On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 01:01:25 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:08:29 -0700, sf wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:31:53 -0600, Mayo > wrote:
>>
>>> Oh knock it off with all the woman-bashing, you bloated dumpling!
>>
>> I stand corrected. He watches Netflix all day long.
>
>Isn't it sweet how I can say *anything* at all, then Casa "Mayo" Boner
>tries to hijack the [sub]thread with stupid, inane comments, which
>then cues Barbara Llorente ("sf") into replying with a mutually stupid
>comeback stroke?

And yet you still haven't figured out the connection between the two,
which has been apparent to me since either late last year or early
this year.

>Don't you two have *any* respect for yourselves? I totally OWN both
>of you. In the meantime, I will carry on here and you two will burn
>and die.

You've just demonstrated that they're having their desired effect on
you. That's all you've done with this post. Well done

>ObFood: It's $.99 spicy leg and thigh night at Popeyes. Got two of
>them and ate one witha can of HEB Spicy Charro Beans. AWESome
>mealtime.

Last night's dinner: Dorper lamb cutlets with a garlic and rosemary
sauce, mashed potato with grated horseradish, onion and peas.

Tonight: roast chook and... dunno yet.

On 9/3/2014 5:11 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 01:01:25 -0500, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:08:29 -0700, sf wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:31:53 -0600, Mayo > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oh knock it off with all the woman-bashing, you bloated dumpling!
>>>
>>> I stand corrected. He watches Netflix all day long.
>>
>> Isn't it sweet how I can say *anything* at all, then Casa "Mayo" Boner
>> tries to hijack the [sub]thread with stupid, inane comments, which
>> then cues Barbara Llorente ("sf") into replying with a mutually stupid
>> comeback stroke?
>
> And yet you still haven't figured out the connection between the two,
> which has been apparent to me since either late last year or early
> this year.

Oh my, pray tell, what IS said "connection"?

>> Don't you two have *any* respect for yourselves? I totally OWN both
>> of you. In the meantime, I will carry on here and you two will burn
>> and die.
>
> You've just demonstrated that they're having their desired effect on
> you. That's all you've done with this post. Well done

<chuckle>

>> ObFood: It's $.99 spicy leg and thigh night at Popeyes. Got two of
>> them and ate one witha can of HEB Spicy Charro Beans. AWESome
>> mealtime.
>
> Last night's dinner: Dorper lamb cutlets with a garlic and rosemary
> sauce, mashed potato with grated horseradish, onion and peas.

Hey, a food post!

> Tonight: roast chook and... dunno yet.

"chook"?

On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:14:29 +1000, JohnJohn >
wrote:

>On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:11:33 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 01:01:25 -0500, Sqwertz >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:08:29 -0700, sf wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:31:53 -0600, Mayo > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Oh knock it off with all the woman-bashing, you bloated dumpling!
>>>>
>>>> I stand corrected. He watches Netflix all day long.
>>>
>>>Isn't it sweet how I can say *anything* at all, then Casa "Mayo" Boner
>>>tries to hijack the [sub]thread with stupid, inane comments, which
>>>then cues Barbara Llorente ("sf") into replying with a mutually stupid
>>>comeback stroke?
>>
>>And yet you still haven't figured out the connection between the two,
>>which has been apparent to me since either late last year or early
>>this year.
>
>O?

Oh yes.

On 9/3/2014 5:41 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:14:29 +1000, JohnJohn >
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:11:33 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 01:01:25 -0500, Sqwertz >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:08:29 -0700, sf wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:31:53 -0600, Mayo > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh knock it off with all the woman-bashing, you bloated dumpling!
>>>>>
>>>>> I stand corrected. He watches Netflix all day long.
>>>>
>>>> Isn't it sweet how I can say *anything* at all, then Casa "Mayo" Boner
>>>> tries to hijack the [sub]thread with stupid, inane comments, which
>>>> then cues Barbara Llorente ("sf") into replying with a mutually stupid
>>>> comeback stroke?
>>>
>>> And yet you still haven't figured out the connection between the two,
>>> which has been apparent to me since either late last year or early
>>> this year.
>>
>> O?
>
> Oh yes.
>

Come on now mate, out with it...

On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 10:00:41 +1000, JohnJohn >
wrote:

>On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:41:47 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:14:29 +1000, JohnJohn >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:11:33 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 01:01:25 -0500, Sqwertz >
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:08:29 -0700, sf wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:31:53 -0600, Mayo > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh knock it off with all the woman-bashing, you bloated dumpling!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I stand corrected. He watches Netflix all day long.
>>>>>
>>>>>Isn't it sweet how I can say *anything* at all, then Casa "Mayo" Boner
>>>>>tries to hijack the [sub]thread with stupid, inane comments, which
>>>>>then cues Barbara Llorente ("sf") into replying with a mutually stupid
>>>>>comeback stroke?
>>>>
>>>>And yet you still haven't figured out the connection between the two,
>>>>which has been apparent to me since either late last year or early
>>>>this year.
>>>
>>>O?
>>
>>Oh yes.
>
>You think they're the same person? Nah.

I never said that... that's not what I meant.
IMO it's better to leave things as they are and not elaborate. Far
more entertaining that way.

On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:26:59 -0600, Mayo > wrote:

> > Tonight: roast chook and... dunno yet.
>
> "chook"?
>
Chicken. He's Australian and apparently they think calling a chicken
"chook" is cute.


--
Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them.

On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:44:44 -0600, Mayo > wrote:

> On 9/3/2014 5:41 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> > On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:14:29 +1000, JohnJohn >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:11:33 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 01:01:25 -0500, Sqwertz >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:08:29 -0700, sf wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:31:53 -0600, Mayo > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Oh knock it off with all the woman-bashing, you bloated dumpling!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I stand corrected. He watches Netflix all day long.
> >>>>
> >>>> Isn't it sweet how I can say *anything* at all, then Casa "Mayo" Boner
> >>>> tries to hijack the [sub]thread with stupid, inane comments, which
> >>>> then cues Barbara Llorente ("sf") into replying with a mutually stupid
> >>>> comeback stroke?
> >>>
> >>> And yet you still haven't figured out the connection between the two,
> >>> which has been apparent to me since either late last year or early
> >>> this year.
> >>
> >> O?
> >
> > Oh yes.
> >
>
> Come on now mate, out with it...

LOL


--
Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them.

On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 20:48:09 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:11:33 +1000, Jeßus wrote:
>
>> And yet you still haven't figured out the connection between the two,
>> which has been apparent to me since either late last year or early
>> this year.
>
>Here's you hinting that you have all the answers and are superior yet
>you're too embarrassed to tell us of your Epiphany.

"Superior". "All the answers". LOL. Whatever you reckon, if you say
so. It's just that you're just as bad as they are, really, and I and
others might as well get some entertainment value out of it. You'll
figure it out eventually anyway.

>>>Don't you two have *any* respect for yourselves? I totally OWN both
>>>of you. In the meantime, I will carry on here and you two will burn
>>>and die.
>>
>> You've just demonstrated that they're having their desired effect on
>> you. That's all you've done with this post. Well done
>
>They have no effect on me except humor and pity.

Which is why you made the post you did, r i g h t . . .

>Plus I feel bad for
>the people who actually read Boners posts and give him any sort of
>consideration.

I read some, but most I don't.

On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 20:49:21 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 10:16:47 +1000, Jeßus wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 10:00:41 +1000, JohnJohn >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:41:47 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:14:29 +1000, JohnJohn >
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:11:33 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 01:01:25 -0500, Sqwertz >
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:08:29 -0700, sf wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:31:53 -0600, Mayo > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Oh knock it off with all the woman-bashing, you bloated dumpling!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I stand corrected. He watches Netflix all day long.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Isn't it sweet how I can say *anything* at all, then Casa "Mayo" Boner
>>>>>>>tries to hijack the [sub]thread with stupid, inane comments, which
>>>>>>>then cues Barbara Llorente ("sf") into replying with a mutually stupid
>>>>>>>comeback stroke?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And yet you still haven't figured out the connection between the two,
>>>>>>which has been apparent to me since either late last year or early
>>>>>>this year.
>>>>>
>>>>>O?
>>>>
>>>>Oh yes.
>>>
>>>You think they're the same person? Nah.
>>
>> I never said that... that's not what I meant.
>> IMO it's better to leave things as they are and not elaborate. Far
>> more entertaining that way.
>
>Ahh. You don't want to get laughed at. Deep down inside you know it,
>whatever it is, isn't true anyway.

Yep, it isnt true. So keep on doing what you do.

On 9/3/2014 6:00 PM, JohnJohn wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:41:47 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:14:29 +1000, JohnJohn >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:11:33 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 01:01:25 -0500, Sqwertz >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:08:29 -0700, sf wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:31:53 -0600, Mayo > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh knock it off with all the woman-bashing, you bloated dumpling!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I stand corrected. He watches Netflix all day long.
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't it sweet how I can say *anything* at all, then Casa "Mayo" Boner
>>>>> tries to hijack the [sub]thread with stupid, inane comments, which
>>>>> then cues Barbara Llorente ("sf") into replying with a mutually stupid
>>>>> comeback stroke?
>>>>
>>>> And yet you still haven't figured out the connection between the two,
>>>> which has been apparent to me since either late last year or early
>>>> this year.
>>>
>>> O?
>>
>> Oh yes.
>
> You think they're the same person? Nah.
>
Doo doo doo doo....

On 9/3/2014 6:16 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 10:00:41 +1000, JohnJohn >
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:41:47 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:14:29 +1000, JohnJohn >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:11:33 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 01:01:25 -0500, Sqwertz >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:08:29 -0700, sf wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:31:53 -0600, Mayo > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh knock it off with all the woman-bashing, you bloated dumpling!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I stand corrected. He watches Netflix all day long.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Isn't it sweet how I can say *anything* at all, then Casa "Mayo" Boner
>>>>>> tries to hijack the [sub]thread with stupid, inane comments, which
>>>>>> then cues Barbara Llorente ("sf") into replying with a mutually stupid
>>>>>> comeback stroke?
>>>>>
>>>>> And yet you still haven't figured out the connection between the two,
>>>>> which has been apparent to me since either late last year or early
>>>>> this year.
>>>>
>>>> O?
>>>
>>> Oh yes.
>>
>> You think they're the same person? Nah.
>
> I never said that... that's not what I meant.
> IMO it's better to leave things as they are and not elaborate. Far
> more entertaining that way.
>

Iow, you have nothing, nary a theory even, lol...

On 9/3/2014 7:48 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:11:33 +1000, Jeßus wrote:
>
>> And yet you still haven't figured out the connection between the two,
>> which has been apparent to me since either late last year or early
>> this year.
>
> Here's you hinting that you have all the answers and are superior yet
> you're too embarrassed to tell us of your Epiphany.

Now Yappy, don't be curt with him.

>>> Don't you two have *any* respect for yourselves? I totally OWN both
>>> of you. In the meantime, I will carry on here and you two will burn
>>> and die.
>>
>> You've just demonstrated that they're having their desired effect on
>> you. That's all you've done with this post. Well done
>
> They have no effect on me except humor and pity. Plus I feel bad for
> the people who actually read Boners posts and give him any sort of
> consideration.

I bet the bill for renting your head space is going to be a whopper!

> ObFood: Tonight is

No one cares Yappy- bugger off.

On 9/3/2014 7:49 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 10:16:47 +1000, Jeßus wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 10:00:41 +1000, JohnJohn >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:41:47 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:14:29 +1000, JohnJohn >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:11:33 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 01:01:25 -0500, Sqwertz >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:08:29 -0700, sf wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:31:53 -0600, Mayo > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Oh knock it off with all the woman-bashing, you bloated dumpling!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I stand corrected. He watches Netflix all day long.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Isn't it sweet how I can say *anything* at all, then Casa "Mayo" Boner
>>>>>>> tries to hijack the [sub]thread with stupid, inane comments, which
>>>>>>> then cues Barbara Llorente ("sf") into replying with a mutually stupid
>>>>>>> comeback stroke?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And yet you still haven't figured out the connection between the two,
>>>>>> which has been apparent to me since either late last year or early
>>>>>> this year.
>>>>>
>>>>> O?
>>>>
>>>> Oh yes.
>>>
>>> You think they're the same person? Nah.
>>
>> I never said that... that's not what I meant.
>> IMO it's better to leave things as they are and not elaborate. Far
>> more entertaining that way.
>
> Ahh. You don't want to get laughed at. Deep down inside you know it,
> whatever it is, isn't true anyway.
>
> -sw
>

Yet you, contrary to all that is humanly normal, actually THRIVE on
being laughed at.

Such is the life of an attention whore, eh squishy?

On 9/3/2014 8:21 PM, sf wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:26:59 -0600, Mayo > wrote:
>
>>> Tonight: roast chook and... dunno yet.
>>
>> "chook"?
>>
> Chicken. He's Australian and apparently they think calling a chicken
> "chook" is cute.
>
>
Odd lot for sure, I wondered if it was some kind of fish...like a snook...

On 9/3/2014 10:09 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 20:48:09 -0500, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:11:33 +1000, Jeßus wrote:
>>
>>> And yet you still haven't figured out the connection between the two,
>>> which has been apparent to me since either late last year or early
>>> this year.
>>
>> Here's you hinting that you have all the answers and are superior yet
>> you're too embarrassed to tell us of your Epiphany.
>
> "Superior". "All the answers". LOL. Whatever you reckon, if you say
> so. It's just that you're just as bad as they are, really, and I and
> others might as well get some entertainment value out of it. You'll
> figure it out eventually anyway.
>
>>>> Don't you two have *any* respect for yourselves? I totally OWN both
>>>> of you. In the meantime, I will carry on here and you two will burn
>>>> and die.
>>>
>>> You've just demonstrated that they're having their desired effect on
>>> you. That's all you've done with this post. Well done
>>
>> They have no effect on me except humor and pity.
>
> Which is why you made the post you did, r i g h t . . .
>
>> Plus I feel bad for
>> the people who actually read Boners posts and give him any sort of
>> consideration.
>
> I read some, but most I don't.
>
It was the Footscray mention, wasn't it?

On 9/3/2014 10:23 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:09:14 +1000, Jeßus wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 20:48:09 -0500, Sqwertz >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:11:33 +1000, Jeßus wrote:
>>>
>>>> And yet you still haven't figured out the connection between the two,
>>>> which has been apparent to me since either late last year or early
>>>> this year.
>>>
>>> Here's you hinting that you have all the answers and are superior yet
>>> you're too embarrassed to tell us of your Epiphany.
>>
>> "Superior". "All the answers". LOL. Whatever you reckon, if you say
>> so. It's just that you're just as bad as they are, really, and I and
>> others might as well get some entertainment value out of it. You'll
>> figure it out eventually anyway.
>
> <yawn> There nothing to figure out. Whatever this secret notion of
> your sis, it's valueless.
>
>> Which is why you made the post you did, r i g h t . . .
>
> Apparently you misinterpreted it. My point was that I own their every
> thought here in RFC. I can only imagine what Boner is posting. Is he
> still following up to my every post like he did last year?
>
> That is called "owned". And Boner owns Barbara. Hard to imagine a
> grown woman getting played like that, but there it is.
>
> -sw
>

Hard to imagine that after the group-killing you and the equally toxic
Marty did was exposed and, for the present at least, terminated you'd
still be begging for my favors.

But such is the life of a true attention whore, eh Squishy?