Sick of GoogleGroups
 

On 9/2/2020 5:43 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 11:36:19 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 >
> wrote:
>>>>>> In the end, everybody will be using Google Groups. Yoose guys just don't know it.
>>>>>

Are you being paid by Google?

>> The difference between yoose and me is that you still think this is the 1990's.
>
The difference is 'yoose' (dsi1/David) keep trying to talk like you're
from Brooklyn and tell everyone else we don't know what we're talking
about. We all know what year it is. We also know other ways to access RFC.

> It's Usenet, you idiot. nntp protocols haven't changed since day 1.
> Only an imbecile like you would think Google groups is some sort of
> advancement, when it fact it's quite the opposite.
>
Minor tweaks, maybe. ;) Google Groups sucks. Period.

It's the realm where people who will never appear again find a post from
2009 only to reply "I agree". The Google Groupers are the lost ones.

Jill

Sick of GoogleGroups
 

jmcquown wrote:
> On 9/2/2020 5:43 PM, Je�us wrote:
>> On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 11:36:19 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
>> >
>> wrote:
>>>>>>> In the end, everybody will be using Google Groups. Yoose
>>>>>>> guys just don't know it.
>>>>>>
>
> Are you being paid by Google?
>
>>> The difference between yoose and me is that you still think this
>>> is the 1990's.
>>
> The difference is 'yoose' (dsi1/David) keep trying to talk like
> you're from Brooklyn and tell everyone else we don't know what
> we're talking about.* We all know what year it is.* We also know
> other ways to access RFC.
>
>> It's Usenet, you idiot. nntp protocols haven't changed since day 1.
>> Only an imbecile like you would think Google groups is some sort of
>> advancement, when it fact it's quite the opposite.
>>
> Minor tweaks, maybe. ;) Google Groups sucks. Period.
>
> It's the realm where people who will never appear again find a post
> from 2009 only to reply "I agree".* The Google Groupers are the
> lost ones.
>
> Jill

Is google groups even worse than aioe?

Sick of GoogleGroups
 

Hank Rogers wrote:

> jmcquown wrote:
> > On 9/2/2020 5:43 PM, Je�ż�us wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 11:36:19 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
> >> >
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>> In the end, everybody will be using Google Groups. Yoose
> >>>>>>> guys just don't know it.
> >>>>>>
> >
> > Are you being paid by Google?
> >
> >>> The difference between yoose and me is that you still think this
> >>> is the 1990's.
> >>
> > The difference is 'yoose' (dsi1/David) keep trying to talk like
> > you're from Brooklyn and tell everyone else we don't know what
> > we're talking about.Â* We all know what year it is.Â* We also know
> > other ways to access RFC.
> >
> >> It's Usenet, you idiot. nntp protocols haven't changed since day 1.
> >> Only an imbecile like you would think Google groups is some sort of
> >> advancement, when it fact it's quite the opposite.
> >>
> > Minor tweaks, maybe. ;) Google Groups sucks. Period.
> >
> > It's the realm where people who will never appear again find a post
> > from 2009 only to reply "I agree".Â* The Google Groupers are the
> > lost ones.
> >
> > Jill
>
> Is google groups even worse than aioe?


If fish were scientists would they be capable of discovering water?

Sick of GoogleGroups
 

Bruce wrote:
>
> Hank Rogers wrote:
>
> > jmcquown wrote:
> > > On 9/2/2020 5:43 PM, Je�ż�us wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 11:36:19 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
> > >> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> In the end, everybody will be using Google Groups. Yoose
> > >>>>>>> guys just don't know it.
> > >>>>>>
> > >
> > > Are you being paid by Google?
> > >
> > >>> The difference between yoose and me is that you still think this
> > >>> is the 1990's.
> > >>
> > > The difference is 'yoose' (dsi1/David) keep trying to talk like
> > > you're from Brooklyn and tell everyone else we don't know what
> > > we're talking about. We all know what year it is. We also know
> > > other ways to access RFC.
> > >
> > >> It's Usenet, you idiot. nntp protocols haven't changed since day 1.
> > >> Only an imbecile like you would think Google groups is some sort of
> > >> advancement, when it fact it's quite the opposite.
> > >>
> > > Minor tweaks, maybe. ;) Google Groups sucks. Period.
> > >
> > > It's the realm where people who will never appear again find a post
> > > from 2009 only to reply "I agree". The Google Groupers are the
> > > lost ones.
> > >
> > > Jill
> >
> > Is google groups even worse than aioe?
>
> If fish were scientists would they be capable of discovering water?

If scientists were fish would you eat them, Bruce?

Sick of GoogleGroups
 

Gary wrote:
> Bruce wrote:
>>
>> Hank Rogers wrote:
>>
>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>> On 9/2/2020 5:43 PM, Je�ż�us wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 11:36:19 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
>>>>> >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In the end, everybody will be using Google Groups. Yoose
>>>>>>>>>> guys just don't know it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Are you being paid by Google?
>>>>
>>>>>> The difference between yoose and me is that you still think this
>>>>>> is the 1990's.
>>>>>
>>>> The difference is 'yoose' (dsi1/David) keep trying to talk like
>>>> you're from Brooklyn and tell everyone else we don't know what
>>>> we're talking about. We all know what year it is. We also know
>>>> other ways to access RFC.
>>>>
>>>>> It's Usenet, you idiot. nntp protocols haven't changed since day 1.
>>>>> Only an imbecile like you would think Google groups is some sort of
>>>>> advancement, when it fact it's quite the opposite.
>>>>>
>>>> Minor tweaks, maybe. ;) Google Groups sucks. Period.
>>>>
>>>> It's the realm where people who will never appear again find a post
>>>> from 2009 only to reply "I agree". The Google Groupers are the
>>>> lost ones.
>>>>
>>>> Jill
>>>
>>> Is google groups even worse than aioe?
>>
>> If fish were scientists would they be capable of discovering water?
>
> If scientists were fish would you eat them, Bruce?
>

Nah, he'd give 'em a quick whiff and throw them back.