|
PLEASE
DO NOT SEND ME EMAIL WITH A MUNGED ADDRESS... after taking the time to
respond mail was returned, TWICE... both address you supply are munged. I will no longer knowingly open any email from you nor will I knowingly respond to any posts from you... you are dead! Sheldon The original message was received at Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:43:16 -0400 (EDT) from root@localhost *** ATTENTION *** Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery. The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section labeled: "----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----". The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section labeled: "----- Transcript of Session Follows -----". The line beginning with "<<<" describes the specific reason your e-mail could not be delivered. The next line contains a second error message which is a general translation for other e-mail servers. Please direct further questions regarding this message to the e-mail administrator or Postmaster at that destination. --AOL Postmaster ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- > ----- Transcript of session follows ----- 550 >... Host unknown (Name server: geemail.com: host not found) Final-Recipient: RFC822; Action: failed Status: 5.1.2 DO NOT SEND ME EMAIL WITH A MUNGED ADDRESS... I took the time to reply and made TWO attmpts to send, both returned... I will no longer open your mail. Remote-MTA: DNS; geemail.com Last-Attempt-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:43:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from by imo-d22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r1.7.) id m.f4.5377fe0f (2519) for >; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:43:16 -0400 (EDT) Return-path: > From: Message-ID: > Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:43:16 EDT Subject: Nancy Young (WAS: Summer Storage of Bread) To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1119627796" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5200 |
On 2005-06-24, Sheldon > wrote:
> I will no longer knowingly open any email from you nor will I > knowingly respond to any posts from you... you are dead! ....and all it takes is a couple munged emails? It the above address correct? nb |
Stavo dormendo su un bancale di lambro quando il post di Sheldon mi
desto' > I will no longer knowingly open any email from you nor will I > knowingly respond to any posts from you... you are dead! > > Sheldon my fav' wannabe-wop :) -- Vilco Think pink, drink rose' |
Sheldon wrote:
> DO NOT SEND ME EMAIL WITH A MUNGED ADDRESS... after taking the time to > respond mail was returned, TWICE... both address you supply are munged. > I will no longer knowingly open any email from you nor will I > knowingly respond to any posts from you... you are dead! So are you gonna keep suffering from chronic wasting-of-money disease? AOL's content is now, for the most part, free to the public. Yay, I love the internets!!!!11 http://tinyurl.com/8bn64 ~john |
Son Volt wrote:
> So are you gonna keep suffering from chronic wasting-of-money disease? > AOL's content is now, for the most part, free to the public. Yay, I love > the internets!!!!11 > > http://tinyurl.com/8bn64 > > ~john Oh my... http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/200...MwBHNlYwM3Mzg- |
Sorry - try again and omit the capital letters.
sf ``````````````````````` On 24 Jun 2005 08:55:22 -0700, Sheldon wrote: > DO NOT SEND ME EMAIL WITH A MUNGED ADDRESS... after taking the time to > respond mail was returned, TWICE... both address you supply are munged. > I will no longer knowingly open any email from you nor will I > knowingly respond to any posts from you... you are dead! > > > Sheldon > > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- > > > |
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:28:47 -0500, notbob wrote:
> On 2005-06-24, Sheldon > wrote: > > > I will no longer knowingly open any email from you nor will I > > knowingly respond to any posts from you... you are dead! > > ...and all it takes is a couple munged emails? It the above address > correct? > His address most certainly IS correct. I've added a couple of letters to my email and incorrectly thought it was a fairly well know one that anyone in the US would figure out. Sheldon and I are virtual friends... maybe you can't tell at this point, but we are. He's being ****y because he's annoyed. |
sf wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:28:47 -0500, notbob wrote: > > > On 2005-06-24, Sheldon > wrote: > > > > > I will no longer knowingly open any email from you nor will I > > > knowingly respond to any posts from you... you are dead! > > > > ...and all it takes is a couple munged emails? It the above address > > correct? > > > His address most certainly IS correct. I've added a couple of letters > to my email and incorrectly thought it was a fairly well know one that > anyone in the US would figure out. > > Sheldon and I are virtual friends... maybe you can't tell at this > point, but we are. He's being ****y because he's annoyed. I don't parse email addresses attached to personal email, I simply assume they're correct. I highlight the missive and hit Respond, whatever email address comes up in the address box is where my reply will go when I hit Send. People change email addresses all the time but typically apprise those they correspond with, so unless i was previously so apprised I'd have no way to know that the address is changed and/or munged, by one character or many, I simply would not know. And I never suspect that personal email addresses from someone I've been corresponding with perhaps only very occasionally but over many years, would be munged, I simply would not suspect such a thing. And people send me forgeries all the time, so after two attempts at sending my reply to the two different but similar email addresses contained in the headers that is precisely what I figured, a forgery... someone getting their jollies from tricking me into writing a lenghty reply for naught... of course now it's deleted, I don't save email. I recieved another email from the same address this morning but because of how it was titled I figured another attempt at getting me to waste my time and effort with a forgery so I deleted it unopened. And I especially don't trust emails from anyone who won't sign their name in the body of the mail... what kinda "friend" is that?!?!? Plus it's kinda difficult to add addresses to my address book with no name to slot in... for a while I would make up nick names but it got confusing with so many "D Cups", "Bazooms", etc. So, "B", send me your REAL/CORRECT email address, unmunged, so that when I click Reply the correct valid address automatically appears in the Send to box. And in the Subj. line place REAL/CORRECT email address... now I just know I'm going to recieve hundreds of emails with that subject. Okay, I just received another email titled "update", I will check it out shortly... so disregard the above instructions. I still haven't figured out why people munge their address (especially for personal mail), I don't and receive very few spams, if I receive six a day it's a lot. Sheldon |
Sheldon wrote:
> I still haven't figured out why people munge their address (especially > for personal mail), I don't and receive very few spams, if I receive > six a day it's a lot. No one is dumb enough to leave their personal email address out on Usenet. You on the other hand had nothing to worry about, at least until just recently as your posts were not being archived... so no spam for you. Too many people must have complained, and it takes a lot for Google to just stop archiving someone's posts without voluntarily adding the x-no-archive tag. Two years worth of posts down the drain. I used to use a junk yahoo email until I started getting 100's of junk/spam emails a day. Since then I make them up and if anyone asks for it, I'll give it to them in private. You speak of how important it is to never divulge personal information to anyone over the interweb and go bonkers when someone puts Michael's last name out there for everyone to see, yet you bitch about people hiding behind fake names and email addresses. Something, no, you just don't add up... ~john |
Son Volt > said:
> Sheldon wrote: > > > I still haven't figured out why people munge their address (especially > > for personal mail), I don't and receive very few spams, if I receive > > six a day it's a lot. > > No one is dumb enough to leave their personal email address out on > Usenet. LOTS of people do, and I don't consider any of them stupid. > You speak of how important it is to > never divulge personal information to anyone over the interweb ... What's the interweb? Carol -- Coming at you live, from beautiful Lake Woebegon |
On 25 Jun 2005 08:09:04 -0700, Sheldon wrote:
> Okay, I just received another email titled "update", I will check it > out shortly... so disregard the above instructions. > Got your return - we're friends again. :) > I still haven't figured out why people munge their address (especially > for personal mail), I don't and receive very few spams, if I receive > six a day it's a lot. The email part of my newsreader is NOT integrated with my email client on purpose and the email reply function in my newsreader IS munged in my newsreader for anti-spam & phishing purposes. I can understand why you had a problem, since you're used to corresponding with me via my other addresses. Although my other email addresses are alive, gmail is what I use currently to filter out cr*p. I check it about once a week for "real" mail, but the people I correspond with regularly have other addresses that I check daily and I prefer to keep them as spam free as possible. Even if spam doesn't enter the inbox, I still have to clear out "suspect mail" (we're not talking about "known" spam). I just checked one and have a total of 187 (suspect email tab) since 6/7, which is a dramatic drop in volume from the days when I had to clean it out every other day or get messages about my mailbox reaching it's 100MB limit. BTW: 656 "known spam" messages were caught June 12 - 25.... and that's only ONE account! I have others. <shudder> I'm not even as concerned about spam as I am about phishing. I received a phising message pretending to be from gmail only yesterday - through one of my non-gmail accounts. I have to call and find out how that thing made it through the Earthlink gauntlet w/o "knocking" first! Caution to gmail account holders… DELETE any message (this was sent to a non-gmail address) sent to you with this subject line: "Your Gmail account has been inactive for a long time". It's Phishing for information. |
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:03:01 -0500, Damsel wrote:
> Son Volt > said: > > > Sheldon wrote: > > > You speak of how important it is to > > never divulge personal information to anyone over the interweb ... > > What's the interweb? > his attempt at levity.. Internet + World Wide Web I thought it was cute. |
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 11:46:46 -0500, Son Volt wrote:
> yet you bitch about people hiding behind fake names and email > addresses. Something, no, you just don't add up... It's not a fake address if you dig a little. He was used to corresponding with me via another address and wasn't familiar enough with gmail to notice it was munged. End of story. Fini. |
sf wrote: > Sheldon wrote: > > > Okay, I just received another email titled "update", I will check it > > out shortly... so disregard the above instructions. > > > Got your return - we're friends again. :) Yes we are, blood buddies. :) > > I still haven't figured out why people munge their address (especially > > for personal mail), I don't and receive very few spams, if I receive > > six a day it's a lot. > > The email part of my newsreader is NOT integrated with my email client > on purpose and the email reply function in my newsreader IS munged in > my newsreader for anti-spam & phishing purposes. I can understand > why you had a problem, since you're used to corresponding with me via > my other addresses. > > Although my other email addresses are alive, gmail is what I use > currently to filter out cr*p. I check it about once a week for "real" > mail, but the people I correspond with regularly have other addresses > that I check daily and I prefer to keep them as spam free as possible. > Even if spam doesn't enter the inbox, I still have to clear out > "suspect mail" (we're not talking about "known" spam). I just checked > one and have a total of 187 (suspect email tab) since 6/7, which is a > dramatic drop in volume from the days when I had to clean it out every > other day or get messages about my mailbox reaching it's 100MB limit. > BTW: 656 "known spam" messages were caught June 12 - 25.... and that's > only ONE account! I have others. <shudder> > > I'm not even as concerned about spam as I am about phishing. I > received a phising message pretending to be from gmail only yesterday > - through one of my non-gmail accounts. I have to call and find out > how that thing made it through the Earthlink gauntlet w/o "knocking" > first! > > Caution to gmail account holders... DELETE any message (this was sent to > a non-gmail address) sent to you with this subject line: "Your Gmail > account has been inactive for a long time". It's Phishing for > information. That all seems so complicated. I use but one address, and AOL has a pretty good spam filter. If I receive mail from an address that's not in my address book it goes into the possible spam folder, I try to check these for legitimate mail, like those from companys where I subscribe to their news letters but if someone changes their addie to something unrecognizable I will more than likely delete it. Anyway, I don't concern myself with spam or phishers, if it's not recognizable I will delete it unopened. I really don't get much spam, I noticed a long time ago if you don't open those they will go away... and of course if I don't open those I can't click on their embedded links... even when people I know send attachments, especially executibles, I don't open the files, I'd rather be safe than regret missing out on some stupid joke, that very likely I've already seen on a website. I keep my virus software and firewall up to date and run my spyware programs everyday... a few dollars spent in protection is worth thousands, and many, many hours in cures that often never fully rehabilitate. I know people mean well but opening their forwarded jokes that have already been re-fowarded to death are one of the best ways to corrupt PCs. Sheldon |
"Sheldon" > said:
> I know people mean well but opening their forwarded > jokes that have already been re-fowarded to death are one of the best > ways to corrupt PCs. When I get something that's been forwarded a million times, I don't bother getting to the core of it, either. What's so hard about copying and pasting it so the next person doesn't have to open 16 attachments to get to a 3-line joke? Carol -- Coming at you live, from beautiful Lake Woebegon |
Damsel spaketh thusly:
> "Sheldon" > said: >> I know people mean well but opening their forwarded >> jokes that have already been re-fowarded to death are one of >> the best ways to corrupt PCs. Often it's easier than that! It's a simple highlight and cut, from the message as it exists in your edit screen. > When I get something that's been forwarded a million times, I > don't bother getting to the core of it, either. What's so hard > about copying and pasting it so the next person doesn't have to > open 16 attachments to get to a 3-line joke? Not to mention that forwarding things like that passes around the e-mail addresses of "friends & family" to -other- friends who pass it along to ??? All of a sudden your e-mail address is in the hands of somebody you wouldn't know from Adam, and maybe a hundred others like them. That's scary. -- _________________________________________ If u are gonna say that I said something, please say what I REALLY said. ($1 Earl) |
"I-zheet M'drurz" > said:
> Damsel spaketh thusly: > > > When I get something that's been forwarded a million times, I > > don't bother getting to the core of it, either. What's so hard > > about copying and pasting it so the next person doesn't have to > > open 16 attachments to get to a 3-line joke? > > Not to mention that forwarding things like that passes around the > e-mail addresses of "friends & family" to -other- friends who pass > it along to ??? All of a sudden your e-mail address is in the > hands of somebody you wouldn't know from Adam, and maybe a hundred > others like them. That's scary. Yeah, I'm thinking of opening a new account just for my niece, for that very reason. Carol -- Coming at you live, from beautiful Lake Woebegon |
Damsel > wrote in message
... > > Not to mention that forwarding things like that passes > > around the e-mail addresses of "friends & family" to > > -other- friends who pass it along to ??? All of a > > sudden your e-mail address is in the hands of somebody > > you wouldn't know from Adam, and maybe a hundred > > others like them. That's scary. I recieved a joke I'd sent on from an account I had back in 1991 with enough forwards (thank you to all the AOL forwarders) to essentially make it [a plain text email] rival a full-fledged PowerPoint presentation. <G> > Yeah, I'm thinking of opening a new account just for my niece, > for that very reason. What is it with some family members that do this? (One "collects" addresses to add to his private joke alias.) The Ranger |
"The Ranger" > said:
> Damsel > wrote in message > ... > > I recieved a joke I'd sent on from an account I had back in 1991 with > enough forwards (thank you to all the AOL forwarders) to essentially > make it [a plain text email] rival a full-fledged PowerPoint > presentation. <G> > > > Yeah, I'm thinking of opening a new account just for my niece, > > for that very reason. > > What is it with some family members that do this? (One "collects" > addresses to add to his private joke alias.) I hate that! I've had people I've never heard of sending me jokes in my private accounts. They're usually pretty good about removing my name from their address book, though. I wonder if your relative knows how unappreciated that is. Carol -- Coming at you live, from beautiful Lake Woebegon |
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 07:56:11 -0700, The Ranger wrote:
> What is it with some family members that do this? (One "collects" > addresses to add to his private joke alias.) It's the college crowd who actually WANT to see those headers... so they can see how far the joke has gone (they like to see them circle the globe) OR people who still haven't figured out how to strip the headers and attribution carats. |
Damsel wrote:
> What's the interweb? Same thing as the stupidmarket... and the internets. ~john |
Son Volt > said:
> Damsel wrote: > > > What's the interweb? > > Same thing as the stupidmarket... and the internets. *grin* Carol -- Coming at you live, from beautiful Lake Woebegon |
Soooo... Sometimes, we wonder why friends keep forwarding jokes to us
without writing a word, maybe this could explain: When you are very busy, but still want to keep in touch, guess what you do? You forward jokes. When you have nothing to say, but still want to keep contact, you forward jokes. When you have something to say, but don't know what, and don't know how, you forward jokes. And to let you know that you are still remembered, you are still important, you are still loved, you are still cared for, guess what you get? A forwarded joke. So my friends, next time if you get a joke, don't think that you've been sent just another forwarded joke, but that you've been thought of today and your friend on the other end of your computer wanted to send you a smile. (not an original post......................it was sent to me, that last time i complained about the damn jokes in my mailbox) -- "Damsel" > wrote in message ... > "The Ranger" > said: > > > Damsel > wrote in message > > ... > > > > I recieved a joke I'd sent on from an account I had back in 1991 with > > enough forwards (thank you to all the AOL forwarders) to essentially > > make it [a plain text email] rival a full-fledged PowerPoint > > presentation. <G> > > > > > Yeah, I'm thinking of opening a new account just for my niece, > > > for that very reason. > > > > What is it with some family members that do this? (One "collects" > > addresses to add to his private joke alias.) > > I hate that! I've had people I've never heard of sending me jokes in my > private accounts. They're usually pretty good about removing my name from > their address book, though. > > I wonder if your relative knows how unappreciated that is. > > Carol > > -- > Coming at you live, from beautiful Lake Woebegon |
rosie read n' post wrote: > Soooo... Sometimes, we wonder why friends keep forwarding jokes to us > without writing a word, maybe this could explain: When you are very > busy, > but still want to keep in touch, guess what you do? You forward jokes. > When > you have nothing to say, but still want to keep contact, you forward > jokes. > When you have something to say, but don't know what, and don't know how, > you > forward jokes. And to let you know that you are still remembered, you > are > still important, you are still loved, you are still cared for, guess > what > you get? A forwarded joke. So my friends, next time if you get a joke, > don't > think that you've been sent just another forwarded joke, but that you've > been thought of today and your friend on the other end of your computer > wanted to send you a smile. Yeah, right... a joke fowarded to you along with 50 other people... people mass mail jokes because THEY need to be remembered, NOT because they care about you. Sheldon |
Damsel > wrote in message
... > "The Ranger" > said: > > Damsel > wrote in message ... > > I recieved a joke I'd sent on from an account I had back > > in 1991 with enough forwards (thank you to all the AOL > > forwarders) to essentially make it [a plain text email] rival > > a full-fledged PowerPoint presentation. <G> > > > > > Yeah, I'm thinking of opening a new account just for my > > > niece, for that very reason. > > > > What is it with some family members that do this? (One > > "collects" addresses to add to his private joke alias.) > > I hate that! I've had people I've never heard of sending me > jokes in my private accounts. They're usually pretty good > about removing my name from their address book, though. > > I wonder if your relative knows how unappreciated that is. In my case, those that continue to do this haven't a clue regarding forwarding, stripping headers, or even what "bcc" is for! The Ranger |
rosie read n' post > wrote in message
... > When you have nothing to say, but still want to keep > contact, you forward jokes. "Best to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak up and remove all doubt." > When you have something to say, but don't know what, > and don't know how, you forward jokes. Nonsense. I keep in contact with everyone in my address book monthly, sometimes more frequently. If using email for communication is SOOOOO difficult, then pick up the damned phone, or visit the person. Otherwise, keep the unfunny, nonhumorous, often past-chestnut-staged jokes to yourself. (Especially when you aren't willing to perform even the most minimum editing to clean them up for readiblity.) > And to let you know that you are still remembered, you > are still important, you are still loved, you are still cared > for, guess what you get? A forwarded joke. > So my friends, next time if you get a joke, don't think that > you've been sent just another forwarded joke, but that > you've been thought of today and your friend on the other > end of your computer wanted to send you a smile. Me, and the other 100 people in their address book? I can do without that type of unsentimental bogy. > (not an original post... it was sent to me, that last time > i complained about the damn jokes in my mailbox) I'd've help them understand the folly of sending canned tripe that's past it use-by date... The Ranger |
sf > wrote in message
... > On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 07:56:11 -0700, The Ranger wrote: > > What is it with some family members that do this? > > (One "collects" addresses to add to his private joke alias.) > [..] OR people who still haven't figured out how to strip > the headers and attribution carats. Bingo. The Ranger |
"The Ranger" > said:
> Damsel > wrote in message > ... > > "The Ranger" > said: > > > > I recieved a joke I'd sent on from an account I had back > > > in 1991 with enough forwards (thank you to all the AOL > > > forwarders) to essentially make it [a plain text email] rival > > > a full-fledged PowerPoint presentation. <G> You mean you got one back with your name as the original sender??? > > > What is it with some family members that do this? (One > > > "collects" addresses to add to his private joke alias.) > > > > I hate that! I've had people I've never heard of sending me > > jokes in my private accounts. They're usually pretty good > > about removing my name from their address book, though. > > > > I wonder if your relative knows how unappreciated that is. > > In my case, those that continue to do this haven't a clue regarding > forwarding, stripping headers, or even what "bcc" is for! Holy cats ... maybe people should be required to pass competency tests prior to being issued an internet account. ;) Carol -- Coming at you live, from beautiful Lake Woebegon |
"The Ranger" > said:
> I'd've Hey, I like that word! I say it all the time, but have never seen it in print before! :) Carol -- Coming at you live, from beautiful Lake Woebegon |
Damsel > wrote in message
... > "The Ranger" > said: > > Damsel > wrote in message ... > > > "The Ranger" > said: > > > > I recieved a joke I'd sent on from an account I had back > > > > in 1991 with enough forwards (thank you to all the AOL > > > > forwarders) to essentially make it [a plain text email] rival > > > > a full-fledged PowerPoint presentation. <G> > You mean you got one back with your name as the original > sender??? Yes indeed. I send one copy myself and bcc'd three friends (with similar warped senses of humor). One of those friends was using aol at the time. She sent it off to a few people and so on and so on... In 1998, I received it from one of my cousins (unaware of who "The Ranger" was). It was a Rod Serling moment. The Ranger |
"The Ranger" > said:
> Damsel wrote... > > > > > "The Ranger" said: > > > > > I recieved a joke I'd sent on from an account I had back > > > > > in 1991 with enough forwards (thank you to all the AOL > > > > > forwarders) to essentially make it [a plain text email] rival > > > > > a full-fledged PowerPoint presentation. <G> > > > You mean you got one back with your name as the original > > sender??? > > Yes indeed. I send one copy myself and bcc'd three friends (with similar > warped senses of humor). One of those friends was using aol at the time. > She sent it off to a few people and so on and so on... In 1998, I > received it from one of my cousins (unaware of who "The Ranger" was). It > was a Rod Serling moment. How many times does *that* happen in a lifetime?!? Do you still have the joke? I'm fully warped. Carol -- Coming at you live, from beautiful Lake Woebegon |
The Ranger wrote:
> Damsel > wrote in message > ... > >>"The Ranger" > said: >> >>>Damsel > wrote in message > > ... > >>>>"The Ranger" > said: >>>> >>>>>I recieved a joke I'd sent on from an account I had back >>>>>in 1991 with enough forwards (thank you to all the AOL >>>>>forwarders) to essentially make it [a plain text email] rival >>>>>a full-fledged PowerPoint presentation. <G> > > >>You mean you got one back with your name as the original >>sender??? > > > Yes indeed. I send one copy myself and bcc'd three friends (with similar > warped senses of humor). One of those friends was using aol at the time. > She sent it off to a few people and so on and so on... In 1998, I > received it from one of my cousins (unaware of who "The Ranger" was). It > was a Rod Serling moment. > > The Ranger > > this sounds like the beginning of an internet urban legend :) -- saerah "It's not a gimmick, it's an incentive."- asterbark, afca aware of the manifold possibilities of the future "I think there's a clause in the Shaman's and Jujumen's Local #57 Union contract that they have to have reciprocity for each other's shop rules." -König Prüß |
|
Damsel > wrote in message
... > Do you still have the joke? I'm fully warped. Yep; gotta find it on one of the floppies. It might be a while but I'll send it to you. The Ranger |
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 07:32:39 -0500, Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> In article >, > wrote: > > Holy cats ... maybe people should be required to pass competency tests > > prior to being issued an internet account. ;) > > > > Carol > > There'd be no one posting here. Hey! I "resemble" that remark. |
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 22:11:41 GMT, rosie read n' post wrote:
> A forwarded joke. So my friends, next time if you get a joke, > don't think that you've been sent just another forwarded joke, > but that you've been thought of today and your friend on the > other end of your computer wanted to send you a smile. I appreciate a good joke and don't care if there's a personal message attached or not. What I don't appreciate is one that still has all the "garbage" on it. I especially don't like any of the ones that want it sent back to the sender. Talk about smarmy... that's it! |
"Sheldon" > wrote in message
oups.com... > > > sf wrote: >> Sheldon wrote: <<snip all the goofy stuff>> > That all seems so complicated. I use but one address, and AOL has a > pretty good spam filter. If I receive mail from an address that's not > in my address book it goes into the possible spam folder, I try to > check these for legitimate mail, like those from companys where I > subscribe to their news letters but if someone changes their addie to > something unrecognizable I will more than likely delete it. <<snip more goofy stuff>> I get it now! Your are an AOL'er! Yer just one step up from the WEBTV people! Sheldon, take your anti-teurets meds, please before you post any more! > Sheldon Bret ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter