Â*As some may recall , we recently bought a rotisserie unit at a yard
sale , and I tried it out . The chicken was good , though I didn't cook
it long enough at first . Any way , I simmered the meat off the carcass
and froze the resulting broth/meat for later use . Last night was later
, and it was awesome . I added a few sliced fresh carrots and tbsp or 2
of dried celery in addition to half a box of rotini , and my wife told
me it was one of my better soup efforts . She makes better soup than me
(I ? grammer police ?) , but then we ate a lot of soup in years past
when kids were little and money was tighter .

--
Snag
Yes , I'm old
and crochety - and armed .
Get outta my woods !

On Monday, July 15, 2019 at 8:39:11 AM UTC-4, Terry Coombs wrote:
> Â*As some may recall , we recently bought a rotisserie unit at a yard
> sale , and I tried it out . The chicken was good , though I didn't cook
> it long enough at first . Any way , I simmered the meat off the carcass
> and froze the resulting broth/meat for later use . Last night was later
> , and it was awesome . I added a few sliced fresh carrots and tbsp or 2
> of dried celery in addition to half a box of rotini , and my wife told
> me it was one of my better soup efforts . She makes better soup than me
> (I ? grammer police ?) , but then we ate a lot of soup in years past
> when kids were little and money was tighter .
>
> --
> Snag
> Yes , I'm old
> and crochety - and armed .
> Get outta my woods !

That sounds most excellent. A good soup can also me made with roast turkey carcass, and roast duck carcass.

On 7/15/2019 7:44 AM, A Moose in Love wrote:
> On Monday, July 15, 2019 at 8:39:11 AM UTC-4, Terry Coombs wrote:
>> Â*As some may recall , we recently bought a rotisserie unit at a yard
>> sale , and I tried it out . The chicken was good , though I didn't cook
>> it long enough at first . Any way , I simmered the meat off the carcass
>> and froze the resulting broth/meat for later use . Last night was later
>> , and it was awesome . I added a few sliced fresh carrots and tbsp or 2
>> of dried celery in addition to half a box of rotini , and my wife told
>> me it was one of my better soup efforts . She makes better soup than me
>> (I ? grammer police ?) , but then we ate a lot of soup in years past
>> when kids were little and money was tighter .
>>
>> --
>> Snag
>> Yes , I'm old
>> and crochety - and armed .
>> Get outta my woods !
> That sounds most excellent. A good soup can also me made with roast turkey carcass, and roast duck carcass.

Â* And leftover beef roast , and ham (with beans) . I've never cooked a
duck , but you're right about turkey . Has a unique flavor all it's own
- smoked turkey is good too . Hmmm , smoked turkey with white beans ...
may have to try that !

--
Snag
Yes , I'm old
and crochety - and armed .
Get outta my woods !

On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 07:39:10 -0500, Terry Coombs >
wrote:

>
> *As some may recall , we recently bought a rotisserie unit at a yard
>sale , and I tried it out . The chicken was good , though I didn't cook
>it long enough at first . Any way , I simmered the meat off the carcass
>and froze the resulting broth/meat for later use . Last night was later
>, and it was awesome . I added a few sliced fresh carrots and tbsp or 2
>of dried celery in addition to half a box of rotini , and my wife told
>me it was one of my better soup efforts . She makes better soup than me
>(I ? grammer police ?) , but then we ate a lot of soup in years past
>when kids were little and money was tighter .

I'm sure it tastes fine but what's the point of rotissering a chicken
to make soup... now you have the rotisserie to clean without the
benefit of enjoying a rotisseried chicken.

On Monday, July 15, 2019 at 10:02:51 AM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 07:39:10 -0500, Terry Coombs >
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Â*As some may recall , we recently bought a rotisserie unit at a yard
> >sale , and I tried it out . The chicken was good , though I didn't cook
> >it long enough at first . Any way , I simmered the meat off the carcass
> >and froze the resulting broth/meat for later use . Last night was later
> >, and it was awesome . I added a few sliced fresh carrots and tbsp or 2
> >of dried celery in addition to half a box of rotini , and my wife told
> >me it was one of my better soup efforts . She makes better soup than me
> >(I ? grammer police ?) , but then we ate a lot of soup in years past
> >when kids were little and money was tighter .
>
> I'm sure it tastes fine but what's the point of rotissering a chicken
> to make soup... now you have the rotisserie to clean without the
> benefit of enjoying a rotisseried chicken.

From what I understand the point is that the rotisserie'd meat is supposed to be eaten, then the carcass cooked to make a fine stock.

On 2019-07-15 10:48 a.m., A Moose in Love wrote:
> On Monday, July 15, 2019 at 10:02:51 AM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:

>> I'm sure it tastes fine but what's the point of rotissering a
>> chicken to make soup... now you have the rotisserie to clean
>> without the benefit of enjoying a rotisseried chicken.
>
> From what I understand the point is that the rotisserie'd meat is
> supposed to be eaten, then the carcass cooked to make a fine stock.
>

I think that was pretty clear to everyone but the rear admiral.

On 7/15/2019 9:48 AM, A Moose in Love wrote:
> On Monday, July 15, 2019 at 10:02:51 AM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 07:39:10 -0500, Terry Coombs >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Â*As some may recall , we recently bought a rotisserie unit at a yard
>>> sale , and I tried it out . The chicken was good , though I didn't cook
>>> it long enough at first . Any way , I simmered the meat off the carcass
>>> and froze the resulting broth/meat for later use . Last night was later
>>> , and it was awesome . I added a few sliced fresh carrots and tbsp or 2
>>> of dried celery in addition to half a box of rotini , and my wife told
>>> me it was one of my better soup efforts . She makes better soup than me
>>> (I ? grammer police ?) , but then we ate a lot of soup in years past
>>> when kids were little and money was tighter .
>> I'm sure it tastes fine but what's the point of rotissering a chicken
>> to make soup... now you have the rotisserie to clean without the
>> benefit of enjoying a rotisseried chicken.
> From what I understand the point is that the rotisserie'd meat is supposed to be eaten, then the carcass cooked to make a fine stock.

Â* Sheldon has comprehension problems . You are right , I simmered the
carcass after we enjoyed a few meals of the chicken . One whole chicken
is on the shopping list , I'm going to do another soon . It's not
something I'll do often , but it's a very nice change from grilled meats .

--
Snag
Yes , I'm old
and crochety - and armed .
Get outta my woods !

On 2019-07-15 12:57 p.m., Terry Coombs wrote:
> On 7/15/2019 9:48 AM, A Moose in Love wrote:

>> Â*From what I understand the point is that the rotisserie'd meat is
>> supposed to be eaten, then the carcass cooked to make a fine stock.
>
> Â* Sheldon has comprehension problems . You are right , I simmered the
> carcass after we enjoyed a few meals of the chicken . One whole chicken
> is on the shopping list , I'm going to do another soon . It's not
> something I'll do often , but it's a very nice change from grilled meats

The next time you want to try one you should use the recipe I use,
called Indian Chicken in an old BBQ cookbook I had. It calls for grated
onion, but I use the food processor. Toss a quartered onion, a large
chopped clove of garlic into the FP and mush it. Add a tsp. of salt,
1/2 tsp pepper and tsp or two of cumin and whiz it some more. Smear
the mixture inside and all over the chicken and let it sit for an hour.
Stick it on the spit and baste with melted butter (or olive oil).

On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:57:55 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2019-07-15 10:48 a.m., A Moose in Love wrote:
>> On Monday, July 15, 2019 at 10:02:51 AM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
>
>>> I'm sure it tastes fine but what's the point of rotissering a
>>> chicken to make soup... now you have the rotisserie to clean
>>> without the benefit of enjoying a rotisseried chicken.
>>
>> From what I understand the point is that the rotisserie'd meat is
>> supposed to be eaten, then the carcass cooked to make a fine stock.
>
>I think that was pretty clear to everyone but the rear admiral.

Your reading comprhension is below infantile, almost matches your
plethora of typos, and barroom BS. The poster indicated that the
chicken wasn't fully cooked so he decided to make soup from it. Would
have been smarter to continue rotisserating. Twenty more minutes of
spinning on the rotisserie would have been much smarter than spending
half the day turning it into soup... and likely not having the
ingredients on hand for a proper soup. Was probably one of those tiny
rotisse chickens anyway, not worth making soup with gnawed/sucked
bones.

When I want to make chicken soup I buy a couple three seven pound
roasters and make gallons of golden Jewish Penicillin. I tried making
chicken soup from a picked over carcass once, not worth the trouble
for diluted **** vasser.

I'll make stock from roast pork and pork chop bones, makes excellent
stock for Chinese soups.

For some reason I detest turkey soup so I always toss the thanksgiving
carcass out for the crows. The only part of a roast turkey I eat are
the drumsticks... all the rest is cat food. Even though turkeys have
humongus breasts I don't like it.

On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:33:20 -0400, wrote:

>On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:57:55 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>
>>I think that was pretty clear to everyone but the rear admiral.
>
>Your reading comprhension is below infantile, almost matches your
>plethora of typos, and barroom BS. The poster indicated that the
>chicken wasn't fully cooked so he decided to make soup from it. Would
>have been smarter to continue rotisserating. Twenty more minutes of
>spinning on the rotisserie would have been much smarter than spending
>half the day turning it into soup... and likely not having the
>ingredients on hand for a proper soup. Was probably one of those tiny
>rotisse chickens anyway, not worth making soup with gnawed/sucked
>bones.
>
>When I want to make chicken soup I buy a couple three seven pound
>roasters and make gallons of golden Jewish Penicillin.

Is there still that much medication and hormones in your chickens?

Bruce wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:33:20 -0400, wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:57:55 -0400, Dave Smith
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> I think that was pretty clear to everyone but the rear admiral.
>>
>> Your reading comprhension is below infantile, almost matches your
>> plethora of typos, and barroom BS. The poster indicated that the
>> chicken wasn't fully cooked so he decided to make soup from it. Would
>> have been smarter to continue rotisserating. Twenty more minutes of
>> spinning on the rotisserie would have been much smarter than spending
>> half the day turning it into soup... and likely not having the
>> ingredients on hand for a proper soup. Was probably one of those tiny
>> rotisse chickens anyway, not worth making soup with gnawed/sucked
>> bones.
>>
>> When I want to make chicken soup I buy a couple three seven pound
>> roasters and make gallons of golden Jewish Penicillin.
>
> Is there still that much medication and hormones in your chickens?
>

His chicken contains a lot of viagra.

On 7/15/2019 7:33 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:57:55 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>> On 2019-07-15 10:48 a.m., A Moose in Love wrote:
>>> On Monday, July 15, 2019 at 10:02:51 AM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
>>>> I'm sure it tastes fine but what's the point of rotissering a
>>>> chicken to make soup... now you have the rotisserie to clean
>>>> without the benefit of enjoying a rotisseried chicken.
>>> From what I understand the point is that the rotisserie'd meat is
>>> supposed to be eaten, then the carcass cooked to make a fine stock.
>> I think that was pretty clear to everyone but the rear admiral.
> Your reading comprhension is below infantile, almost matches your
> plethora of typos, and barroom BS. The poster indicated that the
> chicken wasn't fully cooked so he decided to make soup from it. Would
> have been smarter to continue rotisserating.

Â* Which is exactly what I did , put it back on for another half hour .
We then feasted on rotisserie chicken for several meals , whereupon I
simmered the carcass for soup . You continuously put meanings that I
never intended to my words .

--
Snag
Yes , I'm old
and crochety - and armed .
Get outta my woods !

On 2019-07-15 8:33 p.m., wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:57:55 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>> On 2019-07-15 10:48 a.m., A Moose in Love wrote:
>>> On Monday, July 15, 2019 at 10:02:51 AM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
>>
>>>> I'm sure it tastes fine but what's the point of rotissering a
>>>> chicken to make soup... now you have the rotisserie to clean
>>>> without the benefit of enjoying a rotisseried chicken.
>>>
>>> From what I understand the point is that the rotisserie'd meat is
>>> supposed to be eaten, then the carcass cooked to make a fine stock.
>>
>> I think that was pretty clear to everyone but the rear admiral.
>
> Your reading comprhension is below infantile,

That sent the irony meter right over top.



> . The poster indicated that the
> chicken wasn't fully cooked so he decided to make soup from it.

You need to read his comments again. As he clarified ....
"Sheldon has comprehension problems . You are right , I simmered the
carcass after we enjoyed a few meals of the chicken ."



>Would
> have been smarter to continue rotisserating.

And that is exactly what he said he did.

Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2019-07-15 8:33 p.m., wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:57:55 -0400, Dave Smith
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On 2019-07-15 10:48 a.m., A Moose in Love wrote:
>>>> On Monday, July 15, 2019 at 10:02:51 AM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I'm sure it tastes fine but what's the point of rotissering a
>>>>> chicken to make soup... now you have the rotisserie to clean
>>>>> without the benefit of enjoying a rotisseried chicken.
>>>>
>>>> *From what I understand the point is that the rotisserie'd meat is
>>>> supposed to be eaten, then the carcass cooked to make a fine stock.
>>>
>>> I think that was pretty clear to everyone but the rear admiral.
>>
>> Your reading comprhension is below infantile,
>
> That sent the irony meter right over top.
>
>
>
>> .* The poster indicated that the
>> chicken wasn't fully cooked so he decided to make soup from it.
>
> You need to read his comments again. As he clarified* ....
> "Sheldon has comprehension problems . You are right , I simmered the
> carcass after we enjoyed a few meals of the chicken ."
>
>
>
> *>Would
>> have been smarter to continue rotisserating.
>
> And that is exactly what he said he did.
>

At least we got a repeat lecture on his jewish penicillin.

On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:14:45 -0500, Terry Coombs >
wrote:

>On 7/15/2019 7:33 PM, wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:57:55 -0400, Dave Smith
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On 2019-07-15 10:48 a.m., A Moose in Love wrote:
>>>> On Monday, July 15, 2019 at 10:02:51 AM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
>>>>> I'm sure it tastes fine but what's the point of rotissering a
>>>>> chicken to make soup... now you have the rotisserie to clean
>>>>> without the benefit of enjoying a rotisseried chicken.
>>>> From what I understand the point is that the rotisserie'd meat is
>>>> supposed to be eaten, then the carcass cooked to make a fine stock.
>>> I think that was pretty clear to everyone but the rear admiral.
>> Your reading comprhension is below infantile, almost matches your
>> plethora of typos, and barroom BS. The poster indicated that the
>> chicken wasn't fully cooked so he decided to make soup from it. Would
>> have been smarter to continue rotisserating.
>
> * Which is exactly what I did , put it back on for another half hour .
>We then feasted on rotisserie chicken for several meals , whereupon I
>simmered the carcass for soup . You continuously put meanings that I
>never intended to my words .

That's not what you wrote in your original post... you're as
illiterate/ignorant as Dave Smith.
I think both of yoose use fake names.
No one has seen what yoose look like either, nor anything yoose
claimed to have cooked.... two fakes.
Neither one of yoose barroom fakers can cook a lick.
I GARANTEE TWO FAGGOTS... COOMBS IS MOST DEFINITELY A FAGGOT NAME...
WOOMBS!

On 7/15/2019 9:42 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:
> Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2019-07-15 8:33 p.m., wrote:
>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:57:55 -0400, Dave Smith
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2019-07-15 10:48 a.m., A Moose in Love wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, July 15, 2019 at 10:02:51 AM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> I'm sure it tastes fine but what's the point of rotissering a
>>>>>> chicken to make soup... now you have the rotisserie to clean
>>>>>> without the benefit of enjoying a rotisseried chicken.
>>>>>
>>>>> Â*From what I understand the point is that the rotisserie'd meat is
>>>>> supposed to be eaten, then the carcass cooked to make a fine stock.
>>>>
>>>> I think that was pretty clear to everyone but the rear admiral.
>>>
>>> Your reading comprhension is below infantile,
>>
>> That sent the irony meter right over top.
>>
>>
>>
>>> .Â* The poster indicated that the
>>> chicken wasn't fully cooked so he decided to make soup from it.
>>
>> You need to read his comments again. As he clarifiedÂ* ....
>> "Sheldon has comprehension problems . You are right , I simmered the
>> carcass after we enjoyed a few meals of the chicken ."
>>
>>
>>
>> Â*Â*>Would
>>> have been smarter to continue rotisserating.
>>
>> And that is exactly what he said he did.
>>
>
> At least we got a repeat lecture on his jewish penicillin.
>
>
>
>
>
>
I tried making rotisserie chicken noodle soup. The damned noodles kept
getting tangles as it was spinning.

On 2019-07-15 9:48 p.m., wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:14:45 -0500, Terry Coombs >
> wrote:

>> Â* Which is exactly what I did , put it back on for another half hour .
>> We then feasted on rotisserie chicken for several meals , whereupon I
>> simmered the carcass for soup . You continuously put meanings that I
>> never intended to my words .
>
> That's not what you wrote in your original post... you're as
> illiterate/ignorant as Dave Smith.
> I think both of yoose use fake names.
> No one has seen what yoose look like either, nor anything yoose
> claimed to have cooked.... two fakes.
> Neither one of yoose barroom fakers can cook a lick.
> I GARANTEE TWO FAGGOTS... COOMBS IS MOST DEFINITELY A FAGGOT NAME...
> WOOMBS!
>
>
Wow. You really aren't quite sane tonight.

Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 7/15/2019 9:42 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:
>> Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2019-07-15 8:33 p.m., wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:57:55 -0400, Dave Smith
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2019-07-15 10:48 a.m., A Moose in Love wrote:
>>>>>> On Monday, July 15, 2019 at 10:02:51 AM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm sure it tastes fine but what's the point of rotissering a
>>>>>>> chicken to make soup... now you have the rotisserie to clean
>>>>>>> without the benefit of enjoying a rotisseried chicken.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Â*From what I understand the point is that the rotisserie'd
>>>>>> meat is
>>>>>> supposed to be eaten, then the carcass cooked to make a fine
>>>>>> stock.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think that was pretty clear to everyone but the rear admiral.
>>>>
>>>> Your reading comprhension is below infantile,
>>>
>>> That sent the irony meter right over top.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> .Â* The poster indicated that the
>>>> chicken wasn't fully cooked so he decided to make soup from it.
>>>
>>> You need to read his comments again. As he clarifiedÂ* ....
>>> "Sheldon has comprehension problems . You are right , I simmered
>>> the carcass after we enjoyed a few meals of the chicken ."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Â*Â*>Would
>>>> have been smarter to continue rotisserating.
>>>
>>> And that is exactly what he said he did.
>>>
>>
>> At least we got a repeat lecture on his jewish penicillin.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> I tried making rotisserie chicken noodle soup.* The damned noodles
> kept getting tangles as it was spinning.

It's supposed to wind up, like spaghetti strands on a fork.

Maybe yoose used the wrong kind of noodles.

On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 22:52:16 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2019-07-15 9:48 p.m., wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:14:45 -0500, Terry Coombs >
>> wrote:
>
>>> * Which is exactly what I did , put it back on for another half hour .
>>> We then feasted on rotisserie chicken for several meals , whereupon I
>>> simmered the carcass for soup . You continuously put meanings that I
>>> never intended to my words .
>>
>> That's not what you wrote in your original post... you're as
>> illiterate/ignorant as Dave Smith.
>> I think both of yoose use fake names.
>> No one has seen what yoose look like either, nor anything yoose
>> claimed to have cooked.... two fakes.
>> Neither one of yoose barroom fakers can cook a lick.
>> I GARANTEE TWO FAGGOTS... COOMBS IS MOST DEFINITELY A FAGGOT NAME...
>> WOOMBS!
>>
>>
>Wow. You really aren't quite sane tonight.

he writes for tRump

On Monday, July 15, 2019 at 9:26:42 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
> I tried making rotisserie chicken noodle soup. The damned noodles kept
> getting tangles as it was spinning.
>
For shame. You didn't wrap those noodles around the chicken correctly and
use enough packing tape to hold them tightly. Tsk, tsk.

Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2019-07-15 9:48 p.m., wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:14:45 -0500, Terry Coombs >
>> wrote:
>
>>> *Â* Which is exactly what I did , put it back on for another half
>>> hour .
>>> We then feasted on rotisserie chicken for several meals ,
>>> whereupon I
>>> simmered the carcass for soup . You continuously put meanings that I
>>> never intended to my words .
>>
>> That's not what you wrote in your original post... you're as
>> illiterate/ignorant as Dave Smith.
>> I think both of yoose use fake names.
>> No one has seen what yoose look like either, nor anything yoose
>> claimed to have cooked.... two fakes.
>> Neither one of yoose barroom fakers can cook a lick.
>> I GARANTEE TWO FAGGOTS... COOMBS IS MOST DEFINITELY A FAGGOT NAME...
>> WOOMBS!
>>
>>
> Wow. You really aren't quite sane tonight.
>

He's not sane anytime. Yoose can tell Coombs got under his thin
sailor skin ... He starts screaming "FAGGOT!" anytime that happens.

Then again, it could also be the Crystal Palace talking.

On Tuesday, July 16, 2019 at 12:46:39 AM UTC-4, Hank Rogers wrote:
> Dave Smith wrote:
> > On 2019-07-15 9:48 p.m., wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:14:45 -0500, Terry Coombs >
> >> wrote:
> >
> >>> Â*ÂÂ* Which is exactly what I did , put it back on for another half
> >>> hour .
> >>> We then feasted on rotisserie chicken for several meals ,
> >>> whereupon I
> >>> simmered the carcass for soup . You continuously put meanings that I
> >>> never intended to my words .
> >>
> >> That's not what you wrote in your original post... you're as
> >> illiterate/ignorant as Dave Smith.
> >> I think both of yoose use fake names.
> >> No one has seen what yoose look like either, nor anything yoose
> >> claimed to have cooked.... two fakes.
> >> Neither one of yoose barroom fakers can cook a lick.
> >> I GARANTEE TWO FAGGOTS... COOMBS IS MOST DEFINITELY A FAGGOT NAME...
> >> WOOMBS!
> >>
> >>
> > Wow. You really aren't quite sane tonight.
> >
>
> He's not sane anytime. Yoose can tell Coombs got under his thin
> sailor skin ... He starts screaming "FAGGOT!" anytime that happens.
>
> Then again, it could also be the Crystal Palace talking.

The Crystal Palace only amplifies what's already there.

Cindy Hamilton

Terry Coombs wrote:
> You continuously put meanings that I
> never intended to my words .

That happens often in this ng.

On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 06:53:07 -0400, Gary > wrote:

>Terry Coombs wrote:
>> You continuously put meanings that I
>> never intended to my words .
>
>That happens often in this ng.

Yes, by a guy called Gary, for instance.

On 7/15/2019 9:52 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:
> Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> On 7/15/2019 9:42 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:
>>> Dave Smith wrote:
>>>> On 2019-07-15 8:33 p.m., wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:57:55 -0400, Dave Smith
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2019-07-15 10:48 a.m., A Moose in Love wrote:
>>>>>>> On Monday, July 15, 2019 at 10:02:51 AM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm sure it tastes fine but what's the point of rotissering a
>>>>>>>> chicken to make soup... now you have the rotisserie to clean
>>>>>>>> without the benefit of enjoying a rotisseried chicken.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ÂÂ*From what I understand the point is that the rotisserie'd meat is
>>>>>>> supposed to be eaten, then the carcass cooked to make a fine stock.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think that was pretty clear to everyone but the rear admiral.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your reading comprhension is below infantile,
>>>>
>>>> That sent the irony meter right over top.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> .ÂÂ* The poster indicated that the
>>>>> chicken wasn't fully cooked so he decided to make soup from it.
>>>>
>>>> You need to read his comments again. As he clarifiedÂÂ* ....
>>>> "Sheldon has comprehension problems . You are right , I simmered
>>>> the carcass after we enjoyed a few meals of the chicken ."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ÂÂ*ÂÂ*>Would
>>>>> have been smarter to continue rotisserating.
>>>>
>>>> And that is exactly what he said he did.
>>>>
>>>
>>> At least we got a repeat lecture on his jewish penicillin.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I tried making rotisserie chicken noodle soup.Â* The damned noodles
>> kept getting tangles as it was spinning.
>
> It's supposed to wind up, like spaghetti strands on a fork.
>
> Maybe yoose used the wrong kind of noodles.
>
>

Â* We gave our youngest son a noodle machine for Christmas , maybe I can
get him to make us some extra extra long ones ...

--
Snag
Yes , I'm old
and crochety - and armed .
Get outta my woods !

"Ed Pawlowski" wrote in message ...

On 7/15/2019 9:42 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:
> Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2019-07-15 8:33 p.m., wrote:
>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:57:55 -0400, Dave Smith
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2019-07-15 10:48 a.m., A Moose in Love wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, July 15, 2019 at 10:02:51 AM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> I'm sure it tastes fine but what's the point of rotissering a
>>>>>> chicken to make soup... now you have the rotisserie to clean
>>>>>> without the benefit of enjoying a rotisseried chicken.
>>>>>
>>>>> From what I understand the point is that the rotisserie'd meat is
>>>>> supposed to be eaten, then the carcass cooked to make a fine stock.
>>>>
>>>> I think that was pretty clear to everyone but the rear admiral.
>>>
>>> Your reading comprhension is below infantile,
>>
>> That sent the irony meter right over top.
>>
>>
>>
>>> . The poster indicated that the
>>> chicken wasn't fully cooked so he decided to make soup from it.
>>
>> You need to read his comments again. As he clarified ....
>> "Sheldon has comprehension problems . You are right , I simmered the
>> carcass after we enjoyed a few meals of the chicken ."
>>
>>
>>
>> >Would
>>> have been smarter to continue rotisserating.
>>
>> And that is exactly what he said he did.
>>
>
> At least we got a repeat lecture on his jewish penicillin.
>
>
>
>
>
>
I tried making rotisserie chicken noodle soup. The damned noodles kept
getting tangles as it was spinning.

===

You could have plaited them!

Ed Pawlowski wrote:

> On 7/15/2019 9:42 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:
> > Dave Smith wrote:
> > > On 2019-07-15 8:33 p.m., wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:57:55 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 2019-07-15 10:48 a.m., A Moose in Love wrote:
> > > > > > On Monday, July 15, 2019 at 10:02:51 AM UTC-4, Sheldon
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm sure it tastes fine but what's the point of
> > > > > > > rotissering a chicken to make soup... now you have the
> > > > > > > rotisserie to clean without the benefit of enjoying a
> > > > > > > rotisseried chicken.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Â*From what I understand the point is that the rotisserie'd
> > > > > > meat is supposed to be eaten, then the carcass cooked to
> > > > > > make a fine stock.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think that was pretty clear to everyone but the rear
> > > > > admiral.
> > > >
> > > > Your reading comprhension is below infantile,
> > >
> > > That sent the irony meter right over top.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > .Â* The poster indicated that the
> > > > chicken wasn't fully cooked so he decided to make soup from it.
> > >
> > > You need to read his comments again. As he clarifiedÂ* ....
> > > "Sheldon has comprehension problems . You are right , I simmered
> > > the carcass after we enjoyed a few meals of the chicken ."
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Â*Â*>Would
> > > > have been smarter to continue rotisserating.
> > >
> > > And that is exactly what he said he did.
> > >
> >
> > At least we got a repeat lecture on his jewish penicillin.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> I tried making rotisserie chicken noodle soup. The damned noodles
> kept getting tangles as it was spinning.

LOL!

wrote:
>
> For some reason I detest turkey soup so I always toss the thanksgiving
> carcass out for the crows.

How sad it that? Turkey broth/stock is very strong and my
favorite.


> The only part of a roast turkey I eat are
> the drumsticks...

With all the tendons, etc. My favorite turkey parts are the
thighs.

On Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 8:22:24 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote:
> wrote:
> >
> > For some reason I detest turkey soup so I always toss the thanksgiving
> > carcass out for the crows.
>
> How sad it that? Turkey broth/stock is very strong and my
> favorite.
>
>
> > The only part of a roast turkey I eat are
> > the drumsticks...
>
> With all the tendons, etc. My favorite turkey parts are the
> thighs.

I like the white meat.

A Moose in Love wrote:
>
> On Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 8:22:24 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote:
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > For some reason I detest turkey soup so I always toss the thanksgiving
> > > carcass out for the crows.
> >
> > How sad it that? Turkey broth/stock is very strong and my
> > favorite.
> >
> >
> > > The only part of a roast turkey I eat are
> > > the drumsticks...
> >
> > With all the tendons, etc. My favorite turkey parts are the
> > thighs.
>
> I like the white meat.

I like it all but nothing gets tossed out for critters. I freeze
lots of the meat for future meals and what I don't eat goes into
the pot for 24 hours to make strong stock/broth (bones and
leftover meat)

On 7/15/2019 10:26 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>
> I tried making rotisserie chicken noodle soup.Â* The damned noodles kept
> getting tangles as it was spinning.

I needed a good laugh this morning!

Jill

A Moose in Love wrote:

> On Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 8:22:24 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote:
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > For some reason I detest turkey soup so I always toss the
> > > thanksgiving carcass out for the crows.
> >
> > How sad it that? Turkey broth/stock is very strong and my
> > favorite.
> >
> >
> > > The only part of a roast turkey I eat are
> > > the drumsticks...
> >
> > With all the tendons, etc. My favorite turkey parts are the
> > thighs.
>
> I like the white meat.

I have an oddity here. We all like the dark meats. Even the pets
prefer it.

On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 20:06:44 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:

>A Moose in Love wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 8:22:24 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote:
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > For some reason I detest turkey soup so I always toss the
>> > > thanksgiving carcass out for the crows.
>> >
>> > How sad it that? Turkey broth/stock is very strong and my
>> > favorite.
>> >
>> >
>> > > The only part of a roast turkey I eat are
>> > > the drumsticks...
>> >
>> > With all the tendons, etc. My favorite turkey parts are the
>> > thighs.
>>
>> I like the white meat.
>
>I have an oddity here. We all like the dark meats. Even the pets
>prefer it.

Dark meat:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYEO_WZUGcY&pbjreload=10>