Let me be the first to give the Romney/Ryan duo the clever nickname of Rymney.
It only remains to be seen if they can live up to this clever monicker

Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:

> Let me be the first to give the Romney/Ryan duo the clever nickname of Rymney.
> It only remains to be seen if they can live up to this clever monicker

At least Mitty didn't choose Eric Cantor.

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
> Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:
>
>> Let me be the first to give the Romney/Ryan duo the clever nickname of
>> Rymney.
>> It only remains to be seen if they can live up to this clever monicker
>
> At least Mitty didn't choose Eric Cantor.

Mittens didn't choose anyone. Ryan is the Koch's boy and since they are
coughing up 400,000,000.00 to Romney's election it's no surprise he got
picked. I never thought I would actually see a presidential campaign whose
platform was the abolishment of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and
pretty much any program that benefits the commons. They aren't even trying
to hide their agenda anymore. And the crazy thing is - those who would
suffer the most will vote for Romney. A world order that gave Ayn Ran wet
dreams is not a place you want to live in.

On 8/12/2012 4:18 PM, Paul M. Cook spewed:

> Mittens didn't choose anyone. Ryan is the Koch's boy and since they are
> coughing up 400,000,000.00 to Romney's election it's no surprise he got
> picked. I never thought I would actually see a presidential campaign whose
> platform was the abolishment of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and
> pretty much any program that benefits the commons. They aren't even trying
> to hide their agenda anymore. And the crazy thing is - those who would
> suffer the most will vote for Romney. A world order that gave Ayn Ran wet
> dreams is not a place you want to live in.
>
>
>
>
You people really need to stop drinking the cool aide that Giveaway-BOB
is serving, actually FIND OUT THE FACTS as opposed to what the media is
spoon feeding you and see what the story REALLY IS.

Don't think the country can be any worse off? Vote for the Socialist
Party candidate. BOB

--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to ---

On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:18:58 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
wrote:

>
> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:
> >
> >> Let me be the first to give the Romney/Ryan duo the clever nickname of
> >> Rymney.
> >> It only remains to be seen if they can live up to this clever monicker
> >
> > At least Mitty didn't choose Eric Cantor.
>
> Mittens didn't choose anyone.

I prefer Mittwit.


> Ryan is the Koch's boy and since they are
> coughing up 400,000,000.00 to Romney's election it's no surprise he got
> picked. I never thought I would actually see a presidential campaign whose
> platform was the abolishment of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and
> pretty much any program that benefits the commons. They aren't even trying
> to hide their agenda anymore. And the crazy thing is - those who would
> suffer the most will vote for Romney. A world order that gave Ayn Ran wet
> dreams is not a place you want to live in.
>


--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

"sparkie" > wrote in message
...
> On 8/12/2012 4:18 PM, Paul M. Cook spewed:
>
>> Mittens didn't choose anyone. Ryan is the Koch's boy and since they are
>> coughing up 400,000,000.00 to Romney's election it's no surprise he got
>> picked. I never thought I would actually see a presidential campaign
>> whose
>> platform was the abolishment of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and
>> pretty much any program that benefits the commons. They aren't even
>> trying
>> to hide their agenda anymore. And the crazy thing is - those who would
>> suffer the most will vote for Romney. A world order that gave Ayn Ran
>> wet
>> dreams is not a place you want to live in.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> You people really need to stop drinking the cool aide that Giveaway-BOB is
> serving, actually FIND OUT THE FACTS as opposed to what the media is
> spoon feeding you and see what the story REALLY IS.
>
> Don't think the country can be any worse off? Vote for the Socialist
> Party candidate. BOB
>
> --- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to
> ---

"sparkie" > wrote in message
...
> On 8/12/2012 4:18 PM, Paul M. Cook spewed:
>
>> Mittens didn't choose anyone. Ryan is the Koch's boy and since they are
>> coughing up 400,000,000.00 to Romney's election it's no surprise he got
>> picked. I never thought I would actually see a presidential campaign
>> whose
>> platform was the abolishment of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and
>> pretty much any program that benefits the commons. They aren't even
>> trying
>> to hide their agenda anymore. And the crazy thing is - those who would
>> suffer the most will vote for Romney. A world order that gave Ayn Ran
>> wet
>> dreams is not a place you want to live in.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> You people really need to stop drinking the cool aide that Giveaway-BOB is
> serving, actually FIND OUT THE FACTS as opposed to what the media is
> spoon feeding you and see what the story REALLY IS.

Welcome, World Net Daily reader. It's Kool Aid, not cool aide.

> Don't think the country can be any worse off? Vote for the Socialist
> Party candidate. BOB

You already live under a bridge so you probably won't notice the change
much.

Paul

On Sunday, August 12, 2012 5:04:15 PM UTC-6, The Other Guy wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:13:36 -0700, "Malcom \"Mal\" Reynolds"
>
> > wrote:
>
>
>
> >Let me be the first
>
>
>
> WHAT the **** does THAT have to do with food?????
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To reply by email, lose the Ks...

Must be "food for thought"...only explanation.

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:18:58 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:
>> >
>> >> Let me be the first to give the Romney/Ryan duo the clever nickname of
>> >> Rymney.
>> >> It only remains to be seen if they can live up to this clever monicker
>> >
>> > At least Mitty didn't choose Eric Cantor.
>>
>> Mittens didn't choose anyone.
>
> I prefer Mittwit.

Haven't seen that yet. I love it, thanks.

pavane

The Biggest Moron yapped:

> >Let me be the first
>
> WHAT the **** does THAT have to do with food?????

You need a refresher on Usenet 101. You're supposed to read the
subject *before* you post an idiotic reply.

you are in the food part..what the he#% does this have to do with
food...geez

On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 17:57:37 -0700, (Virginia
Dalton) wrote:

>you are in the food part..what the he#% does this have to do with
>food...geez

Romney picked Ryan because Romney's favorite food is meat loaf.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/14/di...-favorite.html

In article >,
(Virginia Dalton) wrote:

> you are in the food part..what the he#% does this have to do with
> food...geez

you've got webtv and don't know what OT means. LOL

In article >,
The Other Guy > wrote:

> On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:13:36 -0700, "Malcom \"Mal\" Reynolds"
> > wrote:
>
> >Let me be the first
>
> WHAT the **** does THAT have to do with food?????

why everything of course

On Aug 12, 1:18*pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
> "George M. Middius" > wrote in messagenews:mm0g2896fh7tp63af5bujjs3ji2ci35a5j@4ax .com...
>
> > Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:
>
> >> Let me be the first to give the Romney/Ryan duo the clever nickname of
> >> Rymney.
> >> It only remains to be seen if they can live up to this clever monicker
>
> > At least Mitty didn't choose Eric Cantor.
>
> Mittens didn't choose anyone. *Ryan is the Koch's boy and since they are
> coughing up 400,000,000.00 to Romney's election it's no surprise he got
> picked. *I never thought I would actually see a presidential campaign whose
> platform was the abolishment of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and
> pretty much any program that benefits the commons. *They aren't even trying
> to hide their agenda anymore. *And the crazy thing is - those who would
> suffer the most will vote for Romney. *A world order that gave Ayn Ran wet
> dreams is not a place you want to live in.

Ryan can do the Kochs far more good in Congress than out. Getting Ryan
out of Congress is a big break for the Dems.

Paul M. Cook wrote:

> Mitt Romney has no employees.

I got a laugh when he claimed he was CEO of Bain and also retired at
the same time.

I guess food stamps might be a related food topic.

At any rate, you pick either guy you vote for one of two parties that are legally bought out by much bigger money than either candidate has. R or D, we're going to get more of the same "hope and change" lines of crap while maintaing the status quo of huge Fed power and a widdling away of constitutional rights.

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
> Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
>> Mitt Romney has no employees.
>
> I got a laugh when he claimed he was CEO of Bain and also retired at
> the same time.
>

He is running on his record at Bain yet any questions about Bain are
completely off limits.

Paul

On Aug 13, 9:47*am, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
> "George M. Middius" > wrote in messagenews:c4rh28l8ok25h8q2ut74k97is6g1oid7eg@4ax .com...
>
> > Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
> >> Mitt Romney has no employees.
>
> > I got a laugh when he claimed he was CEO of Bain and also retired at
> > the same time.
>
> He is running on his record at Bain yet any questions about Bain are
> completely off limits.

Beware of people who can't explain what they did in their last job.

On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:29:39 -0700, "Pico Rico"
> wrote:

>
> how about all the infrastructure, court system, EPA, etc. that the masses
> are not paying for?

Say what? Have you been watching Fox snews?

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

On 2012-08-13, pavane > wrote:

> Well, we know he's not a coward. He is courageous
> enough to consign millions of his fellow Americans to
> poverty, starvation, untreated health, illiteracy and
> death to further his brave ideals.

LOL!...


--
"I don't know the key to success,
but the key to failure is trying to
please everybody"
http://www.nongmoproject.org/

sf wrote:

> > > Yes-- but he is allowed to run for both offices in WI.

> > He's a coward if he does.

> Oh, come on. If he runs for both, he's a realist.

Realism means he'll be competing against himself for contributions.

Paul M. Cook wrote:

> >> Mitt Romney has no employees.
> >
> > I got a laugh when he claimed he was CEO of Bain and also retired at
> > the same time.

> He is running on his record at Bain yet any questions about Bain are
> completely off limits.

Right-wing theocrats are expert at doublethink. After those two
mass-murder incidents recently, the NRA talking heads claimed that
talking about changing gun laws was "disrespectful" to the victims.
Ha!

spamtrap1888 wrote:

> > He is running on his record at Bain yet any questions about Bain are
> > completely off limits.
>
> Beware of people who can't explain what they did in their last job.

Did you hear what Mrs Romney said about their income taxes? "You
people should leave us alone" or something.

sf wrote:

> > how about all the infrastructure, court system, EPA, etc. that the masses
> > are not paying for?
>
> Say what? Have you been watching Fox snews?

Maybe p.r. means the "masses" of unemployed people who have no income
on which to pay taxes.

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
> spamtrap1888 wrote:
>
>> > He is running on his record at Bain yet any questions about Bain are
>> > completely off limits.
>>
>> Beware of people who can't explain what they did in their last job.
>
> Did you hear what Mrs Romney said about their income taxes? "You
> people should leave us alone" or something.
>

She said "we've given you people all you need to know." You know you are an
elite when your tax deduction for your dancing horsey is almost double the
mean wage of 98% of the country.

Paul

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
> sf wrote:
>
>> > how about all the infrastructure, court system, EPA, etc. that the
>> > masses
>> > are not paying for?
>>
>> Say what? Have you been watching Fox snews?
>
> Maybe p.r. means the "masses" of unemployed people who have no income
> on which to pay taxes.
>

No *income* taxes. They pay through the nose in other taxes many of them
quite regressive.

Paul

On 2012-08-13, Paul M. Cook > wrote:

> for a one William Edward Hickman - a depraved and utterly inhuman monster

Turns out she, like the Nazis, was also a Neitzsche fan. Big surprise.

nb

--
"I don't know the key to success,
but the key to failure is trying to
please everybody"
http://www.nongmoproject.org/

Janet Bostwick wrote:
>
> All of the welfare programs add up to less than 5% of the budget. Now,
> how many trillions are held off shore -- tax free by the wealthy? I
> forget.

All this "class envy" of the rich kills me. If you were rich (and smart)
wouldn't YOU also take advantage of every legal loophole available to pay as
little as you could? Of course you would. You can only blame Congress for
all of them and Congress has been mostly Democratic in the past many many
years.

And I'm not one of the rich ones. I'm in the group that gets screwed the
most. I make the very minimum of middle class but still too high to get any
poor ppl benefits.

Gary

On 8/13/2012 9:00 AM, George M. Middius wrote:
> Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
>>>> Mitt Romney has no employees.
>>>
>>> I got a laugh when he claimed he was CEO of Bain and also retired at
>>> the same time.
>
>> He is running on his record at Bain yet any questions about Bain are
>> completely off limits.
>
> Right-wing theocrats are expert at doublethink. After those two
> mass-murder incidents recently, the NRA talking heads claimed that
> talking about changing gun laws was "disrespectful" to the victims.
> Ha!

Folks went ape-shit over the shooting in a movie theater and you'd think
there would be an outrage if it happened in a place of worship. Of
course, you'd be wrong. That's the breaks.

"Paul M. Cook" > wrote in
:

> Ayn Rand was a genuine sociopath. [...] BTW, she lived on
> Social Security and Medicare for the last years of her life.

And yet she called those who needed it "parasites".

--

Traditions are group efforts to keep the unexpected
from happening.

-- Barbara Tober

On Aug 13, 1:51*pm, Gary > wrote:
> Janet Bostwick wrote:
>
> > All of the welfare programs add up to less than 5% of the budget. Now,
> > how many trillions are held off shore -- tax free by the wealthy? I
> > forget.
>
> All this "class envy" of the rich kills me. *If you were rich (and smart)
> wouldn't YOU also take advantage of every legal loophole available to pay as
> little as you could? Of course you would. *You can only blame Congress for
> all of them and Congress has been mostly Democratic in the past many many
> years.

Congress has been majority Democratic for only four of the past 18
years, but, please, indulge your fantasies.

>
> And I'm not one of the rich ones. I'm in the group that gets screwed the
> most. I make the very minimum of middle class but still too high to get any
> poor ppl benefits.
>

Which po' folks' benefits do you crave?

spamtrap1888 wrote:
>
> Remember human life must be cherished from the moment of conception to
> the moment of birth, at which point keeping it alive might cost Ryan
> money.

One thing I laugh about is the now.....no abortion except in the cases of
rape or incest...from the Pubs and relgious people.

Huh? If they value the fetus so much, why would rape or incest make a
difference? I thought they cared about the unborn.

G.

spamtrap1888 wrote:
>
> On Aug 13, 1:51 pm, Gary > wrote:
> > Janet Bostwick wrote:
> >
> > > All of the welfare programs add up to less than 5% of the budget. Now,
> > > how many trillions are held off shore -- tax free by the wealthy? I
> > > forget.
> >
> > All this "class envy" of the rich kills me. If you were rich (and smart)
> > wouldn't YOU also take advantage of every legal loophole available to pay as
> > little as you could? Of course you would. You can only blame Congress for
> > all of them and Congress has been mostly Democratic in the past many many
> > years.
>
> Congress has been majority Democratic for only four of the past 18
> years, but, please, indulge your fantasies.

I said many many years, not just the past 18 which suits your argument.
BTW, I count 6 years in the past 18 with Democrat majority and another 4 of
50/50.

Let's take it back many many years to around when FDR was elected and many
of our welfare and tax issues progressed. My since 1937, my count is
roughly 51 years if Democrat majority and 20 years of Republican majority.
I'm a few years off with my count but you can see the slant over our
lifetimes.

http://hamptonroads.com/2011/07/beac...-complex-taste
>
> >
> > And I'm not one of the rich ones. I'm in the group that gets screwed the
> > most. I make the very minimum of middle class but still too high to get any
> > poor ppl benefits.
> >
>
> Which po' folks' benefits do you crave?

I don't crave any and I've never sought them even though I would qualify for
a few at times. I prefer to pay my way through life and live on what I can
afford. All of those benefits are paid by tax money. Our taxes are way too
high and don't blame the rich for saving what they legally can.

Gary

Gary wrote:
>
> I said many many years, not just the past 18 which suits your argument.
> BTW, I count 6 years in the past 18 with Democrat majority and another 4 of
> 50/50.
>
> Let's take it back many many years to around when FDR was elected and many
> of our welfare and tax issues progressed. My since 1937, my count is
> roughly 51 years of Democrat majority and 20 years of Republican majority.
> I'm a few years off with my count but you can see the slant over our
> lifetimes.
>
> http://hamptonroads.com/2011/07/beac...-complex-taste

Oh wait a minute! I put the wrong address there. hahaha
Let me try again...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_d...tes_Congresses

Gary

On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 16:51:50 -0400, Gary > wrote:

>Janet Bostwick wrote:
>>
>> All of the welfare programs add up to less than 5% of the budget. Now,
>> how many trillions are held off shore -- tax free by the wealthy? I
>> forget.
>
>All this "class envy" of the rich kills me. If you were rich (and smart)
>wouldn't YOU also take advantage of every legal loophole available to pay as
>little as you could? Of course you would. You can only blame Congress for
>all of them and Congress has been mostly Democratic in the past many many
>years.
>
snip
>Gary
Actually, not. I wouldn't screw every cent out of my country. I'd
make sure that I contributed to my upkeep.
You're talking about the ones who always get to the candy box first
and take all the best pieces. Not everyone is like that.
A friend, very wealthy, who owns a significant fast food chain says he
is happy to pay his taxes because he has the money to do so and his
country made it possible.
Janet US

Janet Bostwick wrote:
>
> Actually, not. I wouldn't screw every cent out of my country. I'd
> make sure that I contributed to my upkeep.
> You're talking about the ones who always get to the candy box first
> and take all the best pieces. Not everyone is like that.
> A friend, very wealthy, who owns a significant fast food chain says he
> is happy to pay his taxes because he has the money to do so and his
> country made it possible.

He's a wealthy business owner and probably has an accountant who does his
taxes. The accountant will do his best to reduce his taxes...that's his job.
It's all legal and no one will willingly pay more than they owe.

Of course he's glad to pay his taxes but he's not going to pay more than he
has to. Only a moron would do that.

Gary

On Aug 12, 1:18*pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:

> I never thought I would actually see a presidential campaign
> whose platform was the abolishment of Social Security, Medicare,
> Medicaid and pretty much any program that benefits the commons.

I am shocked but not surprised.

It makes sense there would be two trust fund babies on the same
ticket, otherwise one of them would not be able to stomach the
other one.

Food related: Puke!!!


Steve

"Michel Boucher" > wrote in message
...
> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in
> :
>
>> Ayn Rand was a genuine sociopath. [...] BTW, she lived on
>> Social Security and Medicare for the last years of her life.
>
> And yet she called those who needed it "parasites".

Paul Ryan used his father's SS death benefits to give himself a college
education and get started in business. Now he wants to destroy SS. They
always pull the ladder up after they have made it over the wall.

Paul

On Aug 13, 11:04*pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
> "Michel Boucher" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in
> :
>
> >> Ayn Rand was a genuine sociopath. *[...] *BTW, she lived on
> >> Social Security and Medicare for the last years of her life.
>
> > And yet she called those who needed it "parasites".
>
> Paul Ryan used his father's SS death benefits to give himself a college
> education and get started in business. *Now he wants to destroy SS. *They
> always pull the ladder up after they have made it over the wall.
>

This confuses people, so I will lay it out. Survivor benefits were
added to Social Security in 1939, to make up in part for the lack of
the family wageearner's income. Children could receive them until they
turned 18, at which point they were considered old enough not to be
dependent on others to earn a living. That changed in 1965, as college
attendance became more widespread. Figuring that students were still
dependent on their parents till they completed college, the benefits
were extended till age 22, but stopped if the student dropped full-
time status.

This continued into the 1970s, but by then the dollars paid out to
college students began to look quite sizable. Eventually the Reagan
Administration proposed a bill to eliminate the benefit for college
students. No more was paid after 1985.

Ryan's father died after the phase-out, when benefits were limited to
age 18, or age 19 if the student is still in high school. So Ryan
merely squirreled away his two years of survivor benefits. Survivor
benefits amounted to what the worker would get if disabled, prorated
among the survivors.