get out of it's way!!! Andy General Cooking 4 29-08-2005 05:12 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"