On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 15:19:24 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2017-06-05 3:08 PM, wrote:
>> Dave Smith wrote:
>>> penmart01 wrote:
>>>> Dave Smith
>>>
>>>> Is it a matter of being a wuss not to make a bad decision?
>>>>
>>>> Why can't you be honest and simply admit you're a biased/prejudiced
>>>> wuss... I've yet to meet anyone with tats who thought they made a bad
>>>> decision.
>>>
>>> You haven't? I have, and there are businesses that remove them, so some
>>> people are spending the money to undo what they had done. Given the
>>> number of people who sport really ugly tattoos, I would say that they
>>> already made bad choices.
>>
>> 99% are just names that are removed/covered, an easy fix and not
>> expensive.
>>
>> Without examples, like without picture of food, it's not a topic that
>> can be discussed intelligently. Granted I've seen some tats that I
>> thought were awful, but I've also seen food pictures here that were
>> equally awful... but never as awful as self decribed food with no
>> pictures.
>>
>Don't tell me that you are still whining about not seeing the food
>pictures I posted. Others saw them.

I've never seen a picture you've posted.

On 2017-06-05 8:29 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 15:19:24 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>> Don't tell me that you are still whining about not seeing the food
>> pictures I posted. Others saw them.
>
> I've never seen a picture you've posted.
>

Don't whine to me about it. Others have.

On Monday, June 5, 2017 at 6:48:52 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
>
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 15:53:24 -0700 (PDT), "
> > wrote:
>
> Just what 'tribe' are they getting these tattoos from.
>
> I don't know. I just know that these things are called tribals. Maybe
> in the Netherlands it refers to a tribe of windmill operators.
>
>
That sounds about right.

On Monday, June 5, 2017 at 7:14:51 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
> I'm not sure of the etiquette of it all either. It is polite to ask
> about them? Can I safely ask, "that exposed portion of the flower on
> your breast is nice, can I see the rest of it?"
>
>
Let us know if that results in one or two black eyes.

:-))

"Bruce" wrote in message ...

On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 20:03:29 -0400, Alex > wrote:

>jmcquown wrote:
>> On 6/3/2017 11:18 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> Price hasn't a whit to do with what constitutes good food... a well
>>> built deli sandwhich can beat a prime rib any day... in fact rib is my
>>> least favorite beef cut, I much prefer chuck and round.
>>>
>> I love prime rib. And ribeye. Ribeye sandwiches (french dip) on
>> buttered toasted french rolls are delicious. I don't like cold cuts
>> so you may have my share of your "deli" sandwiches.
>>
>> I've decided on pot roast for dinner. This "biddy" (my personal
>> troll, Alex, thinks juvenile name-calling fazes me) will be cooking a
>> beef shoulder roast today. As always, it will be delicious.
>>
>> Jill
>
>I've never spoken or typed that word in my life.

That's good. It would reflect badly on you.

==

Bruce!!! lol




--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 09:06:39 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>"Bruce" wrote in message ...
>
>On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 20:03:29 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>
>>jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 6/3/2017 11:18 PM, wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Price hasn't a whit to do with what constitutes good food... a well
>>>> built deli sandwhich can beat a prime rib any day... in fact rib is my
>>>> least favorite beef cut, I much prefer chuck and round.
>>>>
>>> I love prime rib. And ribeye. Ribeye sandwiches (french dip) on
>>> buttered toasted french rolls are delicious. I don't like cold cuts
>>> so you may have my share of your "deli" sandwiches.
>>>
>>> I've decided on pot roast for dinner. This "biddy" (my personal
>>> troll, Alex, thinks juvenile name-calling fazes me) will be cooking a
>>> beef shoulder roast today. As always, it will be delicious.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>>I've never spoken or typed that word in my life.
>
>That's good. It would reflect badly on you.
>
>==
>
>Bruce!!! lol

lol

On 6/5/2017 8:14 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> I'm not sure of the etiquette of it all either. It is polite to ask
> about them? Can I safely ask, "that exposed portion of the flower on
> your breast is nice, can I see the rest of it?"

I saw an episode on one of the judge shows (People's Court, maybe) last
week. The lawsuit was over a vet bill for a horse that was injured
while being boarded. The plaintiff had part of a horse face showing on
her decolletage. The guy who interviews them as they leave the
courtroom commented on it. I'd have been tempted to ask if the full
tattoo included the horses ass.

Jill

On 6/5/2017 10:51 PM, wrote:
> On Monday, June 5, 2017 at 7:14:51 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure of the etiquette of it all either. It is polite to ask
>> about them? Can I safely ask, "that exposed portion of the flower on
>> your breast is nice, can I see the rest of it?"
>>
>>
> Let us know if that results in one or two black eyes.
>
> :-))
>

I just want to appreciate fine art.

On 2017-06-05, Janet > wrote:

> In UK there;s a whole TV series called, and featuring "Tattoo
> disasters".

Long ago, I ran across a webpage that pointed out what Japanese and
other Asian tats really say. It's like tat artists were having a joke
on many clueless round-eyes. I can no longer find the webpage.

nb

On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 19:51:57 -0700 (PDT), "
> wrote:

>On Monday, June 5, 2017 at 7:14:51 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure of the etiquette of it all either. It is polite to ask
>> about them? Can I safely ask, "that exposed portion of the flower on
>> your breast is nice, can I see the rest of it?"
>>
>>
>Let us know if that results in one or two black eyes.

Most women who publicly expose part of a tat over their breast will
gladly move the last bit of cloth aside to expose the entire tat...
least they have for me, especially when they see I have tats and the
one on my chest is typically partly exposed. Women usually engage me
in lengthy discussions about tattoos. Very few women who
have chest tats have them very low on their breast (they are really a
chest tat), you would see it all at the beach. Unless I'm wearing a
business type shirt buttoned up to the next to last button the top
portion of my chest tat is visible... and lots of people who
themselves are into tats have asked to see it all and it's mostly
females who ask... often they are quite surprised when they see the
extent of that tattoo; two tall ships with all sails fully displayed,
with water, clouds, birds, a very nice lighthouse, one banner says US
NAVY another banner says Mediterranean Cruise... it's truly a chest
tat, it doesn't go near the nipples, same as most females with chest
tats.
The little town I live in has two tattoo parlors, one owner operater a
female in her 40s. She's told me that more than half her business is
tattooing females, mostly older females. Females prefer her doing
their tats as many women want tats in intimate places. She's told me
that nowadays it's mostly females who want tats.

In article >, penmart01
@aol.com says...

Unless I'm wearing a
> business type shirt buttoned up to the next to last button the top
> portion of my chest tat is visible... and lots of people who
> themselves are into tats have asked to see it all and it's mostly
> females who ask... often they are quite surprised when they see the
> extent of that tattoo; two tall ships with all sails fully displayed,
> with water, clouds, birds, a very nice lighthouse, one banner says US
> NAVY another banner says Mediterranean Cruise...

Nobody believes you unless you post a picture, LOL

Janet UK

On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 20:49:51 +0100, Janet > wrote:

>In article >, penmart01
says...
>
> Unless I'm wearing a
>> business type shirt buttoned up to the next to last button the top
>> portion of my chest tat is visible... and lots of people who
>> themselves are into tats have asked to see it all and it's mostly
>> females who ask... often they are quite surprised when they see the
>> extent of that tattoo; two tall ships with all sails fully displayed,
>> with water, clouds, birds, a very nice lighthouse, one banner says US
>> NAVY another banner says Mediterranean Cruise...
>
> Nobody believes you unless you post a picture, LOL
>
> Janet UK

I don't have a picture of my chest tat but I will attempt to take
one... may need to use a mirror with Cinamascope... back then there
were no digicams.
But here's my Octopussy:
http://tinypic.com/m/jl6lqu/3
And my Tinkerbell:
http://tinypic.com/m/jl6lqx/3
Not very good pics, taken with a film camera and scanned.
If you visited I'd be pleased to display all my parts if you displayed
all your parts.

On 6/6/2017 5:58 PM, wrote:
> If you visited I'd be pleased to display all my parts if you displayed
> all your parts.
>

That's what you say to the kiddies at the playground, you old pervert.