![]() |
OT - Woot Refurbished vs Reconditioned
On 9/18/2015 7:21 AM, Boron Elgar wrote:
> > Interesting. Thanks for tracking down the info. > > I have never bought anything listed as " reconditioned," as it has > always implied "used" to me. This was just an impression I had with > nothing to back it up. I many not have been 100% correct, but this > confirms my choices over the years. > > In some cases you are correct. It was used or damaged. OTOH, I told the story before how some merchandise is perfectly new, good, tested, but marked refurbished to sell at outlet stores. I've seen this first hand at a few companies I visited. As an aside, the same goes for many things sold with different model numbers. Staples may carry one number, Best Buy another, identical but for some added accessory. |
OT - Woot Refurbished vs Reconditioned
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 23:42:22 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>On 9/18/2015 7:21 AM, Boron Elgar wrote: > >> >> Interesting. Thanks for tracking down the info. >> >> I have never bought anything listed as " reconditioned," as it has >> always implied "used" to me. This was just an impression I had with >> nothing to back it up. I many not have been 100% correct, but this >> confirms my choices over the years. >> >> > >In some cases you are correct. It was used or damaged. OTOH, I told >the story before how some merchandise is perfectly new, good, tested, >but marked refurbished to sell at outlet stores. I've seen this first >hand at a few companies I visited. Yup. This gets around MSRP price breaking and soothes retailers who keep to such things. >As an aside, the same goes for many things sold with different model >numbers. Staples may carry one number, Best Buy another, identical but >for some added accessory. And makes price comparisons tricky, which is its goal, I believe. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter