![]() |
Recipe newsgroup
Obviously all of us love to eat and use newsgroups. For those of you
who have not tried out this recipe NG, it is great. Moderated so no spam and great recipes. Try out: rec.food.recipes Happy Holiday eating! Mark Ferrante |
Ferrante wrote:
> Obviously all of us love to eat and use newsgroups. For those of you > who have not tried out this recipe NG, it is great. Moderated so no > spam and great recipes. Try out: > > rec.food.recipes > > Happy Holiday eating! > > Mark Ferrante I found it to be terribly dull actually. I guess I like a little conversation with my recipes. Goomba. |
Ferrante wrote:
> Obviously all of us love to eat and use newsgroups. For those of you > who have not tried out this recipe NG, it is great. Moderated so no > spam and great recipes. Try out: > > rec.food.recipes > > Happy Holiday eating! > > Mark Ferrante I found it to be terribly dull actually. I guess I like a little conversation with my recipes. Goomba. |
Goomba38 wrote:
> Ferrante wrote: > >> Obviously all of us love to eat and use newsgroups. For those of you >> who have not tried out this recipe NG, it is great. Moderated so no >> spam and great recipes. Try out: >> >> rec.food.recipes >> >> Happy Holiday eating! >> >> Mark Ferrante > > I found it to be terribly dull actually. I guess I > like a little conversation with my recipes. > Goomba. I agree! Might be some great recipes there but you can't reply to them with any real success. Jill |
Goomba38 wrote:
> Ferrante wrote: > >> Obviously all of us love to eat and use newsgroups. For those of you >> who have not tried out this recipe NG, it is great. Moderated so no >> spam and great recipes. Try out: >> >> rec.food.recipes >> >> Happy Holiday eating! >> >> Mark Ferrante > > I found it to be terribly dull actually. I guess I > like a little conversation with my recipes. > Goomba. I agree! Might be some great recipes there but you can't reply to them with any real success. Jill |
jmcquown wrote:
> Goomba38 wrote: > >>Ferrante wrote: >> >> >>>Obviously all of us love to eat and use newsgroups. For those of you >>>who have not tried out this recipe NG, it is great. Moderated so no >>>spam and great recipes. Try out: >>> >>>rec.food.recipes >>> >>>Happy Holiday eating! >>> >>>Mark Ferrante >> >>I found it to be terribly dull actually. I guess I >>like a little conversation with my recipes. >>Goomba. > > > I agree! Might be some great recipes there but you can't reply to them with > any real success. > > Jill > > Agreed. I gave up on that group years ago. -- Steve Did you ever notice that when you blow in a dogs face they get mad at you but when you take them for a ride in the car they stick their head out of the window? |
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 14:28:44 -0600, "jmcquown" >
scribbled some thoughts: >Goomba38 wrote: >> Ferrante wrote: >> >>> Obviously all of us love to eat and use newsgroups. For those of you >>> who have not tried out this recipe NG, it is great. Moderated so no >>> spam and great recipes. Try out: >>> >>> rec.food.recipes >>> >>> Happy Holiday eating! >>> >>> Mark Ferrante >> >> I found it to be terribly dull actually. I guess I >> like a little conversation with my recipes. >> Goomba. > >I agree! Might be some great recipes there but you can't reply to them with >any real success. > >Jill > You can, but they allow it ti be either another recipe or a suggestion, definitely not OT, unless you can somehow bypass/forge the approval header. -- Sincerely, | NOTE: Best viewed in a fixed pitch font | (©) (©) Andrew H. Carter | ------ooo--(_)--ooo------ d(-_-)b | /// \\\ |
In article >,
Ferrante > wrote: > Obviously all of us love to eat and use newsgroups. For those of you > who have not tried out this recipe NG, it is great. Moderated so no > spam and great recipes. Try out: > > rec.food.recipes I used to read that group, but I found *way* too many bad recipes. These ranged from unsafe (infused oils, cakes baked in a jar) to simply crappy. I don't trust the recipes they post there; it seems that many of the posts in response to requests result from simply Googling the issue and posting the first hit or two. -- to respond (OT only), change "spamless.invalid" to "optonline.net" <http://www.thecoffeefaq.com/> |
In article >,
Ferrante > wrote: > Obviously all of us love to eat and use newsgroups. For those of you > who have not tried out this recipe NG, it is great. Moderated so no > spam and great recipes. Try out: > > rec.food.recipes I used to read that group, but I found *way* too many bad recipes. These ranged from unsafe (infused oils, cakes baked in a jar) to simply crappy. I don't trust the recipes they post there; it seems that many of the posts in response to requests result from simply Googling the issue and posting the first hit or two. -- to respond (OT only), change "spamless.invalid" to "optonline.net" <http://www.thecoffeefaq.com/> |
Ferrante wrote:
> Obviously all of us love to eat and use newsgroups. For those of you > who have not tried out this recipe NG, it is great. Moderated so no > spam and great recipes. Try out: Count me as one who does not love to eat newsgroups. --Lia |
Julia Altshuler wrote:
> Ferrante wrote: >> Obviously all of us love to eat and use newsgroups. For those of you >> who have not tried out this recipe NG, it is great. Moderated so no >> spam and great recipes. Try out: > > > Count me as one who does not love to eat newsgroups. > --Lia LOL! Me too. BOB |
Julia Altshuler wrote:
> Ferrante wrote: >> Obviously all of us love to eat and use newsgroups. For those of you >> who have not tried out this recipe NG, it is great. Moderated so no >> spam and great recipes. Try out: > > > Count me as one who does not love to eat newsgroups. > --Lia LOL! Me too. BOB |
Steve Calvin wrote:
> jmcquown wrote: >> Goomba38 wrote: >> >>> Ferrante wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Obviously all of us love to eat and use newsgroups. For those of >>>> you >>>> who have not tried out this recipe NG, it is great. Moderated so no >>>> spam and great recipes. Try out: >>>> >>>> rec.food.recipes >>>> >>>> Happy Holiday eating! >>>> >>>> Mark Ferrante >>> >>> I found it to be terribly dull actually. I guess I >>> like a little conversation with my recipes. >>> Goomba. >> >> >> I agree! Might be some great recipes there but you can't reply to >> them with any real success. >> >> Jill >> >> > Agreed. I gave up on that group years ago. Me too. This is kind of funny. kili |
Steve Calvin wrote:
> jmcquown wrote: >> Goomba38 wrote: >> >>> Ferrante wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Obviously all of us love to eat and use newsgroups. For those of >>>> you >>>> who have not tried out this recipe NG, it is great. Moderated so no >>>> spam and great recipes. Try out: >>>> >>>> rec.food.recipes >>>> >>>> Happy Holiday eating! >>>> >>>> Mark Ferrante >>> >>> I found it to be terribly dull actually. I guess I >>> like a little conversation with my recipes. >>> Goomba. >> >> >> I agree! Might be some great recipes there but you can't reply to >> them with any real success. >> >> Jill >> >> > Agreed. I gave up on that group years ago. Me too. This is kind of funny. kili |
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 11:16:51 GMT, "kilikini"
> wrote: > Steve Calvin wrote: > > jmcquown wrote: > >> Goomba38 wrote: > >> > >>> Ferrante wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Obviously all of us love to eat and use newsgroups. For those of > >>>> you > >>>> who have not tried out this recipe NG, it is great. Moderated so no > >>>> spam and great recipes. Try out: > >>>> > >>>> rec.food.recipes > >>>> > >>>> Happy Holiday eating! > >>>> > >>>> Mark Ferrante > >>> > >>> I found it to be terribly dull actually. I guess I > >>> like a little conversation with my recipes. > >>> Goomba. > >> > >> > >> I agree! Might be some great recipes there but you can't reply to > >> them with any real success. > >> > >> Jill > >> > >> > > Agreed. I gave up on that group years ago. > > Me too. This is kind of funny. > :) We're too chatty to take rfr for long. I rarely even browse it anymore. However, it's a good ng to "lurk" in for those who grumble about all the rfc topics that aren't food related or spin off into something OT. sf Practice safe eating - always use condiments |
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 11:16:51 GMT, "kilikini"
> wrote: > Steve Calvin wrote: > > jmcquown wrote: > >> Goomba38 wrote: > >> > >>> Ferrante wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Obviously all of us love to eat and use newsgroups. For those of > >>>> you > >>>> who have not tried out this recipe NG, it is great. Moderated so no > >>>> spam and great recipes. Try out: > >>>> > >>>> rec.food.recipes > >>>> > >>>> Happy Holiday eating! > >>>> > >>>> Mark Ferrante > >>> > >>> I found it to be terribly dull actually. I guess I > >>> like a little conversation with my recipes. > >>> Goomba. > >> > >> > >> I agree! Might be some great recipes there but you can't reply to > >> them with any real success. > >> > >> Jill > >> > >> > > Agreed. I gave up on that group years ago. > > Me too. This is kind of funny. > :) We're too chatty to take rfr for long. I rarely even browse it anymore. However, it's a good ng to "lurk" in for those who grumble about all the rfc topics that aren't food related or spin off into something OT. sf Practice safe eating - always use condiments |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter