Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Indoor Barbecued Pork
America's test kitchen has on a very good looking, and hopefully tasting
stovetop "barbecued pork" dish. Check out: http://www.americastestkitchen.com/c...eadedporkchops Ed |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Indoor Barbecued Pork
On 2009-09-26, l, not -l > wrote:
> > On 26-Sep-2009, "Theron" > wrote: > >> America's test kitchen has on a very good looking, and hopefully tasting >> stovetop "barbecued pork" dish. Check out: >> >> http://www.americastestkitchen.com/c...eadedporkchops >> >> Ed > > Either the link is in error or we have vastly different ideas of what > constitutes barbecue. The link is to a recipe for "shake and bake" pork > chops. Even allowing for the wide misuse of the term barbecue, a baked, or > even pan fried, pork chop isn't barbecue. Please provide an updated link. Theron mis-quoted the link. It was for "crunchy pork chops" not bbq. Besides, ATK is so far away from anything resembling good cooking, it's no surprise they would try and improve upon shake n bake. nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Indoor Barbecued Pork
"notbob" > wrote in message ... > On 2009-09-26, l, not -l > wrote: >> >> On 26-Sep-2009, "Theron" > wrote: >> >>> America's test kitchen has on a very good looking, and hopefully tasting >>> stovetop "barbecued pork" dish. Check out: >>> >>> http://www.americastestkitchen.com/c...eadedporkchops >>> >>> Ed >> >> Either the link is in error or we have vastly different ideas of what >> constitutes barbecue. The link is to a recipe for "shake and bake" pork >> chops. Even allowing for the wide misuse of the term barbecue, a baked, >> or >> even pan fried, pork chop isn't barbecue. Please provide an updated >> link. > > Theron mis-quoted the link. It was for "crunchy pork chops" not bbq. > Besides, ATK is so far away from anything resembling good cooking, > it's no surprise they would try and improve upon shake n bake. > > nb > > As below, Christopher Kimball has the "Indoor Barbecue Pork" recipe on his site, but has not released it for free viewing as he's supposed. He's a very greedy marketer. Sorry for the mistake, Ed > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Indoor Barbecued Pork
On 2009-09-26, Theron > wrote:
> site, but has not released it for free viewing as he's supposed. He's a very > greedy marketer. Be careful. I get chastised severely about the head and shoulders every time I point that out. nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Indoor Barbecued Pork
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 18:56:13 GMT, "l, not -l" > wrote:
>Either the link is in error or we have vastly different ideas of what >constitutes barbecue. The link is to a recipe for "shake and bake" pork >chops. Even allowing for the wide misuse of the term barbecue, a baked, or >even pan fried, pork chop isn't barbecue. Please provide an updated link. It was informative all the same. I've never been able to find those links, so even a wrong link is better than my feeble attempts. -- I love cooking with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Indoor Barbecued Pork
notbob wrote:
> ATK is so far away from anything resembling good cooking, it's no surprise > they would try and improve upon shake n bake. My experience has been very much to the contrary. I've tried dozens of recipes from ATK and the only misfire has been a disagreement on what makes a "perfect" oatmeal cookie. Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Indoor Barbecued Pork
Christine wrote:
>>notbob wrote: >> >>> ATK is so far away from anything resembling good cooking, it's no >>> surprise they would try and improve upon shake n bake. >> >> My experience has been very much to the contrary. I've tried dozens of >> recipes from ATK and the only misfire has been a disagreement on what >> makes a "perfect" oatmeal cookie. >> >>Bob > > I would agree with Bob. I haven;t tried a lot of their recipes, but > some. And some are truly good. And quite a few folks from rfc think > they are good as well... I guess it should be surprising that notbob and I agree on ANYTHING. Shouldn't we be like matter and antimatter? Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Indoor Barbecued Pork
Christine wrote:
>> I guess it should be surprising that notbob and I agree on ANYTHING. >> Shouldn't we be like matter and antimatter? > > No. It isn't that stark. Just different tastes. > > Bob..not everyone is gonna agree with ya. > I hate to say this...but please stop flaming everyone you disagree > with??? Especially in food threads that start out strong. It doesn't > add anything..and detracts a whole lot. It was a JOKE about the handle "notbob." You know, the way the word "not" in many fields (e.g., computer science and formal logic) means "an exact opposite"? Where did you see a flame? Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Indoor Barbecued Pork
Christine wrote:
> Not in this instance, but in many others. It is getting very > tiring... and not needed. Well, bring it up when it *is* applicable, and I'll think about it. Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Indoor Barbecued Pork
Christine Dabney wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 23:08:49 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger" > > wrote: > > > >> I guess it should be surprising that notbob and I agree on ANYTHING. >> Shouldn't we be like matter and antimatter? >> >> Bob > > No. It isn't that stark. Just different tastes. > > Bob..not everyone is gonna agree with ya. > I hate to say this...but please stop flaming everyone you disagree > with??? Especially in food threads that start out strong. It doesn't > add anything..and detracts a whole lot. > > Christine > The best thing you can consider is adding booby to the plonk file and ignore it |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Indoor Barbecued Pork
Peter's sockpuppet wrote:
>> I hate to say this...but please stop flaming everyone you disagree >> with??? Especially in food threads that start out strong. It doesn't >> add anything..and detracts a whole lot. > > The best thing you can consider is adding booby to the plonk file and > ignore it When a wasted wad like Peter's sockpuppet writes trash like that, I *will* respond, Christine. Sockpuppet, we all know who and what you are. Now **** off back to your "mates." Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Indoor Barbecued Pork
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:13:58 GMT, notbob wrote:
> On 2009-09-26, l, not -l > wrote: >> >> On 26-Sep-2009, "Theron" > wrote: >> >>> America's test kitchen has on a very good looking, and hopefully tasting >>> stovetop "barbecued pork" dish. Check out: >>> >>> http://www.americastestkitchen.com/c...eadedporkchops >>> >>> Ed >> >> Either the link is in error or we have vastly different ideas of what >> constitutes barbecue. The link is to a recipe for "shake and bake" pork >> chops. Even allowing for the wide misuse of the term barbecue, a baked, or >> even pan fried, pork chop isn't barbecue. Please provide an updated link. > > Theron mis-quoted the link. It was for "crunchy pork chops" not bbq. > Besides, ATK is so far away from anything resembling good cooking, > it's no surprise they would try and improve upon shake n bake. > > nb meh. i'm not a shake 'n' baker, but telling people how they can make their own, possibly better, mix seems to me to be a service. your pal, blake |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Indoor Barbecued Pork
> The best thing you can consider is adding booby to the plonk file and
> ignore it Significant that you were silent until Peter's party was over and he was ready to post again. God save the QUEENS! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amended "Indoor Barbecued Pork" | General Cooking | |||
Indoor Barbecued Pork | Barbecue | |||
Indoor Barbecued Pork Amended | Barbecue | |||
2nd Amended "Indoor Barbecued Pork" | Barbecue | |||
Barbecued Pork Steaks | Recipes |