cancer studies
Hi guys
Is it accurate to say that something is a risk for humans if the only cancer studies have been done on rats (and other animals)? Thank for sharing with us |
cancer studies
"blair" > ha scritto nel messaggio > Is it accurate to say that something is a risk for humans if the only> > cancer studies have been done on rats (and other animals)? One extrapolates to all mammals. What do you propose? That we line up a bunch of human babies and force them to smoke cigarettes, wear mascara, use sunblock under lamps until they are one? |
cancer studies
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:28:20 +0200, Giusi wrote:
> "blair" > ha scritto nel messaggio > >> Is it accurate to say that something is a risk for humans if the only> >> cancer studies have been done on rats (and other animals)? > > One extrapolates to all mammals. What do you propose? That we line up a > bunch of human babies and force them to smoke cigarettes, wear mascara, use > sunblock under lamps until they are one? cool! i bet a lot of rats and rabbits would complain about being out of a job, though. your pal, blake |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter