OT but informative: Reza Aslan: God, Globalization & Ending the Waron Terror
 

Reza Aslan: God, Globalization & Ending the War on Terror
http://fora.tv/2009/05/12/Reza_Aslan...n_a_Cosmic_War

/OT but informative: Re/za A/slan: God, G/lobaliz/ation & Endingthe W/ar on T/error
 

Manda Ruby wrote:
> Reza Aslan: God, Globalization & Ending the War on Terror
> http://fora.tv/2009/05/12/Reza_Aslan...n_a_Cosmic_War

spam

--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

Join the Google Groups revolution.........
http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en

amandaF has gone around the bend, and watch out, all you non-brown-skinned USAians, because when the revolution comes it will be televised and Geraldo Rivera will be in the vanguard of those orchestrating the downfall of the decadent corrupt bank
 

Peter wrote:

> Manda Ruby wrote:
>> Reza Aslan: God, Globalization & Ending the War on Terror
>> http://fora.tv/2009/05/12/Reza_Aslan...n_a_Cosmic_War
>
> spam

Interesting idea, but how do you use SPAM in the war on terror? In order to
optimize SPAM's potential as a weapon of mass degustation, you have to force
the terrorists to eat it, which means you have to catch them. But if we
*did* catch all the terrorists, wouldn't the war on terror already be over?

At any rate, it's funny to see our little Burmese fallen debutante trying to
get all political in a cooking newsgroup. I suppose she's so uncomfortable
in a discussion about cooking that she's trying to deflect the conversation
in *any* other direction.

Bob

amandaF has gone around the bend, and watch out, all you non-brown-skinned USAians, because when the revolution comes it will be televised and Geraldo Rivera will be in the vanguard of those orchestrating the downfall of the decadent corrupt bank
 

On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:26:59 -0700, Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> Peter wrote:
>
>> Manda Ruby wrote:
>>> Reza Aslan: God, Globalization & Ending the War on Terror
>>> http://fora.tv/2009/05/12/Reza_Aslan...n_a_Cosmic_War
>>
>> spam
>
> Interesting idea, but how do you use SPAM in the war on terror? In order to
> optimize SPAM's potential as a weapon of mass degustation, you have to force
> the terrorists to eat it, which means you have to catch them. But if we
> *did* catch all the terrorists, wouldn't the war on terror already be over?
>
> At any rate, it's funny to see our little Burmese fallen debutante trying to
> get all political in a cooking newsgroup. I suppose she's so uncomfortable
> in a discussion about cooking that she's trying to deflect the conversation
> in *any* other direction.

Is this argument I started over $.25 worth of kidney beans?

I told her it wasn't worth it, but I guess she didn't take my
advice.

-sw