I hope those of you who answered the troll realised those posts are
crossposted to hell and it generates more of their foolishness here,
rather than drifting away after a couple of posts.

Pls check what groups your post is going to!

On 2016-03-19 11:17 AM, wrote:
> I hope those of you who answered the troll realised those posts are
> crossposted to hell and it generates more of their foolishness here,
> rather than drifting away after a couple of posts.
>
> Pls check what groups your post is going to!
>


Thanks to Ed's advice about customizing Thunderbird's filters, I an no
longer getting the cross posted messages..... until some imbecile here
replies to them. It should be no surprise that 99% of cross posted
messages here are idiotic.

On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:39:35 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2016-03-19 11:17 AM, wrote:
>> I hope those of you who answered the troll realised those posts are
>> crossposted to hell and it generates more of their foolishness here,
>> rather than drifting away after a couple of posts.
>>
>> Pls check what groups your post is going to!
>>
>
>
>Thanks to Ed's advice about customizing Thunderbird's filters, I an no
>longer getting the cross posted messages..... until some imbecile here
>replies to them. It should be no surprise that 99% of cross posted
>messages here are idiotic.

The only time a crossposting might be relevant is a crosspost to
kitchen equipment, possibly. When it goes to all these other kooky
places, we then get a whole bunch of other kooks responding and not
caring about crossposting either.

wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:39:35 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
> > On 2016-03-19 11:17 AM, wrote:
> >> I hope those of you who answered the troll realised those posts are
> >> crossposted to hell and it generates more of their foolishness
> here, >> rather than drifting away after a couple of posts.
> > >
> >> Pls check what groups your post is going to!
> > >
> >
> >
> > Thanks to Ed's advice about customizing Thunderbird's filters, I an
> > no longer getting the cross posted messages..... until some
> > imbecile here replies to them. It should be no surprise that 99%
> > of cross posted messages here are idiotic.
>
> The only time a crossposting might be relevant is a crosspost to
> kitchen equipment, possibly. When it goes to all these other kooky
> places, we then get a whole bunch of other kooks responding and not
> caring about crossposting either.

Actually, alt.bread.recipes can be valid as well.



--

On 2016-03-19 2:16 PM, cshenk wrote:
> wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:39:35 -0400, Dave Smith

>>> Thanks to Ed's advice about customizing Thunderbird's filters, I an
>>> no longer getting the cross posted messages..... until some
>>> imbecile here replies to them. It should be no surprise that 99%
>>> of cross posted messages here are idiotic.
>>
>> The only time a crossposting might be relevant is a crosspost to
>> kitchen equipment, possibly. When it goes to all these other kooky
>> places, we then get a whole bunch of other kooks responding and not
>> caring about crossposting either.
>
> Actually, alt.bread.recipes can be valid as well.
>

True enough, but I don't recall ever seeing that one the cross posted
crap. It is usually alt. something stupid. The 1% of legitimate cross
posts are lost in the myriad idiotic cross posts.

On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:52:54 -0300, wrote:

>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:39:35 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>
>>On 2016-03-19 11:17 AM, wrote:
>>> I hope those of you who answered the troll realised those posts are
>>> crossposted to hell and it generates more of their foolishness here,
>>> rather than drifting away after a couple of posts.
>>>
>>> Pls check what groups your post is going to!
>>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks to Ed's advice about customizing Thunderbird's filters, I an no
>>longer getting the cross posted messages..... until some imbecile here
>>replies to them. It should be no surprise that 99% of cross posted
>>messages here are idiotic.
>
>The only time a crossposting might be relevant is a crosspost to
>kitchen equipment, possibly. When it goes to all these other kooky
>places, we then get a whole bunch of other kooks responding and not
>caring about crossposting either.

right
Janet US

On 2016-03-19 1:52 PM, wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:39:35 -0400, Dave Smith

>> Thanks to Ed's advice about customizing Thunderbird's filters, I an no
>> longer getting the cross posted messages..... until some imbecile here
>> replies to them. It should be no surprise that 99% of cross posted
>> messages here are idiotic.
>
> The only time a crossposting might be relevant is a crosspost to
> kitchen equipment, possibly. When it goes to all these other kooky
> places, we then get a whole bunch of other kooks responding and not
> caring about crossposting either.
>

I would suggest that, sadly, they do care about crossposting. It is
their way of trying to get as many people as possible to see how idiotic
they are.

On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:39:35 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2016-03-19 11:17 AM, wrote:
>> I hope those of you who answered the troll realised those posts are
>> crossposted to hell and it generates more of their foolishness here,
>> rather than drifting away after a couple of posts.
>>
>> Pls check what groups your post is going to!
>>
>
>
>Thanks to Ed's advice about customizing Thunderbird's filters, I an no
>longer getting the cross posted messages..... until some imbecile here
>replies to them. It should be no surprise that 99% of cross posted
>messages here are idiotic.

yep. there is one individual who just doesn't get it and is compelled
to respond. I just right click the original message and delete. But
thanks to her I end up with the message quoted like it is a normal
person posting .
Janet US

On 2016-03-19 2:26 PM, Janet B wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:39:35 -0400, Dave Smith

>> Thanks to Ed's advice about customizing Thunderbird's filters, I an no
>> longer getting the cross posted messages..... until some imbecile here
>> replies to them. It should be no surprise that 99% of cross posted
>> messages here are idiotic.
>
> yep. there is one individual who just doesn't get it and is compelled
> to respond. I just right click the original message and delete. But
> thanks to her I end up with the message quoted like it is a normal
> person posting .


People don't always realize when they reply to one that it has been
cross posted. I learned the hard way to check. Now it is easier to
simply get rid of them ahead of time.

On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:26:05 -0600, Janet B >
wrote:

>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:39:35 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>
>>On 2016-03-19 11:17 AM, wrote:
>>> I hope those of you who answered the troll realised those posts are
>>> crossposted to hell and it generates more of their foolishness here,
>>> rather than drifting away after a couple of posts.
>>>
>>> Pls check what groups your post is going to!
>>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks to Ed's advice about customizing Thunderbird's filters, I an no
>>longer getting the cross posted messages..... until some imbecile here
>>replies to them. It should be no surprise that 99% of cross posted
>>messages here are idiotic.
>
>yep. there is one individual who just doesn't get it and is compelled
>to respond. I just right click the original message and delete. But
>thanks to her I end up with the message quoted like it is a normal
>person posting .
>Janet US

I noticed that you are using Agent. Don't delete the offending
message, mark it "ignore thread." That way you don't get any of the
follow-ups. I have mine set so that all of the ignored messages are
not shown unless I change my view and see who all is there.
--
Susan N.

"Moral indignation is in most cases two percent moral,
48 percent indignation, and 50 percent envy."
Vittorio De Sica, Italian movie director (1901-1974)

On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 19:52:56 -0400, The Cook >
wrote:

>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:26:05 -0600, Janet B >
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:39:35 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>>
>>>On 2016-03-19 11:17 AM, wrote:
>>>> I hope those of you who answered the troll realised those posts are
>>>> crossposted to hell and it generates more of their foolishness here,
>>>> rather than drifting away after a couple of posts.
>>>>
>>>> Pls check what groups your post is going to!
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks to Ed's advice about customizing Thunderbird's filters, I an no
>>>longer getting the cross posted messages..... until some imbecile here
>>>replies to them. It should be no surprise that 99% of cross posted
>>>messages here are idiotic.
>>
>>yep. there is one individual who just doesn't get it and is compelled
>>to respond. I just right click the original message and delete. But
>>thanks to her I end up with the message quoted like it is a normal
>>person posting .
>>Janet US
>
>I noticed that you are using Agent. Don't delete the offending
>message, mark it "ignore thread." That way you don't get any of the
>follow-ups. I have mine set so that all of the ignored messages are
>not shown unless I change my view and see who all is there.

thanks for the tip
Janet US

Janet B wrote:
>
> thanks for the tip

Said the hooker to the leper. >;-o

On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 19:52:56 -0400, The Cook >
wrote:

>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:26:05 -0600, Janet B >
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:39:35 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>>
>>>On 2016-03-19 11:17 AM, wrote:
>>>> I hope those of you who answered the troll realised those posts are
>>>> crossposted to hell and it generates more of their foolishness here,
>>>> rather than drifting away after a couple of posts.
>>>>
>>>> Pls check what groups your post is going to!
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks to Ed's advice about customizing Thunderbird's filters, I an no
>>>longer getting the cross posted messages..... until some imbecile here
>>>replies to them. It should be no surprise that 99% of cross posted
>>>messages here are idiotic.
>>
>>yep. there is one individual who just doesn't get it and is compelled
>>to respond. I just right click the original message and delete. But
>>thanks to her I end up with the message quoted like it is a normal
>>person posting .
>>Janet US
>
>I noticed that you are using Agent. Don't delete the offending
>message, mark it "ignore thread." That way you don't get any of the
>follow-ups. I have mine set so that all of the ignored messages are
>not shown unless I change my view and see who all is there.

Yes one of the beauties of Agent.

On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 21:07:44 -0300, wrote:

>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 19:52:56 -0400, The Cook >
>wrote:
>>
>>I noticed that you are using Agent. Don't delete the offending
>>message, mark it "ignore thread." That way you don't get any of the
>>follow-ups. I have mine set so that all of the ignored messages are
>>not shown unless I change my view and see who all is there.
>
>Yes one of the beauties of Agent.

Who is? Susan? Forte should bring a calendar out under that title.

On 3/19/2016 11:17 AM, wrote:

> I hope those of you who answered the troll realised those posts are
> crossposted to hell and it generates more of their foolishness here,
> rather than drifting away after a couple of posts.
>
> Pls check what groups your post is going to!
>
Along a similar line, the posts that aren't snipped to relevant posts
above are going to be KF'd by me. Many probably won't care but I've had
a look at what is interesting over a certain number of lines, and I can
do without most of them.

--
ღ.¸¸.œ«*¨`*œ¶
Cheryl <-- Getting to be an expert with the kf here lately! lol

On 3/19/2016 9:56 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> RFC has always been a haven for trolls because of a few regulars who
> just can't control their ejaculations.
>
> -sw
You criminally STALK and ABUSE women, you sick little dwarfy man!

Here's what you did when you went all over the Usenet impersonating the
well-liked regular named "sf" and posting all her personal data on the
net against her will, including her:

* home address
* age
* cell phone number
* husband's name

etc.

YOU did that, you evil *******!

And then you had the hubris to actually GLOAT about in public saying:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ost
>
Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:18:00 -0600
MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4



She should call the cops. I've already publicly admitted it is me so
a conviction should be a piece of cake and then forging would stop.
So what's stopping her? I think she suffers from Bovism - she just
loves the attention and drama and screw the rest of the group.

-sw

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


And before that you literally stalked poor Omelet, a local Auustin
favorite, right off the Usenet!

In your worst moment ever you actually begged her to KILL you:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ost
>
3/18/2011 3:49 PM
Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1162
readnews.com - News for Geeks and ISPs
fa35d278.newsreader.readnews.com


Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'd prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Then after having your nose rubbed in your filthy criminal stalking you
came back with, not an apology, nor the slightest remorse, just this:


"The facebook group is much more pleasant."


But we all know that's only because you cower over there in mortal fear
of being booted by the FB admins.

You're _so done_ here virus, I mean really ****ing done.

I'm making you a project like no other, expect a lot more of your evil
abuse and hatred to be aired for all to see here.

And we both know there's a google archive full of your hatred of women
just waiting to be hung out on the virtual clothesline to dry.

Enjoy then, you rotten, worthless misogynistic *******!