General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 35,884
Default For the wannabe grammar cops

http://m.staples.ca/sbdca/en_CA/cre/...s/grammarquiz/
  #2 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 500
Default For the wannabe grammar cops

In article >,
Dave Smith > wrote:
>http://m.staples.ca/sbdca/en_CA/cre/...s/grammarquiz/


That was a very easy quiz. Nevertheless, I got one wrong (whom).

Cindy Hamilton
--




  #3 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,661
Default For the wannabe grammar cops

On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 7:39:17 AM UTC-8, Dave Smith wrote:
> http://m.staples.ca/sbdca/en_CA/cre/...s/grammarquiz/


Do homophones bother Canadians?

I always thought K-12 education in Canada was excellent.
  #4 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,219
Default For the wannabe grammar cops

On 12/3/2013 10:47 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> In article >,
> Dave Smith > wrote:
>> http://m.staples.ca/sbdca/en_CA/cre/...s/grammarquiz/

>
> That was a very easy quiz. Nevertheless, I got one wrong (whom).


Did that make you a grammar guru like me? Heh. That
was easy to ace.

nancy
  #5 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36,804
Default For the wannabe grammar cops

On 12/3/2013 11:56 AM, Nancy Young wrote:
> On 12/3/2013 10:47 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> In article >,
>> Dave Smith > wrote:
>>> http://m.staples.ca/sbdca/en_CA/cre/...s/grammarquiz/

>>
>> That was a very easy quiz. Nevertheless, I got one wrong (whom).

>
> Did that make you a grammar guru like me? Heh. That
> was easy to ace.
>
> nancy


Yep, I only missed one question and it's not something I'd have
used/said in a sentence (written or spoken) anyway. I guess my many
schools (due to military moving) education paid off. Typing
skills... well, I'm pretty good but my brain gets ahead of my fingers
sometimes.

Jill


  #6 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,175
Default For the wannabe grammar cops

On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 8:47:01 AM UTC-7, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> In article >,
>
> Dave Smith > wrote:
>
> >http://m.staples.ca/sbdca/en_CA/cre/...s/grammarquiz/

>
>
>
> That was a very easy quiz. Nevertheless, I got one wrong (whom).
>
>
>
> Cindy Hamilton
>
> --


I got 100% so bite me.

  #7 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
gtr gtr is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,139
Default For the wannabe grammar cops

On 2013-12-03 16:56:53 +0000, Nancy Young said:

> On 12/3/2013 10:47 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> In article >,
>> Dave Smith > wrote:
>>> http://m.staples.ca/sbdca/en_CA/cre/...s/grammarquiz/

>>
>> That was a very easy quiz. Nevertheless, I got one wrong (whom).

>
> Did that make you a grammar guru like me? Heh. That
> was easy to ace.


It turns out there are vastly more grammar gurus than I would have guessed.

  #8 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
gtr gtr is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,139
Default For the wannabe grammar cops

On 2013-12-03 17:32:01 +0000, Roy said:

> On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 8:47:01 AM UTC-7, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> In article >,
>>
>> Dave Smith > wrote:
>>
>>> http://m.staples.ca/sbdca/en_CA/cre/...s/grammarquiz/

>>
>>
>>
>> That was a very easy quiz. Nevertheless, I got one wrong (whom).
>>
>>
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
>> --

>
> I got 100% so bite me.


I got one wrong but it's because accidentally clicked the wrong one.
So it was a mechanical error, not an error in my grammar. I'd love to
get a test like this I could flunk. It would be helpful!

  #9 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,219
Default For the wannabe grammar cops

On 12/3/2013 2:14 PM, gtr wrote:
> On 2013-12-03 16:56:53 +0000, Nancy Young said:
>
>> On 12/3/2013 10:47 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>> In article >,
>>> Dave Smith > wrote:
>>>> http://m.staples.ca/sbdca/en_CA/cre/...s/grammarquiz/
>>>
>>> That was a very easy quiz. Nevertheless, I got one wrong (whom).

>>
>> Did that make you a grammar guru like me? Heh. That
>> was easy to ace.

>
> It turns out there are vastly more grammar gurus than I would have guessed.


I'd be surprised if most people here didn't nail that quiz.

nancy

  #10 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 61,789
Default For the wannabe grammar cops

On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 14:53:37 -0500, Nancy Young
> wrote:

> On 12/3/2013 2:14 PM, gtr wrote:
> > On 2013-12-03 16:56:53 +0000, Nancy Young said:
> >
> >> On 12/3/2013 10:47 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> >>> In article >,
> >>> Dave Smith > wrote:
> >>>> http://m.staples.ca/sbdca/en_CA/cre/...s/grammarquiz/
> >>>
> >>> That was a very easy quiz. Nevertheless, I got one wrong (whom).
> >>
> >> Did that make you a grammar guru like me? Heh. That
> >> was easy to ace.

> >
> > It turns out there are vastly more grammar gurus than I would have guessed.

>
> I'd be surprised if most people here didn't nail that quiz.
>


Didn't bother looking at it, mainly because I don't claim to be a good
speller or a grammar guru but bear/bare as in "B____ with me" gets me
every time. Bear is an animal and bare is naked. Neither one makes
sense in that context. We should have a third spelling to use.

What grates on my last nerve when it is misused? fewer/less.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.


  #11 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 500
Default For the wannabe grammar cops

In article >,
sf > wrote:
>On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 14:53:37 -0500, Nancy Young
> wrote:
>
>> On 12/3/2013 2:14 PM, gtr wrote:
>> > On 2013-12-03 16:56:53 +0000, Nancy Young said:
>> >
>> >> On 12/3/2013 10:47 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> >>> In article >,
>> >>> Dave Smith > wrote:
>> >>>> http://m.staples.ca/sbdca/en_CA/cre/...s/grammarquiz/
>> >>>
>> >>> That was a very easy quiz. Nevertheless, I got one wrong (whom).
>> >>
>> >> Did that make you a grammar guru like me? Heh. That
>> >> was easy to ace.
>> >
>> > It turns out there are vastly more grammar gurus than I would have guessed.

>>
>> I'd be surprised if most people here didn't nail that quiz.
>>

>
>Didn't bother looking at it, mainly because I don't claim to be a good
>speller or a grammar guru but bear/bare as in "B____ with me" gets me
>every time. Bear is an animal and bare is naked. Neither one makes
>sense in that context. We should have a third spelling to use.


To bear is also to carry. Please bear with me, and metaphorically
carry the tedium of this post, and its lame metaphor.
("Bear with me" is related to the idea of forbearance.)


Cindy Hamilton
--




  #12 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,175
Default For the wannabe grammar cops

On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 2:04:17 PM UTC-7, sf wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 14:53:37 -0500, Nancy Young
>
> > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 12/3/2013 2:14 PM, gtr wrote:

>
> > > On 2013-12-03 16:56:53 +0000, Nancy Young said:

>
> > >

>
> > >> On 12/3/2013 10:47 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:

>
> > >>> In article >,

>
> > >>> Dave Smith > wrote:

>
> > >>>> http://m.staples.ca/sbdca/en_CA/cre/...s/grammarquiz/

>
> > >>>

>
> > >>> That was a very easy quiz. Nevertheless, I got one wrong (whom).

>
> > >>

>
> > >> Did that make you a grammar guru like me? Heh. That

>
> > >> was easy to ace.

>
> > >

>
> > > It turns out there are vastly more grammar gurus than I would have guessed.

>
> >

>
> > I'd be surprised if most people here didn't nail that quiz.

>
> >

>
>
>
> Didn't bother looking at it, mainly because I don't claim to be a good
>
> speller or a grammar guru but bear/bare as in "B____ with me" gets me
>
> every time. Bear is an animal and bare is naked. Neither one makes
>
> sense in that context. We should have a third spelling to use.
>
> What grates on my last nerve when it is misused? fewer/less.
>

Don't you remember in Church where they mentioned "The cross-eyed-bear"...or was that "bare"? Sometimes hard to select the right one.

===

  #13 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,987
Default For the wannabe grammar cops



Sheeee-it. Fifth and sixth grade stuff. Aced it, man.

It seems that many people now think it's cool to use "I" when "me" is correct.

"We bought the BMW for both my husband and I to drive." ( Translation: "We have money and my grammar proves it." Ugh.

Who had to drill on the 100 worst words, in reference to spelling?
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So You Wannabe a Chef? aem General Cooking 7 25-09-2010 03:42 AM
More Chilango Wannabe BS from Booger Gunner[_4_] Mexican Cooking 4 30-04-2007 05:25 AM
Grammar error? instructions Tater Winemaking 5 21-03-2007 04:11 PM
Wannabe food critc. jofazer Restaurants 7 11-01-2005 02:10 AM
To All Our Copyright Cops Trivia Vegan 8 13-07-2004 01:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"