Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
so for racks, it seems in order of best to worst is:
stainless nylon vinyl PVC correct? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 02:29:30 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle
> wrote: > so for racks, it seems in order of best to worst is: > > stainless > nylon > vinyl > PVC > > correct? No idea. I can only tell you that I saw a very impressive dishwasher at a real estate open house today. It was a Thermadore - Professional Series. Very impressive. Heavy door, nice styling with a bevel on it. http://www.aggressiveappliances.com/...dwhd630gcp.jpg http://www.aggressiveappliances.com/...es-dishwasher/ -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() tert in seattle wrote: > > so for racks, it seems in order of best to worst is: > > stainless > nylon > vinyl > PVC > > correct? Vinyl and PVC (polyVINYLcloride) are the same thing. Nylon is tougher than PVC, but it's hygroscopic so it had better be over a stainless rack frame or I'd expect rust issues. Stainless will be durable, but it's a hard surface and more likely to damage items placed on the rack than the "padded" nylon or PVC coated racks. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete C. wrote:
> > tert in seattle wrote: >> >> so for racks, it seems in order of best to worst is: >> >> stainless >> nylon >> vinyl >> PVC >> >> correct? > > Vinyl and PVC (polyVINYLcloride) are the same thing. Nylon is tougher > than PVC, but it's hygroscopic so it had better be over a stainless rack > frame or I'd expect rust issues. Stainless will be durable, but it's a > hard surface and more likely to damage items placed on the rack than the > "padded" nylon or PVC coated racks. thanks, that helps |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 03:12:21 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle
> wrote: > Pete C. wrote: > > > > tert in seattle wrote: > >> > >> so for racks, it seems in order of best to worst is: > >> > >> stainless > >> nylon > >> vinyl > >> PVC > >> > >> correct? > > > > Vinyl and PVC (polyVINYLcloride) are the same thing. Nylon is tougher > > than PVC, but it's hygroscopic so it had better be over a stainless rack > > frame or I'd expect rust issues. Stainless will be durable, but it's a > > hard surface and more likely to damage items placed on the rack than the > > "padded" nylon or PVC coated racks. > > thanks, that helps Racks are racks. They are always coated and I don't care what's under the coating. I'd be more concerned about whether or not the wheels were going to fall off. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 08:36:06 -0700, sf > wrote:
>On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 03:12:21 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle > wrote: > >> Pete C. wrote: >> > >> > tert in seattle wrote: >> >> >> >> so for racks, it seems in order of best to worst is: >> >> >> >> stainless >> >> nylon >> >> vinyl >> >> PVC >> >> >> >> correct? >> > >> > Vinyl and PVC (polyVINYLcloride) are the same thing. Nylon is tougher >> > than PVC, but it's hygroscopic so it had better be over a stainless rack >> > frame or I'd expect rust issues. Stainless will be durable, but it's a >> > hard surface and more likely to damage items placed on the rack than the >> > "padded" nylon or PVC coated racks. >> >> thanks, that helps > >Racks are racks. That's what you think. ![]() This is a rack: http://tinyurl.com/6r3hnw6 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 03:12:21 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle > wrote: > >> Pete C. wrote: >> > >> > tert in seattle wrote: >> >> >> >> so for racks, it seems in order of best to worst is: >> >> >> >> stainless >> >> nylon >> >> vinyl >> >> PVC >> >> >> >> correct? >> > >> > Vinyl and PVC (polyVINYLcloride) are the same thing. Nylon is tougher >> > than PVC, but it's hygroscopic so it had better be over a stainless rack >> > frame or I'd expect rust issues. Stainless will be durable, but it's a >> > hard surface and more likely to damage items placed on the rack than the >> > "padded" nylon or PVC coated racks. >> >> thanks, that helps > > Racks are racks. They are always coated and I don't care what's under > the coating. I'd be more concerned about whether or not the wheels > were going to fall off. well, nylon and vinyl are definitely two different things, and since I've got two five-year-olds who like to "help" in the kitchen I want the more durable covering they can stab with a fork without necessitating a replacement rack |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:01:32 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle
> wrote: > sf wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 03:12:21 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle > > wrote: > > > >> Pete C. wrote: > >> > > >> > tert in seattle wrote: > >> >> > >> >> so for racks, it seems in order of best to worst is: > >> >> > >> >> stainless > >> >> nylon > >> >> vinyl > >> >> PVC > >> >> > >> >> correct? > >> > > >> > Vinyl and PVC (polyVINYLcloride) are the same thing. Nylon is tougher > >> > than PVC, but it's hygroscopic so it had better be over a stainless rack > >> > frame or I'd expect rust issues. Stainless will be durable, but it's a > >> > hard surface and more likely to damage items placed on the rack than the > >> > "padded" nylon or PVC coated racks. > >> > >> thanks, that helps > > > > Racks are racks. They are always coated and I don't care what's under > > the coating. I'd be more concerned about whether or not the wheels > > were going to fall off. > > well, nylon and vinyl are definitely two different things, and since > I've got two five-year-olds who like to "help" in the kitchen I want > the more durable covering they can stab with a fork without necessitating > a replacement rack Oh, come on. I raised two kids, a grandchild that's 11 now and currently have two one year old grandchildren who help me with the dishes - but stabbing a rack with a fork has never even come up. Silverware goes in it's own compartment not on the dish racks. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 17, 9:29*pm, tert in seattle > wrote:
> so for racks, it seems in order of best to worst is: > > stainless > nylon > vinyl > PVC > > correct? I would never want stainless racks - glasses and dishes would "bang around" more and possibly chip. The racks in my GE "tall tub" dishwasher are vinyl-coated, and aren't stained or marked up after 6 years of use, and work just fine. N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/19/2012 11:01 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
> On Mar 17, 9:29 pm, tert in > wrote: >> so for racks, it seems in order of best to worst is: >> >> stainless >> nylon >> vinyl >> PVC >> >> correct? > > I would never want stainless racks - glasses and dishes would "bang > around" more and possibly chip. The racks in my GE "tall tub" > dishwasher are vinyl-coated, and aren't stained or marked up after 6 > years of use, and work just fine. My top rack is vinyl and I actually broke a glass in it tonight. I was loading it to run and a bowl I put on the top rack fell over onto glass and broke it and I hope I found all the pieces. I had to just run it. I might find some clean sharp pieces in the flatware bin because I couldn't find any more pieces. I also just bought a GE Tall tub stainless dishwasher. The cycle ended without incident so I'll have to be careful emptying it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 08:01:11 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote: > I would never want stainless racks - glasses and dishes would "bang > around" more and possibly chip. The racks in my GE "tall tub" > dishwasher are vinyl-coated, and aren't stained or marked up after 6 > years of use, and work just fine. Does any manufacturer offer an option of stainless steel racks? -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 19, 11:28*pm, sf > wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 08:01:11 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2 > > > wrote: > > I would never want stainless racks - glasses and dishes would "bang > > around" more and possibly chip. *The racks in my GE "tall tub" > > dishwasher are vinyl-coated, and aren't stained or marked up after 6 > > years of use, and work just fine. > > Does any manufacturer offer an option of stainless steel racks? > > -- > Food is an important part of a balanced diet. I haven't a clue - it was part of the OP from tert: "so for racks, it seems in order of best to worst is: stainless nylon vinyl PVC correct?" N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 07:51:02 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote: > On Mar 19, 11:28*pm, sf > wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 08:01:11 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2 > > > > > wrote: > > > I would never want stainless racks - glasses and dishes would "bang > > > around" more and possibly chip. *The racks in my GE "tall tub" > > > dishwasher are vinyl-coated, and aren't stained or marked up after 6 > > > years of use, and work just fine. > > > > Does any manufacturer offer an option of stainless steel racks? > > > > -- > > Food is an important part of a balanced diet. > > I haven't a clue - it was part of the OP from tert: > > "so for racks, it seems in order of best to worst is: > stainless > nylon > vinyl > PVC > correct?" > It puzzled me then and it's still puzzling me now. I don't remember ever seeing stainless steel racks, only interior walls. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No doubt stainless is the best. Next comes nylon. PVC and vinyl are similar. PVC and vinyl comes with coating. They do not damage the utensils.
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sqwertz" > wrote in message ... > On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 02:29:30 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote: > >> so for racks, it seems in order of best to worst is: >> >> stainless >> nylon >> vinyl >> PVC > > I prefer real flesh. None of that saline or silicon crap for me. I > don't even mind if she doesn't wash dishes, as long as they're real. So hard (or soft?) to argue. pavane |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
dishwashers again | General Cooking | |||
Mechanical Dishwashers | General Cooking | |||
Mechanical Dishwashers | General Cooking | |||
Dishwashers | General Cooking | |||
O.T. Dishwashers | General Cooking |