On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:45:18 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:

>On 3/17/2016 11:21 AM, Je?us wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:45:34 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/16/2016 9:07 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:49 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/15/2016 9:53 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:33:26 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Monday, March 14, 2016 at 11:17:57 PM UTC-6, Jeßus wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:08:50 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> One good thing about severte "third degree" burns, they do not hurt much. All the nerves were destroyed by the burn!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And when the skin starts healing Mr RN, what then?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, since nerves generally do not regernate much... What do you think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think I hope you don't actually ever gain employment as an RN.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Burn victims with severe burns initially have an easy time with their
>>>>> injuries until their nerves come back online - then it's a world of
>>>>> pain, literally. They pretty much have to be doped up all the time for a
>>>>> period of time. The worst part is changing the dressing and removing
>>>>> whatever it is they remove when they clean the burns.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, not very nice.
>>>>
>>>>> I wouldn't have the guts to do that job. My wife worked at the Burn
>>>>> Center of the Pacific so she had some guts. It's quite the badge of
>>>>> courage. Burn nurses have a high burn-out rate - and I'm not even trying
>>>>> to be funny.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think I could do it...
>>>>
>>>
>>> My guess is that being a burn nurse is the toughest kind of nursing
>>> around. The worst thing she ever saw was when a woman lost all the skin
>>> on her body due to an allergic reaction. The good news is that the woman
>>> survived and her new skin was perfect - like a baby's.
>>
>> I have heard of that situation before the new 'improved' skin.
>>
>
>I'd sure like to repair my old skin - it's in shambles. Too bad the fix
>would probably be awesomely painful and probably deadly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXbaWXoapoc

On 3/17/2016 12:16 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:45:18 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>
>> On 3/17/2016 11:21 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:45:34 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/16/2016 9:07 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:49 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/15/2016 9:53 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:33:26 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Monday, March 14, 2016 at 11:17:57 PM UTC-6, Jeßus wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:08:50 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> One good thing about severte "third degree" burns, they do not hurt much. All the nerves were destroyed by the burn!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And when the skin starts healing Mr RN, what then?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, since nerves generally do not regernate much... What do you think?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think I hope you don't actually ever gain employment as an RN.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Burn victims with severe burns initially have an easy time with their
>>>>>> injuries until their nerves come back online - then it's a world of
>>>>>> pain, literally. They pretty much have to be doped up all the time for a
>>>>>> period of time. The worst part is changing the dressing and removing
>>>>>> whatever it is they remove when they clean the burns.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, not very nice.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I wouldn't have the guts to do that job. My wife worked at the Burn
>>>>>> Center of the Pacific so she had some guts. It's quite the badge of
>>>>>> courage. Burn nurses have a high burn-out rate - and I'm not even trying
>>>>>> to be funny.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think I could do it...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My guess is that being a burn nurse is the toughest kind of nursing
>>>> around. The worst thing she ever saw was when a woman lost all the skin
>>>> on her body due to an allergic reaction. The good news is that the woman
>>>> survived and her new skin was perfect - like a baby's.
>>>
>>> I have heard of that situation before the new 'improved' skin.
>>>
>>
>> I'd sure like to repair my old skin - it's in shambles. Too bad the fix
>> would probably be awesomely painful and probably deadly.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXbaWXoapoc
>

That's a very interesting movie. Mostly it made people uncomfortable.

On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:43:43 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:

>On 3/17/2016 12:16 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:45:18 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/17/2016 11:21 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:45:34 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/16/2016 9:07 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have heard of that situation before the new 'improved' skin.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'd sure like to repair my old skin - it's in shambles. Too bad the fix
>>> would probably be awesomely painful and probably deadly.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXbaWXoapoc
>>
>
>That's a very interesting movie. Mostly it made people uncomfortable.

Not me. It was the only Jim Carrey (sp?) movie I ever liked.

On 3/17/2016 1:08 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:43:43 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>
>> On 3/17/2016 12:16 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:45:18 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/17/2016 11:21 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:45:34 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/16/2016 9:07 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have heard of that situation before the new 'improved' skin.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'd sure like to repair my old skin - it's in shambles. Too bad the fix
>>>> would probably be awesomely painful and probably deadly.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXbaWXoapoc
>>>
>>
>> That's a very interesting movie. Mostly it made people uncomfortable.
>
> Not me. It was the only Jim Carrey (sp?) movie I ever liked.
>

I thought it was a pretty good movie - it was kind of scary because it's
real life horror - not fake slasher stuff.

On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 13:40:17 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:

>On 3/17/2016 1:08 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:43:43 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/17/2016 12:16 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:45:18 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/17/2016 11:21 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:45:34 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/16/2016 9:07 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have heard of that situation before the new 'improved' skin.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd sure like to repair my old skin - it's in shambles. Too bad the fix
>>>>> would probably be awesomely painful and probably deadly.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXbaWXoapoc
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's a very interesting movie. Mostly it made people uncomfortable.
>>
>> Not me. It was the only Jim Carrey (sp?) movie I ever liked.
>>
>
>I thought it was a pretty good movie - it was kind of scary because it's
>real life horror - not fake slasher stuff.

Known quite a few ppl on the Interweb that are very much like the
character Carrey plays in the movie.

On 2016-03-17 7:08 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:43:43 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>
>> On 3/17/2016 12:16 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:45:18 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/17/2016 11:21 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:45:34 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/16/2016 9:07 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have heard of that situation before the new 'improved' skin.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'd sure like to repair my old skin - it's in shambles. Too bad the fix
>>>> would probably be awesomely painful and probably deadly.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXbaWXoapoc
>>>
>>
>> That's a very interesting movie. Mostly it made people uncomfortable.
>
> Not me. It was the only Jim Carrey (sp?) movie I ever liked.
>

I saw Jim Carrey in a local comedy venue when he was just starting out.
He was really funny. His movies have been disappointing. I have to give
him credit for his acting in Man on the Moon. Not being crazy about his
movie performances, and really hating Andy Kauffman, I have to saw that
I was impressed with him in that movie. He was also good in Eternal
Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.

On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:21:24 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2016-03-17 7:08 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:43:43 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/17/2016 12:16 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:45:18 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/17/2016 11:21 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:45:34 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/16/2016 9:07 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have heard of that situation before the new 'improved' skin.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd sure like to repair my old skin - it's in shambles. Too bad the fix
>>>>> would probably be awesomely painful and probably deadly.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXbaWXoapoc
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's a very interesting movie. Mostly it made people uncomfortable.
>>
>> Not me. It was the only Jim Carrey (sp?) movie I ever liked.
>>
>
>I saw Jim Carrey in a local comedy venue when he was just starting out.
>He was really funny. His movies have been disappointing.

He gets too over the top, which gets old after a while.

>I have to give
>him credit for his acting in Man on the Moon. Not being crazy about his
>movie performances, and really hating Andy Kauffman, I have to saw that
>I was impressed with him in that movie. He was also good in Eternal
>Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.

Actually, I agree with you there. I'd forgotten about those two
particular movies.

On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 3:18:11 PM UTC-4, Jeßus wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:21:24 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
> >On 2016-03-17 7:08 PM, Je?us wrote:
> >> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:43:43 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 3/17/2016 12:16 PM, Je?us wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:45:18 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 3/17/2016 11:21 AM, Je?us wrote:
> >>>>>> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:45:34 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 3/16/2016 9:07 AM, Je?us wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I have heard of that situation before the new 'improved' skin.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'd sure like to repair my old skin - it's in shambles. Too bad the fix
> >>>>> would probably be awesomely painful and probably deadly.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXbaWXoapoc
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> That's a very interesting movie. Mostly it made people uncomfortable.
> >>
> >> Not me. It was the only Jim Carrey (sp?) movie I ever liked.
> >>
> >
> >I saw Jim Carrey in a local comedy venue when he was just starting out.
> >He was really funny. His movies have been disappointing.
>
> He gets too over the top, which gets old after a while.
>
> >I have to give
> >him credit for his acting in Man on the Moon. Not being crazy about his
> >movie performances, and really hating Andy Kauffman, I have to saw that
> >I was impressed with him in that movie. He was also good in Eternal
> >Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.
>
> Actually, I agree with you there. I'd forgotten about those two
> particular movies.

I liked him (oddly enough) in The Mask, and in The Truman
Show, where he was well controlled by the director. He's
a very talented man, but he needs a firm hand on the reins.

Cindy Hamilton

On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:47:32 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 3:18:11 PM UTC-4, Jeßus wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:21:24 -0400, Dave Smith
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >On 2016-03-17 7:08 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:43:43 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On 3/17/2016 12:16 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> >>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:45:18 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On 3/17/2016 11:21 AM, Je?us wrote:
>> >>>>>> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:45:34 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On 3/16/2016 9:07 AM, Je?us wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I have heard of that situation before the new 'improved' skin.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I'd sure like to repair my old skin - it's in shambles. Too bad the fix
>> >>>>> would probably be awesomely painful and probably deadly.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXbaWXoapoc
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> That's a very interesting movie. Mostly it made people uncomfortable.
>> >>
>> >> Not me. It was the only Jim Carrey (sp?) movie I ever liked.
>> >>
>> >
>> >I saw Jim Carrey in a local comedy venue when he was just starting out.
>> >He was really funny. His movies have been disappointing.
>>
>> He gets too over the top, which gets old after a while.
>>
>> >I have to give
>> >him credit for his acting in Man on the Moon. Not being crazy about his
>> >movie performances, and really hating Andy Kauffman, I have to saw that
>> >I was impressed with him in that movie. He was also good in Eternal
>> >Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.
>>
>> Actually, I agree with you there. I'd forgotten about those two
>> particular movies.
>
>I liked him (oddly enough) in The Mask, and in The Truman
>Show, where he was well controlled by the director. He's
>a very talented man, but he needs a firm hand on the reins.

Yes, his over-the-topness needs moderation.
He's a lot funnier without it IMO.