Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
Moderate-fat Diet Is Kinder To Heart Than Low-fat Diet
On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 22:56:53 -0500, Bob > wrote:
>> Viola! :-) > >"Viola?" Chung's illiterate in two languages. > >Bob My, my, hard at work TROLLING Chung today, aren't we? http://makeashorterlink.com/?D1DA32257 http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap950909.html Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long. |
|
|||
|
|||
Moderate-fat Diet Is Kinder To Heart Than Low-fat Diet
PASTORIO THE OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE TROLL WROTE:
Nah, John. Just because the folks who do it like to wear lab coats doesn't make it a science. > psychology > http://www.wordsmyth.net/live/home.p...chty pe=exact > "the study or science of mental, emotional, and behavioral states and > processes." A study isn't necessarily science. The scientific method is what determines that definition. Recording what happened isn't science, that's cataloguing. Watching rats and extrapolating isn't science, it's statistical guessing. > Second, the American Psychological Association amended its bylaws in > 2001 to recognize "promoting health" as one of its major missions. Well, of course they did. The old business hasn't done very well so they needed to branch out. The old "buying a friend" biz has fizzled. > Thorn B & Saah P. Notes from the APA Council of Representatives > meeting. Health Psychologist, 2001, 23(3)5.8. > > Third, there is a relatively new field called health psychology. Gotta do something when the old core business isn't working. > health psychology > http://216.251.232.159/semdweb/Inter...SP/1557230.asp > "the aggregate of the specific educational, scientific, and > professional contributions of the discipline of psychology See, these guys call it a "discipline" rather than a science. > to the > promotion and maintenance of health, the prevention and treatment of > illness, the identification of etiologic and diagnostic correlates of > health, illness, and related dysfunction, and the analysis and > improvement of the health care system." At first glance, it looks like they're out to practice medicine without actually doing that. Except, upon scrutiny, they're just writing more words on paper. Promote and maintain health. Noble. Prevent and treat illness...? Psychologists are going to treat illness? Don't think so. Ah, now we get into something, um, solid. They're going to do their statistical stuff with identifying things. And complaining about the health care system. Probably gonna try to get their rates up and get it all covered by insurance. Pah. Science, my ass. > Fourth, psychologists have been practicing alternative medicine for > quite a long time when they use biofeedback, hypnotherapy, or > cognitive behavior therapy to treat a medical condition. But it's all very funny how they can't seem to *prove* much about how their activities have done much to improve the human condition. Or change human technology. Or change human philosophy. Or change human actions. Failed "science," John. No "science" to speak of. > Alternative medicine was yesterday's quackery, is today's > complementary medicine, and will be tomorrow's new branch of medicine. > http://tutorials.naturalhealthperspe.../glossary.html Right. And it'll still be called quackery. Euphemisms don't change the essential character of a fact. http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap960222.html Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long. |
|
|||
|
|||
Moderate-fat Diet Is Kinder To Heart Than Low-fat Diet
Poor John. Here's a guy who practices (...or does he. He didn't say he
was a psychologist, he says that he has the degree. That's where they teach you to say, "Would you like fries with that?" until you get the advanced degrees. Then they teach you to write grant proposals to study rats and planaria and such.)... Scientists are stupid. Right, John. They just have millennia of successful accomplishment of defining and understanding the physical world. Little better record than psychologists who have essentially become statisticians recording what already happened. 20-20 hindsight through jargon-colored glasses... > All I can say Geek is that your own words, are making you look pretty > damn stupid at this moment. > > Ha, ... Hah, Ha! Give it a rest, John. All you're doing is making pronouncements, just like Chung and Mu_shroom. No backup. No solid information. Matti provides that and you don't. See the difference? >>I am with the authors of the study and >>stand by my earlier statement that the most common definition for >>very-low-fat diet is 15% or less calories from fat and for the low-fat-diet >>15-30% calories from fat. > > Need I remind you that the subject of this THREAD is that idiot > citation of YOURS that tried to suggest that a 18% Fat diet was a > Low-Fat diet. 18% fat is a low-fat diet by any intelligent, knowledgeable definition. > STOP trying to weasel your way out of your Tom Foolery, Geek! Tomfoolery is one word. And it would apply more to your behavior than Matti's: TOMFOOLERY Pronunciation: `tm'fooluree WordNet Dictionary Definition: [n] foolish or senseless behavior Synonyms: folly, foolery, indulgence See Also: buffoonery, caper, clowning, frivolity, frolic, gambol, harlequinade, play, prank, romp > And, kindly STOP abusing the English language. Ha, ... Hah, Ha! It's *an* 18% fat diet... low-fat diet (no caps necessary). And it's tomfoolery. You might want to look into your use of the language before trying that lame insult approach. You sound like Chung now. > Low Fat Diets are 30% Fat. Low-fat diets BEGIN at 30% by some definitions. Less than 30% is, by logical extension and further definition, low fat, too. Anything below 30% is logically low in fat. > All educated people agree on this. Sorry, John. You can't speak for "all" of any group of people. And, in this case, there are sincere disagreements amongst knowledgeable people about the threshold of what constitutes a low fat diet. Read the citations instead of pontificating. > -- > John Gohde, > Feeling Great and Better than Ever! > > Natural health is an eclectic self-care system of natural therapies > that builds and restores health by working with the natural > recuperative powers of the human body. > http://tutorials.naturalhealthperspe...efinition.html Uh, right. Bob http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap960222.html Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Idiot Proof Diet-Online Diet Menu Generator | General Cooking | |||
Moderate-fat Diet Is Kinder To Heart Than Low-fat Diet | Historic | |||
Moderate-fat Diet Is Kinder To Heart Than Low-fat Diet | Historic | |||
Dr. Andrew B. Chung is deluded WAS: Moderate-fat Diet Is Kinder To Heart Than Low-fat Diet | Historic | |||
Low carb diet and heart disease... | General Cooking |