|
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
|
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
"ChattyCathy" > wrote in message ... > http://www.recfoodcooking.com > > aem's wish is my command. Tie? Cant tell! |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
cshenk wrote:
> > "ChattyCathy" > wrote in message > ... >> http://www.recfoodcooking.com >> >> aem's wish is my command. > > Tie? > > Cant tell! Heh. You owned up first... Choose a TFH ;-) -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
"ChattyCathy" > wrote in message ... > http://www.recfoodcooking.com > > aem's wish is my command. > -- > Cheers > Chatty Cathy Maybe. It depends on how bored I am. I'm #2. There was already a "No" vote. Durn. I need a new hat. |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
ChattyCathy > wrote in on
Sep Sun 2009 01:44 pm > http://www.recfoodcooking.com > > aem's wish is my command. Did you know if you leave the site after voting and then vote again you don't see that silly cheat page. -- Is that your nose, or are you eatting a banana? -Jimmy Durante |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
"Jenny" wrote
> I'm #2. There was already a "No" vote. > > Durn. I need a new hat. Hehe It's only my 3rd. Oh, will go shopping! |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
hahabogus wrote:
> ChattyCathy > wrote in > on Sep Sun 2009 01:44 pm > >> http://www.recfoodcooking.com >> >> aem's wish is my command. > > Did you know if you leave the site after voting and then vote again > you don't see that silly cheat page. > Yabut, that's cheating ;-) -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
"ChattyCathy" wrote
> cshenk wrote: Hee i have a benie and an 'around the house'. I finally settled on : Formal Occasions. Tough choice though witht he Tiara. |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
cshenk wrote:
> "Jenny" wrote > >> I'm #2. There was already a "No" vote. >> >> Durn. I need a new hat. > > Hehe It's only my 3rd. Oh, will go shopping! Well, there's more than enough TFH's to go around... You can both have one. -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
"ChattyCathy" wrote
> cshenk wrote: >> "Jenny" wrote >> >>> I'm #2. There was already a "No" vote. >> Hehe It's only my 3rd. Oh, will go shopping! > > Well, there's more than enough TFH's to go around... You can both have > one. Cool! This one was so close, unless yor computer records show other, we tied ;-) |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
On Sep 27, 11:44 am, ChattyCathy > wrote:
> http://www.recfoodcooking.com > > aem's wish is my command. > -- My post was just a joke. It always amuses me when a design conflicts with a desire, if that's not too vague. In other words, the OP apparently (though he may also have been joking) wanted people to go look at a site, but the way he posted about it almost insured that no one would go look. So I chuckled at it. (Naturally, some took it seriously and flailed about with the usual cries of horror about spam, but they were as irrelevant as usual.) -aem |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
ChattyCathy > wrote in
on Sep Sun 2009 01:57 pm > hahabogus wrote: > >> ChattyCathy > wrote in >> on Sep Sun 2009 01:44 pm >> >>> http://www.recfoodcooking.com >>> >>> aem's wish is my command. >> >> Did you know if you leave the site after voting and then vote again >> you don't see that silly cheat page. >> > Yabut, that's cheating ;-) go figure.... -- Is that your nose, or are you eatting a banana? -Jimmy Durante |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
aem wrote:
> On Sep 27, 11:44 am, ChattyCathy > wrote: >> http://www.recfoodcooking.com >> >> aem's wish is my command. >> -- > My post was just a joke. It always amuses me when a design conflicts > with a desire, if that's not too vague. In other words, the OP > apparently (though he may also have been joking) wanted people to go > look at a site, but the way he posted about it almost insured that no > one would go look. So I chuckled at it. (Naturally, some took it > seriously and flailed about with the usual cries of horror about spam, > but they were as irrelevant as usual.) -aem http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHhootD0_mQ or http://tinyurl.com/c8vxku ;-) -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
l, not -l wrote:
> Maybe; it depends on who posted the link. I would click on the link > if from someone trusted on the list; but, would not if from a stranger > or the usual suspects on RFC. Usual suspects. Love that term <g> -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
"l, not -l" > wrote in
: > Maybe; it depends on who posted the link. I would click on > the link if from someone trusted on the list; but, would not > if from a stranger or the usual suspects on RFC. I agree. |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
In article >,
ChattyCathy > wrote: > aem wrote: > > > On Sep 27, 11:44 am, ChattyCathy > wrote: > >> http://www.recfoodcooking.com > >> > >> aem's wish is my command. > >> -- > > My post was just a joke. It always amuses me when a design conflicts > > with a desire, if that's not too vague. In other words, the OP > > apparently (though he may also have been joking) wanted people to go > > look at a site, but the way he posted about it almost insured that no > > one would go look. So I chuckled at it. (Naturally, some took it > > seriously and flailed about with the usual cries of horror about spam, > > but they were as irrelevant as usual.) -aem > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHhootD0_mQ > or > http://tinyurl.com/c8vxku > > ;-) I love British Humor... ;-D -- Peace! Om "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." --Steve Rothstein Subscribe: |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
On 2009-09-27, Omelet > wrote:
> In article >, >> > seriously and flailed about with the usual cries of horror about spam, Didn't you get the wrong MP skit? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anwy2MPT5RE nb |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:11:55 -0700 (PDT), aem >
wrote: >On Sep 27, 11:44 am, ChattyCathy > wrote: >> http://www.recfoodcooking.com >> >> aem's wish is my command. >> -- >My post was just a joke. It always amuses me when a design conflicts >with a desire, if that's not too vague. In other words, the OP >apparently (though he may also have been joking) wanted people to go >look at a site, but the way he posted about it almost insured that no >one would go look. So I chuckled at it. (Naturally, some took it >seriously and flailed about with the usual cries of horror about spam, >but they were as irrelevant as usual.) -aem I have absolutely no idea what this is all about. I must have either missed it or have a key word filtered out. -- I love cooking with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food. |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
sf wrote:
> > I have absolutely no idea what this is all about. I must have either > missed it or have a key word filtered out. > There was a thread a few days ago where the OP had a 'mystery' tinyurl in it; aem made a joke about it... Anyway, bottom line is this: if somebody you don't know from Adam (or anybody you do know for that matter) posts just a tinyurl link (i.e. you have no idea what/where you'll end up) would/do you click on it? FWIW, I agree with some here that say if they "know" the poster they'll probably click on the link. However, if I'm posting a link myself, I usually put in the full link *plus* the tinyurl (for those who have newsreaders that 'wrap' long URLs over more than one line, which can render them 'un-click-able') and I see quite a few others do the same. Mind you, even using a full link doesn't always give an accurate indication of what to expect. Life is full of little risks, ain't it? <veg> -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
cshenk wrote:
> "ChattyCathy" wrote >> cshenk wrote: >>> "Jenny" wrote >>> >>>> I'm #2. There was already a "No" vote. >>> Hehe It's only my 3rd. Oh, will go shopping! >> >> Well, there's more than enough TFH's to go around... You can both >> have one. > > Cool! This one was so close, unless yor computer records show other, > we tied ;-) It has happened before... so I decided that if it happened again I'd just award two TFHs ;-) -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:59:30 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote:
> cshenk wrote: > >> "Jenny" wrote >> >>> I'm #2. There was already a "No" vote. >>> >>> Durn. I need a new hat. >> >> Hehe It's only my 3rd. Oh, will go shopping! > > Well, there's more than enough TFH's to go around... You can both have > one. tsk, tsk. where are Rules and Standards? your pal, blake |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
blake murphy wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:59:30 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote: > >> cshenk wrote: >> >>> "Jenny" wrote >>> >>>> I'm #2. There was already a "No" vote. >>>> >>>> Durn. I need a new hat. >>> >>> Hehe It's only my 3rd. Oh, will go shopping! >> >> Well, there's more than enough TFH's to go around... You can both >> have one. > > tsk, tsk. where are Rules and Standards? Right where I like 'em... -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
In article >,
ChattyCathy > wrote: > blake murphy wrote: > > > On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:59:30 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote: > > > >> cshenk wrote: > >> > >>> "Jenny" wrote > >>> > >>>> I'm #2. There was already a "No" vote. > >>>> > >>>> Durn. I need a new hat. > >>> > >>> Hehe It's only my 3rd. Oh, will go shopping! > >> > >> Well, there's more than enough TFH's to go around... You can both > >> have one. > > > > tsk, tsk. where are Rules and Standards? > > Right where I like 'em... Speaking of rules and standards... Did you get that new survey idea I e-mailed yesterday? I got a delivery delay message. Not exactly a bounce, but close. It was an idea for a survey on cooking in the nude. I thought it would be amusing. ;-) Based on a recent set of posts on a.b.f. -- Peace! Om "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." --Steve Rothstein Subscribe: |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
Omelet wrote:
> > Speaking of rules and standards... > > Did you get that new survey idea I e-mailed yesterday? I got a > delivery > delay message. Not exactly a bounce, but close. Nope. Our ISP was doing 'Sunday maintenance' for a couple of hours yesterday, so it might have been intercepted by the Vogons... > It was an idea for a > survey on cooking in the nude. I thought it would be amusing. ;-) > Based on a recent set of posts on a.b.f. Something like this? http://www.recfoodcooking.com/survey...html?survey=15 -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
In article >,
ChattyCathy > wrote: > Omelet wrote: > > > > Speaking of rules and standards... > > > > Did you get that new survey idea I e-mailed yesterday? I got a > > delivery > > delay message. Not exactly a bounce, but close. > > Nope. Our ISP was doing 'Sunday maintenance' for a couple of hours > yesterday, so it might have been intercepted by the Vogons... > > > It was an idea for a > > survey on cooking in the nude. I thought it would be amusing. ;-) > > Based on a recent set of posts on a.b.f. > > Something like this? > > http://www.recfoodcooking.com/survey...html?survey=15 Ah. I must have missed that one. :-) Oh well! I might have been off list at the time, or too busy to read all the threads. -- Peace! Om "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." --Steve Rothstein Subscribe: Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/home?tab=mq> |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
In article >,
ChattyCathy > wrote: > sf wrote: > > > > > I have absolutely no idea what this is all about. I must have either > > missed it or have a key word filtered out. > > > > There was a thread a few days ago where the OP had a 'mystery' tinyurl > in it; aem made a joke about it... > > Anyway, bottom line is this: if somebody you don't know from Adam (or > anybody you do know for that matter) posts just a tinyurl link (i.e. > you have no idea what/where you'll end up) would/do you click on it? > > FWIW, I agree with some here that say if they "know" the poster they'll > probably click on the link. You left out an important part. As I remember (and I'm too lazy to look it up), the whole post shouted SPAM! > However, if I'm posting a link myself, I usually put in the full link > *plus* the tinyurl (for those who have newsreaders that 'wrap' long > URLs over more than one line, which can render them 'un-click-able') > and I see quite a few others do the same. Mind you, even using a full > link doesn't always give an accurate indication of what to expect. Life > is full of little risks, ain't it? <veg> I still wouldn't click on it, if I didn't know the poster and it was obviously a spam post. The spammer can easily include an absurdly long URL that goes to something related to food that looks interesting, and a tinyURL that points to spam. I wouldn't put it past them, either. -- Dan Abel Petaluma, California USA |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
Dan Abel wrote:
> > You left out an important part. As I remember (and I'm too lazy to > look it up), the whole post shouted SPAM! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anwy2MPT5RE -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:54:00 +0200, ChattyCathy
> wrote: > >However, if I'm posting a link myself, I usually put in the full link >*plus* the tinyurl (for those who have newsreaders that 'wrap' long >URLs over more than one line, which can render them 'un-click-able') >and I see quite a few others do the same. Mind you, even using a full >link doesn't always give an accurate indication of what to expect. Life >is full of little risks, ain't it? <veg> I agree with the practice of posting both long and short links... Tiny also has a "preview" type link that I find very annoying, but I guess people who are nervous can feel better with. Personally, I'm in the don't care range. I don't click on suspect links most of the time and when I do my AV pre-checks it for viruses. I'm a pretty safe consumer. I haven't ever had a significant virus and what I've had was something stuck off in a temp file (once or twice only). <shrug> I'm not scared of that. My DD's computer came home from college loaded with hijackers, Trojans and viruses (at least I thought they were viruses). It took me a while and I had to go to a Hijack This forum, but I cleaned it up on my own without resorting to reformatting. -- I love cooking with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food. |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:24:12 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote:
> blake murphy wrote: > >> On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:59:30 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote: >> >>> cshenk wrote: >>> >>>> "Jenny" wrote >>>> >>>>> I'm #2. There was already a "No" vote. >>>>> >>>>> Durn. I need a new hat. >>>> >>>> Hehe It's only my 3rd. Oh, will go shopping! >>> >>> Well, there's more than enough TFH's to go around... You can both >>> have one. >> >> tsk, tsk. where are Rules and Standards? > > Right where I like 'em... you naughty girl. your pal, blake |
(2009-09-27) NS-RFC: We need a survey: would ANYONE EVER...
In article >,
ChattyCathy > wrote: > Omelet wrote: > > > > Speaking of rules and standards... > > > > Did you get that new survey idea I e-mailed yesterday? I got a > > delivery > > delay message. Not exactly a bounce, but close. > > Nope. Our ISP was doing 'Sunday maintenance' for a couple of hours > yesterday, so it might have been intercepted by the Vogons... > > > It was an idea for a > > survey on cooking in the nude. I thought it would be amusing. ;-) > > Based on a recent set of posts on a.b.f. > > Something like this? > > http://www.recfoodcooking.com/survey...html?survey=15 10/12/2006 (2006/10/12) for those who don't want to count up from the bottom. -- Dan Abel Petaluma, California USA |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter