In article >, cshenk1
@cox.net says...
>

> Whomever this is, I wish I could help them, but I do not know how.

Carol, your posts make clear you are completely out of your depth. You
can't help the offender. Responding confirms and validates the
effectiveness of the behaviour; attention rewards it.


You CAN help the group (and the targets of abuse) by NOT reposting
those messages (which just gives them wider coverage; acting as a
publicity agent). If you would desist from that, you'd minimise the
negative effect on the group, and on the people being forged.

Janet UK

On 2015-09-17 19:25:49 +0000, Janet said:

> In article >, cshenk1
> @cox.net says...
>>
>
>> Whomever this is, I wish I could help them, but I do not know how.
>
> Carol, your posts make clear you are completely out of your depth. You
> can't help the offender. Responding confirms and validates the
> effectiveness of the behaviour; attention rewards it.
>
>
> You CAN help the group (and the targets of abuse) by NOT reposting
> those messages (which just gives them wider coverage; acting as a
> publicity agent). If you would desist from that, you'd minimise the
> negative effect on the group, and on the people being forged.

That would then leave the remaining 7 or 8 unrepentant troll-jockeys.

Janet wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> In article >, cshenk1
> @cox.net says...
> >
>
> > Whomever this is, I wish I could help them, but I do not know how.
>
> Carol, your posts make clear you are completely out of your depth.
> You can't help the offender. Responding confirms and validates the
> effectiveness of the behaviour; attention rewards it.
>
>
> You CAN help the group (and the targets of abuse) by NOT reposting
> those messages (which just gives them wider coverage; acting as a
> publicity agent). If you would desist from that, you'd minimise the
> negative effect on the group, and on the people being forged.
>
> Janet UK

Forget it Janet. These kids killed the UK group but they are not
killing here. Learn to read a freaking header.

Carol

--