ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

Diet drinks may have zero calories but those artificial sweeteners are
not necessarily sliding through your digestive system unnoticed.
According to new research, sugar substitutes can change the guest list
at that bacterial party in your intestines known as your microbiota.
The researchers who made the finding say that in mice, at least, this
disturbance in the internal ecosystem actually raised blood sugar, thus
defeating the purpose of these products by increasing risk for type 2
diabetes and obesity.



http://www.forbes.com/sites/fayeflam...ndly-bacteria/

ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:46:35 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>Diet drinks may have zero calories but those artificial sweeteners are
>not necessarily sliding through your digestive system unnoticed.
>According to new research, sugar substitutes can change the guest list
>at that bacterial party in your intestines known as your microbiota.
>The researchers who made the finding say that in mice, at least, this
>disturbance in the internal ecosystem actually raised blood sugar, thus
>defeating the purpose of these products by increasing risk for type 2
>diabetes and obesity.
>
>
>
>http://www.forbes.com/sites/fayeflam...ndly-bacteria/

Shouldn't have bothered to post. I gave the article and everyone
responding said the study is flawed (including, of course, Julie)
Janet US

ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

On 9/17/2014 6:46 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> Diet drinks may have zero calories but those artificial sweeteners are
> not necessarily sliding through your digestive system unnoticed.

Now you're just baiting her. Please don't.

Jill

ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

On 2014-09-17 7:19 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 9/17/2014 6:46 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> Diet drinks may have zero calories but those artificial sweeteners are
>> not necessarily sliding through your digestive system unnoticed.
>
> Now you're just baiting her. Please don't.
>
>

Really? I linked it to a an article on the latest research. She has
deleted herself into thinking that she can pig out on artificially
sweetened sodas and that there are no problems with it. She thinks that
since it is not sugared that it won't bother her diabetes, but this
research indicates that it is probably making her problem worse.
a

ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

Dave Smith > wrote in
:

> Really? I linked it to a an article on the latest research.
> She has deleted herself into thinking that she can pig out on
> artificially sweetened sodas and that there are no problems
> with it. She thinks that since it is not sugared that it won't
> bother her diabetes, but this research indicates that it is
> probably making her problem worse.

Not being specialists, and not in possession of blood work (as if
we could even read it), I suggest we leave that to the
professionals. People smoke, drink alcohol, ingest toxic
substances every day. If they want to do that, you can't stop
them. You can't even stop them from voting Conservative even
though all evidence points to the fact that that is against
everyone's self interest, not to mention the common weal.

*sigh*

--

Socialism never took root in America because the
poor there see themselves not as an exploited
proletariat but as temporarily embarassed
millionaires. - John Steinbeck

ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

On 2014-09-17 7:30 PM, JohnJohn wrote:

>> Really? I linked it to a an article on the latest research. She has
>> deleted herself into thinking that she can pig out on artificially
>> sweetened sodas and that there are no problems with it. She thinks that
>> since it is not sugared that it won't bother her diabetes, but this
>> research indicates that it is probably making her problem worse.
>> a
>
> You're obsessed with her.
>

It is hard not to notice her posts when she accounts for 40% of the
traffic here.

ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2014-09-17 7:19 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>> On 9/17/2014 6:46 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> Diet drinks may have zero calories but those artificial sweeteners are
>>> not necessarily sliding through your digestive system unnoticed.
>>
>> Now you're just baiting her. Please don't.
>>
>>
>
> Really? I linked it to a an article on the latest research. She has
> deleted herself

if only!

ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

"Janet Bostwick" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:46:35 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>>Diet drinks may have zero calories but those artificial sweeteners are
>>not necessarily sliding through your digestive system unnoticed.
>>According to new research, sugar substitutes can change the guest list
>>at that bacterial party in your intestines known as your microbiota.
>>The researchers who made the finding say that in mice, at least, this
>>disturbance in the internal ecosystem actually raised blood sugar, thus
>>defeating the purpose of these products by increasing risk for type 2
>>diabetes and obesity.
>>
>>
>>
>>http://www.forbes.com/sites/fayeflam...ndly-bacteria/
>
> Shouldn't have bothered to post. I gave the article and everyone
> responding said the study is flawed (including, of course, Julie)
> Janet US

I saw the article. I see articles all the time like this on the diabetes
newsgroup. And then a few days or a few weeks later, another article will
be posted stating why that one was wrong. I don't pay much mind to them
unless unless I see the same information coming from numerous sources. So
far that hasn't happened. Not with diet sodas anyway.

ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

"JohnJohn" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:24:11 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>>On 2014-09-17 7:19 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 9/17/2014 6:46 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>> Diet drinks may have zero calories but those artificial sweeteners are
>>>> not necessarily sliding through your digestive system unnoticed.
>>>
>>> Now you're just baiting her. Please don't.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Really? I linked it to a an article on the latest research. She has
>>deleted herself into thinking that she can pig out on artificially
>>sweetened sodas and that there are no problems with it. She thinks that
>>since it is not sugared that it won't bother her diabetes, but this
>>research indicates that it is probably making her problem worse.
>>a
>
> You're obsessed with her.

Several here seem to be. :(

ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

On 9/17/2014 7:07 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> "JohnJohn" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:24:11 -0400, Dave Smith
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On 2014-09-17 7:19 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>> On 9/17/2014 6:46 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>> Diet drinks may have zero calories but those artificial sweeteners are
>>>>> not necessarily sliding through your digestive system unnoticed.
>>>>
>>>> Now you're just baiting her. Please don't.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Really? I linked it to a an article on the latest research. She has
>>> deleted herself into thinking that she can pig out on artificially
>>> sweetened sodas and that there are no problems with it. She thinks that
>>> since it is not sugared that it won't bother her diabetes, but this
>>> research indicates that it is probably making her problem worse.
>>> a
>>
>> You're obsessed with her.
>
> Several here seem to be. :(

I think it's your writing style mostly. You share a lot more personal
experience and feeling than most, and that leads to unnatural fixations
and attachments.

At the other end of that equation you also are likely the most read
poster here, so your method is not madness.

It just has its costs.

Pity too.

ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:30:54 +1000, JohnJohn >
wrote:

>On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:24:11 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>
>>On 2014-09-17 7:19 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 9/17/2014 6:46 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>> Diet drinks may have zero calories but those artificial sweeteners are
>>>> not necessarily sliding through your digestive system unnoticed.
>>>
>>> Now you're just baiting her. Please don't.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Really? I linked it to a an article on the latest research. She has
>>deleted herself into thinking that she can pig out on artificially
>>sweetened sodas and that there are no problems with it. She thinks that
>>since it is not sugared that it won't bother her diabetes, but this
>>research indicates that it is probably making her problem worse.
>>a
>
>You're obsessed with her.

No he isn't.

ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:06:52 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>I saw the article. I see articles all the time like this on the diabetes
>newsgroup. And then a few days or a few weeks later, another article will
>be posted stating why that one was wrong. I don't pay much mind to them
>unless unless I see the same information coming from numerous sources. So
>far that hasn't happened. Not with diet sodas anyway.

Fixed a section of your post for you below:

>I don't pay much mind to them unless unless I see the information suits my personal agenda - THEN I trust the articles without question.

ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:56:46 +1000, JohnJohn >
wrote:

>On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 16:35:56 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:30:54 +1000, JohnJohn >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:24:11 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 2014-09-17 7:19 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>> On 9/17/2014 6:46 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>>> Diet drinks may have zero calories but those artificial sweeteners are
>>>>>> not necessarily sliding through your digestive system unnoticed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now you're just baiting her. Please don't.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Really? I linked it to a an article on the latest research. She has
>>>>deleted herself into thinking that she can pig out on artificially
>>>>sweetened sodas and that there are no problems with it. She thinks that
>>>>since it is not sugared that it won't bother her diabetes, but this
>>>>research indicates that it is probably making her problem worse.
>>>>a
>>>
>>>You're obsessed with her.
>>
>>No he isn't.
>
>Maybe you both are.

Nope.

ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

On Thursday, September 18, 2014 2:41:52 AM UTC-4, Je�us wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:06:52 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>
> > wrote:
>
>
>
> >I saw the article. I see articles all the time like this on the diabetes
>
> >newsgroup. And then a few days or a few weeks later, another article will
>
> >be posted stating why that one was wrong. I don't pay much mind to them
>
> >unless unless I see the same information coming from numerous sources. So
>
> >far that hasn't happened. Not with diet sodas anyway.
>
>
>
> Fixed a section of your post for you below:
>
>
>
> >I don't pay much mind to them unless unless I see the information suits my personal agenda - THEN I trust the articles without question.

And I'll delete that useless 'unless'. She'll be a writer yet.

ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:45:13 -0700 (PDT), Kalmia
> wrote:

>On Thursday, September 18, 2014 2:41:52 AM UTC-4, Je�us wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:06:52 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >I saw the article. I see articles all the time like this on the diabetes
>>
>> >newsgroup. And then a few days or a few weeks later, another article will
>>
>> >be posted stating why that one was wrong. I don't pay much mind to them
>>
>> >unless unless I see the same information coming from numerous sources. So
>>
>> >far that hasn't happened. Not with diet sodas anyway.
>>
>>
>>
>> Fixed a section of your post for you below:
>>
>>
>>
>> >I don't pay much mind to them unless unless I see the information suits my personal agenda - THEN I trust the articles without question.
>
>And I'll delete that useless 'unless'. She'll be a writer yet.

:)

ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

jmcquown wrote:


On 9/17/2014 6:46 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
Diet drinks may have zero calories but those artificial sweeteners are
not necessarily sliding through your digestive system unnoticed.

Now you're just baiting her.* Please don't.

Jill


He baits and you berate.* Which is worse?

ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

On 2014-09-18, Roger > wrote:

> <html>

Usenet (nntp) does not recognize html, you putz!

ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

notbob wrote:
>
> On 2014-09-18, Roger > wrote:
>
> > <html>
>
> Usenet (nntp) does not recognize html, you putz!

"Usenet (nntp) does not recognize html" ;) snark!@

ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

On Thursday, September 18, 2014 6:51:31 PM UTC-5, Roger wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
>
>
> On
> 9/17/2014 6:46 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>
>
> Diet drinks may have zero calories but
> those artificial sweeteners are
>
>
> not necessarily sliding through your digestive system unnoticed.
>
>
>
>
>
> Now you're just baiting her.� Please don't.
>
>
>
>
> Jill
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> He baits and you berate.� Which is worse?

But I am the master berater. Julie even claims to have me killfiled.

--Bryan

ping Julie the at least 12 cans of diet soda per day queen
 

On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 10:49:28 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
> wrote:

>On Thursday, September 18, 2014 6:51:31 PM UTC-5, Roger wrote:
>> jmcquown wrote:
>>
>>
>> On
>> 9/17/2014 6:46 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>> Diet drinks may have zero calories but
>> those artificial sweeteners are
>>
>>
>> not necessarily sliding through your digestive system unnoticed.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Now you're just baiting her.? Please don't.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jill
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> He baits and you berate.? Which is worse?
>
>But I am the master berater.

Bwrrrryan is the masturbater of other faggots.