On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:01:54 +0100, Janet > wrote:

>In article >,
says...
>
>> I remember that they once existed but I don't remember the part that
>> came before @hotmail.com.
>>
> Probably some of your previous troll identities.

Spoken like the troll that you are.

Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:23:49 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>
> > Yes, this was the page that for some strange reason really matters
> > to you. It was also a very wierd and disturbing thing to have
> > Steve hunt for.
>
> Making it seem like I'm stalking you doesn't do anything for you
> credibility or cause here. Like I said, I saw it in the list of RFC
> subscribers as we were "celebrating" the 500 member/subscriber mark.
> That's hardly as evil (bwhahahahahahahahahahahHAHAAH!) as you make it
> out to be.
>
> -sw

Steve, I don't know what your issue is, nor do I care. The only odd
thing is, you felt you needed to hunt for a facebook page related to
me. That is quite odd, even for here.

Your name has been related to stalking before. The only thing you have
done in this thread, is validate it may be real.

--

Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 08:56:43 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>
> > Found it! I'd used it in 2016 to try to locate Shane Ludwig. We
> > needed him to adjust the account privledges in a yahoo recipe group
> > (me and my cohort moderator).
>
> Well, this is kinda odd, but probably not a coincidence. Shane Ludwig
> just joined the RFC on Facebook group an hour ago (yes, I was stalking
> him, too <rolling eyes>).
>
> Of course you'll need a Facebook account to contact him there <snork>.
>
> -sw

Shane Ludwig was only moderator of Yahoo group 'Recipes' who could
correct the accounts of me and my cohort he turned them over to, so we
could raise another to moderator level. He fixed it for us in time.

Tell him Hi and thanks from me and Simon!

--

Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 13:23:58 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> > "cshenk" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> Julie Bove wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> > >
> >> ????? I have no clue what you mean on Steve putting up an account
> >> pretending to be me. As to TOS violation, I don't give a flip
> about >> Facebook's TOS.
> >
> > Wait! So now you're accusing Steve of making up a fake page and
> > pretending to be you?
>
> Give it up, Julie. She never accused or implied that I put up that
> Facebook account in her name.
>
> -sw

No, you never did, just in case some are rattling the chains on that.

--

Julie Bove wrote in rec.food.cooking:

>
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 15:30:12 -0500, cshenk wrote:
> >
> > > Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 05:09:12 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > If it's not your real name, then that's a TOS violation. But
> > > > > Steve put up an account with the same name as you use here
> > > > > and you claimed that you got it so you could look at stuff
> > > > > there.
> > > >
> > > > WTF? I didn't put up any account under her name. You're nuts.
> > > > Even Carol hasn't claimed that, and has (finally) admitted it
> > > > was hers. Sheesh.
> > >
> > > No Steve, you didn't. You are definately odd in trying to track
> > > me to an account but you didnt create it. For some oddball
> > > reason you say I deleted it but, no, it's still there.
> >
> > Anybody who clicks on the link can see that it's not there any more
> > - since you deleted it 36 hours ago.
> >
> > https://www.facebook.com/cshenk
> >
> > Why do you continue this lame charade?
> >
> > -sw
>
> I clicked the link and I still see it.

Steve may be tripping over security settings. Best I can guess there.

--

Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:33:46 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>
> > Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:23:49 -0500, cshenk wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yes, this was the page that for some strange reason really matters
> >>> to you. It was also a very wierd and disturbing thing to have
> >>> Steve hunt for.
> >>
> >> Making it seem like I'm stalking you doesn't do anything for you
> >> credibility or cause here. Like I said, I saw it in the list of
> RFC >> subscribers as we were "celebrating" the 500 member/subscriber
> mark. >> That's hardly as evil (bwhahahahahahahahahahahHAHAAH!) as
> you make it >> out to be.
> >
> > Steve, I don't know what your issue is, nor do I care. The only odd
> > thing is, you felt you needed to hunt for a facebook page related to
> > me. That is quite odd, even for here.
>
> Damn, you are one DENSE broad. Do ever READ anything you're replying
> to? I explained where and how I saw your name and yet it still just
> keeps flying in one ear and whooshing out the other. Get a grip!
>
> -sw

Perhaps Steve, but the fact that you felt a need to 'check me out' at
all at any location for a Facebook address and post a url is not normal
behavior.

If it makes you feel better to call me by a dimunitive name of 'broad'
to cover it, then :yawn: been called far worse.

I get along with you generally but this one time, you've made a wrong
call and to save face, should just cease to post.

--

Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:39:25 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>
> > Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 08:56:43 -0500, cshenk wrote:
> >>
> >>> Found it! I'd used it in 2016 to try to locate Shane Ludwig. We
> >>> needed him to adjust the account privledges in a yahoo recipe
> group >>> (me and my cohort moderator).
> >>
> >> Well, this is kinda odd, but probably not a coincidence. Shane
> Ludwig >> just joined the RFC on Facebook group an hour ago (yes, I
> was stalking >> him, too <rolling eyes>).
> >>
> >> Of course you'll need a Facebook account to contact him there
> <snork>.
> >
> > Shane Ludwig was only moderator of Yahoo group 'Recipes' who could
> > correct the accounts of me and my cohort he turned them over to, so
> > we could raise another to moderator level. He fixed it for us in
> > time.
> >
> > Tell him Hi and thanks from me and Simon!
>
> I told him you were looking for him and he was given your contact
> information by somebody else in the Facebook group.
>
> -sw

Dude, we made contact in 2016....



--

On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 19:03:36 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 22:14:27 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>>
>>> Anybody who clicks on the link can see that it's not there any more -
>>> since you deleted it 36 hours ago.
>>>
>>> https://www.facebook.com/cshenk
>>>
>>> Why do you continue this lame charade?
>>
>> I clicked the link and I still see it.
>
>Perhaps is in your browser cache. I tired it in three different
>browsers both logged in and not logged into facebook.
>
>Huh, but I DO still see it in the list of RFC members and can see the
>account from that link. So I guess I'm partially at fault here.
>Facebook is playing games on me making me look stupid (Facebook has a
>way of doing that to everyone, one way or another).

The link works for me. I get a CS Facebook page that starts with a
picture of a beagle. FWIW.

Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 19:11:54 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>
> > Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:39:25 -0500, cshenk wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >>>
> >>>> On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 08:56:43 -0500, cshenk wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Found it! I'd used it in 2016 to try to locate Shane Ludwig.
> We >>>>> needed him to adjust the account privledges in a yahoo recipe
> >> group >>> (me and my cohort moderator).
> >>>>
> >>>> Well, this is kinda odd, but probably not a coincidence. Shane
> >> Ludwig >> just joined the RFC on Facebook group an hour ago (yes, I
> >> was stalking >> him, too <rolling eyes>).
> >>>>
> >>>> Of course you'll need a Facebook account to contact him there
> >> <snork>.
> >>>
> >>> Shane Ludwig was only moderator of Yahoo group 'Recipes' who could
> >>> correct the accounts of me and my cohort he turned them over to,
> so >>> we could raise another to moderator level. He fixed it for us
> in >>> time.
> >>>
> >>> Tell him Hi and thanks from me and Simon!
> >>
> >> I told him you were looking for him and he was given your contact
> >> information by somebody else in the Facebook group.
> >
> > Dude, we made contact in 2016....
>
> Well, exCUSE me. All you said is that you were trying to contact him
> (twice). There was nothing to indicate you ever made contact until
> after I mentioned it to him. I'll be sure not to do that again. Tell
> him Hello yourself.
>
> -sw

THat was not well done. Now you have Maxine and Shane on alert that
soemthing was wrong. I said i used the account to find him a year ago.
Hint (maybe blugeon needed?) a YEAR AGO.

Do NOT look up another's account and send alerts that are a year old
for them ok? You now definatley look like a stalker even if you did
not intend it.

You missed 'Shane fixed it'? We made contact OBVIOUSLY.

What the hell was in your head?

Don't worry, I sent him a note already that you were an idiot and all
is well.

--

Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 19:03:36 -0500, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 22:14:27 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
> >
> >> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> > > > >
> >>> Anybody who clicks on the link can see that it's not there any
> more - >>> since you deleted it 36 hours ago.
> > > >
> >>> https://www.facebook.com/cshenk
> > > >
> >>> Why do you continue this lame charade?
> >>
> >> I clicked the link and I still see it.
> >
> > Perhaps is in your browser cache. I tired it in three different
> > browsers both logged in and not logged into facebook.
> >
> > Huh, but I DO still see it in the list of RFC members and can see
> > the account from that link. So I guess I'm partially at fault here.
> > Facebook is playing games on me making me look stupid (Facebook has
> > a way of doing that to everyone, one way or another).
>
> The link works for me. I get a CS Facebook page that starts with a
> picture of a beagle. FWIW.

Yes. It's a basic set. I'll now have to use to make sure Shane isnt
freaked out by SW contacting him. THat was NOT well done by Steve at
all.

--

Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 19:08:19 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>
> > Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:33:46 -0500, cshenk wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >>>
> >>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:23:49 -0500, cshenk wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Yes, this was the page that for some strange reason really
> matters >>>>> to you. It was also a very wierd and disturbing thing
> to have >>>>> Steve hunt for.
> >>>>
> >>>> Making it seem like I'm stalking you doesn't do anything for you
> >>>> credibility or cause here. Like I said, I saw it in the list of
> >> RFC >> subscribers as we were "celebrating" the 500
> member/subscriber >> mark. >> That's hardly as evil
> (bwhahahahahahahahahahahHAHAAH!) as >> you make it >> out to be.
> >>>
> >>> Steve, I don't know what your issue is, nor do I care. The only
> odd >>> thing is, you felt you needed to hunt for a facebook page
> related to >>> me. That is quite odd, even for here.
> >>
> >> Damn, you are one DENSE broad. Do ever READ anything you're
> replying >> to? I explained where and how I saw your name and yet it
> still just >> keeps flying in one ear and whooshing out the other.
> Get a grip!
> >
> > Perhaps Steve, but the fact that you felt a need to 'check me out'
> > at all at any location for a Facebook address and post a url is not
> > normal behavior.
> >
> > If it makes you feel better to call me by a dimunitive name of
> > 'broad' to cover it, then :yawn: been called far worse.
> >
> > I get along with you generally but this one time, you've made a
> > wrong call and to save face, should just cease to post.
>
> <sigh> Yeah, you beat me down and I think we're both done here. I'll
> let Lucretia or Ophelia have the next round!
>
> -sw

Neither Ofhelia or Lucretia would take a name mentioned for why a
facebook account was used, miss it was a year ago then send them a
message on facebook for me by proxy, and cause an alert to that person.
That was 100% you.

You owe an apology to Shane, Maxine and me for your behavior.

--

"cshenk" > wrote in message
...
> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:33:46 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>>
>> > Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:23:49 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Yes, this was the page that for some strange reason really matters
>> >>> to you. It was also a very wierd and disturbing thing to have
>> >>> Steve hunt for.
>> >>
>> >> Making it seem like I'm stalking you doesn't do anything for you
>> >> credibility or cause here. Like I said, I saw it in the list of
>> RFC >> subscribers as we were "celebrating" the 500 member/subscriber
>> mark. >> That's hardly as evil (bwhahahahahahahahahahahHAHAAH!) as
>> you make it >> out to be.
>> >
>> > Steve, I don't know what your issue is, nor do I care. The only odd
>> > thing is, you felt you needed to hunt for a facebook page related to
>> > me. That is quite odd, even for here.
>>
>> Damn, you are one DENSE broad. Do ever READ anything you're replying
>> to? I explained where and how I saw your name and yet it still just
>> keeps flying in one ear and whooshing out the other. Get a grip!
>>
>> -sw
>
> Perhaps Steve, but the fact that you felt a need to 'check me out' at
> all at any location for a Facebook address and post a url is not normal
> behavior.

If that were true then most people using FB would not be normal.
>
> If it makes you feel better to call me by a dimunitive name of 'broad'
> to cover it, then :yawn: been called far worse.
>
> I get along with you generally but this one time, you've made a wrong
> call and to save face, should just cease to post.
>
> --
>

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 19:08:19 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>
>> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:33:46 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:23:49 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, this was the page that for some strange reason really matters
>>>>>> to you. It was also a very wierd and disturbing thing to have
>>>>>> Steve hunt for.
>>>>>
>>>>> Making it seem like I'm stalking you doesn't do anything for you
>>>>> credibility or cause here. Like I said, I saw it in the list of
>>> RFC >> subscribers as we were "celebrating" the 500 member/subscriber
>>> mark. >> That's hardly as evil (bwhahahahahahahahahahahHAHAAH!) as
>>> you make it >> out to be.
>>>>
>>>> Steve, I don't know what your issue is, nor do I care. The only odd
>>>> thing is, you felt you needed to hunt for a facebook page related to
>>>> me. That is quite odd, even for here.
>>>
>>> Damn, you are one DENSE broad. Do ever READ anything you're replying
>>> to? I explained where and how I saw your name and yet it still just
>>> keeps flying in one ear and whooshing out the other. Get a grip!
>>
>> Perhaps Steve, but the fact that you felt a need to 'check me out' at
>> all at any location for a Facebook address and post a url is not normal
>> behavior.
>>
>> If it makes you feel better to call me by a dimunitive name of 'broad'
>> to cover it, then :yawn: been called far worse.
>>
>> I get along with you generally but this one time, you've made a wrong
>> call and to save face, should just cease to post.
>
> <sigh> Yeah, you beat me down and I think we're both done here. I'll
> let Lucretia or Ophelia have the next round!

Hehehe.

"cshenk" > wrote in message
...
> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 19:03:36 -0500, Sqwertz >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 22:14:27 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> > > > >
>> >>> Anybody who clicks on the link can see that it's not there any
>> more - >>> since you deleted it 36 hours ago.
>> > > >
>> >>> https://www.facebook.com/cshenk
>> > > >
>> >>> Why do you continue this lame charade?
>> >>
>> >> I clicked the link and I still see it.
>> >
>> > Perhaps is in your browser cache. I tired it in three different
>> > browsers both logged in and not logged into facebook.
>> >
>> > Huh, but I DO still see it in the list of RFC members and can see
>> > the account from that link. So I guess I'm partially at fault here.
>> > Facebook is playing games on me making me look stupid (Facebook has
>> > a way of doing that to everyone, one way or another).
>>
>> The link works for me. I get a CS Facebook page that starts with a
>> picture of a beagle. FWIW.
>
> Yes. It's a basic set. I'll now have to use to make sure Shane isnt
> freaked out by SW contacting him. THat was NOT well done by Steve at
> all.

Fer crying out loud!

"cshenk" > wrote in message
...
> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 19:08:19 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>>
>> > Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:33:46 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >>>
>> >>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:23:49 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Yes, this was the page that for some strange reason really
>> matters >>>>> to you. It was also a very wierd and disturbing thing
>> to have >>>>> Steve hunt for.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Making it seem like I'm stalking you doesn't do anything for you
>> >>>> credibility or cause here. Like I said, I saw it in the list of
>> >> RFC >> subscribers as we were "celebrating" the 500
>> member/subscriber >> mark. >> That's hardly as evil
>> (bwhahahahahahahahahahahHAHAAH!) as >> you make it >> out to be.
>> >>>
>> >>> Steve, I don't know what your issue is, nor do I care. The only
>> odd >>> thing is, you felt you needed to hunt for a facebook page
>> related to >>> me. That is quite odd, even for here.
>> >>
>> >> Damn, you are one DENSE broad. Do ever READ anything you're
>> replying >> to? I explained where and how I saw your name and yet it
>> still just >> keeps flying in one ear and whooshing out the other.
>> Get a grip!
>> >
>> > Perhaps Steve, but the fact that you felt a need to 'check me out'
>> > at all at any location for a Facebook address and post a url is not
>> > normal behavior.
>> >
>> > If it makes you feel better to call me by a dimunitive name of
>> > 'broad' to cover it, then :yawn: been called far worse.
>> >
>> > I get along with you generally but this one time, you've made a
>> > wrong call and to save face, should just cease to post.
>>
>> <sigh> Yeah, you beat me down and I think we're both done here. I'll
>> let Lucretia or Ophelia have the next round!
>>
>> -sw
>
> Neither Ofhelia or Lucretia would take a name mentioned for why a
> facebook account was used, miss it was a year ago then send them a
> message on facebook for me by proxy, and cause an alert to that person.
> That was 100% you.
>
> You owe an apology to Shane, Maxine and me for your behavior.

Some of that makes no sense but I can't see what he did wrong. Sheesh.

On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:55:44 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:33:46 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>
>> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:23:49 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, this was the page that for some strange reason really matters
>>>> to you. It was also a very wierd and disturbing thing to have
>>>> Steve hunt for.
>>>
>>> Making it seem like I'm stalking you doesn't do anything for you
>>> credibility or cause here. Like I said, I saw it in the list of RFC
>>> subscribers as we were "celebrating" the 500 member/subscriber mark.
>>> That's hardly as evil (bwhahahahahahahahahahahHAHAAH!) as you make it
>>> out to be.
>>
>> Steve, I don't know what your issue is, nor do I care. The only odd
>> thing is, you felt you needed to hunt for a facebook page related to
>> me. That is quite odd, even for here.
>
>Damn, you are one DENSE broad. Do ever READ anything you're replying
>to? I explained where and how I saw your name and yet it still just
>keeps flying in one ear and whooshing out the other. Get a grip!
>
>-sw

I saw her name listed among the members also. I was surprised because
I didn't think she had gone to the Facebook group. So I "checked her
out" too. I clicked on the name to see if it was the same person and
it was. Nothing nefarious or stalking. Actually, I looked 'checked
out' a couple of names on the membership list.
Janet US

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:17:02 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> "cshenk" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 19:03:36 -0500, Sqwertz >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 22:14:27 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>>> >> ...
>>>> > > > >
>>>> >>> Anybody who clicks on the link can see that it's not there any
>>>> more - >>> since you deleted it 36 hours ago.
>>>> > > >
>>>> >>> https://www.facebook.com/cshenk
>>>> > > >
>>>> >>> Why do you continue this lame charade?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I clicked the link and I still see it.
>>>> >
>>>> > Perhaps is in your browser cache. I tired it in three different
>>>> > browsers both logged in and not logged into facebook.
>>>> >
>>>> > Huh, but I DO still see it in the list of RFC members and can see
>>>> > the account from that link. So I guess I'm partially at fault here.
>>>> > Facebook is playing games on me making me look stupid (Facebook has
>>>> > a way of doing that to everyone, one way or another).
>>>>
>>>> The link works for me. I get a CS Facebook page that starts with a
>>>> picture of a beagle. FWIW.
>>>
>>> Yes. It's a basic set. I'll now have to use to make sure Shane isnt
>>> freaked out by SW contacting him. THat was NOT well done by Steve at
>>> all.
>>
>> Fer crying out loud!
>
> Really. We've seen some kooky stuff from her, but this takes the
> cake.

I am starting to wonder what her problem was but you're the psych major.
You'll have to diagnose her.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:50:58 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> "cshenk" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>
>>>> <sigh> Yeah, you beat me down and I think we're both done here. I'll
>>>> let Lucretia or Ophelia have the next round!
>>>
>>> Neither Ofhelia or Lucretia would take a name mentioned for why a
>>> facebook account was used, miss it was a year ago then send them a
>>> message on facebook for me by proxy, and cause an alert to that person.
>>> That was 100% you.
>>>
>>> You owe an apology to Shane, Maxine and me for your behavior.
>>
>> Some of that makes no sense but I can't see what he did wrong. Sheesh.
>
> The whole, innocent conversation is publicly available on RFC on
> Facebook. A simple, "Thanks, Steve. But I didn't need his help
> anymore" would have sufficed.

Yep.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 20:12:42 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>
>> You owe an apology to Shane, Maxine and me for your behavior.
>
> Yeah, I feel like I should apologize for YOUR behavior. Like we
> needed any more proof you're insane.

*snicker*

On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 22:47:10 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:
snip
>
>ObFood: I should really eat more vegetables today. I'll make up for
>it tomorrow at Jason's Deli salad bar.
>
>-sw

I'm thinking grilled brats with peppers, onions and mushrooms on
bollio rolls with sides of some leftover potato salad and baked beans.
I have a pork butt thawing for smoking later in the week. I'll make
pulled pork and cole slaw.
We're having a 'cold spell' -- temps in the high 80s and low 90s with
nighttime temps in low 60s. Those temps make for pleasant living and
cooking outdoors.
Janet US

On 2017-07-17 10:41 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 22:47:10 -0500, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
> snip
>>
>> ObFood: I should really eat more vegetables today. I'll make up for
>> it tomorrow at Jason's Deli salad bar.
>>
>> -sw
>
> I'm thinking grilled brats with peppers, onions and mushrooms on
> bollio rolls with sides of some leftover potato salad and baked beans.
> I have a pork butt thawing for smoking later in the week. I'll make
> pulled pork and cole slaw.
> We're having a 'cold spell' -- temps in the high 80s and low 90s with
> nighttime temps in low 60s. Those temps make for pleasant living and
> cooking outdoors.
> Janet US
>
It'll be cooler here too this week but the smoke from the BC wild fires
means that it's best to stay indoors with the windows and doors shut.
Furthermore, I can't go out for cycle rides, just as I was planning on a
75k trip.
Graham

On 2017-07-18 7:15 AM, wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:04:46 -0600, graham > wrote:
>
>> On 2017-07-17 10:41 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 22:47:10 -0500, Sqwertz >
>>> wrote:
>>> snip
>>>>
>>>> ObFood: I should really eat more vegetables today. I'll make up for
>>>> it tomorrow at Jason's Deli salad bar.
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>>
>>> I'm thinking grilled brats with peppers, onions and mushrooms on
>>> bollio rolls with sides of some leftover potato salad and baked beans.
>>> I have a pork butt thawing for smoking later in the week. I'll make
>>> pulled pork and cole slaw.
>>> We're having a 'cold spell' -- temps in the high 80s and low 90s with
>>> nighttime temps in low 60s. Those temps make for pleasant living and
>>> cooking outdoors.
>>> Janet US
>>>
>> It'll be cooler here too this week but the smoke from the BC wild fires
>> means that it's best to stay indoors with the windows and doors shut.
>> Furthermore, I can't go out for cycle rides, just as I was planning on a
>> 75k trip.
>> Graham
>
> I saw some pics on the National last night of the smoke blowing over
> Alberta. Better than having the fires though, see Aussie firefighters
> are going to join them now as well.
>
My son lives and works in the Okanagan where rental property was already
at a premium. Now it will be impossible. Last winter, the *main floor*
of a 1000sq ft bungalow was $1800/month!!!!
Graham

On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:04:46 -0600, graham > wrote:

>snip
>It'll be cooler here too this week but the smoke from the BC wild fires
>means that it's best to stay indoors with the windows and doors shut.
>Furthermore, I can't go out for cycle rides, just as I was planning on a
>75k trip.
>Graham

I'm sorry to hear about the smoke drift. We have been fortunate so
far this year and last year in that we haven't had the scent of smoke
or the overcast from smoke. I hope you get a weather shift soon that
allows the smoke to move out.
Janet US

On 2017-07-18 9:36 AM, wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:26:37 -0600, graham > wrote:
>
>> On 2017-07-18 7:15 AM, wrote:
>>> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:04:46 -0600, graham > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2017-07-17 10:41 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 22:47:10 -0500, Sqwertz >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> snip
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ObFood: I should really eat more vegetables today. I'll make up for
>>>>>> it tomorrow at Jason's Deli salad bar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -sw
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm thinking grilled brats with peppers, onions and mushrooms on
>>>>> bollio rolls with sides of some leftover potato salad and baked beans.
>>>>> I have a pork butt thawing for smoking later in the week. I'll make
>>>>> pulled pork and cole slaw.
>>>>> We're having a 'cold spell' -- temps in the high 80s and low 90s with
>>>>> nighttime temps in low 60s. Those temps make for pleasant living and
>>>>> cooking outdoors.
>>>>> Janet US
>>>>>
>>>> It'll be cooler here too this week but the smoke from the BC wild fires
>>>> means that it's best to stay indoors with the windows and doors shut.
>>>> Furthermore, I can't go out for cycle rides, just as I was planning on a
>>>> 75k trip.
>>>> Graham
>>>
>>> I saw some pics on the National last night of the smoke blowing over
>>> Alberta. Better than having the fires though, see Aussie firefighters
>>> are going to join them now as well.
>>>
>> My son lives and works in the Okanagan where rental property was already
>> at a premium. Now it will be impossible. Last winter, the *main floor*
>> of a 1000sq ft bungalow was $1800/month!!!!
>> Graham
>
> It seems so strange because I tend to think of BC as a 'wet' province
> - all same as Devon when you have weather travelling across a sea then
> lifting up to traverse the moors or Rockies.
>
The N.American desert pokes up into BC. Drive through Kamloops - it's
parched.

On 2017-07-18 10:05 AM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:04:46 -0600, graham > wrote:
>
>> snip
>> It'll be cooler here too this week but the smoke from the BC wild fires
>> means that it's best to stay indoors with the windows and doors shut.
>> Furthermore, I can't go out for cycle rides, just as I was planning on a
>> 75k trip.
>> Graham
>
> I'm sorry to hear about the smoke drift. We have been fortunate so
> far this year and last year in that we haven't had the scent of smoke
> or the overcast from smoke. I hope you get a weather shift soon that
> allows the smoke to move out.
> Janet US
>
The trouble is, if the fires are still burning, the wind might shift in
your direction:-(
Graham

On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:43:03 -0600, graham > wrote:

>On 2017-07-18 10:05 AM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:04:46 -0600, graham > wrote:
>>
>>> snip
>>> It'll be cooler here too this week but the smoke from the BC wild fires
>>> means that it's best to stay indoors with the windows and doors shut.
>>> Furthermore, I can't go out for cycle rides, just as I was planning on a
>>> 75k trip.
>>> Graham
>>
>> I'm sorry to hear about the smoke drift. We have been fortunate so
>> far this year and last year in that we haven't had the scent of smoke
>> or the overcast from smoke. I hope you get a weather shift soon that
>> allows the smoke to move out.
>> Janet US
>>
>The trouble is, if the fires are still burning, the wind might shift in
>your direction:-(
>Graham

I hope not. The problem with breaking the drought is that all the
rain encouraged wild grass growth that naturally dies off around the
middle/end of June. All that dead grass is great fuel for moving
forest and range fires right along. We have had some fires here but
most have been attacked and put out within a day or two. This was the
quietest July 4th ever. There are signs everywhere telling people
that fireworks are not allowed beyond certain points because of the
danger of range fire. Last year a young clueless person set off
fireworks at a high point above the city. The grass caught fire, the
winds caught the fire, a house was lost, Lots of other stuff. They
caught the guy and held off sentencing him until a couple of weeks
just before the 4th. In addition to community service he is going to
have to pay off the cost of fighting the fire, $339,000. Basically
his life is ruined because of stupidity. I have no problem with
lightening caused fires but the careless caused fires really make me
angry.
Janet US

Julie Bove wrote in rec.food.cooking:

>
> "cshenk" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> > > On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 19:08:19 -0500, cshenk wrote:
> > >
> >>> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> > > >
> >>>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:33:46 -0500, cshenk wrote:
> > > > >
> >>>>> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> > > > > >
> >>>>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:23:49 -0500, cshenk wrote:
> > > > > > >
> >>>>>>> Yes, this was the page that for some strange reason really
> >>matters >>>>> to you. It was also a very wierd and disturbing thing
> >>to have >>>>> Steve hunt for.
> > > > > > >
> >>>>>> Making it seem like I'm stalking you doesn't do anything for
> you >>>>>> credibility or cause here. Like I said, I saw it in the
> list of >>>> RFC >> subscribers as we were "celebrating" the 500
> >>member/subscriber >> mark. >> That's hardly as evil
> >>(bwhahahahahahahahahahahHAHAAH!) as >> you make it >> out to be.
> > > > > >
> >>>>> Steve, I don't know what your issue is, nor do I care. The only
> >>odd >>> thing is, you felt you needed to hunt for a facebook page
> >>related to >>> me. That is quite odd, even for here.
> > > > >
> >>>> Damn, you are one DENSE broad. Do ever READ anything you're
> >>replying >> to? I explained where and how I saw your name and yet
> it >>still just >> keeps flying in one ear and whooshing out the
> other.
> > > Get a grip!
> > > >
> >>> Perhaps Steve, but the fact that you felt a need to 'check me out'
> >>> at all at any location for a Facebook address and post a url is
> not >>> normal behavior.
> > > >
> >>> If it makes you feel better to call me by a dimunitive name of
> >>> 'broad' to cover it, then :yawn: been called far worse.
> > > >
> >>> I get along with you generally but this one time, you've made a
> >>> wrong call and to save face, should just cease to post.
> > >
> >><sigh> Yeah, you beat me down and I think we're both done here.
> I'll
> > > let Lucretia or Ophelia have the next round!
> > >
> > > -sw
> >
> > Neither Ofhelia or Lucretia would take a name mentioned for why a
> > facebook account was used, miss it was a year ago then send them a
> > message on facebook for me by proxy, and cause an alert to that
> > person. That was 100% you.
> >
> > You owe an apology to Shane, Maxine and me for your behavior.
>
> Some of that makes no sense but I can't see what he did wrong. Sheesh.

Steve probably didnt 'mean wrong' but had he tried this on Lucreta or
just about any other member, the outcry would have been very loud.

Steve made a bad call to backtrack *any member* here.

I got Maxine in RI calmed down now.

--

Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:50:58 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> > "cshenk" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> > >
> >>> <sigh> Yeah, you beat me down and I think we're both done here.
> I'll >>> let Lucretia or Ophelia have the next round!
> > >
> >> Neither Ofhelia or Lucretia would take a name mentioned for why a
> >> facebook account was used, miss it was a year ago then send them a
> >> message on facebook for me by proxy, and cause an alert to that
> person. >> That was 100% you.
> > >
> >> You owe an apology to Shane, Maxine and me for your behavior.
> >
> > Some of that makes no sense but I can't see what he did wrong.
> > Sheesh.
>
> The whole, innocent conversation is publicly available on RFC on
> Facebook. A simple, "Thanks, Steve. But I didn't need his help
> anymore" would have sufficed.
>
> -sw

There is no 'THanks Steve' on this one. You didnt help me at all as it
was a long fixed issue. All you did was freak out some others. I
assume I will never get the apology.


--

Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 20:12:42 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>
> > You owe an apology to Shane, Maxine and me for your behavior.
>
> Yeah, I feel like I should apologize for YOUR behavior. Like we
> needed any more proof you're insane.
>
> -sw

Steve, lets drill this though your thick head.

You took it on yourself to look me up, then contact people without
asking me over an old issue, using a site I am not using and *knew* I
am not reading. If that isn't being a stalker asshole, then you must
have a very odd definition that eliminates that behavior only if
committed by YOU.

I will never get an apology from you, because you are not able to see
that your actions were wrong from the start.

--

"cshenk" > wrote in message
...
> Julie Bove wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>>
>> "cshenk" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >
>> > > On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 19:08:19 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>> > >
>> >>> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> > > >
>> >>>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:33:46 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>> > > > >
>> >>>>> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> > > > > >
>> >>>>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:23:49 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> >>>>>>> Yes, this was the page that for some strange reason really
>> >>matters >>>>> to you. It was also a very wierd and disturbing thing
>> >>to have >>>>> Steve hunt for.
>> > > > > > >
>> >>>>>> Making it seem like I'm stalking you doesn't do anything for
>> you >>>>>> credibility or cause here. Like I said, I saw it in the
>> list of >>>> RFC >> subscribers as we were "celebrating" the 500
>> >>member/subscriber >> mark. >> That's hardly as evil
>> >>(bwhahahahahahahahahahahHAHAAH!) as >> you make it >> out to be.
>> > > > > >
>> >>>>> Steve, I don't know what your issue is, nor do I care. The only
>> >>odd >>> thing is, you felt you needed to hunt for a facebook page
>> >>related to >>> me. That is quite odd, even for here.
>> > > > >
>> >>>> Damn, you are one DENSE broad. Do ever READ anything you're
>> >>replying >> to? I explained where and how I saw your name and yet
>> it >>still just >> keeps flying in one ear and whooshing out the
>> other.
>> > > Get a grip!
>> > > >
>> >>> Perhaps Steve, but the fact that you felt a need to 'check me out'
>> >>> at all at any location for a Facebook address and post a url is
>> not >>> normal behavior.
>> > > >
>> >>> If it makes you feel better to call me by a dimunitive name of
>> >>> 'broad' to cover it, then :yawn: been called far worse.
>> > > >
>> >>> I get along with you generally but this one time, you've made a
>> >>> wrong call and to save face, should just cease to post.
>> > >
>> >><sigh> Yeah, you beat me down and I think we're both done here.
>> I'll
>> > > let Lucretia or Ophelia have the next round!
>> > >
>> > > -sw
>> >
>> > Neither Ofhelia or Lucretia would take a name mentioned for why a
>> > facebook account was used, miss it was a year ago then send them a
>> > message on facebook for me by proxy, and cause an alert to that
>> > person. That was 100% you.
>> >
>> > You owe an apology to Shane, Maxine and me for your behavior.
>>
>> Some of that makes no sense but I can't see what he did wrong. Sheesh.
>
> Steve probably didnt 'mean wrong' but had he tried this on Lucreta or
> just about any other member, the outcry would have been very loud.
>
> Steve made a bad call to backtrack *any member* here.
>
> I got Maxine in RI calmed down now.

Jinxy. He looked me up on FB once. I didn't freak.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:09:27 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> "cshenk" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Julie Bove wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "cshenk" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>> > Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>> >
>>>> > > On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 19:08:19 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> >>> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>> > > >
>>>> >>>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:33:46 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>>>> > > > >
>>>> >>>>> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:23:49 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, this was the page that for some strange reason really
>>>> >>matters >>>>> to you. It was also a very wierd and disturbing thing
>>>> >>to have >>>>> Steve hunt for.
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> >>>>>> Making it seem like I'm stalking you doesn't do anything for
>>>> you >>>>>> credibility or cause here. Like I said, I saw it in the
>>>> list of >>>> RFC >> subscribers as we were "celebrating" the 500
>>>> >>member/subscriber >> mark. >> That's hardly as evil
>>>> >>(bwhahahahahahahahahahahHAHAAH!) as >> you make it >> out to be.
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> >>>>> Steve, I don't know what your issue is, nor do I care. The only
>>>> >>odd >>> thing is, you felt you needed to hunt for a facebook page
>>>> >>related to >>> me. That is quite odd, even for here.
>>>> > > > >
>>>> >>>> Damn, you are one DENSE broad. Do ever READ anything you're
>>>> >>replying >> to? I explained where and how I saw your name and yet
>>>> it >>still just >> keeps flying in one ear and whooshing out the
>>>> other.
>>>> > > Get a grip!
>>>> > > >
>>>> >>> Perhaps Steve, but the fact that you felt a need to 'check me out'
>>>> >>> at all at any location for a Facebook address and post a url is
>>>> not >>> normal behavior.
>>>> > > >
>>>> >>> If it makes you feel better to call me by a dimunitive name of
>>>> >>> 'broad' to cover it, then :yawn: been called far worse.
>>>> > > >
>>>> >>> I get along with you generally but this one time, you've made a
>>>> >>> wrong call and to save face, should just cease to post.
>>>> > >
>>>> >><sigh> Yeah, you beat me down and I think we're both done here.
>>>> I'll
>>>> > > let Lucretia or Ophelia have the next round!
>>>> > >
>>>> > > -sw
>>>> >
>>>> > Neither Ofhelia or Lucretia would take a name mentioned for why a
>>>> > facebook account was used, miss it was a year ago then send them a
>>>> > message on facebook for me by proxy, and cause an alert to that
>>>> > person. That was 100% you.
>>>> >
>>>> > You owe an apology to Shane, Maxine and me for your behavior.
>>>>
>>>> Some of that makes no sense but I can't see what he did wrong. Sheesh.
>>>
>>> Steve probably didnt 'mean wrong' but had he tried this on Lucreta or
>>> just about any other member, the outcry would have been very loud.
>>>
>>> Steve made a bad call to backtrack *any member* here.
>>>
>>> I got Maxine in RI calmed down now.
>>
>> Jinxy. He looked me up on FB once. I didn't freak.
>
> I did? Probably at some point. I'm sorry.

Yes. You told me to change my privacy settings. I did. Thanks.

On 7/19/2017 8:05 AM, wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:09:27 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>>>> Neither Ofhelia or Lucretia would take a name mentioned for why a
>>>>> facebook account was used, miss it was a year ago then send them a
>>>>> message on facebook for me by proxy, and cause an alert to that
>>>>> person. That was 100% you.
>
> Don't speak for me imbecile! I do not have, nor did I ever have a
> damn stupid fb account, IMO it's a perfect venue for dolts like you
> and shenk!
>
>
I had a FB account very briefly, years ago. I recently got suckered
into something (my fault) that re-activated the account. I had to jump
through hoops to deactivate it again. So while I can't say I *never*
had a FB account, I can definitely say I don't use it. Why is this even
an issue? Who cares who has a FB account or a defunct web site or whatever?

OB Food: I love fish, so I'll be baking a couple of cod fillets tonight.

Jill

On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 09:05:21 -0300, wrote:

>On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:09:27 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"cshenk" > wrote in message
...
>>> Julie Bove wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "cshenk" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>> > Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>> >
>>>> > > On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 19:08:19 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> >>> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > let Lucretia or Ophelia have the next round!
>>>> > >
>>>> > > -sw
>>>> >
>>>> > Neither Ofhelia or Lucretia would take a name mentioned for why a
>>>> > facebook account was used, miss it was a year ago then send them a
>>>> > message on facebook for me by proxy, and cause an alert to that
>>>> > person. That was 100% you.
>
>Don't speak for me imbecile! I do not have, nor did I ever have a
>damn stupid fb account, IMO it's a perfect venue for dolts like you
>and shenk!

Did you change your medication without talking to your doctor again?

Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:11:32 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>
> > There is no 'THanks Steve' on this one. You didnt help me at all
> > as it was a long fixed issue. All you did was freak out some
> > others.
>
> The only person who was 'freaked out' was you, Carol.
>
> > I assume I will never get the apology.
>
> I'm sorry.
>
> -sw

Apology accepted. I don't think you meant harm. It's just not you to
do that. It's over now.

--