What's with Google?
 

Cheri wrote:
>
> > wrote in message
> ...
>
> > I really liked Nathan's Coney Island Frankfurters... those packaged
> > and sold at market are a different dawg, as are the dawgs sold at the
>
> I used to really like Nathan's franks, but in the past few years I don't
> think they taste the same.
>
> Cheri

I agree completely, I stopped paying the price just for the name.
The best all-beef ones to me are the Oscar Meyer ones these days.

Hey, that annual contest is on ESPN2 from noon-one eastern time
if anyone cares to watch it. The actual contest is at the end of
the hour. I'll probably watch it. I'm easily amused and still
boggled that anyone could possibly eat that many in just 10
minutes. "Inconceivable!"

What's with Google?
 

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> Cheri wrote:
>>
>> > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> > I really liked Nathan's Coney Island Frankfurters... those packaged
>> > and sold at market are a different dawg, as are the dawgs sold at the
>>
>> I used to really like Nathan's franks, but in the past few years I don't
>> think they taste the same.
>>
>> Cheri
>
> I agree completely, I stopped paying the price just for the name.
> The best all-beef ones to me are the Oscar Meyer ones these days.
>
> Hey, that annual contest is on ESPN2 from noon-one eastern time
> if anyone cares to watch it. The actual contest is at the end of
> the hour. I'll probably watch it. I'm easily amused and still
> boggled that anyone could possibly eat that many in just 10
> minutes. "Inconceivable!"


Yes, I saw that. I won't watch because it makes me want to gag, but some
people must enjoy it or it wouldn't be so popular. BTW, I don't really care
for the "uncured" that a lot of the hot dog makers are putting out either. I
like Caspers the best.

Cheri

Cheri

What's with Google?
 

On Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:35:10 -0400, Gary > wrote:

>Cheri wrote:
>>
>> > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> > I really liked Nathan's Coney Island Frankfurters... those packaged
>> > and sold at market are a different dawg, as are the dawgs sold at the
>>
>> I used to really like Nathan's franks, but in the past few years I don't
>> think they taste the same.
>>
>> Cheri
>
>I agree completely, I stopped paying the price just for the name.
>The best all-beef ones to me are the Oscar Meyer ones these days.

Oscar Mayer Premium Beef Franks:
"beef, water, corn syrup, contains less than 2% of salt, potassium
lactate, dextrose, sodium phosphates, sodium diacetate, flavor,
ascorbic acid [vitamin c], extractives of paprika, sodium nitrite"

Damn, I wish I could buy that here. I love a science experiment. This
could be the cure for the common cold!

What's with Google?
 

On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 07:33:58 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>"Gary" wrote:
>> Cheri wrote:
>>>
>>> <penmart01 wrote:
>>>
>>> > I really liked Nathan's Coney Island Frankfurters... those packaged
>>> > and sold at market are a different dawg, as are the dawgs sold at the
>>>
>>> I used to really like Nathan's franks, but in the past few years I don't
>>> think they taste the same.
>>>
>>> Cheri
>>
>> I agree completely, I stopped paying the price just for the name.
>> The best all-beef ones to me are the Oscar Meyer ones these days.

Nathans at the market are not the same as at Coney, not even close.
Hebrew National are no longer the same as they were 40 years ago... I
don't even believe the Hebrew Nationals sold at stupidmarkets are
kosher, they absolutely can't be kosher when sold from the same case
as non-kosher and from a non-kosher store. When I was a kid Hebrew
National products were only sold from kosher delis/butchers... also
Isaac Gellis and Shofar brands which I thought were better. Kosher
dawgs were terrible once they were sold packaged... originally they
were sold loose and string tied betwwen each link and always in
natural casings. Kosher salami and balogna was never sold packaged
either... now it's all Fake kosher... save your money!

>> Hey, that annual contest is on ESPN2 from noon-one eastern time
>> if anyone cares to watch it. The actual contest is at the end of
>> the hour. I'll probably watch it. I'm easily amused and still
>> boggled that anyone could possibly eat that many in just 10
>> minutes. "Inconceivable!"

Perhaps the contest uses cocktail franks... it's somehow gotta be
fixed, no human can eat 72 full sized dawgs with rolls... maybe they
have a port installed at the distal end of their esophogus with a
plastic bag attached because no human stomach can hold 72 dawgs, let
alone 72 rolls... even the dwarf as big as he is can't eat more than
10 dawgs. I'll bet Smith's Big Niece can't eat a dozen dawgs with
rolls.
Hotdogs weigh what, 2 ounces each, typically 8 to the pound.... means
72 hot dogs weigh 9 pounds. Can anyone here eat a 9 pound boneless
rib roast? In ten minutes? Even in ten hours?
Eight cheapo hot dog rolls weigh 12 ounces... 72 rolls means that's
nearly seven pounds of bread, like four large loaves. All together
thats sixteen pounds of food.
Two 100 pound hungry German shepherds can't eat 72 franks without
puking and shitting before they are halfway,
That contest is FAKE news.

What's with Google?
 

Sqwertz wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Jul 2018 16:48:57 -0400, wrote:
>
>> Nathans at the market are not the same as at Coney, not even close.
>> Hebrew National are no longer the same as they were 40 years ago... I
>> don't even believe the Hebrew Nationals sold at stupidmarkets are
>> kosher, they absolutely can't be kosher when sold from the same case
>> as non-kosher and from a non-kosher store. When I was a kid Hebrew
>> National products were only sold from kosher delis/butchers... also
>> Isaac Gellis and Shofar brands which I thought were better. Kosher
>> dawgs were terrible once they were sold packaged... originally they
>> were sold loose and string tied betwwen each link and always in
>> natural casings. Kosher salami and balogna was never sold packaged
>> either... now it's all Fake kosher... save your money!
>
> Ignoring more of your bullshit above, I'm getting ready to make a
> patty melt on non-kosher Jewish rye. Thank you HEB for not making
> your "Jewish Rye" bread Kosher. I'm just going to put meat and
> cheese on it anyway to assure I go to hell.
>
>> That contest is FAKE
>
> <yawn> Get some better rants already. Your shtick of calling
> everybody and everything liars and fakes got really old and childish
> a long time ago.
>
> -sw
>

You don't need kosher anyway. Only difference is some old jew like
Popeye rubbed his dick on it and said a magic prayer.

What's with Google?
 

On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 16:14:28 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Wed, 04 Jul 2018 16:48:57 -0400, wrote:
>
>> Nathans at the market are not the same as at Coney, not even close.
>> Hebrew National are no longer the same as they were 40 years ago... I
>> don't even believe the Hebrew Nationals sold at stupidmarkets are
>> kosher, they absolutely can't be kosher when sold from the same case
>> as non-kosher and from a non-kosher store. When I was a kid Hebrew
>> National products were only sold from kosher delis/butchers... also
>> Isaac Gellis and Shofar brands which I thought were better. Kosher
>> dawgs were terrible once they were sold packaged... originally they
>> were sold loose and string tied betwwen each link and always in
>> natural casings. Kosher salami and balogna was never sold packaged
>> either... now it's all Fake kosher... save your money!
>
>Ignoring more of your bullshit above, I'm getting ready to make a
>patty melt on non-kosher Jewish rye. Thank you HEB for not making
>your "Jewish Rye" bread Kosher. I'm just going to put meat and
>cheese on it anyway to assure I go to hell.
>
>> That contest is FAKE
>
><yawn> Get some better rants already. Your shtick of calling
>everybody and everything liars and fakes got really old and childish
>a long time ago.
>
>-sw

The dwarf is not a fake, he eats shit and always has.

What's with Google?
 

In article >, Sqwertz
> wrote:

> <snip> I'm getting ready to make a patty melt on non-kosher Jewish rye.

I haven't eaten a patty melt in thirty years. I loved them. Why did I
quit? Tonight is the night. I have all the ingredients. It'll be on
Orowheat dill rye. I'm browning the onions now. The rest will be easy
and later. Thanks for the idea.

leo

What's with Google?
 

What's with Google?
 

In article >, Sqwertz
> wrote:

> Glad I could motivate you into making some real food while the wife
> is presumably still away :-)

Meh...I burned it a little. I'm still going to eat it.
<https://www.dropbox.com/s/3avvth58qtreyy1/PattyMelt.jpg?dl=0>

leo

What's with Google?
 

On Wed, 04 Jul 2018 23:46:05 -0700, Leonard Blaisdell
> wrote:

>In article >, Sqwertz
> wrote:
>
>> Glad I could motivate you into making some real food while the wife
>> is presumably still away :-)
>
>Meh...I burned it a little. I'm still going to eat it.
><https://www.dropbox.com/s/3avvth58qtreyy1/PattyMelt.jpg?dl=0>

She'd better come home soon.

What's with Google?
 

I find any and all "over-eating" programs disgusting. Where is the glory in advertising gluttony
to the world when so many people here and elsewhere don't have enough to eat?

N.

What's with Google?
 

On Thursday, July 5, 2018 at 7:44:30 AM UTC-5, Nancy2 wrote:
> I find any and all "over-eating" programs disgusting. Where is the glory in advertising gluttony
> to the world when so many people here and elsewhere don't have enough to eat?
>
> N.

I hear ya!! :-(

Gluttony is one of the Seven Deadly Sins! :-(

John Kuthe...

What's with Google?
 

Nancy2 wrote:
>
> I find any and all "over-eating" programs disgusting. Where is the glory in advertising gluttony
> to the world when so many people here and elsewhere don't have enough to eat?
>
> N.

I've though the same thing. Those 74 dogs and buns that Joey
scarfed down in 10 minutes would have provided many meals for
hungry people.

What's with Google?
 

On Wed, 04 Jul 2018 Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
>Sqwertz wrote:
>
>> Glad I could motivate you into making some real food while the wife
>> is presumably still away :-)
>
>Meh...I burned it a little. I'm still going to eat it.
><https://www.dropbox.com/s/3avvth58qtreyy1/PattyMelt.jpg?dl=0>

Not burned, that's how we like it, 'high brown'.

What's with Google?
 

On Thu, 05 Jul 2018 10:04:18 -0400, Gary > wrote:

>Nancy2 wrote:
>>
>> I find any and all "over-eating" programs disgusting. Where is the glory in advertising gluttony
>> to the world when so many people here and elsewhere don't have enough to eat?
>>
>> N.
>
>I've though the same thing. Those 74 dogs and buns that Joey
>scarfed down in 10 minutes would have provided many meals for
>hungry people.

Are you trying to be emperor of the world and telling everybody what
to eat or something?

What's with Google?
 

Druce wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jul 2018 10:04:18 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>
>> Nancy2 wrote:
>>>
>>> I find any and all "over-eating" programs disgusting. Where is the glory in advertising gluttony
>>> to the world when so many people here and elsewhere don't have enough to eat?
>>>
>>> N.
>>
>> I've though the same thing. Those 74 dogs and buns that Joey
>> scarfed down in 10 minutes would have provided many meals for
>> hungry people.
>
> Are you trying to be emperor of the world and telling everybody what
> to eat or something?
>

Yeah. I thought that was your routine :)

What's with Google?
 

On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 17:25:07 -0500, Hank Rogers >
wrote:

>Druce wrote:
>> On Thu, 05 Jul 2018 10:04:18 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>>
>>> Nancy2 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I find any and all "over-eating" programs disgusting. Where is the glory in advertising gluttony
>>>> to the world when so many people here and elsewhere don't have enough to eat?
>>>>
>>>> N.
>>>
>>> I've though the same thing. Those 74 dogs and buns that Joey
>>> scarfed down in 10 minutes would have provided many meals for
>>> hungry people.
>>
>> Are you trying to be emperor of the world and telling everybody what
>> to eat or something?
>>
>
>Yeah. I thought that was your routine :)

No, I just tell yoose *what* you're eating (and that it's not really
edible).

What's with Google?
 

On Thursday, July 5, 2018 at 1:20:02 PM UTC-5, Sheldon wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Jul 2018 Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
> >Sqwertz wrote:
> >
> >> Glad I could motivate you into making some real food while the wife
> >> is presumably still away :-)
> >
> >Meh...I burned it a little. I'm still going to eat it.
> ><https://www.dropbox.com/s/3avvth58qtreyy1/PattyMelt.jpg?dl=0>
>
> Not burned, that's how we like it, 'high brown'.

That cook on bread is for people who are low in their carbon intake. Carbon is a very important dietary mineral and most people are a bit low on their carbon intake.

Have your doctor check the carbon level in your blood. You can take dietary carbon supplements as well. Charcoal briquettes are helpful but kinda crunchy!

John Kuthe...