FoodBanter.com

FoodBanter.com (https://www.foodbanter.com/)
-   General Cooking (https://www.foodbanter.com/general-cooking/)
-   -   MEASURING tips and techniques (including "scant" ) (https://www.foodbanter.com/general-cooking/53062-measuring-tips-techniques-including.html)

Nancree 01-02-2005 04:00 AM

MEASURING tips and techniques (including "scant" )
 
"Scant - A scant measurement indicates that you should use slightly less than
the actual measure."

http://www.hormel.com/templates/know...temid=7&hlite=
true&id=584&querytext=Measuring

Nancree

-L. 01-02-2005 06:39 AM


Nancree wrote:
> "Scant - A scant measurement indicates that you should use slightly

less than
> the actual measure."
>


Well, duh! Does anyone really want cooking tips from HORMEL? Their
food has to be some of the worst on the market.

I have never measured anything while cooking - learned to cook by eye
(at about age 11) and have done so ever since. I do sometimes measure
when baking, if it isn't something I make often. I don't bake a lot,
though.

-L.


JimLane 01-02-2005 08:32 AM

-L. wrote:
> Nancree wrote:
>
>>"Scant - A scant measurement indicates that you should use slightly

>
> less than
>
>>the actual measure."
>>

>
>
> Well, duh! Does anyone really want cooking tips from HORMEL? Their
> food has to be some of the worst on the market.
>
> I have never measured anything while cooking - learned to cook by eye
> (at about age 11) and have done so ever since. I do sometimes measure
> when baking, if it isn't something I make often. I don't bake a lot,
> though.
>
> -L.
>


Well la de da for you. It does provide a definition for "scant,"
something I did not see you put up. Or did I miss your post?


jim

jmcquown 01-02-2005 09:19 AM

Nancree wrote:
> "Scant - A scant measurement indicates that you should use slightly
> less than the actual measure."
>
> http://www.hormel.com/templates/know...temid=7&hlite=
> true&id=584&querytext=Measuring
>
> Nancree


Yep, a scant cup means slightly less than 8 oz. My grandmothers didn't
measure things exactly and, in fact, often said "fill your palm" for a
measure of salt or baking soda. Grandma Mac's recipes often called for
"butter the size of a walnut" which basically meant about 2 Tbs. butter.
Gotta learn to translate :)

Jill



Peter Aitken 01-02-2005 02:31 PM

"-L." > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Nancree wrote:
>> "Scant - A scant measurement indicates that you should use slightly

> less than
>> the actual measure."
>>

>
> Well, duh! Does anyone really want cooking tips from HORMEL? Their
> food has to be some of the worst on the market.
>
> I have never measured anything while cooking - learned to cook by eye
> (at about age 11) and have done so ever since. I do sometimes measure
> when baking, if it isn't something I make often. I don't bake a lot,
> though.
>
> -L.
>


You *do* measure - with your eye! Sometimes the best way.


--
Peter Aitken

Remove the crap from my email address before using.



-L. 01-02-2005 05:46 PM


JimLane wrote:
>
> Well la de da for you. It does provide a definition for "scant,"
> something I did not see you put up. Or did I miss your post?
>
>
> jim


Do you really need a definition for "scant"? Isn't is
self-explanatory?

-L.


Default User 01-02-2005 05:52 PM

jmcquown wrote:

> Yep, a scant cup means slightly less than 8 oz. My grandmothers

didn't
> measure things exactly and, in fact, often said "fill your palm" for

a
> measure of salt or baking soda. Grandma Mac's recipes often called

for
> "butter the size of a walnut" which basically meant about 2 Tbs.

butter.
> Gotta learn to translate :)



I recall reading in The Joy of Cooking that they conciously got rid of
all the "scant" and "heaping" type measurement directions in favor of
precise ones. That sometimes led to rather odd ones like, "one cup
flour minus one tablespoon" and such.




Brian


jmcquown 01-02-2005 07:30 PM

Default User wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
>
>> Yep, a scant cup means slightly less than 8 oz. My grandmothers
>> didn't measure things exactly and, in fact, often said "fill your
>> palm" for a measure of salt or baking soda. Grandma Mac's recipes
>> often called for "butter the size of a walnut" which basically meant
>> about 2 Tbs. butter. Gotta learn to translate :)

>
>
> I recall reading in The Joy of Cooking that they conciously got rid of
> all the "scant" and "heaping" type measurement directions in favor of
> precise ones. That sometimes led to rather odd ones like, "one cup
> flour minus one tablespoon" and such.
>
> Brian


That's kind of silly, but I've seen those measurement reductions myself.
I'm pretty sure my grandmothers didn't have any cookbooks - at least, I
never saw one in either of their homes. I rarely measure anything unless
I'm making rice or bread.

Jill



Sheldon 01-02-2005 08:07 PM


-L. wrote:
>
> Well, duh! Does anyone really want cooking tips from HORMEL? Their
> food has to be some of the worst on the market.


How little you know. Hormel ain't just Spam, not that Spam is an awful
product, I happen to enjoy it occasionaly and it's the national food of
Hawaii. But if were to go to hormel.com and click on Products you'd
see a wide variety, many of which are represntitive of the best in the
world, to wit Hormel Di Lusso Genoa Salami (no other even comes close)
and Hormel La Rosa Pepperoni is nonpareil.

Btw, "scant" defines your IQ.

scant
a : barely or scarcely sufficient; especially : not quite coming up to
a stated measure b : lacking in amplitude or quantity
---

Sheldon


Sheldon 01-02-2005 08:21 PM


-L. wrote:
>
> Well, duh! Does anyone really want cooking tips from HORMEL? Their
> food has to be some of the worst on the market.


How little you know. Hormael ain't jsut Spam, not that's it's awful, I
happen to like it occasionally and it's the national food of Hawaii.
If one goes to the Hormel.com web site adn click on products they'd see
a wide array, many of which set a standard for the best in the world,
to wit: Di Lusso Genoa Salami, La Rosa pepperoni, etal.

Btw, "scant" defines your [culinary] IQ.

scant
a : barely or scarcely sufficient; especially : not quite coming up to
a stated measure b : lacking in amplitude or quantity
---

Sheldon


aem 01-02-2005 08:40 PM


jmcquown wrote:
> [snip] I rarely measure anything unless
> I'm making rice or bread.
>
> Jill


To simplify measuring for rice, you can keep your rice in a canister
and use a plastic measure as the scoop (mine's =BD Cup, which I will
fill 3 or 4 times.) That takes care of the rice part. Then the next
time you've measured in the water, put your finger down in the water to
touch the top of the rice. Note the height of the water: for example,
in the pot I always use for the quantity I usually make, the water
rises to just above the first knuckle. That's all you need from then
on. Saves getting out a measuring cup each time.

As to other measurements, recipes are just a guide aren't they? If I
know my baking powder or my dried herbs are a little old, I'll use a
little more. If the wine is particularly flavorful I'll use a little
more (in both the pot and the glass), and if the coffee roast is really
dark I'll use a little less.

-aem


scrooge 01-02-2005 09:10 PM


jmcquown wrote:
<SNIP>
Grandma Mac's recipes often called for
> "butter the size of a walnut" which basically meant about 2 Tbs.

butter.
> Gotta learn to translate :)
>
> Jill


My gramma's recipes called for the same amount of butter. But my
favorite was one of her cookie recipes which called for "6 to 8 gurgles
of molasses"!

Scrooge


Gregory Morrow 01-02-2005 10:24 PM


Sheldon wrote:

> -L. wrote:
> >
> > Well, duh! Does anyone really want cooking tips from HORMEL? Their
> > food has to be some of the worst on the market.

>
> How little you know. Hormel ain't just Spam, not that Spam is an awful
> product, I happen to enjoy it occasionaly and it's the national food of
> Hawaii.



Just bought some...hmmm...Spam sammiches for din - din tonight sounds pretty
good I think...

--
Best
Greg



jmcquown 01-02-2005 11:06 PM

scrooge wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
> <SNIP>
> Grandma Mac's recipes often called for
>> "butter the size of a walnut" which basically meant about 2 Tbs.
>> butter. Gotta learn to translate :)
>>
>> Jill

>
> My gramma's recipes called for the same amount of butter. But my
> favorite was one of her cookie recipes which called for "6 to 8
> gurgles of molasses"!
>
> Scrooge


ROFL! Well, yeah, it does "gurgle" when you pour it ;)

Jill



Damsel in dis Dress 01-02-2005 11:20 PM

On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:06:33 -0600, "jmcquown" >
wrote:

>scrooge wrote:
>>
>> My gramma's recipes called for the same amount of butter. But my
>> favorite was one of her cookie recipes which called for "6 to 8
>> gurgles of molasses"!
>>
>> Scrooge

>
>ROFL! Well, yeah, it does "gurgle" when you pour it ;)


My mom used "glugs."

Carol
--
"Years ago my mother used to say to me... She'd say,
'In this world Elwood, you must be oh-so smart or oh-so pleasant.'
Well, for years I was smart.... I recommend pleasant. You may quote me."

*James Stewart* in the 1950 movie, _Harvey_

-L. 02-02-2005 12:52 AM


Sheldon wrote:
> -L. wrote:
> >
> > Well, duh! Does anyone really want cooking tips from HORMEL?

Their
> > food has to be some of the worst on the market.

>
> How little you know. Hormel ain't just Spam, not that Spam is an

awful
> product, I happen to enjoy it occasionaly


Why could one "enjoy" an "awful" product?

and it's the national food of
> Hawaii. But if were to go to hormel.com and click on Products you'd
> see a wide variety, many of which are represntitive of the best in

the
> world, to wit Hormel Di Lusso Genoa Salami (no other even comes

close)
> and Hormel La Rosa Pepperoni is nonpareil.


We don't eat that stuff. Heart attack in a stick. Not to mention
Hormel's OSHA and Union violations.

>
> Btw, "scant" defines your IQ.

As always, you're so nice, Sheldon.

-L.


BOB 02-02-2005 01:08 AM

-L. wrote:
> JimLane wrote:
>>
>> Well la de da for you. It does provide a definition for
>> "scant," something I did not see you put up. Or did I
>> miss your post?
>>
>>
>> jim

>
> Do you really need a definition for "scant"? Isn't is
> self-explanatory?
>
> -L.


Ummm?
There was a discussion in another thread with people asking what the
definition was. No one actually knew, and several people asked.

Maybe that's why Jim asked if he missed your post?

Maybe you were practicing your measuring techniques and missed the thread?

BOB



-L. 02-02-2005 07:51 AM


BOB wrote:
> Ummm?
> There was a discussion in another thread with people asking what the
> definition was. No one actually knew, and several people asked.


Oh, ok. I missed that one! You mean I actually knew something some
others didn't? LOL...I wasn't tryingto be a PITA - I seriously thought
it was self-explanatory.

>
> Maybe that's why Jim asked if he missed your post?
>
> Maybe you were practicing your measuring techniques and missed the

thread?

Actually I was. I cooked a whole spread yesterday - roasted ham,
turkey, mashed potatoes, turkey gravy, dressing, broccoli, and
buttermilk biscuits. That was on top of the cuke/tomato/green salad I
made for lunch. :)

-L.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter