Am Sonntag, 28. Mai 2017 13:12:32 UTC+2 schrieb Bruce:
> On Sun, 28 May 2017 08:10:02 -0300, lucretia
> > wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 27 May 2017 19:23:52 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
> >
> >>lucretia wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >>
> >>> Huh? You nuts or something? The last thing I would ever do is look
> >>> for someone to be my 'proxy' - I will not take it up with males
> >>> either, granted they should and do sometimes, dump on him but it
> >>> irritates beyond belief to see a FEMALE supporting his crude posts -
> >>> it sometimes comes over as if you fancy him or something equally
> >>> stupid.
> >>
> >>Actually you are the one being nuts. I did not defend him. A fakester
> >>posted as him and the comment on my end was to quit QUOTING it. Got
> >>it? Not sure yet? Don't quote the rude crap anyone here says. Still
> >>missing it? I DIDNT SAY ANYTHING about Sheldon. Now YOU are saying
> >>I'm suporting his posts? Get a brain.
> >
> >
> >I don't believe you actually read what is written, your brain must be
> >as dirty as his given how your kitchen stove looks.
>
> Is this the ultimate insult between women? "Your stove is dirty!"

<G> No offense taken.
And between men (kitchen-wise)?

"You scrub your iron pans with soap-water!"
"You put your knives in the dish-washer!"
"You bbq chicken-parts (others than wings) and eat them!"
"You like tofu!"

And - the ultimate (but suitable one):
"You like your steak well done with ketchup!!!"

Bye, Sanne.

On Sun, 28 May 2017 04:37:36 -0700 (PDT), sanne
> wrote:

>Am Sonntag, 28. Mai 2017 13:12:32 UTC+2 schrieb Bruce:
>> On Sun, 28 May 2017 08:10:02 -0300, lucretia
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >I don't believe you actually read what is written, your brain must be
>> >as dirty as his given how your kitchen stove looks.
>>
>> Is this the ultimate insult between women? "Your stove is dirty!"
>
><G> No offense taken.
>And between men (kitchen-wise)?
>
>"You scrub your iron pans with soap-water!"
>"You put your knives in the dish-washer!"

If it was possible, I'd put the whole house in the dishwasher.

>"You bbq chicken-parts (others than wings) and eat them!"
>"You like tofu!"

I think that's the worst one, even though I like tofu.

>And - the ultimate (but suitable one):
>"You like your steak well done with ketchup!!!"

Ok, that's even worse!

On 5/28/2017 7:37 AM, sanne wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 28. Mai 2017 13:12:32 UTC+2 schrieb Bruce:

>> Is this the ultimate insult between women? "Your stove is dirty!"
>
> <G> No offense taken.
> And between men (kitchen-wise)?
>
> "You scrub your iron pans with soap-water!"
> "You put your knives in the dish-washer!"
> "You bbq chicken-parts (others than wings) and eat them!"
> "You like tofu!"
>
> And - the ultimate (but suitable one):
> "You like your steak well done with ketchup!!!"

So funny.

"You eat pizza with a fork!" or better "You parboil your ribs!"

nancy

On 5/28/2017 7:11 AM, Bruce wrote:
> On Sun, 28 May 2017 08:10:02 -0300, lucretia
> > wrote:
>> I don't believe you actually read what is written, your brain must be
>> as dirty as his given how your kitchen stove looks.
>
> Is this the ultimate insult between women? "Your stove is dirty!"

The plot thickens. ;-D

"cshenk" wrote in message
...

Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Thu, 25 May 2017 15:12:54 -0700 (PDT), "
> > wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 2:48:56 PM UTC-5, Roy wrote:
> >>
> >> Rather than condemn and curse out Ophelia perhaps a suggestion to
> her would be >> more effective and LESS repulsive and vulgar.
> >>
> > She's been asked/informed about trimming posts but she just
> > sticks her fingers in her ears and replies "la-la-la-la-la,
> > I can't hear you." But go ahead, feel free to ask her and
> > stand back and wait for your cussing out.
>
> I've seen a lot worse happening here that nobody said a word about.
> And now you're in a witch hunt over insufficient trimming?

Considering the post was highly offensive with the 'n-word', this time
it DID matter and a bunch of others quoted it all.

She;s just one of many who don't have a clue on trimming, or do not
care. Normally, it's not an issue but I didnt appreciate getting that
repulsive racial derogatary diatribe multimple times. Again, she's
just one of many who repeated it.

===

*sigh* I had forgotten you were perfect))

Time you were back in my filter)))




--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Bruce" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 26 May 2017 15:00:06 -0700 (PDT), "
> wrote:

>On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 4:42:59 PM UTC-5, lucretia wrote:
>>
>> Yes, even though some criticized they left the subject unchanged.
>>
>>
>Guilty as charged and yes, I should have changed the wording
>of the subject. At least you didn't see everybody else's
>replies along with the original post when I replied.

That word is just as bad as Sheldon's average phobic post and nobody
seems to mind those. RFC: double standards, hypocrisy and group
hysteria. Great fun!

==

Ahhh you have noticed <g>

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"cshenk" wrote in message
...

lucretia wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Sat, 27 May 2017 11:29:09 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
> > lucretia wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> On Fri, 26 May 2017 17:39:38 -0500, "cshenk" >
> wrote: >>
> >> > Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >> >
> >> >> On Fri, 26 May 2017 15:00:06 -0700 (PDT),
> >> " >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 4:42:59 PM UTC-5, lucretia wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Yes, even though some criticized they left the subject
> >> unchanged. >> > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > Guilty as charged and yes, I should have changed the wording
> >> >> > of the subject. At least you didn't see everybody else's
> >> >> > replies along with the original post when I replied.
> >> >>
> >> >> That word is just as bad as Sheldon's average phobic post and
> >> nobody >> seems to mind those. RFC: double standards, hypocrisy and
> >> group >> hysteria. Great fun!
> >> >
> >> > No, it's not the same at all. Sheldon likes big boobs. The
> N-word >> > is radically past that.
> >>
> >> His use of other words are just as offensive to women, you just
> choose >> not to see it for some reason.
> >
> > Oh here we go again. I'm supposed to fly my hands in the air and
> > flap them everytime he says 'boob' or whatever else your soul
> > thinks I'm supposed to control that he posts. Guess what. Not
> > happening. I also dont mindlessly quote those messages either.
> >
> > I may quote a part of his messages if there was something of
> > interest, but I remove the rest if it was not of interest.
>
> boobs? If he stuck with that it would be fine. I suppose you will
> claim you have never seen him use filthy language, the sort that can
> only be referring to women.

And again, you seem to think because I am female, that it's my
responsibility to control a usenet member. I tell you what. Try
telling the guys here that it's THEIR problem to solve instead of
telling me it's all mine because I am female. I bet you get short
shrift if you get anything at all.

In the end, if you have a problem with any member, take it up with
them. Do not expect proxy services and don't blame folks when they
refuse to give them.

===

Is is a pity you don't remember that when you are issuing your orders.

--

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Wayne Boatwright" wrote in message
9.44...

On Sat 27 May 2017 11:02:25a, cshenk told us...

> lucretia wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On Sat, 27 May 2017 11:29:09 -0500, "cshenk" >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > lucretia wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, 26 May 2017 17:39:38 -0500, "cshenk" >
>> >> wrote: >>
>> >> > Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Fri, 26 May 2017 15:00:06 -0700 (PDT),
>> >> >> " >> >
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 4:42:59 PM UTC-5, lucretia
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Yes, even though some criticized they left the subject
>> >> >> >> unchanged. >> > >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > Guilty as charged and yes, I should have changed the
>> >> >> > wording of the subject. At least you didn't see
>> >> >> > everybody else's replies along with the original post
>> >> >> > when I replied.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> That word is just as bad as Sheldon's average phobic post
>> >> >> and
>> >> nobody >> seems to mind those. RFC: double standards,
>> >> hypocrisy and group >> hysteria. Great fun!
>> >> >
>> >> > No, it's not the same at all. Sheldon likes big boobs. The
>> >> > N-word >> > is radically past that.
>> >>
>> >> His use of other words are just as offensive to women, you
>> >> just choose >> not to see it for some reason.
>> >
>> > Oh here we go again. I'm supposed to fly my hands in the air
>> > and flap them everytime he says 'boob' or whatever else your
>> > soul thinks I'm supposed to control that he posts. Guess what.
>> > Not happening. I also dont mindlessly quote those messages
>> > either.
>> >
>> > I may quote a part of his messages if there was something of
>> > interest, but I remove the rest if it was not of interest.
>>
>> boobs? If he stuck with that it would be fine. I suppose you
>> will claim you have never seen him use filthy language, the sort
>> that can only be referring to women.
>
> And again, you seem to think because I am female, that it's my
> responsibility to control a usenet member. I tell you what. Try
> telling the guys here that it's THEIR problem to solve instead of
> telling me it's all mine because I am female. I bet you get short
> shrift if you get anything at all.
>
> In the end, if you have a problem with any member, take it up with
> them. Do not expect proxy services and don't blame folks when
> they refuse to give them.
>

Why not just drop it, Carol. I know you're on a roll, but it has
become tiresome and you'll ultimately never accomplish anything by
pursuing it. What's more, you're just inviting more unnecessary
commentary.


Wayne Boatwright

===

I am realising she likes the attention)


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Bruce" wrote in message ...

On Sat, 27 May 2017 14:05:11 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:

>Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On Sat, 27 May 2017 13:02:25 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>
>> > lucretia wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >
>> >> On Sat, 27 May 2017 11:29:09 -0500, "cshenk" >
>> wrote: >>
>> >> > lucretia wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >> >
>> >> >> His use of other words are just as offensive to women, you just
>> >> >> choose not to see it for some reason.
>> >> >
>> >> > Oh here we go again. I'm supposed to fly my hands in the air and
>> >> > flap them everytime he says 'boob' or whatever else your soul
>> >> > thinks I'm supposed to control that he posts. Guess what. Not
>> >> > happening. I also dont mindlessly quote those messages either.
>> >> >
>> >> > I may quote a part of his messages if there was something of
>> >> > interest, but I remove the rest if it was not of interest.
>> >>
>> >> boobs? If he stuck with that it would be fine. I suppose you will
>> >> claim you have never seen him use filthy language, the sort that
>> can >> only be referring to women.
>> >
>> > And again, you seem to think because I am female, that it's my
>> > responsibility to control a usenet member. I tell you what. Try
>> > telling the guys here that it's THEIR problem to solve instead of
>> > telling me it's all mine because I am female. I bet you get short
>> > shrift if you get anything at all.
>>
>> Why do you have a problem with the "N-word" then? Since don't control
>> what a "usenet member" posts and you don't flap your hands
>
>Talk about a massive 'whoosh' over your head!

I'll take that comment very serisouly since it comes from the expert
on whoosh.

===

lol

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Bruce" wrote in message ...

On Sat, 27 May 2017 19:11:31 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2017-05-27 6:56 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>> On Sat 27 May 2017 02:55:16p, lucretia told us...
>
>>
>> Someone should get rid of Sheldon, literally and permanently! He has
>> been the bane opf everyone's existence here for decades. He lies, he
>> insults, ad infinitum, and contributes absoluitely nothing
>> worthwhile.
>>
>
>There are others here who are much more caustic. At least he is
>attempting to be humorous.

You only think that because you're 50% like him.

==

+100000000


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Wayne Boatwright" wrote in message
9.44...

On Sat 27 May 2017 04:11:31p, Dave Smith told us...

> On 2017-05-27 6:56 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>> On Sat 27 May 2017 02:55:16p, lucretia told us...
>
>>
>> Someone should get rid of Sheldon, literally and permanently! He
>> has been the bane opf everyone's existence here for decades. He
>> lies, he insults, ad infinitum, and contributes absoluitely
>> nothing worthwhile.
>>
>
> There are others here who are much more caustic. At least he is
> attempting to be humorous.
>
>

IMHO he is simply just nuts.

Wayne Boatwright

===

I tend to ignore the rude, nasty, dirty bits and just respond the the decent
bits

No, I don't care if someone doesn't like that. Tough!



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Bruce" wrote in message ...

On Sun, 28 May 2017 08:10:02 -0300, lucretia
> wrote:

>On Sat, 27 May 2017 19:23:52 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
>>lucretia wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> Huh? You nuts or something? The last thing I would ever do is look
>>> for someone to be my 'proxy' - I will not take it up with males
>>> either, granted they should and do sometimes, dump on him but it
>>> irritates beyond belief to see a FEMALE supporting his crude posts -
>>> it sometimes comes over as if you fancy him or something equally
>>> stupid.
>>
>>Actually you are the one being nuts. I did not defend him. A fakester
>>posted as him and the comment on my end was to quit QUOTING it. Got
>>it? Not sure yet? Don't quote the rude crap anyone here says. Still
>>missing it? I DIDNT SAY ANYTHING about Sheldon. Now YOU are saying
>>I'm suporting his posts? Get a brain.
>
>
>I don't believe you actually read what is written, your brain must be
>as dirty as his given how your kitchen stove looks.

Is this the ultimate insult between women? "Your stove is dirty!"

====

lol Well I have to agree with that, because she does post pics ...

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"sanne" wrote in message
...

Am Samstag, 27. Mai 2017 08:04:37 UTC+2 schrieb Bruce:

> I believe that Google Groupers don't even know how much history
> they're quoting. I think, by default, they only see a link saying
> "Show quoted text" or something. If they don't click that, they could
> be quoting the entire bible and they wouldn't know it.

Oh yes, we do when replying - and I just don't know what to do now:
Snip (like I did here), don't (for Wayne)...
Or risk being "accused" snipping falsely when I didn't snip at all. ;-)

Bye, Sanne.

===

Sanne, this is NOT a moderated group and if someone feels the need to be in
such, I suggest they bugger off and join one.!

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Sun, 28 May 2017 19:13:20 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>"Bruce" wrote in message ...
>
>On Fri, 26 May 2017 15:00:06 -0700 (PDT), "
> wrote:
>
>>On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 4:42:59 PM UTC-5, lucretia wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, even though some criticized they left the subject unchanged.
>>>
>>>
>>Guilty as charged and yes, I should have changed the wording
>>of the subject. At least you didn't see everybody else's
>>replies along with the original post when I replied.
>
>That word is just as bad as Sheldon's average phobic post and nobody
>seems to mind those. RFC: double standards, hypocrisy and group
>hysteria. Great fun!
>
>==
>
>Ahhh you have noticed <g>

Yes. It sucks to be the victim of the day, but they'll soon move on
again

"Bruce" wrote in message ...

On Sun, 28 May 2017 19:13:20 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>"Bruce" wrote in message
.. .
>
>On Fri, 26 May 2017 15:00:06 -0700 (PDT), "
> wrote:
>
>>On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 4:42:59 PM UTC-5, lucretia wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, even though some criticized they left the subject unchanged.
>>>
>>>
>>Guilty as charged and yes, I should have changed the wording
>>of the subject. At least you didn't see everybody else's
>>replies along with the original post when I replied.
>
>That word is just as bad as Sheldon's average phobic post and nobody
>seems to mind those. RFC: double standards, hypocrisy and group
>hysteria. Great fun!
>
>==
>
>Ahhh you have noticed <g>

Yes. It sucks to be the victim of the day, but they'll soon move on
again

==

Trooo that ... nodnodnod! ;-)



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Wayne Boatwright" wrote in message
9.44...

On Sun 28 May 2017 11:15:52a, Ophelia told us...

> "Wayne Boatwright" wrote in message
> 9.44...
>
> On Sat 27 May 2017 11:02:25a, cshenk told us...
>
>> lucretia wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> On Sat, 27 May 2017 11:29:09 -0500, "cshenk" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > lucretia wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>> >
>>> >> On Fri, 26 May 2017 17:39:38 -0500, "cshenk"
>>> >> > wrote: >>
>>> >> > Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> On Fri, 26 May 2017 15:00:06 -0700 (PDT),
>>> >> >> " >> >
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> > On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 4:42:59 PM UTC-5, lucretia
>>> >> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Yes, even though some criticized they left the subject
>>> >> >> >> unchanged. >> > >
>>> >> >> > >
>>> >> >> > Guilty as charged and yes, I should have changed the
>>> >> >> > wording of the subject. At least you didn't see
>>> >> >> > everybody else's replies along with the original post
>>> >> >> > when I replied.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> That word is just as bad as Sheldon's average phobic post
>>> >> >> and
>>> >> nobody >> seems to mind those. RFC: double standards,
>>> >> hypocrisy and group >> hysteria. Great fun!
>>> >> >
>>> >> > No, it's not the same at all. Sheldon likes big boobs. The
>>> >> > N-word >> > is radically past that.
>>> >>
>>> >> His use of other words are just as offensive to women, you
>>> >> just choose >> not to see it for some reason.
>>> >
>>> > Oh here we go again. I'm supposed to fly my hands in the air
>>> > and flap them everytime he says 'boob' or whatever else your
>>> > soul thinks I'm supposed to control that he posts. Guess
>>> > what.
>>> > Not happening. I also dont mindlessly quote those messages
>>> > either.
>>> >
>>> > I may quote a part of his messages if there was something of
>>> > interest, but I remove the rest if it was not of interest.
>>>
>>> boobs? If he stuck with that it would be fine. I suppose you
>>> will claim you have never seen him use filthy language, the sort
>>> that can only be referring to women.
>>
>> And again, you seem to think because I am female, that it's my
>> responsibility to control a usenet member. I tell you what. Try
>> telling the guys here that it's THEIR problem to solve instead of
>> telling me it's all mine because I am female. I bet you get
>> short shrift if you get anything at all.
>>
>> In the end, if you have a problem with any member, take it up
>> with them. Do not expect proxy services and don't blame folks
>> when they refuse to give them.
>>
>
> Why not just drop it, Carol. I know you're on a roll, but it has
> become tiresome and you'll ultimately never accomplish anything by
> pursuing it. What's more, you're just inviting more unnecessary
> commentary.
>
>
> Wayne Boatwright
>
> ===
>
> I am realising she likes the attention)
>
>

She no longer exists in my world.

Wayne Boatwright

====

Nor in mine but you will see responses. Of course if you were Dave you
would whinge about that (although I doubt he is clever enough to know how to
do that). Hell he has had years to learn it but apparently hasn't managed
it.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On 5/29/2017 4:24 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> The two most oft
> posters here need to get lives.
>
> -sw



Steve Wertz - unrepentant woman stalker and total head case begging poor
Omelet to shoot him with a sniper rifle in austin.food:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ost
>
3/18/2011 3:49 PM
Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1162
readnews.com - News for Geeks and ISPs
fa35d278.newsreader.readnews.com


Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'd prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------