On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 05:40:44 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote:

>Lucretia, you are correct about the "flushable" wipes. They aren't. My plumber thinks
>some entity (a city, perhaps) should absolutely sue the makers.
>
>N.

I saw pics of the London blockage, bigger than a double decker bus, I
would think they are suing - costly as well as difficult and
inconvenient.

On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:51:46 -0400, Gary > wrote:

>Nancy2 wrote:
>>
>> Lucretia, you are correct about the "flushable" wipes. They aren't. My plumber thinks
>> some entity (a city, perhaps) should absolutely sue the makers.
>
>Agreed. Only toilet paper should be flushed. Not even paper
>towels.
>
>I did a load of laundry 2 weeks ago and somehow a paper towel got
>mixed in. Oh what a mess that was. About a thousand little paper
>towel bits all stuck to the clean clothes. Big mistake.

If that happens put two Downy cloths in the dryer and run. Usually
gathers it all up. Now I am talking a kleenex but should work for
paper towel as well.
>
>I also have (doing the occasional hand wash in a 5-gallon bucket)
>missed something before I poured the soapy water into the toilet.
>While pouring, I'd see:
>First time: an athletic sock pour out and go right down
>2nd time years later: a pair of underpants do the same.
>
>Both times clogged it immediately and required a snake to remove.
>Both times I got scolded for doing that. heheh
>
>I don't hand wash items anymore. Live and learn from history.

On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:55:08 -0400, Gary > wrote:

>John Kuthe wrote:
>>
>> Be a HUMAN! STOP CUTTING DOWN TREES to wipe your butts! Be like bears! Rub your butt ON A TREE!!
>
>Is that what you do each morning, John?

Must be quite a sight for the student lodgers!

On 2019-04-17 8:55 a.m., Gary wrote:
> John Kuthe wrote:
>>
>> Be a HUMAN! STOP CUTTING DOWN TREES to wipe your butts! Be like bears! Rub your butt ON A TREE!!
>
> Is that what you do each morning, John?
>



He does not need to wipe his butt. He is a perfect asshole.

On 2019-04-17 3:16 p.m., Pamela wrote:
> On 14:12 17 Apr 2019, : wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 05:40:44 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Lucretia, you are correct about the "flushable" wipes. They aren't. My
>>> plumber thinks some entity (a city, perhaps) should absolutely sue the
>>> makers.
>>>
>>> N.
>>
>> I saw pics of the London blockage, bigger than a double decker bus, I
>> would think they are suing - costly as well as difficult and
>> inconvenient.
>
> Some fatbergs are even bigger .....
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatberg#Notable_fatbergs
>
> Ugh!
>
Before clicking on the link, I thought that this was another post about
Walmart!

On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 22:16:07 +0100, Pamela >
wrote:

>On 14:12 17 Apr 2019, : wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 05:40:44 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>Lucretia, you are correct about the "flushable" wipes. They aren't. My
>>>plumber thinks some entity (a city, perhaps) should absolutely sue the
>>>makers.
>>>
>>>N.
>>
>> I saw pics of the London blockage, bigger than a double decker bus, I
>> would think they are suing - costly as well as difficult and
>> inconvenient.
>
>Some fatbergs are even bigger .....
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatberg#Notable_fatbergs
>
>Ugh!

That's a good name for them!

On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:17:25 -0600, graham > wrote:

>On 2019-04-17 3:16 p.m., Pamela wrote:
>> On 14:12 17 Apr 2019, : wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 05:40:44 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lucretia, you are correct about the "flushable" wipes. They aren't. My
>>>> plumber thinks some entity (a city, perhaps) should absolutely sue the
>>>> makers.
>>>>
>>>> N.
>>>
>>> I saw pics of the London blockage, bigger than a double decker bus, I
>>> would think they are suing - costly as well as difficult and
>>> inconvenient.
>>
>> Some fatbergs are even bigger .....
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatberg#Notable_fatbergs
>>
>> Ugh!
>>
>Before clicking on the link, I thought that this was another post about
>Walmart!

lol - although I expect they sell them!

Correction: the commercial I saw for "no hair wrap," was Shark. Someone said that, so
good on you. ;-))

N.