I guess this thing is not on, damn!
 

On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:26:48 -0400, "jmcquown" >
wrote:

> Hi, TFM. I don't know how many people here on rfc still access
> alt.binaries.food. Lots of people here post links if they want to post
> pictures of food.

I've seen a lot of rfc posters there lately.

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

I guess this thing is not on, damn!
 

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:26:48 -0400, "jmcquown" >
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, TFM. I don't know how many people here on rfc still access
>> alt.binaries.food. Lots of people here post links if they want to post
>> pictures of food.
>
> I've seen a lot of rfc posters there lately.
>
> --
I wouldn't know... I use NIN and they don't do binary groups. I don't
really care about binaries. Don't take pictures of food anymore, either.
It was fun for a while but I'd rather eat my food than plate it up and try
to make it look pretty. It gets cold while I'm trying to take the perfect
photo. More important to me is that it tastes good :)

Jill

I guess this thing is not on, damn!
 

jmcquown wrote:
>
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:26:48 -0400, "jmcquown" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, TFM. I don't know how many people here on rfc still access
>>> alt.binaries.food. Lots of people here post links if they want to post
>>> pictures of food.
>>
>> I've seen a lot of rfc posters there lately.
>>
>> --
> I wouldn't know... I use NIN and they don't do binary groups. I don't
> really care about binaries. Don't take pictures of food anymore,
> either. It was fun for a while but I'd rather eat my food than plate
> it up and try to make it look pretty. It gets cold while I'm trying
> to take the perfect photo. More important to me is that it tastes
> good :)
>
> Jill
>
>
It's always about you, eh?

I guess this thing is not on, damn!
 

"L G" > wrote in message
...
> jmcquown wrote:
>>
>> "sf" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:26:48 -0400, "jmcquown" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, TFM. I don't know how many people here on rfc still access
>>>> alt.binaries.food. Lots of people here post links if they want to post
>>>> pictures of food.
>>>
>>> I've seen a lot of rfc posters there lately.
>>>
>>> --
>> I wouldn't know... I use NIN and they don't do binary groups. I don't
>> really care about binaries. Don't take pictures of food anymore, either.
>> It was fun for a while but I'd rather eat my food than plate it up and
>> try to make it look pretty. It gets cold while I'm trying to take the
>> perfect photo. More important to me is that it tastes good :)
>>
>> Jill
>>
>>
> It's always about you, eh?

No, it's always about YOU. And you're not doing anything but making
yourself look like an obsessed ass.

I guess this thing is not on, damn!
 

On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:26:24 -0400, "jmcquown" >
wrote:

>
>"sf" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:26:48 -0400, "jmcquown" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, TFM. I don't know how many people here on rfc still access
>>> alt.binaries.food. Lots of people here post links if they want to post
>>> pictures of food.
>>
>> I've seen a lot of rfc posters there lately.
>>
>> --
>I wouldn't know... I use NIN and they don't do binary groups.

If you don't know then why did you post about it? I know this is
typical of you but it really is ignorant.

Lou

I guess this thing is not on, damn!
 

In article >,
Lou Decruss > wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:26:24 -0400, "jmcquown" >
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"sf" > wrote in message
> .. .
> >> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:26:48 -0400, "jmcquown" >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi, TFM. I don't know how many people here on rfc still access
> >>> alt.binaries.food. Lots of people here post links if they want to post
> >>> pictures of food.
> >>
> >> I've seen a lot of rfc posters there lately.

> >I wouldn't know... I use NIN and they don't do binary groups.
>
> If you don't know then why did you post about it? I know this is
> typical of you but it really is ignorant.

My suggestion is that people check to see if their newserver carries
certain binary groups, like ABF, even if they say they don't. Mine
does. ABF is a low volume group, with binaries that transfer in a
fraction of a second. That's not the kind of group that they are trying
to exclude.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

I guess this thing is not on, damn!
 

On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:55:13 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote:

> ABF is a low volume group, with binaries that transfer in a
> fraction of a second. That's not the kind of group that they are trying
> to exclude.

The reason why the binaries convert quickly is because posters try to
put up small pictures. It's an international group and a lot of
people are still on dial up and all the baggage that comes with it.

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

I guess this thing is not on, damn!
 

On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:24:44 -0700, sf wrote:

> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:55:13 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote:
>
>> ABF is a low volume group, with binaries that transfer in a
>> fraction of a second. That's not the kind of group that they are trying
>> to exclude.
>
> The reason why the binaries convert quickly is because posters try to
> put up small pictures. It's an international group and a lot of
> people are still on dial up and all the baggage that comes with it.

Nonetheless, good suggestion.

TFM®

I guess this thing is not on, damn!
 

On Jul 28, 6:26*pm, "jmcquown" > wrote:
> "sf" > wrote in message
>
> ... > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:26:48 -0400, "jmcquown" >
> > wrote:
>
> >> Hi, TFM. *I don't know how many people here on rfc still access
> >> alt.binaries.food. *Lots of people here post links if they want to post
> >> pictures of food.
>
> > I've seen a lot of rfc posters there lately.
>
> > --
>
> I wouldn't know... I use NIN and they don't do binary groups. *I don't
> really care about binaries. *Don't take pictures of food anymore, either.

I guess this thing is not on, damn!
 

jmcquown wrote:
>
> "L G" > wrote in message
> ...
>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>
>>> "sf" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:26:48 -0400, "jmcquown" >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi, TFM. I don't know how many people here on rfc still access
>>>>> alt.binaries.food. Lots of people here post links if they want to
>>>>> post
>>>>> pictures of food.
>>>>
>>>> I've seen a lot of rfc posters there lately.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> I wouldn't know... I use NIN and they don't do binary groups. I
>>> don't really care about binaries. Don't take pictures of food
>>> anymore, either. It was fun for a while but I'd rather eat my food
>>> than plate it up and try to make it look pretty. It gets cold while
>>> I'm trying to take the perfect photo. More important to me is that
>>> it tastes good :)
>>>
>>> Jill
>>>
>>>
>> It's always about you, eh?
>
> No, it's always about YOU. And you're not doing anything but making
> yourself look like an obsessed ass.
Really, Jill?

I guess this thing is not on, damn!
 

On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:55:13 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote:

>In article >,
> Lou Decruss > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:26:24 -0400, "jmcquown" >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"sf" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>> >> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:26:48 -0400, "jmcquown" >
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi, TFM. I don't know how many people here on rfc still access
>> >>> alt.binaries.food. Lots of people here post links if they want to post
>> >>> pictures of food.
>> >>
>> >> I've seen a lot of rfc posters there lately.
>
>> >I wouldn't know... I use NIN and they don't do binary groups.
>>
>> If you don't know then why did you post about it? I know this is
>> typical of you but it really is ignorant.
>
>My suggestion is that people check to see if their newserver carries
>certain binary groups, like ABF, even if they say they don't. Mine
>does. ABF is a low volume group, with binaries that transfer in a
>fraction of a second. That's not the kind of group that they are trying
>to exclude.

I used Eternal-September for a year or so. There was a garden group
that came in along with ABF but only the smaller binaries got through.
I'd see responses but no picture.

Lou

I guess this thing is not on, damn!
 

"Dan Abel" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> Lou Decruss > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:26:24 -0400, "jmcquown" >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"sf" > wrote in message
>> .. .
>> >> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:26:48 -0400, "jmcquown" >
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi, TFM. I don't know how many people here on rfc still access
>> >>> alt.binaries.food. Lots of people here post links if they want to
>> >>> post
>> >>> pictures of food.
>> >>
>> >> I've seen a lot of rfc posters there lately.
>
>> >I wouldn't know... I use NIN and they don't do binary groups.
>>
>> If you don't know then why did you post about it? I know this is
>> typical of you but it really is ignorant.
>
Sorry to piggyback on your post, Dan. "Lou" hasn't fiture out yet that
I've had him blocked for years. I don't care to look at photos of food. As
I've stated before, I used to take pictures of the food I cooked and I even
posted to ABF in the past. But I'd rather eat what I cook than take
pictures of it.

Jill

> My suggestion is that people check to see if their newserver carries
> certain binary groups, like ABF, even if they say they don't. Mine
> does. ABF is a low volume group, with binaries that transfer in a
> fraction of a second. That's not the kind of group that they are trying
> to exclude.
>
> --
> Dan Abel
> Petaluma, California USA
>