The controversy
 

"Bob (this one)" wrote:
>
> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> > David Smith wrote:
> >
> >>"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>>>I have appealed to Dr. Chung to help the group.
> >>>
> >>>Yes, you have. The Lord's purpose for me here is to inform. Whether
> >>>this information helps a person will depend on that person's judgment.
> >>>
> >>Perhaps it depends on the quality of your information.
> >
> > This would be the case were we among the truthful.
>
> Let's parse this exchange. Chung says his job, as decreed by the lord
> that Chung gets secret messages from, is to inform. The lord has made it
> clear to Chung that what he says and how he says it is just peachy with
> the celestial presence.
>
> And the job of communicating that vital information has nothing to do
> with Chung's ways and means, its totally up to that person he's dumping
> his OCD on.
>
> When the quality of Chung's information and, by inference, methods of
> communication are questioned, Chug replies with one of his grandest non
> sequiturs yet, that anyone who doesn't get his messages is untruthful.
>
> Anybody got any questions about all this?

Certainly.

How would you explain John 6:65 ?


At His service,

Andrew

--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist

**
Suggested Reading:
(1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?G1D5217EA
(2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?B5CE25FFA
(3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A
(4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A
(5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
(6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A
(7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129