FoodBanter.com

FoodBanter.com (https://www.foodbanter.com/)
-   General Cooking (https://www.foodbanter.com/general-cooking/)
-   -   would you rather have juicy steak or babyback ribs? (https://www.foodbanter.com/general-cooking/52532-would-you-rather-have.html)

big macbeth 26-01-2005 06:08 AM

would you rather have juicy steak or babyback ribs?
 
i'd take the ribs but i don't eat pork.


don freeman 26-01-2005 06:41 AM


> i'd take the ribs but i don't eat pork.
>


I'd agree. Back ribs are a bigger treat than a steak.

I only eat back ribs about four times a year, and so I don't parboil
them. Parboiling is for wimps. For the next day or so, I walk around
feeling full of pork fat, but it all seems to be worth it.


[email protected] 26-01-2005 10:18 AM

and the dylan content is:

"I'm longin' for that sweet fat that sticks to your ribs"

1/2 rack of baby back ribs with "i'd gladly pay you tuesday for a
hamburger today" parboil.


*****General 26-01-2005 04:32 PM

Well up until last week it would have been the ribs but now that I've had
shark steak, there really is no competition anymore.



Steve Calvin 26-01-2005 04:36 PM

*****General wrote:
> Well up until last week it would have been the ribs but now that I've had
> shark steak, there really is no competition anymore.
>
>


*crossposting deleted *

Boy, that's a tough question! Can I have both? ;-)

--
Steve

Every job is a self-portrait of the person who did it.
Autograph your work with excellence.


Vox Humana 26-01-2005 05:45 PM


"big macbeth" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> i'd take the ribs but i don't eat pork.
>


I'll take the steak. Too many variable with pork ribs. You might get a
slab that was boiled!



BOB 26-01-2005 07:51 PM

Steve Calvin wrote:
> *****General wrote:
>> Well up until last week it would have been the ribs but
>> now that I've had shark steak, there really is no
>> competition anymore.

>
> *crossposting deleted *

Good!
>
> Boy, that's a tough question! Can I have both? ;-)
>

Or all three...maybe not the same meal.

BOB
with ribs on the Kamado...going to be a good meal in about 4 hours



Simon 26-01-2005 07:57 PM


"Vox Humana" > wrote in message
...
>
> "big macbeth" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
>> i'd take the ribs but i don't eat pork.
>>

>
> I'll take the steak. Too many variable with pork ribs. You might get a
> slab that was boiled!


Sounds better than sea slug!



don freeman 26-01-2005 09:04 PM



> Well up until last week it would have been the ribs but now that I've had
> shark steak, there really is no competition anymore.
>
>

But was the shark steak juicy?


*****General 26-01-2005 10:27 PM


"don freeman" > wrote in message
news:YBTJd.181471$8l.138640@pd7tw1no...
>
>
>> Well up until last week it would have been the ribs but now that I've had
>> shark steak, there really is no competition anymore.

> But was the shark steak juicy?
>


About as juicy as a chicken steak, but nicer.



Shawn Hearn 27-01-2005 06:36 AM

In article .com>,
"big macbeth" > wrote:

> i'd take the ribs but i don't eat pork.


Depends on what I am in the mood for.

[email protected] 27-01-2005 03:26 PM

In rec.food.cooking Shawn Hearn > wrote:
: In article .com>,
: "big macbeth" > wrote:

:> i'd take the ribs but i don't eat pork.

: Depends on what I am in the mood for.

Spare ribs have more flavor and meat than baby backs. Baby backs
are popular because of marketing hype and because it doesn't take
a restaraunt as long to prepare them.

don freeman 27-01-2005 03:49 PM


> Spare ribs have more flavor and meat than baby backs. Baby backs
> are popular because of marketing hype and because it doesn't take
> a restaraunt as long to prepare them.



I've always thought of baby back ribs as spareribs. They seem to have
more meat than the other spare ribs, which have a lot more fat and
longer, bigger bones. The flavour always seemed better too.


Emil 27-01-2005 07:55 PM

Baby back is from the porkloin rib chop area.
Small bones [riblets] are from the porkloin loin chop area.
Spare ribs are from the BostonButt [shoulder] + large rib area [below] the
backribs..


--
Emil

"don freeman" > wrote in message
news:D48Kd.189481$6l.177469@pd7tw2no...
>
>> Spare ribs have more flavor and meat than baby backs. Baby backs
>> are popular because of marketing hype and because it doesn't take
>> a restaraunt as long to prepare them.

>
>
> I've always thought of baby back ribs as spareribs. They seem to have more
> meat than the other spare ribs, which have a lot more fat and longer,
> bigger bones. The flavour always seemed better too.
>




don freeman 27-01-2005 08:53 PM



> Baby back is from the porkloin rib chop area.
> Small bones [riblets] are from the porkloin loin chop area.
> Spare ribs are from the BostonButt [shoulder] + large rib area [below] the
> backribs..
>


Thanks for this info. This is very interesting. I've noticed, if I get
baby back ribs that are too meaty, they taste like pork chops.

I must investigate real spare ribs. But aren't they much fattier than
back ribs?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter